Quote from: Cadescove on July 27, 2018, 03:49:50 AM
Says the one who links noted racist Hal Turner and then runs away from it.
http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/political-discussion-and-debate/putin-gives-trump-160-terabytes-of-communication-intercepts/msg362366/#msg362366

Tsk, tsk.
Wow, that tinfoil hat thread died an ignominious death quickly. 

OK, where did I supposedly run away? It was you that made the topic about race, and that should concern you.
When all you focus on is the issue of race while completely discounting what someone has to say, this is the earmark of a racist.
Here you are again with Walter, taking a piece of historical knowledge and focusing on one element, race, so again, you wear your brand proudly, never once considering the knowledge being imparted.

How can I get it through your fucking head, no one gives a shit about race, it's essentially a Leftist construct, now a tool of the left and your constant attention to it exposes you for two things, a racist as well as a brainwashed leftist tool, a useful Idiot, f you will.

Can you not see that you have been programmed like Pavlov's dogs to react to anything perceived racist, even from an anthropological POV, are you really such a Leftist follower, that you're willing to further the divide our culture?
I feel sorry for you, having to go through life wearing the prism of a racist and never seeing people for their character and actions, because if you used character as your measure, you'd see the left for what they truly are. They've made you feel inferior and jealous, rather than accept who you are and be proud of yourself and quit viewing yourself as a victim.
I hope to God one day you wake up from the Koolaide hangover and see the truth.

Racism is a leftist construct?


Historical knowledge? Darkies?

You didn't defend Hal Turner, is it because it's indefensible?

You are a very strange individual.

Quote from: Cadescove on July 27, 2018, 06:41:42 AM
Racism is a leftist construct?


Historical knowledge? Darkies?

You didn't defend Hal Turner, is it because it's indefensible?

You are a very strange individual.

What you perceive as yesteryear racism, was not viewed in the same pretext it is today, just because someone would describe someones facial features and compare them to a monkey, was not necessarily racist, merely a true comparison. Are you trying to deny reality now?
This is what the left has created, a bunch of browbeaten kids dissuaded from speaking the truth.
Much could be compared in other races such as the Mongols, but doing so is merely an observation of physical traits. If history had used your constraints when observing homo-sapiens, science would be in perpetuity, the dark ages.

As to Turner, II only care about his sources, it is you that use leftist commie propaganda to destroy the messenger.
Did you even read through the Wiki post and its sources? it reads like an Al Sharpton donor list!
I truly feel sorry for you resorting to using a known Marxist site like the Southern Poverty Leftist Center as your guide. Kiiiid, wake the fuck up and learn about these groups and just how unamerican they are.

Quote
Cuvier thought the Caucasian skull was the most beautifully shaped. He divided humanity into three races: white, yellow and black, and rated each for the beauty or ugliness of the skull and quality of their civilizations. According to Cuvier, a European, the White race was at the top, and the black race was at the bottom.

Cuvier wrote about Caucasians (Europeans):

The white race, with oval face, straight hair and nose, to which the civilised people of Europe belong and which appear to us the most beautiful of all, is also superior to others by its genius, courage and activity.

Regarding Negros, Cuvier wrote:

The Negro race... is marked by black complexion, crisped of woolly hair, compressed cranium and a flat nose, The projection of the lower parts of the face, and the thick lips, evidently approximate it to the monkey tribe: the hordes of which it consists have always remained in the most complete state of barbarism.

That's the very definition of racism, woody you can't see that.

Quote from: Cadescove on July 27, 2018, 07:06:09 AM
Quote
Cuvier thought the Caucasian skull was the most beautifully shaped. He divided humanity into three races: white, yellow and black, and rated each for the beauty or ugliness of the skull and quality of their civilizations. According to Cuvier, a European, the White race was at the top, and the black race was at the bottom.

Cuvier wrote about Caucasians (Europeans):

The white race, with oval face, straight hair and nose, to which the civilised people of Europe belong and which appear to us the most beautiful of all, is also superior to others by its genius, courage and activity.

Regarding Negros, Cuvier wrote:

The Negro race... is marked by black complexion, crisped of woolly hair, compressed cranium and a flat nose, The projection of the lower parts of the face, and the thick lips, evidently approximate it to the monkey tribe: the hordes of which it consists have always remained in the most complete state of barbarism.

That's the very definition of racism, woody you can't see that.

This is exactly my point! It is morons like you that want to burn books because it disrupts your sensitivities and view of right and wrong.
You learn from the past, but to view it in the context of our current repressive and regressive backward culture is destructively paralyzing.

Do you not see what the left is doing by creating a bunch of snowflakes such as yourself, in how you see yourself as a victim?

Quote from: Cadescove on July 27, 2018, 07:06:09 AM
Quote
Cuvier thought the Caucasian skull was the most beautifully shaped. He divided humanity into three races: white, yellow and black, and rated each for the beauty or ugliness of the skull and quality of their civilizations. According to Cuvier, a European, the White race was at the top, and the black race was at the bottom.

Cuvier wrote about Caucasians (Europeans):

The white race, with oval face, straight hair and nose, to which the civilised people of Europe belong and which appear to us the most beautiful of all, is also superior to others by its genius, courage and activity.

Regarding Negros, Cuvier wrote:

The Negro race... is marked by black complexion, crisped of woolly hair, compressed cranium and a flat nose, The projection of the lower parts of the face, and the thick lips, evidently approximate it to the monkey tribe: the hordes of which it consists have always remained in the most complete state of barbarism.

That's the very definition of racism, woody you can't see that.

It's not racism to observe physical characteristics, and prefer some over others.

The textbook definition of racism always was "to claim the superiority of one race over another".  I guess to be extrapolated out to insults for one, or celebrations of another.

But certainly not "have an opinion that I don't like".

It's like LGBT.  "Homophobe" is a stupid malaprop.  Nobody's afraid of a mincing, wincing, prancing fool.  Or anybody who doesn't act like that and just lives their life with some dignity and privacy.

Islamophobe also.  The only islamists that anyone fears are the assholes who strap C4 to themselves to blow up scores of innocent people.

All the "phobes" and "ists" have boiled down to one thing for whiny little leftists -

"racism = everything and everybody who won't agree with me, really anybody who won't praise everything I say".

What a piss poor way to go through life. And it IS the whole democrat, leftist, liberal, progressive community now.

As a matter of fact they've amped it up in the last year - "everybody who won't praise me is LITERALLY  HITLER and NAZIIIIIII !!!"

Supremely childish.  A whole segment of America.  What a filthy shame.

Quote from: Cadescove on July 27, 2018, 06:41:42 AM
Racism is a leftist construct?


Historical knowledge? Darkies?

You didn't defend Hal Turner, is it because it's indefensible?

You are a very strange individual.

Yep.  Racism was invented by the left in the assumption that black people and other minorities should be owned by democrats, and taken care of in a subservient, incompetent existence.

Starting with slavery and Jim Crow, democrat inventions and strongholds, extending all the way to today where non-democrat blacks are called "Uncle Toms" ..... brazenly, in public, to their faces, by democrats.  I read black liberals using this term everywhere on the internet, and they're proud to sling it at conservative or GOP African Americans.  See it real time on TV news and radio as well.  They are proud to say it.

The GOP was literally created to snatch slavery from democrats, and today that translates to snatching away from democrats, their destruction of the black community in Chicago, Detroit, LA, Oakland, MD, NYC, STL, Ferguson, and many others.  All for their votes.

Hal Turner and dumbass terms for black people ?  I have no use for them.  But neither absolve democrats for their ~175 years of racism.

There are no doubt some racists stumbling around out there on the right.  But they don't have a whole community and political party dedicated to racism.

Quote from: AndyJackson on July 27, 2018, 08:51:06 AM
Yep.  Racism was invented by the left in the assumption that black people and other minorities should be owned by democrats, and taken care of in a subservient, incompetent existence.

Starting with slavery and Jim Crow, democrat inventions and strongholds, extending all the way to today where non-democrat blacks are called "Uncle Toms" ..... brazenly, in public, to their faces, by democrats.  I read black liberals using this term everywhere on the internet, and they're proud to sling it at conservative or GOP African Americans.  See it real time on TV news and radio as well.  They are proud to say it.

The GOP was literally created to snatch slavery from democrats, and today that translates to snatching away from democrats, their destruction of the black community in Chicago, Detroit, LA, Oakland, MD, NYC, STL, Ferguson, and many others.  All for their votes.

Hal Turner and dumbass terms for black people ?  I have no use for them.  But neither absolve democrats for their ~175 years of racism.

There are no doubt some racists stumbling around out there on the right.  But they don't have a whole community and political party dedicated to racism.

We also have white people that think and feel they are better than other white people.  All you have to do is look at Hillary and Bill Clinton,  Comey and Strzok along with over half of congress. 

Jax,
Your comment that "it is not racism to observe physical characteristics";
is the core definition of anthropology and remains beyond obvious.
That is what Couvier did in defining racial groups, recognizing both the
shared characteristics among Men as well as their distinct and unique
physical and social differences.
An anecdote about the name (not the it means squat).
The family came from a Swiss Province where the original spelling was Cuvier.
Decades later, the Province was absorbed by France and the spelling shifted
to Couvier.
For a moment I thought the spelling crank that Walks chased out the door,
was back again.