:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
To think, the Dims share one brain cell between the entire party. These idiots have no idea just how out numbered they are. I say, bring it on bitches, but don't say we didn't warn you. :glare:
On Monday, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) made an appearance on "The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon," and reiterated her position on a mandatory buyback plan for "assault weapons."
Towards the end of her appearance on the show, Harris took questions from the audience which was largely made up of college students. A young man asked her about her policy on mandatory gun buybacks and if forcing people to do so is in line with their constitutional right to bear arms.
"Do you believe in the mandatory buyback of quote unquote assault weapons and whether or not you do, how does that idea not go against fundamentally the Second Amendment?" Andrew from Fordham University asked.
"Great question, I do believe that we need to do buybacks and I'll tell you why," Harris responded. "First of all, let's be clear about what assault weapons are. They have been designed to kill a lot of human beings quickly. They are weapons of war with no place on the streets of a civil society. I've seen assault weapons kill babies and police officers."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/kamala-harris-says-she-would-use-an-executive-order-to-buyback-assault-weapons_3085143.html
and pay for colleges for everyone
and give free medical insurance
and give us open borders
and let the prisoners all free with the right to vote
and end all oil production
and ban straws nationally
and kill all cows and pigs and dogs and farting humans
and take away all guns
and fire all the cops, soldiers and border guards
and let us not forget that killing you kids is a right but kissing the opposite sex can get you arrested whenever they decide they did not like it, 20 years, 30 years later... any time you want.
You take laxatives orally so where does she take hers to make this warm stream of crap come out of her mouth.
So Kamelass has seen something that doesn't exist kill babies and police officers? I say she's a damn liar.
And what would happen if I refused? The government would come to my house with guns so they can take my guns. That would look really good.
These f**kwits never think.
[quote author=Solar link=topic=33838.msg384160#msg384160 date=156876
I do believe that we need to do buybacks and I'll tell you why," Harris responded. "First of all, let's be clear about what assault weapons are. They have been designed to kill a lot of human beings quickly. They are weapons of war with no place on the streets of a civil society. I've seen assault weapons kill babies and police officers."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/kamala-harris-says-she-would-use-an-executive-order-to-buyback-assault-weapons_3085143.html
[/quote]
My guess would be that Planned parenthood(Which is desiged to kill a lot of Human beings quickly) kills more babies than assault weapons
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on September 18, 2019, 01:31:18 PM
My guess would be that Planned parenthood(Which is desiged to kill a lot of Human beings quickly) kills more babies than assault weapons
You think Harris will be in favor of banning "assault suction catheters" that kill 400,000 plus unborn babies a year.....?
When the 2nd Amendment was written when muskets were weapons of war and citizens could also have cannons at their homes.
The arguments that try to separate these weapons from the hands of law abiding Americans are absolutely ridiculous and against the Constitution. If Americans let her shred that part of the Constitution then what other part could she do as well?
An AR-15 is just a standard semiautomatic pistol with a longer barrel and shoulder stock. It is no more deadly. You can put a 30 round clip on a handgun. That means that she will go after 90% of all handguns sold in the USA today as well.
Will she take your Jeeps and Hummers away because they look like vehicles used in war? What an idiot she is.
Quote from: carolina73 on September 19, 2019, 06:17:50 PM
When the 2nd Amendment was written when muskets were weapons of war and citizens could also have cannons at their homes.
The arguments that try to separate these weapons from the hands of law abiding Americans are absolutely ridiculous and against the Constitution. If Americans let her shred that part of the Constitution then what other part could she do as well?
An AR-15 is just a standard semiautomatic pistol with a longer barrel and shoulder stock. It is no more deadly. You can put a 30 round clip on a handgun. That means that she will go after 90% of all handguns sold in the USA today as well.
Will she take your Jeeps and Hummers away because they look like vehicles used in war? What an idiot she is.
An AR 15 is far from being a standard semiautomatic pistol in any way. It is a semiautomatic rifle. Semiautomatic handguns do not use clips especially 30 round clips. Assault weapon is a BS term made up by gun grabbers to begin with. An AR 15 is not a military style rifle. Even if it was it is even more so protected by the 2nd Amendment.
Quote from: carolina73 on September 19, 2019, 06:17:50 PM
When the 2nd Amendment was written when muskets were weapons of war and citizens could also have cannons at their homes.
The arguments that try to separate these weapons from the hands of law abiding Americans are absolutely ridiculous and against the Constitution. If Americans let her shred that part of the Constitution then what other part could she do as well?
An AR-15 is just a standard semiautomatic pistol with a longer barrel and shoulder stock. It is no more deadly. You can put a 30 round clip on a handgun. That means that she will go after 90% of all handguns sold in the USA today as well.
Will she take your Jeeps and Hummers away because they look like vehicles used in war? What an idiot she is.
https://writingexplained.org/clip-vs-magazine-difference
Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 19, 2019, 06:33:22 PM
An AR 15 is far from being a standard semiautomatic pistol in any way. It is a semiautomatic rifle. Semiautomatic handguns do not use clips especially 30 round clips. Assault weapon is a BS term made up by gun grabbers to begin with. An AR 15 is not a military style rifle. Even if it was it is even more so protected by the 2nd Amendment.
Buy your larger magazines here.
https://www.sportsmansguide.com/productlist/shooting/gun-magazines-clips/handgun-pistol-mags?d=223&c=121&s=22
You pull the trigger and one bullet comes out. I have no idea what you are you talking about.
Sorry that I said clips instead of magazines but I am sure that did not confuse anyone that much.
From a engineering standpoint the mechanisms on a semi-automatic hand gun is the same as a semi-automatic rifle. They load, fire and eject the shells in the same manner.
Since they are not talking about shooter firing from long distances when looking at these weapons they serve the same exact purpose. Their argument is that it is an assault weapon because it looks "mean". In other words if you take an AR-15 and paint it pink and then put a bow on it, then Democrats will no longer call it an Assault Weapon.
Quote from: carolina73 on September 20, 2019, 08:37:04 AM
Buy your larger magazines here.
https://www.sportsmansguide.com/productlist/shooting/gun-magazines-clips/handgun-pistol-mags?d=223&c=121&s=22
You pull the trigger and one bullet comes out. I have no idea what you are you talking about.
Sorry that I said clips instead of magazines but I am sure that did not confuse anyone that much.
From a engineering standpoint the mechanisms on a semi-automatic hand gun is the same as a semi-automatic rifle. They load, fire and eject the shells in the same manner.
Since they are not talking about shooter firing from long distances when looking at these weapons they serve the same exact purpose. Their argument is that it is an assault weapon because it looks "mean". In other words if you take an AR-15 and paint it pink and then put a bow on it, then Democrats will no longer call it an Assault Weapon.
Please stop. You're wrong and obviously have zero experience on this subject..
Quote from: carolina73 on September 19, 2019, 06:17:50 PM
When the 2nd Amendment was written when muskets were weapons of war and citizens could also have cannons at their homes.
The arguments that try to separate these weapons from the hands of law abiding Americans are absolutely ridiculous and against the Constitution. If Americans let her shred that part of the Constitution then what other part could she do as well?
An AR-15 is just a standard semiautomatic pistol with a longer barrel and shoulder stock. It is no more deadly. You can put a 30 round clip on a handgun. That means that she will go after 90% of all handguns sold in the USA today as well.
Will she take your Jeeps and Hummers away because they look like vehicles used in war? What an idiot she is.
:thumbup: That pretty much nailed beto too. https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2019/09/20/columbine-survivor-orourke-shouldnt-ban-semiautomatic-weapons/ Dims have backed themselves into another corner, and it will go down hill fast. If semiautomatic pistols are banned with the "assault" rifles and pistols ( and yes there are ar pistols) what's left? The base will keep asking for more bans, its out of the bag now and no going back.
Quote from: s3779m on September 20, 2019, 12:05:36 PM
:thumbup: That pretty much nailed beto too. https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2019/09/20/columbine-survivor-orourke-shouldnt-ban-semiautomatic-weapons/ Dims have backed themselves into another corner, and it will go down hill fast. If semiautomatic pistols are banned with the "assault" rifles and pistols ( and yes there are ar pistols) what's left? The base will keep asking for more bans, its out of the bag now and no going back.
Yes there are AR pistols but the AR was never designed to be a handgun and AR pistols are a hybrid . They are rare and impractical. More of a novelty. If you really want to get technical any double action revolver can be considered semiautomatic.
Quote from: carolina73 on September 20, 2019, 08:37:04 AM
Buy your larger magazines here.
https://www.sportsmansguide.com/productlist/shooting/gun-magazines-clips/handgun-pistol-mags?d=223&c=121&s=22
You pull the trigger and one bullet comes out. I have no idea what you are you talking about.
Sorry that I said clips instead of magazines but I am sure that did not confuse anyone that much.
From a engineering standpoint the mechanisms on a semi-automatic hand gun is the same as a semi-automatic rifle. They load, fire and eject the shells in the same manner.
Since they are not talking about shooter firing from long distances when looking at these weapons they serve the same exact purpose. Their argument is that it is an assault weapon because it looks "mean". In other words if you take an AR-15 and paint it pink and then put a bow on it, then Democrats will no longer call it an Assault Weapon.
Magazines fill clips. But never call it a gun. It was a weapon or a Piece, but never a gun, we all got nailed for that one. I still call it a gun, out of protest. :biggrin:
Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 19, 2019, 06:33:22 PM
An AR 15 is far from being a standard semiautomatic pistol in any way. It is a semiautomatic rifle. Semiautomatic handguns do not use clips especially 30 round clips. Assault weapon is a BS term made up by gun grabbers to begin with. An AR 15 is not a military style rifle. Even if it was it is even more so protected by the 2nd Amendment.
Actually the term assault weapon dates back to WWI, but the left are so stupid of history, they applied it to the AR or it's "Ugly Gun" look alike. Yeah, they actually think AR stands for assault rifle.
Quote from: Solar on September 20, 2019, 12:25:54 PM
Actually the term assault weapon dates back to WWI, but the left are so stupid of history, they applied it to the AR or it's "Ugly Gun" look alike. Yeah, they actually think AR stands for assault rifle.
Yes assault weapon was used for the small machine guns used by the Germans. The way that the term "assault rifle" is being used in modern terms is a BS made up term. Just like transgender and toxic masculinity to name just a couple. Another BS term is "gun crimes"and "gun violence". No gun in the history of firearms has ever committed a crime or caused violence. At some point this make believe garbage must stop and must be called out when it happens.
One more thing, any weapon that is used to assault someone is an assault weapon. Assault is a verb not a noun.
Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 20, 2019, 11:18:59 AM
Please stop. You're wrong and obviously have zero experience on this subject..
You obviously flunked out of engineering school.
Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 20, 2019, 12:35:23 PM
Yes assault weapon was used for the small machine guns used by the Germans. The way that the term "assault rifle" is being used in modern terms is a BS made up term. Just like transgender and toxic masculinity to name just a couple. Another BS term is "gun crimes"and "gun violence". No gun in the history of firearms has ever committed a crime or caused violence. At some point this make believe garbage must stop and must be called out when it happens.
One more thing, any weapon that is used to assault someone is an assault weapon. Assault is a verb not a noun.
Bingo!!! Ir's pure PC Bull Shit! Just like "Hate Speech", there is no such thing, but the left keeps using it in hopes it becomes part of our vernacular.
Quote from: carolina73 on September 20, 2019, 01:15:40 PM
You obviously flunked out of engineering school.
I have built and repaired many firearms. How many have you done? Have you even shot a firearm? You should stop before you continue to embarrass yourself more.
Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 20, 2019, 01:43:02 PM
I have built and repaired many firearms. How many have you done? Have you even shot a firearm? You should stop before you continue to embarrass yourself more.
You seem to like to go on these attacks but I am not intimated by your tactics.
Obviously, there are some differences between a truck and a car but they are built the same way. They have the same mechanics. The same with guns.
From the aspect of mass shootings and the call for the assault weapons ban we are not talking about snipers and large distances. The Las Vegas shooter is probably the only recent shooting that needed a rifle. The shootings were in schools, churches ... and no one was wearing body armor.
What they are trying to ban is magazines that hold many rounds and the ability to fire rapidly. We are talking about less than 20 yards for these school shootings. You do not need a bullet that can hold a larger charge. They did not need a longer barrel.
So if you have something to add then please feel free to educate. Your attempted bullying bull shit just makes me laugh at how weak your argument must be. I am trying to restrain myself here from being more blunt.
Quote from: carolina73 on September 20, 2019, 02:16:53 PM
You seem to like to go on these attacks but I am not intimated by your tactics.
Obviously, there are some differences between a truck and a car but they are built the same way. They have the same mechanics. The same with guns.
From the aspect of mass shootings and the call for the assault weapons ban we are not talking about snipers and large distances. The Las Vegas shooter is probably the only recent shooting that needed a rifle. The shootings were in schools, churches ... and no one was wearing body armor.
What they are trying to ban is magazines that hold many rounds and the ability to fire rapidly. We are talking about less than 20 yards for these school shootings. You do not need a bullet that can hold a larger charge. They did not need a longer barrel.
So if you have something to add then please feel free to educate. Your attempted bullying bull shit just makes me laugh at how weak your argument must be. I am trying to restrain myself here from being more blunt.
And again you continue to embarrass yourself with your obvious ignorance of what you are talking about. Your wrong and what's sad is you continue on proving how wrong you are. I was trying to be nice asking you to quit while you're ahead. Please continue on. Whenever you spout BS I will call you on your BS. There are no so called "assault weapons" on the market legally for purchase without specially required licenses. An AR15 or a semiautomatic AK47 is not an "assault rifle". All handguns are not the same and have different mechanics between them and are definitely different mechanically from rifles. Go ahead and be more blunt.
If you knew what you were talking about you would also know that a bullet doesn't hold a charge.
Come and prove your ignorance some more. Spout your BS.
Let it go guys. What's important is that we're teaching our readership the truth, but we don't need to attack each other in the process, we're all on the same side. :smile:
I really get mad and nervous when I hear idiots Kamala ad dumbo O'Rourke talking about "Assault weapons" and "Military style weapons" few if any of them have ever been in the military and have no idea what they are talking about ....they use words to scare people who don't know any better either.
Growing up in Western Pa and preparing for the hunting season, I saved up my money from mowing laws and weeding old Ladies gardens to buy a "assault weapon". Which were on sale at the local "army /navy surplus" store. I paid 11.99 plus tax on what was one hell of a assault weapon during the Spanish America war....a 30-40 Kraig bolt action rifle, it was big, heavy and even had a bayonet lug. Wrapped in jelly cosmoline and plastic found in some warehouse somewhere, This was about October of 1964 a few weeks before Kennedy was killed and everything was later to change regarding firearms. I bought it with cash at age 14, no paperwork needed, bought a box of bullets for it and got a deer tag for my Junior Hunting license. Kids my age always bought 22 bullets, shotgun shells or ammo for a "deer rifle" nobody batted a eye. The old clerk wrapped it in newspaper ad I got on the Bus headed for home, everyone knew what I had, nobody cared.
The point of this little trip down memory lane is what WAS a State of the ART 'assault weapon' in 1903 was an obsolete antique in 1964 and a collectors item in 2019. I fear these clowns will try to ban ANYTHING the military used going back to 1860, because at one time it had a Military use, designed to kill as may enemy soldiers as quickly as possible on the battlefield.
Don't let them get a toe hold, don't let them Ban or restrict anything
Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 20, 2019, 02:40:36 PM
And again you continue to embarrass yourself with your obvious ignorance of what you are talking about. Your wrong and what's sad is you continue on proving how wrong you are. I was trying to be nice asking you to quit while you're ahead. Please continue on. Whenever you spout BS I will call you on your BS. There are no so called "assault weapons" on the market legally for purchase without specially required licenses. An AR15 or a semiautomatic AK47 is not an "assault rifle". All handguns are not the same and have different mechanics between them and are definitely different mechanically from rifles. Go ahead and be more blunt.
If you knew what you were talking about you would also know that a bullet doesn't hold a charge.
Come and prove your ignorance some more. Spout your BS.
I dont think you know what youre talking about...
Quote from: T Hunt on September 21, 2019, 06:59:32 PM
I dont think you know what youre talking about...
You just don't think.
Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 20, 2019, 11:18:59 AM
Please stop. You're wrong and obviously have zero experience on this subject..
Question. With the exception of the longer barrel and the shoulder stock (which are attachments to some pistols), not to mention cosmetics, and gas versus recoil operation, what is the difference between an AR-15 an a pistol?
Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 21, 2019, 08:09:17 PM
You just don't think.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Your quite the attack dog, arent you? I hope someday you and Solar disagree on something. That will be quite fun to watch.....
Wow to argue the difference between clip and bullet. Those of us who are older grew up using the word clip when talking about a magazine. Clearly there is a difference but a while back no one would not understand what I meant if I asked them to hand me, my clip. And well being correct on bullet is once again a difference without a distinction. I think your life would be more peaceful if you spent less time stressed out about others peoples words that still convey what they are saying. I sense a huge inferiority complex where you feel good criticizing others comments. But honestly you are not even doing that, you find a technical error and then criticize the person which is one sure way to insure that you are not really having a discussion. So Killer Clouds I guess you find pleasure in getting others stirred up. There is no value in that and only is a sign that nothing is being added to the discussion. I think that "so called attack weapons" is a correct statement because many of these freedom takers call some guns attack weapons. Mad up or not if a word is used and understood by a group it has its own meaning no matter if other like it or not.
Quote from: raptor5618 on September 23, 2019, 10:47:04 AM
Wow to argue the difference between clip and bullet. Those of us who are older grew up using the word clip when talking about a magazine. Clearly there is a difference but a while back no one would not understand what I meant if I asked them to hand me, my clip. And well being correct on bullet is once again a difference without a distinction. I think your life would be more peaceful if you spent less time stressed out about others peoples words that still convey what they are saying. I sense a huge inferiority complex where you feel good criticizing others comments. But honestly you are not even doing that, you find a technical error and then criticize the person which is one sure way to insure that you are not really having a discussion. So Killer Clouds I guess you find pleasure in getting others stirred up. There is no value in that and only is a sign that nothing is being added to the discussion. I think that "so called attack weapons" is a correct statement because many of these freedom takers call some guns attack weapons. Mad up or not if a word is used and understood by a group it has its own meaning no matter if other like it or not.
hate to interrupt but that was me who posted the link showing the difference between a clip and a magazine, not killer clouds. I put it up mostly tongue in cheek but also to show the difference. Well that's all I had to say please proceed.
How is it a buy back if it is mandatory and it wasn't sold by them in the first place?
Quote from: The Boo Man... on September 23, 2019, 12:57:37 PM
How is it a buy back if it is mandatory and it wasn't sold by them in the first place?
same way beto is a man of color
Quote from: s3779m on September 23, 2019, 01:02:10 PM
same way beto is a man of color
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: s3779m on September 23, 2019, 01:02:10 PM
same way beto is a man of color
Have you noticed his skin tone? It's sort of Aquamarine.
Quote from: The Boo Man... on September 23, 2019, 01:43:42 PM
Have you noticed his skin tone? It's sort of Aquamarine.
Yeah, and when it's that thin, you can see through it to the blue blood vessels. Thin skinned at birth. Seriously (sangre azul) comes from Spanish so called Royalty "Blue Bloods". In other words genetically thin skinned, which could also be the origin of thin skinned in attitude.
Vegans tend to suffer this ailment, pale as Hell and thin skinned. :biggrin:
Quote from: Solar on September 23, 2019, 01:54:13 PM
Yeah, and when it's that thin, you can see through it to the blue blood vessels. Thin skinned at birth. Seriously (sangre azul) comes from Spanish so called Royalty "Blue Bloods". In other words genetically thin skinned, which could also be the origin of thin skinned in attitude.
Vegans tend to suffer this ailment, pale as Hell and thin skinned. :biggrin:
Dopers too