He must really suck at trying to harm domestic energy production than. Either that or you are wrong in your assessment that his administration is trying to increase oil prices and decrease domestic production. I wonder which one it is.
Both you and Dr Watt.
Energy production in America has increased under Obama ... Has the election changed anything for this forum ? know we had about 1 day where everyone was laid back but it seems to be back to normal now.
I've warned you about name calling, do it again, and it will be the last time.
Quick question: does "dumb-shit" count? Second quick question: do you care to actually respond to my point?
As I said before, this topic has been beaten like a dead horse.But you claim 99% adhere to the aspect that AGW is real but a closer look at the numbers exposes a huge flaw in the need to change human behavior at the risk of destroying our economy.That flaw is a one degree rise in temp over a 100 year span, a negligible number at that, so sure, why not agree, what could possibly be the consequene of not agreeing?Well, how about losing all funding and a destroyed carreer? EPA Chief Vows to Probe E-mail Threatening to‘Destroy’ Career of Climate Skeptic During today’s hearing, Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), Ranking Member of the Environment and Public Works Committee, confronted Stephen Johnson, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with a threatening e-mail from a group of which EPA is currently a member. The e-mail threatens to “destroy” the career of a climate skeptic. Michael T. Eckhart, president of the environmental group the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE), wrote in an email on July 13, 2007 to Marlo Lewis, senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI): “It is my intention to destroy your career as a liar. If you produce one more editorial against climate change, I will launch a campaign against your professional integrity. I will call you a liar and charlatan to the Harvard community of which you and I are members. I will call you out as a man who has been bought by Corporate America. Go ahead, guy. Take me on." http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=04373015-802A-23AD-4BF9-C3F02278F4CF
Is NASA in on this conspiracy? NASA has openly supported global warming theory. So have dozens of reputable scientific organizations, many (unlike NASA) private.You do realize that the conspiracy you are proposing would make the 911-truther-conspiracy look like a schoolyard prank, right?
Only a complete moron would still believe in AGW -- even after Climate-gate.
There's a reason it's no longer in the news, it's no longer warming.So much for computer models.