She plays both sides of the fence.  She pleases the green crowd and alienates labor unions but then offers them a carrot.  And the dupes will fall for it.



"Hillary Clin­ton said Tues­day that she op­poses con­struc­tion of the Key­stone XL oil sands pipeline, an an­nounce­ment that ends years of de­clin­ing to weigh in on the con­tro­ver­sial pro­ject that en­vir­on­ment­al­ists are bat­tling hard to de­feat.

Clin­ton's com­ments came just as most of Wash­ing­ton's at­ten­tion was turned to the ar­rival of Pope Fran­cis in D.C. Ac­cord­ing to a copy of her re­marks provided by the pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, Clin­ton said, "I think it is im­per­at­ive that we look at the Key­stone Pipeline as what I be­lieve it is—a dis­trac­tion from the im­port­ant work we have to do to com­bat cli­mate change, and un­for­tu­nately, from my per­spect­ive, one that in­ter­feres with our abil­ity to move for­ward to deal with all the oth­er is­sues. There­fore, I op­pose it."

The rev­el­a­tion of her po­s­i­tion in Iowa will likely help the Demo­crat­ic White House can­did­ate cor­ral sup­port among green act­iv­ists, but the pro­ject is sup­por­ted by a large num­ber of labor uni­ons, an­oth­er key part of the Demo­crat­ic base. Speak­ing to jobs spe­cific­ally Tues­day, Clin­ton said she wants to im­ple­ment a policy that'd "put thou­sands of Amer­ic­ans to work" fix­ing old, leaky pipelines and re­pair­ing rail­cars, rail beds, and rail tracks that cur­rently trans­port oil. She said there are "a lot more jobs, from my per­spect­ive, on a North Amer­ic­an clean en­ergy agenda than you would ever get from one pipeline cross­ing the bor­der."

http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/73635/hillary-clinton-comes-out-against-keystone-pipeline-after-months-non-answers

The endless BS artist will say anything to ensure support in her quest for the WH. Anyone that believes her is an idiot.

Quote from: tac on September 22, 2015, 02:10:45 PM
The endless BS artist will say anything to ensure support in her quest for the WH. Anyone that believes her is an idiot.

No argument from me.

Quote from: tac on September 22, 2015, 02:10:45 PM
The endless BS artist will say anything to ensure support in her quest for the WH. Anyone that believes her is an idiot.

They are more than idiots. They are dangerous idiots. Why do I say that? I say that because of the very real threat a Hillary Clinton Presidency would pose to our Republic.

Obama's already done massive damage to everything from individual Constitutional rights, to the very concept of the rule of law.

Four to eight more years of that sort of governance is a scary thought indeed. Or well it should be to anyone with as little as two functioning brain cells to rub together.

Hillary isn;t going to win any vote by blocking the pipeline....the unions are hoping for it, I really hope the unions throw in for the Pubs this time around, just like Reagan.

Quote from: Dubinsky on September 22, 2015, 02:01:24 PM
The rev­el­a­tion of her po­s­i­tion in Iowa will likely help the Demo­crat­ic White House can­did­ate cor­ral sup­port among green act­iv­ists, but the pro­ject is sup­por­ted by a large num­ber of labor uni­ons, an­oth­er key part of the Demo­crat­ic base. Speak­ing to jobs spe­cific­ally Tues­day, Clin­ton said she wants to im­ple­ment a policy that'd "put thou­sands of Amer­ic­ans to work" fix­ing old, leaky pipelines and re­pair­ing rail­cars, rail beds, and rail tracks that cur­rently trans­port oil. She said there are "a lot more jobs, from my per­spect­ive, on a North Amer­ic­an clean en­ergy agenda than you would ever get from one pipeline cross­ing the bor­der."

http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/73635/hillary-clinton-comes-out-against-keystone-pipeline-after-months-non-answers

1) There are a lot more jobs in a clean energy agenda than in a pipeline
the same way that there are more jobs in digging with shovels than in using bulldozers.

2) Shipping oil by rail will always be dirtier and more hazardous than shipping oil by pipeline,
no matter how well-maintained the railways are.

3) The real reason Dems oppose the Keystone XL pipeline is:
the railway currently used to transport oil, BNSF, is owned by none other than: George Soros!

This carefully crafted statement from Hillary packs a lot of important messages to her masters.
It makes clear that she will increase the pork barrel spending even more
(at our expense, both as taxpayers and as consumers!)
to both the unions and the environmentalist radicals!

Work harder, get less. Vote Democrat.

Quote from: je_freedom on September 22, 2015, 06:32:59 PM
1) There are a lot more jobs in a clean energy agenda than in a pipeline
the same way that there are more jobs in digging with shovels than in using bulldozers.

2) Shipping oil by rail will always be dirtier and more hazardous than shipping oil by pipeline,
no matter how well-maintained the railways are.

3) The real reason Dems oppose the Keystone XL pipeline is:
the railway currently used to transport oil, BNSF, is owned by none other than: George Soros!

This carefully crafted statement from Hillary packs a lot of important messages to her masters.
It makes clear that she will increase the pork barrel spending even more
(at our expense, both as taxpayers and as consumers!)
to both the unions and the environmentalist radicals!

Work harder, get less. Vote Democrat.

So are you saying George Soros is Warren Buffett?   Warren Buffett owns the BNSF Railway Co. paying $34 billion for it.  Or did I fall a sleep sometime?   

There is some filthy rich white leftist envoro- loon who donates tons of Money to the Dems and especially Obamao (probably backing Hillary now) who has made stopping the XL pipeline his mission in life....can't remember his name but he lives in the midwest somewhere within spitting distance of one of the proposed routes.

Quote from: walkstall on September 22, 2015, 06:58:18 PM
So are you saying George Soros is Warren Buffett?   Warren Buffett owns the BNSF Railway Co. paying $34 billion for it.  Or did I fall a sleep sometime?   

You're right.  It's Warren Buffet - a radical leftist clone of George Soros.

Here are a few more radical left billionaires:
Peter Lewis - owns the controlling share of Progressive Insurance.
Tom Steyer - a radical left billionaire environmentalist