Hey, Russ. Some choices, eh?

Quote from: Solid Right on May 25, 2016, 08:36:32 PM
Your Solarness --

If you insist on engaging in this nonsense, it would be better if you picked a time when my Ladyfriend was not out of the country.  That way, I wouldn't have the time to help you with the fundamentals of forum posting.

1 - Comprehension is not your issue??  Read on.

2 - Well, as I said once before, "I can explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you."  You will need to work on that on your own time.

3 - I don't even know what "not of party" is supposed to mean.  I suggested that a write-in vote is not going to produce the next President of these United States.  It's not.  Get over it.

4 - Well, yeah, it is an alternative viewpoint to that of thinking that a write-in vote is going to produce the next President.

5 - I have a deal for you:  If you can refrain from telling me what I should have said, I will extend the same courtesy to you.  I'm actually pretty good at writing what I want to say, in case you hadn't noticed.

6 - Nope; I didn't say that.  There's that reading comprehension problem again.  What I suggested was that you are already tuning up to sing the "Loser's Lament" -- "It wasn't our fault."  Oh, boo hoo.  Stubborn as I am, and that is considerable, I have not yet abandoned the notion that the convention will reject Trump, and, somehow, Cruz will come away with the nomination.  (Yeah, Hoofer, there is that fur-bearing trout story.)

7 - Yes, yes, of course, "It wasn't our fault."  Somewhere around here, somebody has a tag line that says (approx), "It is not Barack Obama who is the problem, it is all those Americans who allowed him to become President."

8 - Oh, golly, gee whiz, yes!  Send that message!  And gag on it for the four years of Hillary, just like we are with Obama.  All those people who stayed home in 2012 really sent a message, didn't they?  And, now, their message is, "But it wasn't our fault."

Since I'm waiting for a phone call from China, and it's not lunch time there yet, I shall amuse myself a little bit more.  You could just ignore me, you know.  I don't post here much, and I only posted because I feel a certain kinship with Hoofer and our common views on gun issues.  Yes, I know, it's an open forum and anybody can respond to anybody, but you could have just passed it by.  Instead, there you are, like a hungry trout rising to a dry fly.

I, too, could ignore you, but I'm passing some idle time at the moment, and seldom have I encountered someone whose opinion of himself quite matches yours, so the temptation is hard to resist.  (Yes, I know, there is another, but he's the President, and he doesn't post here.).

Yes, I understand that you are the Big Frog in this little pond, but I really don't care.  There are so many ponds out there in cyberspace, and so many Big Frogs that one loses track.  That, and you really aren't as good at this stuff as you think you are.  Really, you're not.  I gently suggested that the whole Trump issue seemed to have caused a disconnect in you're logic processing circuitry.  I dunno, now.  Maybe it was always there, and the Trump issue just exacerbates it.

If you would prefer that I not post here anymore, just say so, and I will honor your wishes.  Or, I suppose, you could do your Big Frog thing and ban me, but that might be an admission you're not ready to make.

Anyhow, I think I shall now await my phone call.  Meanwhile,

Be well,
Russ

Ya know, I was going to parse the shit out of this, but then I thought, why bother? You can't seem to grasp current forum technology and reciprocate the same courtesy back, no, instead I have to open a separate window to see what I wrote, and all because some old frog from a dried up mud puddle no longer frequented hasn't the capacity for learning new concepts.
Then has the audacity to insult their host with a myriad of noxious comments based in emotion because he hates having his views challenged.
Which explains why your forum has no Pagerank, and ours has a ranking of 5 out of 10, but I'd be willing to be you haven't a clue what all that means, considering you're still using software only fond in internet museums.
Hurry, go look it up.

Look, I get it, actual debate is not your forte so you build straw men in hopes of distracting from having to face serious queries from your opponents, I get that, but I'm also a fire bug and love torching said distractions, only for so long, then you like so many before you, reach troll status.
So lets cut the crap, you go back to your vernal pond/mud hole and drive away your own traffic. Deal? Assuming you even have any left.

Quote from: Solar on May 25, 2016, 05:53:59 AM
And to think, they could have gotten behind the only Constitutionalist in the race just weeks before, Hell, still could since he has yet to concede, and send a message to all candidates, which is exactly what an endorsement is supposed to do.

I could see it if Trump was the actual nominee, of which he is not.

They should have, what help sold me on Cruz was how pro 2nd amendment he is. Now its too late sadly.