Quote from: washington on September 13, 2014, 06:12:39 AM
No he's not.  Not by a mile.

Compelling argument bro

Quote from: Mountainshield on September 13, 2014, 06:41:26 AM
Compelling argument bro

Quote from: washington on September 13, 2014, 06:12:39 AM
No he's not.  Not by a mile.

Could you advise us why not?

Quote from: supsalemgr on September 13, 2014, 08:18:52 AM
Could you advise us why not?

I already have check the other thread. 

Quote from: washington on September 13, 2014, 08:23:07 AM
I already have check the other thread. 

Stop the BS. As much as you may think, the people on this board are not impressed enough with you to commit all your posts to memory. Now please answer the question.

Quote from: supsalemgr on September 13, 2014, 08:36:24 AM
Stop the BS. As much as you may think, the people on this board are not impressed enough with you to commit all your posts to memory. Now please answer the question.

I'm not going to copy and paste duplicate posts.  Go to the only other cruz thread and read like an adult. Thank you very much, and good morning btw..

I bumped the thread to the top for you, fyi.

Quote from: washington on September 13, 2014, 08:54:32 AM
I'm not going to copy and paste duplicate posts.  Go to the only other cruz thread and read like an adult. Thank you very much, and good morning btw..

As Solar has said, your time is running out young man.  Someone called BS, now back it up.  We don't do your home work, it's up to you.

fine, I'll give in,

What has Cruz done in Congress that has garnered bipartisan support or support within his own party?  The American people will never not for a long time after this President vote for any candidate that has never lead anything with bipartisan support and accomplished what he set out to accomplish.  Another words you need way more than a big mouth.  Voters learn.  This will be the number 1 thing they look for in the next President. 


On the completely different subject of bipartisan support the reason why congress has such a low approval rating which shatters the Presidents FYI, is because the lack of working together.  See Newt Gingrich proved that you don't have to sacrifice core principles to accomplish things in congress with the other side, and he also did it with a democrat president.  Whether you have done it on the federal level or state level as a Governor doesn't matter as long as you have experience in Government doing it on a high profile level.  This will be the type of candidate that's the next president.  In a way Cruz is like Obama in th sense that he was a new lone wolf in congress before running for president.  We've learned our lesson. 

Also 1 key point I want to make - Because the American public doesn't realize that harry reid has stopped all GOP legislation from advancing they just see a disfunctional congress as a whole.  This is why Rand Paul and Cruz really have nothing to go on.  Our next president wont be coming from congress.

To speak of cruz as a viable candidate right now is potentially making the same mistake the libs made by electing Obama.

Quote from: washington on September 13, 2014, 09:02:50 AM
fine, I'll give in,

Quote from: walkstall on September 13, 2014, 09:07:11 AM

I still think you guys are lazy and I made it very easy for you, but whatever...

Quote from: washington on September 13, 2014, 09:02:50 AM
fine, I'll give in,

What has Cruz done in Congress that has garnered bipartisan support or support within his own party?  The American people will never not for a long time after this President vote for any candidate that has never lead anything with bipartisan support and accomplished what he set out to accomplish.  Another words you need way more than a big mouth.  Voters learn.  This will be the number 1 thing they look for in the next President. 


On the completely different subject of bipartisan support the reason why congress has such a low approval rating which shatters the Presidents FYI, is because the lack of working together.  See Newt Gingrich proved that you don't have to sacrifice core principles to accomplish things in congress with the other side, and he also did it with a democrat president.  Whether you have done it on the federal level or state level as a Governor doesn't matter as long as you have experience in Government doing it on a high profile level.  This will be the type of candidate that's the next president.  In a way Cruz is like Obama in th sense that he was a new lone wolf in congress before running for president.  We've learned our lesson. 

Also 1 key point I want to make - Because the American public doesn't realize that harry reid has stopped all GOP legislation from advancing they just see a disfunctional congress as a whole.  This is why Rand Paul and Cruz really have nothing to go on.  Our next president wont be coming from congress.

To speak of cruz as a viable candidate right now is potentially making the same mistake the libs made by electing Obama.

Bipartisan support, working together, Newt Gringrich =

Quote from: Mountainshield on September 13, 2014, 09:24:40 AM
Bipartisan support, working together, Newt Gringrich =

During the GOPS full controll of governemnt during the bush years they didn't really include the dems, so in return the dems didn't include the republicans and shut them out 100%.  What goes around comes around which = very low approval ratings when deadlock happens.  Common sense.  Don't make same mistake twice.

Quote from: washington on September 13, 2014, 09:29:50 AM
During the GOPS full controll of governemnt during the bush years they didn't really include the dems, so in return the dems didn't include the republicans and shut them out 100%.  What goes around comes around which = very low approval ratings when deadlock happens.  Common sense.  Don't make same mistake twice.

Meh ... if "bipartisan support" is dead, the mortal wound was the Ds' annual Reagan's-Budget-Is-DOA ritual-mockery some 20 years earlier. And the original Borking was the coup de grace.

Quote from: washington on September 13, 2014, 09:29:50 AM
During the GOPS full controll of governemnt during the bush years they didn't really include the dems, so in return the dems didn't include the republicans and shut them out 100%.  What goes around comes around which = very low approval ratings when deadlock happens.  Common sense.  Don't make same mistake twice.