Don't take me wrong , I'm a real fan of the female's breasts. In private.
The topless march that happened on Sunday in NY seems to me an absolutely disturbing fact.
First any human being mustn't stay naked in public. It's just immoral. And second the message they are trying to show with their protest isn't actually working. Cause there's no such thing as gender discrimination anymore in the USA.
So the only result of such marches we receive is just the hundreds of half-naked women on the streets.
Sounds like prostitution or exhibition.
Thanks, the exhibit was nice
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/23/topless-protesters-new-york-times-square


Adjust jpg size.
walks

I see a few people who are, no doubt, veterans of Occupy wall street   

Quote from: ReadyToShoot on August 24, 2015, 05:51:45 AM
Don't take me wrong , I'm a real fan of the female's breasts. In private.
The topless march that happened on Sunday in NY seems to me an absolutely disturbing fact.
First any human being mustn't stay naked in public. It's just immoral. And second the message they are trying to show with their protest isn't actually working. Cause there's no such thing as gender discrimination anymore in the USA.
So the only result of such marches we receive is just the hundreds of half-naked women on the streets.
Sounds like prostitution or exhibition.
Thanks, the exhibit was nice
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/23/topless-protesters-new-york-times-square

Don't be such a prude.

Quote from: ReadyToShoot on August 24, 2015, 05:51:45 AM
Don't take me wrong , I'm a real fan of the female's breasts. In private.
The topless march that happened on Sunday in NY seems to me an absolutely disturbing fact.
First any human being mustn't stay naked in public. It's just immoral. And second the message they are trying to show with their protest isn't actually working. Cause there's no such thing as gender discrimination anymore in the USA.
So the only result of such marches we receive is just the hundreds of half-naked women on the streets.
Sounds like prostitution or exhibition.
Thanks, the exhibit was nice
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/23/topless-protesters-new-york-times-square

This has been going on for years, and the fact still stands that most women still know better, and will continue to do so for the time being.

Depends on who's in the parade. The girl pictured has my permission. So does Kate Upton.

Quote from: Ulsterking on August 24, 2015, 08:05:14 AM
This has been going on for years, and the fact still stands that most women still know better, and will continue to do so for the time being.

If they were really trying to fight for equality they would go to the Middle East to fight the discrimination in person.
That just an absurd movement to undress women.
I am no gay. I love beautiful naked female body. But not at the time the body yells something rude about its exclusive rights!

One more reason to never plan a trip to NYC.

There are some women that should never be sen topless, the two in the article are examples.

I never understand the real point of these type events.

The human body has always been more appealing with a little clothing.  It leaves something to the imagination!!

Frankly, a nude body is boring!

These women just want attention.  They feel attention deprived.

I must say the men are very brave going top less.   

Quote from: taxed on August 24, 2015, 06:10:58 AM
Don't be such a prude.

Personal boundaries versus social norms, where the average 12-year-old child in America has been exposed to explicit full-frontal nudity and sex acts: what we used to call banned material now available through typing a four-letter word (rhymes with born) into Google Image search. Where does "prudery" begin? In the home or the legislatures?

We're obsessed with sex. Women have used allure for thousands of years. Men have BEEN allured, and will BE allured. The species will continue, Supreme Court idiots notwithstanding.

Quote from: tac on August 24, 2015, 10:44:54 AM
There are some women that should never be sen topless, the two in the article are examples.

  The redhead in the photo posted above? Who's the second one? The blur of that black gal in the background?

And if you ARE speaking of the redhead --- get thee to an oculist!   

The two WITHIN THE ARTICLE...? I take it all back. Except the part about the redhead. 

Quote from: quiller on August 25, 2015, 03:19:13 AM
The two WITHIN THE ARTICLE...? I take it all back. Except the part about the redhead. 

Did your eyeballs burn in that image?

Quote from: tac on August 25, 2015, 04:43:51 AM


Did your eyeballs burn in that image?

Not the redhead. Aunt Sagalong and Bandana Bertha? Well.....