Kyle Rittenhouse FINALLY Released on $2 Million Cash Bond

Started by Solar, November 20, 2020, 02:15:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Killer Clouds

Quote from: Solar on November 21, 2020, 10:49:16 AM
He's too emotional to grasp the simple concept he's arguing against his own Rights granted by God, not men.
And you're too emotional to face the facts. I'm not arguing rights, I'm stating the law. You're the one screaming at the sky with your lib/RINO BS. I didn't know that Scania was a liberal but apparently he was.

Solar

Quote from: Killer Clouds on November 21, 2020, 10:25:24 AM
The fact is Rittenhouse broke the law sky screamer. He's a fucking criminal that you think is a hero somehow. The bipartisan laws that are in place have nothing to do with RINOs or liberals. You said you want more criminals like him running the streets. Scream a little louder because the sky isn't listening.
Jesus Christ, pull that stick out of your ass and take a dep breath, you're about to blow a gasket.

"The bipartisan laws that are in place have nothing to do with RINOs or liberals."

What are you, 12 years old? Both party's were taken over by leftists decades ago, there is no such animal as bipartisan, everything they do advances a leftist agenda!
You've been here how long and you haven't learned that yet? The fact that they've whittled away at your Rights doesn't set off alarm bells in your head?
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Killer Clouds

Quote from: Solar on November 21, 2020, 10:55:03 AM
Jesus Christ, pull that stick out of your ass and take a dep breath, you're about to blow a gasket.

"The bipartisan laws that are in place have nothing to do with RINOs or liberals."

What are you, 12 years old? Both party's were taken over by leftists decades ago, there is no such animal as bipartisan, everything they do advances a leftist agenda!
You've been here how long and you haven't learned that yet? The fact that they've whittled away at your Rights doesn't set off alarm bells in your head?
Face the facts sky screamer. The law was broken. Are you saying Scalia was a liberal? The GCA of 1934 and every gun control law since then says you're wrong. Rittenhouse is a minor, an unconvicted felon and will be a prisoner. He is criminal garbage.

Sick Of Silence

Quote from: Killer Clouds on November 21, 2020, 10:54:04 AM
And you're too emotional to face the facts. I'm not arguing rights, I'm stating the law. You're the one screaming at the sky with your lib/RINO BS. I didn't know that Scania was a liberal but apparently he was.

Were the laws unConstitutional to begin with?
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

Solar

Quote from: Killer Clouds on November 21, 2020, 10:54:04 AM
And you're too emotional to face the facts. I'm not arguing rights, I'm stating the law. You're the one screaming at the sky with your lib/RINO BS. I didn't know that Scania was a liberal but apparently he was.
No son, you're the only one here breaking your action figures and kicking the dog, the rest of us are actually laughing at your temper tantrum. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Killer Clouds

Quote from: Solar on November 21, 2020, 11:01:17 AM
No son, you're the only one here breaking your action figures and kicking the dog, the rest of us are actually laughing at your temper tantrum. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Not so child. You're the one screaming at the sky like the crazy libs you say you despise. You can't face the indisputable facts. Rittenhouse house committed felonies BEFORE he went to the riot by his own admissions.

Owebo

Quote from: Killer Clouds on November 21, 2020, 10:59:57 AM
Face the facts sky screamer. The law was broken. Are you saying Scalia was a liberal? The GCA of 1934 and every gun control law since then says you're wrong. Rittenhouse is a minor, an unconvicted felon and will be a prisoner. He is criminal garbage.

What laws?

Owebo

Quote from: Killer Clouds on November 21, 2020, 11:07:40 AM
Not so child. You're the one screaming at the sky like the crazy libs you say you despise. You can't face the indisputable facts. Rittenhouse house committed felonies BEFORE he went to the riot by his own admissions.

What felonies?

Solar

Quote from: Killer Clouds on November 21, 2020, 11:07:40 AM
Not so child. You're the one screaming at the sky like the crazy libs you say you despise. You can't face the indisputable facts. Rittenhouse house committed felonies BEFORE he went to the riot by his own admissions.
OK, tell us when these laws went into effect and why. I'll show you a leftist agenda!

I'd say take a chill pill, but you'd probably hyperventilate and choke on it. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Killer Clouds

Quote from: Solar on November 21, 2020, 11:21:46 AM
OK, tell us when these laws went into effect and why. I'll show you a leftist agenda!

I'd say take a chill pill, but you'd probably hyperventilate and choke on it. :lol: :lol: :lol:
You can't prove that I'm wrong. Do you think Scalia was a liberal? Did Scalia had a liberal agenda? Your 2nd amendment argue doesn't fly.  Go back to yelling at the sky.

Possum

Quote from: tiny1 on November 21, 2020, 09:32:33 AM
He's yakking about underage possession of a firearm.  It belonged to a friend, and he's only 17 at the time.   Misdemeanor.
I think there was a jaywalking in there too.

Owebo

Quote from: Killer Clouds on November 21, 2020, 11:26:56 AM
You can't prove that I'm wrong. Do you think Scalia was a liberal? Did Scalia had a liberal agenda? Your 2nd amendment argue doesn't fly.  Go back to yelling at the sky.

Which right in the 2A doesn't fly?

Killer Clouds

Quote from: Owebo on November 21, 2020, 11:42:22 AM
Which right in the 2A doesn't fly?
There are many laws that restrict where and who can legally possess a firearm and who is prohibited from having a firearearm Rittenhouse did not legally possess the firearm he had. 2nd amendment has nothing to do with it. Rittenhouse is a criminal.

BayouCountry

Quote from: Killer Clouds on November 21, 2020, 12:27:06 PM
There are many laws that restrict where and who can legally possess a firearm and who is prohibited from having a firearearm Rittenhouse did not legally possess the firearm he had. 2nd amendment has nothing to do with it. Rittenhouse is a criminal.

No, he is not a criminal until he is convicted of a crime.  The 2nd Amendment doesn't mention an age limit.  The constitution is the law of the land, not state gun laws.  Calling Rittenhouse a criminal is slander considering the possibility that his right to bear arms could go to the Supreme Court and he could be found to be within his rights to carry a gun. He would most likely lose on precedent.

I hope you have the same opinion that illegal aliens are criminals.  That is federal law.

I hope the kid gets off if the facts show he was attacked and defended himself.  That's up to a jury to decide.  The state can then bring up their case that he illegally acquired the firearm.  Again, that will be up to a jury to decide if he is a "criminal."

Killer Clouds

Quote from: BayouCountry on November 21, 2020, 01:56:16 PM
No, he is not a criminal until he is convicted of a crime.  The 2nd Amendment doesn't mention an age limit.  The constitution is the law of the land, not state gun laws.  Calling Rittenhouse a criminal is slander considering the possibility that his right to bear arms could go to the Supreme Court and he could be found to be within his rights to carry a gun. He would most likely lose on precedent.

I hope you have the same opinion that illegal aliens are criminals.  That is federal law.

I hope the kid gets off if the facts show he was attacked and defended himself.  That's up to a jury to decide.  The state can then bring up their case that he illegally acquired the firearm.  Again, that will be up to a jury to decide if he is a "criminal."
Yes border jumpers are criminals. You don't have to be convicted of anything to be called a criminal. Rittenhouse is a criminal because he broke firearms laws. I have never once argued that be should be charged with anything other than his felony firearms crimes.  The argument might possibly made is that he knew there was going to be trouble because he felt he needed to carry an illegal firearm to protect himself and shouldn't have been there in the first place. He had no right to have the firearm he used to kill 2 people and injure 1. Don't get me wrong when I make that statement. The 2 that got killed deserved what they got. The 1 that got injured deserved to be killed. Rittenhouse broke firearm laws that the Supreme Court have already determined to be constitutional. The Supreme Court has already determined that restrictions on the 2nd amendment are constitutional.  Any rights under the 2nd amendment do not apply to Rittenhouse according to existing state and federal laws. Rittenhouse and his  parents and his accomplice accomplice will possibly be held civilly liable.

Criminal

1: one who has committed a crime

2: a person who has been convicted of a crime