NASA Scientist: Global Warming Is Nonsense

Started by taxed, February 16, 2018, 02:13:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

taxed

The libs are losing ground. Slowly, people of science are becoming less fearful and speaking out.

https://www.inquisitr.com/1234575/nasa-scientist-global-warming-is-nonsense/

Quote"The term 'climate change' is meaningless. The Earth's climate has been changing since time immemorial, that is since the Earth was formed 1,000 million years ago. The theory of 'man-made climate change' is an unsubstantiated hypothesis [about] our climate [which says it] has been adversely affected by the burning of fossil fuels in the last 100 years, causing the average temperature on the earth's surface to increase very slightly but with disastrous environmental consequences. The theory is that the CO2 emitted by burning fossil fuel is the 'greenhouse gas' causes 'global warming' — in fact, water is a much more powerful greenhouse gas and there is 20 time more of it in our atmosphere (around one per cent of the atmosphere) whereas CO2 is only 0.04 per cent. There is no reproducible scientific evidence CO2 has significantly increased in the last 100 years. Anecdotal evidence doesn't mean anything in science, it's not significant..."

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
#PureBlood #TrumpWon

walkstall

Quote from: taxed on February 16, 2018, 02:13:57 PM
The libs are losing ground. Slowly, people of science are becoming less fearful and speaking out.

https://www.inquisitr.com/1234575/nasa-scientist-global-warming-is-nonsense/

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Who would'a thunk it?         :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation.- James Freeman Clarke

Always remember "Feelings Aren't Facts."

Solar

Add to that, Co2 increases, follow warming, not the other way around, which would explain why we're headed for a Maunder Minimum (mini ice age).
The warming ceased more than a decade ago, so brace yourself for the next 3 decades of serious cooling, something I'm certainly not looking forward to.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Walter Josh

Scientifically verifiable radiometric carbon age-dating has established the Age of Earth @ 4,545,000,000 years and its cyclical nature as perpetual !
As such, anyone paying any attention to anything the global warming assholery has to say, is a certifiable moron.

walkstall

Quote from: Walter Josh on February 16, 2018, 08:42:15 PM
Scientifically verifiable radiometric carbon age-dating has established the Age of Earth @ 4,545,000,000 years and its cyclical nature as perpetual !
As such, anyone paying any attention to anything the global warming assholery has to say, is a certifiable moron.


Give or take a day or two.   :smile:
A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation.- James Freeman Clarke

Always remember "Feelings Aren't Facts."

Solar

Quote from: Walter Josh on February 16, 2018, 08:42:15 PM
Scientifically verifiable radiometric carbon age-dating has established the Age of Earth @ 4,545,000,000 years and its cyclical nature as perpetual !
As such, anyone paying any attention to anything the global warming assholery has to say, is a certifiable moron.

Yes, and that true atmospheric cycle is based on solid acceptable evidence from the planet itself.

Though I challenge 4,545 billion year claim, simply because they have yet to find another rock older.
My question to them is, how many times has the planet recycled itself before, what they claim, to have been the beginning? How many times has it cycled since the last cycle?

These so called scientists love puzzles, problem is, when they find "Consensus" on a theory they run with it as proof and until proven otherwise, the theory is accepted.

Just like AGW, the Fed and UN hired enough hacks to back their theory, and in no time consensus became approved theory despite evidence to the contrary, the Democratic way won the argument by majority vote by a group of people not even qualified to speak on the subject for lack of knowledge.
They bullied real scientists through consensus. Proof as to why our Founders avoided the term Democracy, they recognized its failures in mob rule.

I love theoretical science, but I also love the idea of Astrology but keep both safely tucked away in the  "Entertainment Box" knowing both are based on "What Ifs".
Liberals thrive on this shit, like old women love tabloid papers in the checkout line.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Walter Josh

Solar,
An astute observation about consensus but at least it comes from those w/a
shared background in Chemistry, Physics, Geology, Mathematics and the rest;
rather that our political hustlers masquerading as enlightened thinkers.

Solar

Quote from: Walter Josh on February 17, 2018, 12:43:10 PM
Solar,
An astute observation about consensus but at least it comes from those w/a
shared background in Chemistry, Physics, Geology, Mathematics and the rest;
rather that our political hustlers masquerading as enlightened thinkers.
Exactly!
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!