Conservative Political Forum

General Category => Political Discussion and Debate => Topic started by: Solar on October 03, 2017, 11:33:55 AM

Title: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: Solar on October 03, 2017, 11:33:55 AM
Leftist Stupidity Epitomized.
Hell, doesn't this idiot know the speed of sound is slower than a bullet, let alone the fact that you can't actually silence a weapon? :rolleyes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnL14CZUP0E
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: Billy's bayonet on October 03, 2017, 03:33:38 PM
What business is it of his anyhow what somebody uses to hunt deer.
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: Bronx on October 03, 2017, 04:04:44 PM
Talk about Sportsman.......In africa when an idiot shoots a lion it's the shooter's fault but in American when one man shoots another man it's the gun's fault.
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: Solar on October 03, 2017, 04:35:51 PM
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on October 03, 2017, 03:33:38 PM
What business is it of his anyhow what somebody uses to hunt deer.
Shhhh, don't tell this nimrod about Bow Hunting. :lol:
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: Cryptic Bert on October 03, 2017, 08:01:54 PM
WTF? I have never hunted, never owned a gun but know that by the time the animal hears the gun it is too late.
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: Solar on October 04, 2017, 03:55:23 AM
Quote from: The Boo Man... on October 03, 2017, 08:01:54 PM
WTF? I have never hunted, never owned a gun but know that by the time the animal hears the gun it is too late.
I'd ask where do they find these people, then I realized it was 'Honest Williams' doing the interview. :biggrin:
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: taxed on October 04, 2017, 05:06:21 PM
This must be the same science they use for man-made global warming.
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: Hoofer on October 04, 2017, 05:36:49 PM
Next they'll outlaw clear mono-filament fishing line, because the fish can't see it?

Either this guy is ignorant, or he (they) think the audience is a bunch of suckers, who'd believe anything.

Did super-sonic jets stop making a sonic boom when the exceed Mach 1?   
Even a "hot" shot-gun slug for deer hunting and make a sonic "crack" that a silencer can't eliminate.  Supressors (silencers) only work on sub-sonic bullets... they've been watching too many Hollywood movies.

Where they sleeping during 7th grade science glass???
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: Solar on October 04, 2017, 05:42:57 PM
Quote from: taxed on October 04, 2017, 05:06:21 PM
This must be the same science they use for man-made global warming.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Bingo!
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: Possum on October 04, 2017, 08:59:04 PM
Quote from: Hoofer on October 04, 2017, 05:36:49 PM
Next they'll outlaw clear mono-filament fishing line, because the fish can't see it?

Either this guy is ignorant, or he (they) think the audience is a bunch of suckers, who'd believe anything.

Did super-sonic jets stop making a sonic boom when the exceed Mach 1?   
Even a "hot" shot-gun slug for deer hunting and make a sonic "crack" that a silencer can't eliminate.  Supressors (silencers) only work on sub-sonic bullets... they've been watching too many Hollywood movies.

Where they sleeping during 7th grade science glass???
I believe all this talk about silencers from the dims falls under "if you say a lie often enough people will believe it" category, there are too many sound bites using the same faulty "facts". Personally,  the only legislation I see coming out of this will concern bump stocks. 
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: walkstall on October 05, 2017, 02:26:21 AM
Quote from: s3779m on October 04, 2017, 08:59:04 PM
I believe all this talk about silencers from the dims falls under "if you say a lie often enough people will believe it" category, there are too many sound bites using the same faulty "facts". Personally,  the only legislation I see coming out of this will concern bump stocks.



"How do you eat an elephant?   One bite at a time."   

That's what Dem's and RINO's do best.
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: supsalemgr on October 05, 2017, 04:10:59 AM
Quote from: s3779m on October 04, 2017, 08:59:04 PM
I believe all this talk about silencers from the dims falls under "if you say a lie often enough people will believe it" category, there are too many sound bites using the same faulty "facts". Personally,  the only legislation I see coming out of this will concern bump stocks.

I agree with your assessment and this creates a dilemma for me.

I do not see the need for any private citizen to have basically a machine gun. That being said, I have concern about any law to restrict guns. As Walks mentioned this would just be the first bite. It is the camel's nose under the tent.
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: Cryptic Bert on October 05, 2017, 05:38:27 PM
It gets better folks!

https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/915622557306548224/photo/1
Title: Re: Sportsmen Will Claim They Need Silencers So Deer Don't Hear The Gunshot
Post by: TboneAgain on October 05, 2017, 06:04:14 PM
Quote from: walkstall on October 05, 2017, 02:26:21 AM


"How do you eat an elephant?   One bite at a time."   

That's what Dem's and RINO's do best.

Exactly! Through the years, it's always been some new and deadly thing that just has to be banned. Remember Saturday Night Specials? (There was even a TV show called that, not to mention the Lynyrd Skynyrd song.) Long before that it was "gangster weapons," like the venerable Thompson. There have been crusades against "silencers," "assault" weapons, sniper weapons, "plastic guns," folding stocks, large-capacity magazines (or, in the vernacular of a highly-educated journalist, "clips") "dum-dum" bullets, flash suppressors, body armor-piercing rounds ("cop-killer" bullets),  novelty items like the old "zip guns," and many more. Even cutting tools like switchblades and butterfly knives have been demonized.

The Left knows we'll never do a Down Under rollover and say, "Okay, here ya go. I'll take a couple hundo for my tricked out AR and I promise I won't buy any more." So they pick away, a little at a time. In my memory, it's only been in recent years that some of the worst gun laws have been rolled back, especially in DC. Other than a few tiny victories (like FOPA back in 1986), it's all been downhill.

When something crazy happens, the long knives come out. Just today, Bret Stephens, the new token so-called conservative at the NYT, called for the outright repeal of 2A. But that won't happen, and the Left knows it. So they play the long game, and hope the frog doesn't notice how hot the water in the pot is getting.....