Quote from: wally on April 27, 2015, 05:26:02 PM
I agree with you and Redbead...I will be surprized if this doesn't happen, as a matter of fact.  Obama and his marxists buddies are just getting their ducks in a row for the great purge!  They need a replacement candidate who they can install...let's see, Obama can't run again so who could it be?

Civil unrest and martial law changes everything.......

Quote from: Solar on April 26, 2015, 05:12:40 PM
That was the point in my theory, get this all out in the open now, prove her innocence and they quickly forget, but walk a way thinking Klinton in innocent.

I think you are right in thinking Clinton entered the race hoping all the questions would end up going away by the times the elections rolled around

But I think this is bigger than that. Bill taking 700 thousand dollar speaking fees and then favors from donators when Hillery was secretary of state

Lets say the uranium deal,is bogus. You still have all the other scandals that are connected to the Clinton Foundation You can dismiss some of it. But not all

All her opponent would have to do is repeatedly bring up all the money they have collected and spent
Point out how Her and Bill are the 1%ers that the far left hate so much

I think Shes toast

Quote from: Norseman on April 27, 2015, 07:37:43 PM
I think you are right in thinking Clinton entered the race hoping all the questions would end up going away by the times the elections rolled around

But I think this is bigger than that. Bill taking 700 thousand dollar speaking fees and then favors from donators when Hillery was secretary of state

Lets say the uranium deal,is bogus. You still have all the other scandals that are connected to the Clinton Foundation You can dismiss some of it. But not all

All her opponent would have to do is repeatedly bring up all the money they have collected and spent
Point out how Her and Bill are the 1%ers that the far left hate so much

I think Shes toast

But that's the beauty of this scheme. This is being portrayed as huge, totally hyped as the biggest scandal of the decade, bigger than anything the Clinton's have been accused of.

But the problem is, they didn't break any laws. So what happens when all this has been beat to death in the media?
The people will pretty much be sick of all the "Bogus Clinton Scandals" and ignore Benghazi when we try and use it in the campaigns against her.

Hollywood couldn't have written a better plot, in fact, they probably helped devise this plot.
The Marxists know their target audience, like Pavlov new his dogs, and they'll respond just the way the party trained them to react.

Of course you I, and everyone here will be up at arms over Benghazi, but not the leftist base, they'll have grown weary of all the attacks against Hitlery, the "Female Victim" of a right wing attack.

Oh, and it was 500 K he got for speaking. Just to keep the facts straight.

Quote from: Solar on April 27, 2015, 08:14:50 PM
But that's the beauty of this scheme. This is being portrayed as huge, totally hyped as the biggest scandal of the decade, bigger than anything the Clinton's have been accused of.

But the problem is, they didn't break any laws. So what happens when all this has been beat to death in the media?
The people will pretty much be sick of all the "Bogus Clinton Scandals" and ignore Benghazi when we try and use it in the campaigns against her.

Hollywood couldn't have written a better plot, in fact, they probably helped devise this plot.
The Marxists know their target audience, like Pavlov new his dogs, and they'll respond just the way the party trained them to react.

Of course you I, and everyone here will be up at arms over Benghazi, but not the leftist base, they'll have grown weary of all the attacks against Hitlery, the "Female Victim" of a right wing attack.

Oh, and it was 500 K he got for speaking. Just to keep the facts straight.

I totally understand where you are coming from and if that wasnt there plan, I am sure that's the strategy they will take
They may not have broken any laws but it makes them look like money hungry sleeze bags. All her opponents would have to do is get the question out, where did all that money go?

The Clintons are everything the Wall street protesters and far left loons hate, and all you would need to do is keep pointing that out

If another Democrat decides to run against her, The right wing wouldn't have to say a word about it let them eat each other up.

I watched that Fox special, and He said on there it was 700 thousand, doesn't matter. It showed what opportunistic sleeze bags the Clintons really are.

If you are right, I think it will blow up in there faces

It looks like the MSM are jumping on this story too.

I think this race will be easy for the right if they can keep pushing how the Clintons are just the same elitists they hate

I have to agree with Solar and Taxed on this one.  This, like most of the schemes in the WH, has Obola, Jarrett, and Clintoon written all over it.  Obola has been good at playing dumb to what's been going in in his adm., saying that he heard about most of the goings on in the news, or that events like the Benghazi attack were caused by a video.  Stay with me, I will make my point.  No one on this forum believes that Obola and Jarrett are ill-informed as to what all WH members are doing.

Might I remind all of you of a statement that Obola made to Putin before his last election as president took place.  "I'll have more freedom after I'm re-elected".  To do what, pray tell?  This statement made it look like he was being intentionally subserviate to Putin.  What kinds of deals were they cooking up at that time?  Major but kissing on that one. 

Again, look at the statement that was made about the American public on the passage of Bozocare.  This scheme was done because Americans were stupid enough to fall for it.  Well, some americans anyway. 

QuoteClinton Foundation a 'slush fund' - lands on watchlist of shady charities

The Clinton family's mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

  ....In all, the group reported $84.6 million in "functional expenses" on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over — money the organization has said represents pledges rather than actual cash on hand.

 

 

  Some of the tens of millions in administrative costs finance more than 2,000 employees, including aid workers and health professionals around the world.

  But that's still far below the 75 percent rate of spending that nonprofit experts say a good charity should spend on its mission.

"Far below" is putting it mildly. Reporting $140 million in grants and pledges - and then spending a little over 6% of that on actual aid - has raised more than a few eyebrows. In fact, prominent charity watchdogs have now decided that the Foundation is "problematic" and have added it to their watchlist. 
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/71488

Wow!! Give 100 dollars and 6 dollars might get used for the advertised charities! Outrageous! Here is another link to this story!

This slush fund is nothing more then a way to keep Clinton machine members employed until the build up for Hillary's campaign! All of their core people bought paid for and maintained. It's the Clinton's Acorn!

Quote from: keyboarder on April 28, 2015, 03:37:02 PM
I have to agree with Solar and Taxed on this one.  This, like most of the schemes in the WH, has Obola, Jarrett, and Clintoon written all over it.  Obola has been good at playing dumb to what's been going in in his adm., saying that he heard about most of the goings on in the news, or that events like the Benghazi attack were caused by a video.  Stay with me, I will make my point.  No one on this forum believes that Obola and Jarrett are ill-informed as to what all WH members are doing.

Might I remind all of you of a statement that Obola made to Putin before his last election as president took place.  "I'll have more freedom after I'm re-elected".  To do what, pray tell?  This statement made it look like he was being intentionally subserviate to Putin.  What kinds of deals were they cooking up at that time?  Major but kissing on that one. 

Again, look at the statement that was made about the American public on the passage of Bozocare.  This scheme was done because Americans were stupid enough to fall for it.  Well, some americans anyway.

I like the way you think and post!   

Quote from: redbeard on April 27, 2015, 05:11:56 PM
If she tosses Obama under the bus He will crucify her and Bill. How long before Obama unleashes his justice department over this and a thousand other things I'm sure he knows about if she turns on him!
The estimated worth of the Clintons is up to about 200 million! They were supposedly broke when Bill left office. Where did the money come from? Speaking Fees?

I don;t think anybody is tossing anybody under the bus, I think they planned the whole thing and the aftermath.

Obamao will step up and take one for the team and support whatever wild twist Hillary's spin doctors come up with.

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on April 28, 2015, 05:15:45 PM
I don;t think anybody is tossing anybody under the bus, I think they planned the whole thing and the aftermath.

Obamao will step up and take one for the team and support whatever wild twist Hillary's spin doctors come up with.

Absolutely no way!!  Obama doesn't take one for anyone!

Quote from: kroz on April 28, 2015, 05:54:24 PM

Absolutely no way!!  Obama doesn't take one for anyone!

Maybe they'll blame it all on Biden!! 

Quote from: kroz on April 28, 2015, 05:54:24 PM

Absolutely no way!!  Obama doesn't take one for anyone!

Absolutely correct. Obama is all about Obama. This is a relationship of convenience. As long as each party have equal amounts of dirt it will be live and let live.

Quote from: kroz on April 28, 2015, 03:52:04 PM
I like the way you think and post!   

Thanx and you are a much welcomed poster with great input.  My biggest problem is finding time to post.  Here, you have to be able to back up what you say and I do ok at replying to the posts of others but have a hard time finding enough time to do research on topics that I might like to post.  Lots of items won't post at one link so I have to find what I'm looking for in an item that will post. 

How do you like our forum?  I ran acros s it when looking for another poster that I used to post with on another forum.  Great people here with great ideas.  Alot of them are accomplished and may have been journalists or writers.  The adm. and mods are also well versed.  It is an education just reading some of their ideas.  Plus, the comedic responses keep it light and enjoyable. 

Enjoy yourself and welcome.       Key   

QuoteWaPo Fact Checker Gives Clinton Foundation 3 Pinocchios


On Sunday, the Clinton Foundation's acting chief executive, Maura Pally, issued a statement saying that while the CGEP is publicly listed as a donor on the Clinton Foundation's website, its individual donors are omitted because under Canadian law "all charities are prohibited from disclosing donors without prior permission from each donor."

Pally's statement, according to the Post, implies a blanket Canadian law prohibiting charities from disclosing donor information without permission.

Not so, according to Fact Checker writer Michelle Ye Hee Lee.

"The charity's own memo says it is operating under federal obligations and its fiduciary duty for its board of directors," she writes. "The federal law does not explicitly ban charities from disclosing individual donor names without permission. In fact, it only applies to commercial use of personal information. The public release of donor names for a non-commercial purpose is not prohibited. The charity, however, interprets the release of donor records as 'bartering,' which experts have questioned."

Hillary Clinton, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for the presidency, has come under fire for the foundation's failure to disclose donors. A 2008 agreement between the Obama administration and Clinton, the former secretary of state, requires her to publicly do so, according to the newspaper.


http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Washington-Post-fact-checker-clinton-foundation-pinocchios/2015/04/29/id/641534/#ixzz3YjmGxpxc

They are not going to be able to lie their way out of this!!

Quote from: redbeard on April 29, 2015, 02:49:50 PM
They are not going to be able to lie their way out of this!!

If only we had a real Justice Dept. that could investigate this and see if their is criminal wrongdoing.  They do this with other suspicious charities and Foundations. 

Quote from: wally on April 29, 2015, 03:55:45 PM
If only we had a real Justice Dept. that could investigate this and see if their is criminal wrongdoing.  They do this with other suspicious charities and Foundations.

Note it was the Washington post calling them out on their lies! one of the original 3 given access to the book!