Looking for conservative clarification

Started by EHMakeup, January 20, 2013, 04:37:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Stranger

Quote from: Capt.Obvious on January 22, 2013, 02:43:39 AM
And back in the day, you could own a naval warship.  Bazooka's, atom bombs, chemical weapons, all regulated out of the hands of the average citizen. 

Why not continue with more sensible regulation, like limiting personal firearms to bolt action rifles for hunting?  Just a thought.
The 2nd amendment never was and still isn't about hunting. Another liberal talking point from MM 101.
"Every man is like the company he keeps."
"Show me your friends and I'll show you your Future"

Capt.Obvious

Quote from: The Stranger on January 22, 2013, 12:56:17 PM
The 2nd amendment never was and still isn't about hunting. Another liberal talking point from MM 101.

Yea yea, it's about protecting the average citizen from tyranny.  My question is, who's going to protect me from the average citizen?

When the Founders wrote the 2nd, they lived in the time of muskets, that could take between 30 seconds to a minute to reload. They could not imagine guns that could fire 30 rounds in a few seconds.


taxed

Quote from: Capt.Obvious on January 22, 2013, 01:06:12 PM
Yea yea, it's about protecting the average citizen from tyranny.  My question is, who's going to protect me from the average citizen?
Be a man and protect yourself.  You can't have your ass wiped for you your entire life.

#PureBlood #TrumpWon

AndyJackson

The data and actual outcomes prove, time and time again, that the fewer gun laws and greater prevalence of legally owned weapons leads to less crime and gun violence / accidennts.

This is not a contest of beliefs, it's fact and figures.

But the liberals still squall "wild west all over again, shootouts everywhere, rivers of blood running in the street".

It never comes true, just the opposite always happens, yet the liberals will repeat the same falsehoods for the 947th time next time they get scared of some new legislation that they don't like.

Being childish and a liar never felt good for me.  But I guess it's mama's milk for the liberal.

AndyJackson

There is no gun that a joe schmoe can own, that fires 30 rounds in a few seconds.

More liberal dishonesty.

You can buy a gun legally, with the right background check, that can fire one round in one second for one trigger pull.  And for joe schmoe, most will miss their mark.

If joe schmoe lives in a crap hole like DET, CHI, CA, NJ, NO, NYC, LA, etc.......he really ought to have at least 15 rounds at his disposal.

Capt.Obvious

Quote from: taxed on January 22, 2013, 01:07:17 PM
Be a man and protect yourself.  You can't have your ass wiped for you your entire life.

I am protecting my self, I'm fighting to regulate firearms and make my life safer.

taxed

Quote from: Capt.Obvious on January 22, 2013, 01:20:05 PM
I am protecting my self, I'm fighting to regulate firearms and make my life safer.

No you're not.  More guns = less crime.  It's pretty simple.
#PureBlood #TrumpWon

Capt.Obvious

Quote from: AndyJackson on January 22, 2013, 01:17:40 PM
There is no gun that a joe schmoe can own, that fires 30 rounds in a few seconds.

More liberal dishonesty.

You can buy a gun legally, with the right background check, that can fire one round in one second for one trigger pull.  And for joe schmoe, most will miss their mark.

If joe schmoe lives in a crap hole like DET, CHI, CA, NJ, NO, NYC, LA, etc.......he really ought to have at least 15 rounds at his disposal.

See GAT triggers by Black Warrior.

Rapid Fire demo using Gat trigger

AndyJackson

lol, even I couldn't have expected he or she to blurt out what I just insulted them for.....as if on cue.

Mind blowing.

But I hate to act like I'm picking on poor old Capt.

It's all of them, like a completely rampant plague.

AndyJackson

Quote from: Capt.Obvious on January 22, 2013, 01:22:41 PM
See GAT triggers by Black Warrior.

Rapid Fire demo using Gat trigger

Whatever a GAT trigger is, it's not owned by joe schmoe.

I've heard of some gadget that can somehow cause a 3-round burst, but that's still illegal if it needs any kind of alteration or improper operation of the weapon.

Also of some weird use of one's fingers to do something similar.  Sorry, we can't do anything about people's weird use of their fingers, nor can we call it a standard threat to society.

Can you explain whatever your point is for us  ?  Just a simple explanation of what you're claiming.

Capt.Obvious

Quote from: AndyJackson on January 22, 2013, 01:23:32 PM
lol, even I couldn't have expected he or she to blurt out what I just insulted them for.....as if on cue.

Mind blowing.

But I hate to act like I'm picking on poor old Capt.

It's all of them, like a completely rampant plague.

You are so easy to entertain.  It's called satire, google it.

AndyJackson

No, it's not.

It's called a pathological inability to tell the truth, which is why it's so prevalent in liberal rants and tangents.

And always followed up by "ooooohhhhh, hahaha, I was joking !"......whenever you're called on it.

We've all seen it 1000 times on the internet.  You're not bringing anything new.

It's YOU that's on here fighting tooth and nail trying to prove something to somebody.

It's ME / WE that are having fun with it.

Just not feeling the satire, humor, sarcasm, irony, and so on.  It's just not there.

AndyJackson

Oh, and I always liked this one too -

"You are so easy to entertain."

A cute little variant of "I'm so smart and you're so dumb".

Loosely related to "Oh I made you so mad, bwahahaha".

These little self-satisfying, self-justifying quips are REALLY old, Capt. my friend.

Don't make the embarrassing mistake of thinking that you're rolling out nifty, fresh, snarky awesomeness.

Everybody here has seen this stuff ad nauseum, everywhere.

Capt.Obvious

Quote from: AndyJackson on January 22, 2013, 01:37:19 PM
No, it's not.

It's called a pathological inability to tell the truth, which is why it's so prevalent in liberal rants and tangents.

And always followed up by "ooooohhhhh, hahaha, I was joking !"......whenever you're called on it.

We've all seen it 1000 times on the internet.  You're not bringing anything new.

It's YOU that's on here fighting tooth and nail trying to prove something to somebody.

It's ME / WE that are having fun with it.

Just not feeling the satire, humor, sarcasm, irony, and so on.  It's just not there.

There's no deception, I really do want a safer society.  I just phrased it in such a way as to caricature your view of the stereotypical liberal.

In other words, your post is disregarded as more vitriol and unproductive. It's a nice way of dismissing your comment.


AndyJackson

Caricature of the stereotypical liberal.

Just wow.    That would be you, the stereotypical liberall.

Are you the guy / gal on the other PF that's always anti-gun, but claims to be a big hunter and posts his/her birds taken  ?

The "I'm not a liberal" bugeyed liberal.  An internet classic.

Sometimes expanded on as "I was a hardcore conservative for 40 years, but because of Bush I must support Obama".