Quote from: taxed on May 13, 2015, 04:40:25 PM
Being a researcher doesn't make you smart.  I'm sorry to break the news to you.

Global warming claims/papers have all been pier reviewed as well.

Quote from: Solar on May 13, 2015, 04:45:11 PM
Global warming claims/papers have all been pier reviewed as well.

You can get a lib to believe anything.  Just tell them it's peer reviewed!!!

Quote from: Solar on May 13, 2015, 04:45:11 PM
Global warming claims/papers have all been pier reviewed as well.

AND he never responded to my psot concerning the mission statement from the WHO (as part of the UN) and they have compiled tghis "research" just as they have the "research" supporting Global Warming.  It's pseudoscience and a new form of Lysenkoism.  (Rush spoke of Lysenkoism on his show today, as a matter of fact)

Quote from: wally on May 13, 2015, 04:51:43 PM
AND he never responded to my psot concerning the mission statement from the WHO (as part of the UN) and they have compiled tghis "research" just as they have the "research" supporting Global Warming.  It's pseudoscience and a new form of Lysenkoism.  (Rush spoke of Lysenkoism on his show today, as a matter of fact)

He was trained to just post all those "sources".  He's never really went through them.

Quote from: wally on May 13, 2015, 04:51:43 PM
AND he never responded to my psot concerning the mission statement from the WHO (as part of the UN) and they have compiled tghis "research" just as they have the "research" supporting Global Warming.  It's pseudoscience and a new form of Lysenkoism.  (Rush spoke of Lysenkoism on his show today, as a matter of fact)

Yeah, WHO routinely ranks the US with the claims of one of the worst health care systems in the world.

Quote from: Solar on May 13, 2015, 04:54:53 PM
Yeah, WHO routinely ranks the US with the claims of one of the worst health care systems in the world.

The WHO actually drops your ranking if you have enough households who can AFFORD health care.  I need to find that data again....

Yoo Hoo, the sun is cooling.
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/01/31/with-suns-activity-set-to-diminish-is-global-cooling-coming/

Quote from: darroll on May 13, 2015, 05:09:35 PM
Yoo Hoo, the sun is cooling.
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/01/31/with-suns-activity-set-to-diminish-is-global-cooling-coming/

darroll, this need to also be put in the Library if you would please.

Quote from: steve folkster on May 13, 2015, 12:11:37 PM

I also don't understand the point about listing who sits on the council.  Of course some of those regimes aren't great, like Saudi Arabia.  But does that mean they also cant be correct in pointing out human rights abuses?

I guess what I am asking, is what human rights abuses, if any, do you think America commits?

Abortion for one, state sponsored abortion, killing unborn children who are ALIVE and likely cognizant in the womb.

Oppressive taxation by the GOvt for insidious programs like Obamaocare and for foreign aid to countries who engage in REAL HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS like some of the list already mentioned for another

Last, enabling human rights violations in other countries like Mexico and Guatemala by promoting unchecked immigration
and lawlessness. Children are encouraged to make a dangerous trek through a hostile terrain and environment controlled by criminal private armies who exploit them as well as adults so that they can take advantage of the Obamao regime's totally lawless immigration policy. Said Policy is a threat and hardship to every man, woman and child in the USA.

Nobody is discussing global warming.

I am very disappointed to find no real sources sent to refute these things but just literally regurigiations of things like calling me a liberal, which I am not, etc.

Anyone can discuss in such a manner.

There have been as I wrote over 50 studies on this topic from all over the world.  That is the topic of uranium.

The US air force itself admits that it likely causes increase cancer rates.

To think that anything written here remotely questions these diverse judgments is abusrd.

I was hoping this site was fact based.  It is not.

Falsely calling me a liberal is a pathetic attempt at refuting over 50 studies and the conclsuions of the US gob.

Quote from: steve folkster on May 14, 2015, 06:21:51 AM
Nobody is discussing global warming.

I am very disappointed to find no real sources sent to refute these things but just literally regurigiations of things like calling me a liberal, which I am not, etc.

Anyone can discuss in such a manner.

There have been as I wrote over 50 studies on this topic from all over the world.  That is the topic of uranium.

The US air force itself admits that it likely causes increase cancer rates.

To think that anything written here remotely questions these diverse judgments is abusrd.

I was hoping this site was fact based.  It is not.

Falsely calling me a liberal is a pathetic attempt at refuting over 50 studies and the conclsuions of the US gob.

your links were a total failure! You were asked to backup your assertions about "Depleted Uranium" KEYWORD, DEPLETED!!!!
And all you provided was evidence that uranium causes cancer related disease, which is a no brainer!
YES... we all know uranium causes a myriad of diseases, which is why I stated your links were an insult to our intellect.

Quote from: steve folkster on May 14, 2015, 06:21:51 AM
Nobody is discussing global warming.

I am very disappointed to find no real sources sent to refute these things but just literally regurigiations of things like calling me a liberal, which I am not, etc.

Anyone can discuss in such a manner.

There have been as I wrote over 50 studies on this topic from all over the world.  That is the topic of uranium.

The US air force itself admits that it likely causes increase cancer rates.

To think that anything written here remotely questions these diverse judgments is abusrd.

I was hoping this site was fact based.  It is not.

Falsely calling me a liberal is a pathetic attempt at refuting over 50 studies and the conclsuions of the US gob.

Just throwing out your "50 studies" does not give us facts.  If you give us hard facts..... maybe you will receive the debate you say you want.

We ARE a fact based group here!

Quote from: taxed on May 13, 2015, 04:50:24 PM


You can get a lib to believe anything.  Just tell them it's peer reviewed!!!

Brian Williams used to do a lot of stories on new research. Look where that got him.....

It cracks me up that college people believe that they can learn facts from people with no actual real-world experience --- the eau de essence of the United Nations, which is supported to the tune of about 25% of total operating costs at U.S. expense and comprises the largest above-ground waste repository in the United States.

Quote from: steve folkster on May 13, 2015, 01:50:55 PM
This a compilation of 50 Peer reviewed journals the conclusion of which is the more time we have to study uranium the more likely it causes defects and cancer.


To take the first dozen in alphabetical order is a complete misunderstanding of analysis in my view.


But if you feel you are smarter then all of these researchers, etc, that's fine by me.  The truth is not really debated anymore.

It was initially in the late 90s.  But as time went on and more research became available a consensus has formed.  The US and British government continue to block new reports the leaks of which show statically signifant data linking cancer to uranium.

Pro military industrial complex big government sites, like reason.com, even say you're wrong:
http://reason.com/archives/2003/03/26/nuclear-genocide

Quote from: Solar on May 14, 2015, 06:31:34 AM
your links were a total failure! You were asked to backup your assertions about "Depleted Uranium" KEYWORD, DEPLETED!!!!
And all you provided was evidence that uranium causes cancer related disease, which is a no brainer!
YES... we all know uranium causes a myriad of diseases, which is why I stated your links were an insult to our intellect.