Author Topic: Trump vs Media coverage  (Read 537 times)

Offline Hoofer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4761
  • Gender: Male
  • HAM Radio - the last form of free expression
Trump vs Media coverage
« on: May 27, 2017, 03:02:00 PM »
First off, I can't see the need to link to *any* of the negative media coverage Donald Trump has been getting.  Numbers like 98% against, makes it pretty darn hard to find anything neutral or even a hint of positive.  It is disgusting, BUT, what else did we expect from the MSM who went 110% in for Hillary Clinton - and still sore about the loss.

Did you hear what the POTUS did for Climate Change...?   Merkel just raised the gross temperature in Germany - they ought to be banning her from politics, she's bad for Global Warming!
German Chancellor Angela Merkel criticised what she called "a very difficult, not to say very unsatisfactory" discussion with Trump on the issue.

"Here we have a situation of six against one, meaning there is still no sign of whether the US will remain in the Paris accord or not," she said.

What a change of FLOTUS can make - Melania Trump has a quite a fan base!

Even her escort is beaming - well... she does have a natural smile, IMO, it's from a grateful, thankful spirit.

Meanwhile, the MSM still desperate to steal the headlines of what looks like a productive, pro-America G-8 summit, puts Jarrett all over the place, hoping to continue the false narrative... something about Donald Trump a raging communist, secretly working for Putin.
The only one's confused is the Clinton / Soros camps, they did pull out all the stops for Hillary... what failed? :confused:

I really, really like the POTUS *remembering* he is representing the United States of America, and not George Soros and the Globalists.

More specifically, get the USA out of the Paris Climate agreement, and do what Poland is doing, stop taking in Immigrants.

In a political broadcast published on YouTube, he said: “After recent events connected with acts of terror, [Poland] will not accept refugees because there is no mechanism that would ensure security."

The European Union has recently suggested that countries should be asked to accept a quota of refugees, or pay €250,000 (£200,000) for each asylum-seeker they turn away.

So the EU wants to blackmail Poland into accepting refugees, really?   Considering the recent loss of life in London, it's probably cheaper to pay to keep them OUT!

It is interesting to note, all the good stuff that's really pro-America, is being smothered by anti-Trump garbage on TV & radio.  Last night I stayed in a hotel (work related), and flipping through the channels, it's pretty evident there's too much media HATE against the POTUS.
All animals are created equal; Some just take longer to cook.   Survival is keeping an eye on those around you...

Offline supsalemgr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12297
  • Gender: Male
Re: Trump vs Media coverage
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2017, 12:36:47 PM »
Speaking of MSM coverage of the Trump administration, let's look at the coverage of Kushner and the communication with the Russians. In none of the "stories" does the reporting indicate anything illegal was done. OTOH, this crowd was silent while Obama/Kerry were negotiating a deal with a country the US does not even have diplomatic relations with - Iran. The MSM hypocrisy screams at us.
"If you can't run with the big dawgs, stay on the porch!"


Powered by EzPortal