Quote from: Solar on October 01, 2014, 07:50:08 AM
Red, it has nothing to do with that, it's the strange structuring of sentences, that makes it difficult to read.
Using a comma, then hitting the
              enter key, and creating short sentences that get cutoff
midstream, then hitting      the space bar several times
         when starting a new sentence. I butchered my response so you could see how your replies look to us.

I am not attacking you, you aren't the only one with structure issues (being dyslexic I have my own) that I usually pass off as cell phone posting.
We just want you to know, if it's too hard too hard to read, we just ignore the post, as I usually skip yours because they are too hard to read.

Let me add, from what few of your posts I've read, you appear to be on the money.

Thanks Solar. As you indicated, it is not anything about the content, just the structure of the posts.

Red, never ever post without linking to the original site, under any circumstances, if you can't source it, don't post it! 

   I collected a  couple of paragraphs of Dinesh
D'Sousa's comments from  a Breitbart article.
Then I lost the link.
We have a very intelligent man on out hands, here,
this Dinesh. He is in the prime of his career and is
doing some very good things for us and his country.
Here are a couple of copy and pastes I felt were
noteworthy.

Quote---------------------------

D'Souza said that the political left has institutionalized itself in America, taking over education, Hollywood, and other entertainment distribution channels and other parts of the culture.

"The left is dominant in that it has the huge institutions on its side," D'Souza said. "What helps us is we are at a huge moment of opportunity at which the business models of these institutions are obsolete. These gigantic studios, these tyrannical unions, colleges cost way too much, a lot of the old media models are crumbling. So out of this chaos comes hope, and what I'm hoping to do is to create some new institutions in these areas, take advantage of the free market system and technology to not only make rival movies but create a business model that works better than theirs."

Because of the left's dominance in American culture, D'Souza said that the right needs to expand its influence on the culture as well—and do things like his do$#%entary films rather than just writing books or fighting day-to-day political and policy battles.
---------------------
Moving forward and heading into the 2016 presidential cycle, D'Souza said the Republicans will lose the White House yet again if the GOP keeps shunning the different elements of the conservative movement—national security conservatives, social conservatives, and libertarians or fiscal conservatives.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/09/29/Exclusive-Dinesh-D-Souza-Holder-s-Next-Job-Crime-Boss

We might take some comfort and inspiration in those words.
As examples, Home Schooling, self learning, and distance
education might  be seen as the new paradigm. (Kind of like
Phoenix rising  from the ashes.) Suddenly, having been
home schooled becomes this unique advantage for those
interested in working within the new model.

        Here is another article about Denish D'Sousa, this one about
a time he got fired for criticizing Obama.
http://www.alan.com/2012/10/19/dinesh-dsousa-accused-obama-for-attacking-traditional-values-a-week-before-forced-resignation/
       I am looking at all the heat Ted Cruz is taking for standing
up to Washington and the Democrats. Cruz is not the only
one. Col. Brown of SOF has written scathing criticisms, especially
starting about a year ago with Parliament's balking at following
this administration into Syria and Obama's pathetic response to
last year's attack of Camp Ashraf.
         If the press can succeed in putting the spot lite on Cruz, it
will take away from the reality that this administration is in shambles.
     

Quote from: red_dirt on October 04, 2014, 09:13:05 PM
        Here is another article about Denish D'Sousa, this one about
a time he got fired for criticizing Obama.
http://www.alan.com/2012/10/19/dinesh-dsousa-accused-obama-for-attacking-traditional-values-a-week-before-forced-resignation/
       I am looking at all the heat Ted Cruz is taking for standing
up to Washington and the Democrats. Cruz is not the only
one. Col. Brown of SOF has written scathing criticisms, especially
starting about a year ago with Parliament's balking at following
this administration into Syria and Obama's pathetic response to
last year's attack of Camp Ashraf.
         If the press can succeed in putting the spot lite on Cruz, it
will take away from the reality that this administration is in shambles.
     

Hmm...public interest is high for a Ted Cruz run at the presidency.  This forum and this thread alone has generated 2700 reads.   Like this but folks are gonna have to translate their interest in a moving way, like beating feet to the elections and doing everything they can to support an honest change in Washington.  It is not enough to read about change and transparency, feet must be put on it. 

Exchange:

        Did the Democrats know in advance how spineless Congress, the public, and the Washington crowd really is?  Did it come as a surprise, or did Obama just keep pushing the envelope, meet with little resistance, so he pushed some more.  It seems like that is the way it went.
           Obama has to be delighted. He pushed the Harvard faculty around as a student in the 1970's.  He no doubt, and we have heard about this,  bullied his way around the Chicago Democratic Machine to the point those tough old Chicago boys trembled and ran. How could he, in his wildest dreams, imagine himself pushing around Congress, the Pentagon, and the national press.  I am guessing that when he got in, his left wing associates such as Bill Ayers, must have said, "The hell with it, go for it. What do you have to lose." So he did.
---------------

Response from Kz:

     I think you are absolutely right.  He pushed around on the floor and found it to be soft so be broke through.  He found it to be so easy that he continued to break through the barriers with impunity.  He is shocked at how easy it was.  And he still has more than two years to rule through Regulations and EOs.  Who needs Congress?  He can accomplish virtually anything he wants with the stroke of his pen!
      If you remember, he said earlier that he could do nothing about amnesty because he didn't have the Constitutional power.  Apparently someone told him to "go for it" and see what happened.  So he gave amnesty to a certain category of people through an EO.  There was a lot of noise for a few weeks, but nothing bad happened to him.  So, phase two of amnesty looms just after the November election.  The sky is now the limit.  He knows that no one will stop him.  And the liberal activist courts will protect him.
     Must be a very heady feeling!!!

      This is a pretty good article about the differences between Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.  They are currently leading the pack for 2016.  Although I don't agree with everything said in this article, I think it fairly accurately delineates the differences between the two.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/oct/8/ted-cruz-rand-paul-competition-could-reshape-repub/

Bottom line..... Ted is the ONLY candidate that totally sticks to his guns and does not say anything for political reasons.  He speaks from the heart based upon personal convictions.