‘The Truth In 11 Minutes’: Defense Lawyer Posts Video Of Kyle Rittenhouse

Started by Frenchconnection, September 23, 2020, 12:59:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Solar

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 26, 2020, 04:12:52 PM
They can and they will. Rittenhouse is guilty. He never should have been there to begin with armed as he was.  He is a criminal.
Wow, judge, jury and hangman, all in one?
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Killer Clouds

Quote from: Solar on September 26, 2020, 06:02:53 PM
Wow, judge, jury and hangman, all in one?
Just like you my friend.
With the facts that are out in the public domain on Rittenhouse right now and If I was on a jury,  I would not be able to convict on on 1st degree murder or 1st degree attempted murder. Possibly on wreckless endangerment and definitely on minor in possession of a dangerous weapon.

redbeard

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 26, 2020, 06:28:02 PM
Just like you my friend.
With the facts that are out in the public domain on Rittenhouse right now and If I was on a jury,  I would not be able to convict on on 1st degree murder or 1st degree attempted murder. Possibly on wreckless endangerment and definitely on minor in possession of a dangerous weapon.
Clear self defense! If he wasn't attacked no one would have been hurt! Why hasn't the guy that he shot in the arm been charged? He was a felon in possession of a hand gun? That is a felony! What about his attempted assault? :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:

taxed

Quote from: Solar on September 26, 2020, 01:12:50 PM
 
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Do you hear yourself? This is not an emotional issue and you're caught up in looking at this from a lib POV, emotional and guns are bad.
That is not the case, he didn't look for trouble, he was there to prevent it and these morons attacked this kid and paid the ultimate price for their stupidity!
Again, do you hear yourself? Dangerous? It's a fuckin tool, that's all, there is NOTHING D"Dangerous" about an inanimate object! Not a single one of my guns has done anything "Dangerous on its own!
Wrong!!! He can't be indicted for  law that only pertains  to an adult.
I did answer it, you just didn't like facing the fact this is a Constitutional issue and not the emotional one you're arguing. Here's the answer I posted!
"Are you talking Illinois, or Idaho? Point being, many states have bastardized the Bill of Rights, while other states protected our Rights."

Seriously? Are you even listening to the shit you're saying?

Sure he will, the first go around, but on appeal he'll be cleared of all charges. Also he will win a defamation suit when all is said and done, just like the Covington kid.

Which has zero to do with this case, that's for another court to decide.He's decades more mature than most people his age, watch the video and think again.
"Are you talking Illinois, or Idaho? Point being, many states have bastardized the Bill of Rights, while other states protected our Rights."

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
#PureBlood #TrumpWon

Killer Clouds

Quote from: redbeard on September 26, 2020, 06:36:32 PM
Clear self defense! If he wasn't attacked no one would have been hurt! Why hasn't the guy that he shot in the arm been charged? He was a felon in possession of a hand gun? That is a felony! What about his attempted assault? :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
I agree that he should be charged too. The felon that got wounded should be charged with felon in possession of a firearm which is a felony. He should also be charged with 2nd degree attempted murder that he admitted to.

redbeard

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 26, 2020, 06:43:20 PM
I agree that he should be charged too. The felon that got wounded should be charged with felon in possession of a firearm which is a felony. He should also be charged with 2nd degree attempted murder that he admitted to.
1st deg. assault and felon in possession of a handgun what i would charge him with, but with that the boy had every right to use deadly force to defend himself! :blink:

Sick Of Silence

With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

Solar

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 26, 2020, 06:28:02 PM
Just like you my friend.
With the facts that are out in the public domain on Rittenhouse right now and If I was on a jury,  I would not be able to convict on on 1st degree murder or 1st degree attempted murder. Possibly on wreckless endangerment and definitely on minor in possession of a dangerous weapon.
I'm not the one judging him emotionally, you are! I'm standing behind the Right to bear arms, the Right to self Defense.
You are the one ready to hang the kid without trial.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Solar

Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Killer Clouds

Quote from: Solar on September 27, 2020, 03:47:45 AM
I'm not the one judging him emotionally, you are! I'm standing behind the Right to bear arms, the Right to self Defense.
You are the one ready to hang the kid without trial.
You're full of shit and lying your ass off. Nothing I've said has anything to do with emotions. I've stated facts and the law. Now whose acting like a lefty accusing someone of doing what they are doing? That would be you. When have I said he didn't have a right to self defense? All I have said all along is he broke the law by having the gun. You keep saying he was legal to have it and that is a lie. How's it feel to be a lying lefty piece of shit that you are?

T Hunt

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 24, 2020, 09:40:39 AM
I did answer your question. 2a say a minor open carrying a deadly weapon is a misdemeanor.  Violations in 3c make the misdemeanor in 2a a felony.

No sorry, thats not my question at all. Im asking that in the quote,

Quote"(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593."

What is the phrase "This section"(bolded) refering too? Which section is C refering too when it says THIS SECTION APPLIES ONLY....?
"Let's Go Brandon, I agree!"  -Biden

Possum

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 27, 2020, 07:02:14 AM
You're full of shit and lying your ass off. Nothing I've said has anything to do with emotions. I've stated facts and the law. Now whose acting like a lefty accusing someone of doing what they are doing? That would be you. When have I said he didn't have a right to self defense? All I have said all along is he broke the law by having the gun. You keep saying he was legal to have it and that is a lie. How's it feel to be a lying lefty piece of shit that you are?
Except the part that says innocent until proven guilty. You have called this kid a criminal when he has yet to go to trail. There is a good chance charges will be dropped. If so, will you still call him a criminal? Well, you have made your point, you have stated this kid is a criminal and is guilty. What should his punishment be?, after all two, what upstanding? individuals are dead all because Rittenhouse dared to go and help others? Life imprisonment good enough for you? Death?  I think it is a sad day in hell when a kid who is doing the right thing, (just imagine if there were 500 more just like Rittenhouse at the riots, no more riots), gets blasted by someone on what are minor issues. The issue here is there are a couple of bad guys dead because of their actions, not because Rittenhouse was carrying a gun.

Killer Clouds

Quote from: T Hunt on September 27, 2020, 08:02:54 AM
No sorry, thats not my question at all. Im asking that in the quote,

What is the phrase "This section"(bolded) refering too? Which section is C refering too when it says THIS SECTION APPLIES ONLY....?
Rittenhouse was not in c9mpliance with 29.593. I have also explained that the difference between 2a and 3c is 2a is a misdemeanor and 3c is a felony.  Rittenhuose was a minor in possession of an illegally aquired dangerous weapon. There is no state in the US that allows minors to open carry a firearm in public.

Solar

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 27, 2020, 08:26:13 AM
Rittenhouse was not in c9mpliance with 29.593. I have also explained that the difference between 2a and 3c is 2a is a misdemeanor and 3c is a felony.  Rittenhuose was a minor in possession of an illegally aquired dangerous weapon. There is no state in the US that allows minors to open carry a firearm in public.
You still did not answer the question. Is that because you realized it blows all your silly claims out of the water?
And you are wrong again, many states allow kids to own and shoot weapons.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!