Quote from: blake allyn on March 29, 2017, 03:17:15 PM
Bsahahhahaha.  Yeah the Japanese government, US pentagon and the China, scientists, and NASA are all in collusion.

What do they say the global temperature should be?

Quote
Read the study on climate scientists.  Right up there.  6 separate studies done reproduced the same results.  Yeah they are all liars but some random guy on a message board who cant even interpret a peer reviewed study is correct.  Even the CEO of exxon Mobil is in on the scam.

What results?

Quote
Bahahahhahahahahahahaha.  Bahahahahahahha.

Oh and the fact the last three years are the hottest on record is just a lucky coincidence for the scammers.   Bhahahahhahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

I see why you fail... you're good at it!
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/01/26/warmest-ten-years-on-record-now-includes-all-december-data/

QuoteConclusion

The three hottest years for HadCRUT4.5, HadSST3 and GISS are 2016, 2015 and 2014 in that order. So when people talk about the last three years being the hottest, they are NOT talking about the satellite data. According to the satellite data, 2016 sets a new record with 1998 dropping to second place. However the difference is so small that we could say that 2016 and 1998 are in a statistical tie.

As I indicated in my last post, I had expected HadCRUT4.5 to be very close. As it turned out, HadCRUT4.5 is the only data set of the five that I cover that went up from November to December. The other four went down from November to December. In terms of where December would rank if its anomaly were to hold for 2017, RSS is the odd man out. How long do you think that this will be the case?

Bahahahahsahhaahhahahahahsahha

Quote from: taxed on March 29, 2017, 03:31:14 PM
What do they say the global temperature should be?
What results?
I see why you fail... you're good at it!
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/01/26/warmest-ten-years-on-record-now-includes-all-december-data/

You can read the studies and answer each question you asked.  I suspect that you cant understand them.

Every single military on Earth agrees with climate change and that it  is man made.  Everyone.  End of discussion.

Quote from: blake allyn on March 29, 2017, 03:42:26 PM
You can read the studies and answer each question you asked.  I suspect that you cant understand them.

Why are we not underwater yet?  We were supposed to be by now.  Don't you remember?

Quote
Every single military on Earth agrees with climate change and that it  is man made.  Everyone.  End of discussion.

No they don't.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/clarifications-corrections/526191/Climate-change-is-a-lie-global-warming-not-real-claims-weather-channel-founder

QuoteJohn Coleman, who co-founded the Weather Channel, shocked academics by insisting the theory of man-made climate change was no longer scientifically credible.

Instead, what 'little evidence' there is for rising global temperatures points to a 'natural phenomenon' within a developing eco-system.

Quote from: blake allyn on March 29, 2017, 03:42:26 PM
You can read the studies and answer each question you asked.  I suspect that you cant understand them.

Every single military on Earth agrees with climate change and that it  is man made.  Everyone.  End of discussion.

  I don't think so!   

Quote from: walkstall on March 29, 2017, 03:50:05 PM


  I don't think so!   

He thinks the ice caps are melting... 

Quote from: taxed on March 29, 2017, 03:48:54 PM
http://www.express.co.uk/news/clarifications-corrections/526191/Climate-change-is-a-lie-global-warming-not-real-claims-weather-channel-founder

Thats odd cause on the weather channell website they clearly state climate change is man made, real.  Hmm.

https://weather.com/science/environment/news/global-warming-weather-channel-position-statement-20141029



"UH dud hur, I picked one person who doesn't beleive even though the vast majority do."

Again, go through the climate change study on scientists provided, and explain the flaw in all 6 studies methodlology that allowed them to reach the same conclusion.

I'll be waiting.


As for the militaries, China, the US, the EU, Japan,Israel, just a few I picked.  ALl agree.  ALl links provided.  HMMMM!

Yeah, but some nuts on a website say its false and I am supposed to believe.


20 sources go in an demolish them.

Quote from: blake allyn on March 29, 2017, 03:56:23 PM
Thats odd cause on the weather channell website they clearly state climate change is man made, real.  Hmm.

https://weather.com/science/environment/news/global-warming-weather-channel-position-statement-20141029

The article parrots hoaxes.  The founder was right.  Keep trying....

Quote
"UH dud hur, I picked one person who doesn't beleive even though the vast majority do."

Nobody believes it.  Even those who depend on the funding to keep the hoax going.

Quote
Again, go through the climate change study on scientists provided, and explain the flaw in all 6 studies methodlology that allowed them to reach the same conclusion.

Nothing has been proved, only debunked. 

Quote
I'll be waiting.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-05/climategate-2-noaa-whistleblower-claims-world-leaders-fooled-fake-global-warming-dat

QuoteDr John Bates' disclosures about the manipulation of data behind the so-called 'Pausebuster' paper is the biggest scientific scandal since 'Climategate' in 2009 when, as Britain's Daily Mail reported, thousands of leaked emails revealed scientists were trying to block access to data, and using a 'trick' to conceal embarrassing flaws in their claims about global warming.

Quote
As for the militaries, China, the US, the EU, Japan,Israel, just a few I picked.  ALl agree.  ALl links provided.  HMMMM!

No they don't.

Quote
Yeah, but some nuts on a website say its false and I am supposed to believe.

You believe CO2 is a pollutant and the ice caps are melting.  You're not very bright.

Quote
20 sources go in an demolish them.

All your sources depend on fake manipulated data.  Keep trying...

Also, what should the temperature be?

Quote from: taxed on March 29, 2017, 04:44:43 PM
The article parrots hoaxes.  The founder was right.  Keep trying....
Nobody believes it.  Even those who depend on the funding to keep the hoax going.
Nothing has been proved, only debunked. 
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-05/climategate-2-noaa-whistleblower-claims-world-leaders-fooled-fake-global-warming-dat



No they don't.
You believe CO2 is a pollutant and the ice caps are melting.  You're not very bright.
All your sources depend on fake manipulated data.  Keep trying...

Also, what should the temperature be?

This argument style that I know Solar uses as well, is that of a child. 

Yes, all the militarizes of the countries are lying.  LOL.

Quote from: blake allyn on March 29, 2017, 05:18:06 PM
This argument style that I know Solar uses as well, is that of a child. 

Yes, all the militarizes of the countries are lying.  LOL.

When are we supposed to be underwater?

Quote from: taxed on March 29, 2017, 05:18:36 PM
When are we supposed to be underwater?

Thats not how climate change works.  But its evident, from that question, you have no clue nor have read one study done on the topic other then perhaps the ceo of the weather channel lol.

Quote from: blake allyn on March 29, 2017, 02:09:25 PM
Easily?  Come on I am falling for like virtually every scientist on earth, every military on earth, my own eyes, thermometers, oil companies.  I am just as gullible as everyone else! 


Guy thinks he can refute an article with 20 sources in one sentence lol.  Go ahead, go into each an argue the science!

Every scientist on earth?

Quote from: blake allyn on March 29, 2017, 05:29:17 PM
Thats not how climate change works.  But its evident, from that question, you have no clue nor have read one study done on the topic other then perhaps the ceo of the weather channel lol.

You are using the same idiocy that I've been debating against since the 90s.  Those lemmings thought we'd be underwater in the 2000s.  I told them that's stupid, yet they continued to parrot the same idiocy you're parroting this very day.  I have 100% accuracy against the "scientists" and lemmings who said otherwise.  They are and have been wrong because the ice caps are thicker than ever and we're not under water.

Part of the hoax you believe in involves the sea levels rising.  When are we supposed to be underwater?  If you don't have enough confidence in your "science", then just say so.

Quote from: The Boo Man... on March 29, 2017, 05:29:56 PM
Every scientist on earth?

"Virtualy" every, as I wrote.  According to a recent study, of 6 seperate studies, between 90-100& of CLIMATE SCIENTISTS,  as I cited the peer review article, beleive in climate change and attribute it to man made activity.


In part due to emissions, in part due to clearing land.

To be fair, he cited the co-founder of the weather channel, even the the weather channel disagrees.

The debate is over.