Quote from: American Pride on February 14, 2020, 04:47:43 PM
Another Paul Ryan. 

Shit... I think he's on the board...

He is and notice about the same time they took a left turn. He's in cahoots with Murdoch's son's.

1.Klobachar
2.Bloomberg
3.Biden
4.Boot edge edge
5.Gabbard
6.Warren
7.Sanders

Klobuchar would be the least damaging? Think again. Sure there are few things in the article that sound good on paper and help her to appear more moderate than her competitors if that's the benchmark. Here's a concise consolidation of her views. A few stand out. Eliminate the Electoral College? That one speaks for itself in terms of damage. Take a read and decide for yourself.

https://www.politico.com/2020-election/candidates-views-on-the-issues/amy-klobuchar/

Quote from: American Pride on February 14, 2020, 04:59:16 PM
He is and notice about the same time they took a left turn. He's in cahoots with Murdoch's son's.

I know I keep posting articles from CH, but you keep reminding me of stuff.  What's funny is this article gets the most action on the site:

https://conservativehardliner.com/why-i-think-media-organizations-are-really-big-trouble

I could never understand why these media organizations seem to not have a care in the world about ratings and making money, so I through that theory out...

Quote from: taxed on February 15, 2020, 12:56:23 AM
I know I keep posting articles from CH, but you keep reminding me of stuff.  What's funny is this article gets the most action on the site:

https://conservativehardliner.com/why-i-think-media-organizations-are-really-big-trouble

I could never understand why these media organizations seem to not have a care in the world about ratings and making money, so I through that theory out...

Very enlightening and I think you nailed it.

Quote"I think these (some) media companies are using the guise of journalism to facilitate and sell national security information.  Maybe they transport information, and maybe they play matchmakers between our spooks and the foreign actors with money."

"Previously, I had the perspective that foreign money buys the media so their puppets parrot what they're told, and ditto from the spook side, where spooks do the sqwaking or tell the media personalities what to say and write like good little mockingbirds.  I assumed the media's primary role was prostitute who knew they were behaving seditiously, or covertly, but needed the cash.

All that happens, but I think it's more of their cover than primary role.  Now I think such a media company is simply a brand or logo acting as an umbrella for spooks and foreigners to get together under the cover of "journalism", i.e.:"

Quote from: taxed on February 14, 2020, 04:01:54 PM
I think Gabbard would be the worst.  She's a fuckin' lunatic.

https://conservativehardliner.com/youre-not-trump-supporter-or-conservative-if-youre-defending-tulsi-gabbard

This young lady seems to have Gabbard figured out as well and why some on the right are fooled by her.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0MwShzZg6U

Quote from: American Pride on February 15, 2020, 01:28:21 AM
This young lady seems to have Gabbard figured out as well and why some on the right are fooled by her.

Wow!!!  When I get our indie sources list put together, she's definitely on it....

This new crop of zoomer conservatives are going to save the damn country....

Klobuchar might be the most dangerous because of that voice. Why do most democrat women have voices that force birds to fly into the jaws of alligators? 

Quote from: Jasmine on February 14, 2020, 03:50:30 PM
I sure hope you're right. It just worries me that the dems will stoop to anything to get Trump out of office. And Trump himself doesn't help matters when he talks. Sometimes his mouth gets him in unnecessary trouble.

I always look at his gaffes as "At least we know what he thinks about this".  Most others speak political speech that means nothing of any substance.

Quote from: crepe05 on February 15, 2020, 04:22:34 AM
I always look at his gaffes as "At least we know what he thinks about this".  Most others speak political speech that means nothing of any substance.

What gaffes?

Quote from: taxed on February 15, 2020, 04:31:11 AM
What gaffes?

There aren't any. Trump says what he means and means what he says. What others see as gaffes are said with a specific intent in mind.  Let's not forget that he's also the master "troller" of Democrats. Another great quality. He gets them every time.

Quote from: American Pride on February 15, 2020, 04:34:32 AM
There aren't any. Trump says what he means and means what he says. What others see as gaffes are said with a specific intent in mind.  Let's not forget that he's also the master "troller" of Democrats. Another great quality. He gets them every time.

Exactly.  The man literally has everything down to the letter... even his "misspellings".

Gabbard would be the least harmful. I support her view on American regime change wars and she is he only candidate that doesnt want abortion up till birth (she might be pro life but cant say IT because its political suicide if youre a democrat?). Other than that they Are all pretty bad. Everyone wants abortion till birth, insane gunlaws (like closing the "hate loophole" which I didnt Even know what was till I watched it on Steven Crowder lately), red flag laws etc.
nd they all want to pay for healthcare for illegals, ban ice and what not.Berniee might have the most insane economic policies, he would run the econocmy into the ground. He used to be less crazy about immigrants but he too seems to have gotten on the open borders train.

The most evil woman in Politics might get in again? Oh please say it is so.