Author Topic: Jack Dorsey Admits Twitter "Unfairly" Shadow-banning 600,000+ Conservatives  (Read 208 times)

Offline Counter Globalist

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Using the Globalists' own tactics against them.
What does everyone think of this dbag? Twitter exec says they weren't shadow-banning anyone but it's been fixed... How do you fix what isn't broken?
« Last Edit: September 06, 2018, 03:15:04 PM by admin »
Never forget the power of sharing. That's why they shadowban us.

Offline Solar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 62959
  • Gender: Male
Re: Jack Dorsey Admits Twitter "Unfairly" Shadow-banning 600,000+ Conservatives
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2018, 03:14:13 PM »
Ya know, only members in good standing are afforded the privilege of plugging their sites.
How about you join the discussion first, become a contributing member of the forum, and then we'll see about boosting your site, K?
#WWG1WGA

Offline Counter Globalist

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Using the Globalists' own tactics against them.
Re: Jack Dorsey Admits Twitter "Unfairly" Shadow-banning 600,000+ Conservatives
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2018, 06:47:03 PM »
I already get plenty of traffic to my site. I was trying to ADD TO THE DISCUSSION by spreading a damn article I WROTE (not plugging my site). Sorry I bothered you I won't again. I am not a fan of censorship. You removed my link and I'll kindly remove myself to a community that doesn't feel the need to suppress information. Trying to force people to become an accepted member of a community before showing their hand is a stupid move.  :thumbdown:

In fact, if posting my content and asking for feedback is not participating in the community what is?
Never forget the power of sharing. That's why they shadowban us.

Offline Solar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 62959
  • Gender: Male
Re: Jack Dorsey Admits Twitter "Unfairly" Shadow-banning 600,000+ Conservatives
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2018, 08:00:07 PM »
I already get plenty of traffic to my site. I was trying to ADD TO THE DISCUSSION by spreading a damn article I WROTE (not plugging my site). Sorry I bothered you I won't again. I am not a fan of censorship. You removed my link and I'll kindly remove myself to a community that doesn't feel the need to suppress information. Trying to force people to become an accepted member of a community before showing their hand is a stupid move.  :thumbdown:

In fact, if posting my content and asking for feedback is not participating in the community what is?
Lose the attitude and check the PM in your profile.
#WWG1WGA

Offline The Boo Man...

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17871
  • Gender: Male
  • I shall play you the song of my people
Re: Jack Dorsey Admits Twitter "Unfairly" Shadow-banning 600,000+ Conservatives
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2018, 08:51:37 PM »
I'm fine with this. Twitter is quickly becoming a liberal wasteland and alternatives are popping up (One of the reasons the left hate the free market). They are killing themselves. I'm not going to stand in their way.


Offline Solar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 62959
  • Gender: Male
Re: Jack Dorsey Admits Twitter "Unfairly" Shadow-banning 600,000+ Conservatives
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2018, 09:03:10 PM »
I'm fine with this. Twitter is quickly becoming a liberal wasteland and alternatives are popping up (One of the reasons the left hate the free market). They are killing themselves. I'm not going to stand in their way.
Agree. The internet as we know it will not be the same in a decade, 5 years, next year, things change overnight, tech advances and the left does not control the narrative.
Remember Myspace, AOL, Netscape? At one time they ran things too. There is one thing all of this has in common, they cannot control the narrative, which is why the left went to war against Ajit Pai over net neutrality, a serious misnomer if there ever was one.
#WWG1WGA

 

Powered by EzPortal