Conservative Political Forum

General Category => Political Discussion and Debate => Topic started by: joesixpack on June 02, 2020, 09:27:15 PM

Title: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: joesixpack on June 02, 2020, 09:27:15 PM
https://twitter.com/bentaub91/status/1267840280214069248?s=09


If so, what would the penalty be for the officers?
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Sick Of Silence on June 02, 2020, 09:54:34 PM
What about my rights? What about my rights that were trampled on by these agitators who are having fake outrage over someone they don't truly know. If they did, they would know he is a bad person for what he did.

I didn't arrest him. I don't live in that state. I don't live in that city. I don't even live in a big city. Why should I be disturbed at midnight in my residential area and be worried that the terrorist Antifa or black thugs are going to riot, loot, and attack fellow residents.

Peaceful protestors don't do that. Peaceful protestors don't test the cops after given an order.
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Solar on June 03, 2020, 05:03:56 AM
So a bunch of protesters still whining, still causing police around the nation after a week of rioting and murder, I'm supposed to show sympathy for?
Fuck you and this entire movement, they had their chance, and they totally fucked it up. Move on!
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Bronx on June 03, 2020, 05:06:31 AM
Quote from: joesixpack on June 02, 2020, 09:27:15 PM
https://twitter.com/bentaub91/status/1267840280214069248?s=09


If so, what would the penalty be for the officers?

Nothing...remember the two 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judges Jacqueline Nguyen and Barry Silverman, Nguyen is an Obama appointee and Silverman, a Clinton appointee suspended the Bill of Rights.

And guess what the 1st Amendment falls under the BIll of Rights............... :thumbsup:

Now if you think these Judges are dead wrong then whatever happens to these police officers should happen to these two 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judges Jacqueline Nguyen and Barry Silverman................. :thumbsup:

If you agree with these two judges then your 1st Amendment is out the window and you have sit to say........... :thumbsup:

Joe One Can.......your silence on these two liberal judges suspending the Bill of Rights is deafening.

What say you............... :confused:

http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/political-discussion-and-debate/obama-clinton-9th-circuit-judges-suspend-bill-of-rights-until-coronavirus-is-cu/msg410764/#msg410764
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: joesixpack on June 03, 2020, 06:16:46 AM
Quote from: Bronx on June 03, 2020, 05:06:31 AM
Nothing...remember the two 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judges Jacqueline Nguyen and Barry Silverman, Nguyen is an Obama appointee and Silverman, a Clinton appointee suspended the Bill of Rights.

And guess what the 1st Amendment falls under the BIll of Rights............... :thumbsup:

Now if you think these Judges are dead wrong then whatever happens to these police officers should happen to these two 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judges Jacqueline Nguyen and Barry Silverman................. :thumbsup:

If you agree with these two judges then your 1st Amendment is out the window and you have sit to say........... :thumbsup:

Joe One Can.......your silence on these two liberal judges suspending the Bill of Rights is deafening.

What say you............... :confused:

http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/political-discussion-and-debate/obama-clinton-9th-circuit-judges-suspend-bill-of-rights-until-coronavirus-is-cu/msg410764/#msg410764

So, essentially what you're saying is that since you think those judges were wrong, that the police are also wrong.

I guess someone can appeal their decision or try to get them impeached.

What would the penalty be for the officers? False arrest, I suppose? Getting fired, maybe?
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Solar on June 03, 2020, 06:35:07 AM
Quote from: joesixpack on June 03, 2020, 06:16:46 AM
So, essentially what you're saying is that since you think those judges were wrong, that the police are also wrong.

I guess someone can appeal their decision or try to get them impeached.

What would the penalty be for the officers? False arrest, I suppose? Getting fired, maybe?
You're a fool! You have no idea the context in which this occurred, all you see is a bunch of Snowflakes whining on the eighth day of rioting.
Maybe, just maybe the little Marxists had a warrant and one of the cops recognized his worthless ass, maybe they brought him over to five him cake and a milk to settle him down.

Point is, you suckered for an edited video, Fool!
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Bronx on June 03, 2020, 06:55:02 AM
Quote from: joesixpack on June 03, 2020, 06:16:46 AM
So, essentially what you're saying is that since you think those judges were wrong, that the police are also wrong.

I guess someone can appeal their decision or try to get them impeached.

What would the penalty be for the officers? False arrest, I suppose? Getting fired, maybe?

Joe One Can...you read my response and it's very clear where I stand. I wanna know where you stand since this is your thread.

Now if you want my opinion...well here it goes. Once a "peaceful" protest turns violent and a police officer or someone defending their property is murdered the label of "peaceful" is out of the question and I would take every word spoken from there on as a life threatening situation, therefore, I would arrest anyone that even looked at me wrong.

Always remember Joe One Can............You sleep peacefully at night because there are a few tough men prepared to do violence on their behalf.

You should be on your knees saying thank you to them arresting officers.
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Sick Of Silence on June 03, 2020, 07:26:36 AM
Quote from: Bronx on June 03, 2020, 06:55:02 AM
QuoteJoe One Can...you read my response and it's very clear where I stand. I wanna know where you stand since this is your thread.

Now if you want my opinion...well here it goes. Once a "peaceful" protest turns violent and a police officer or someone defending their property is murdered the label of "peaceful" is out of the question and I would take every word spoken from there on as a life threatening situation, therefore, I would arrest anyone that even looked at me wrong.

Always remember Joe One Can............You sleep peacefully at night because there are a few tough men prepared to do violence on their behalf.

You should be on your knees saying thank you to them arresting officers.

I want an answer as well. What about my rights?
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: joesixpack on June 03, 2020, 08:31:15 AM
Quote from: Bronx on June 03, 2020, 06:55:02 AM
Joe One Can...you read my response and it's very clear where I stand. I wanna know where you stand since this is your thread.

Now if you want my opinion...well here it goes. Once a "peaceful" protest turns violent and a police officer or someone defending their property is murdered the label of "peaceful" is out of the question and I would take every word spoken from there on as a life threatening situation, therefore, I would arrest anyone that even looked at me wrong.

Always remember Joe One Can............You sleep peacefully at night because there are a few tough men prepared to do violence on their behalf.

You should be on your knees saying thank you to them arresting officers.

I'm of the opinion that the officers acted inappropriately and possibly illegally
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: joesixpack on June 03, 2020, 08:32:02 AM
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on June 03, 2020, 07:26:36 AM
Now if you want my opinion...well here it goes. Once a "peaceful" protest turns violent and a police officer or someone defending their property is murdered the label of "peaceful" is out of the question and I would take every word spoken from there on as a life threatening situation, therefore, I would arrest anyone that even looked at me wrong.

Always remember Joe One Can............You sleep peacefully at night because there are a few tough men prepared to do violence on their behalf.

You should be on your knees saying thank you to them arresting officers.


I want an answer as well. What about my rights?

If you're an American citizen we have the same rights, my friend
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Solar on June 03, 2020, 08:35:53 AM
Quote from: joesixpack on June 03, 2020, 08:31:15 AM
I'm of the opinion that the officers acted inappropriately and possibly illegally
So you know more than what you saw in an edited video designed to create the illusion he was singled out for speaking?

Come on Joe, please tell me you aren't this gullible. How about you do a little research and see what he was actually detained for.

The last thing cops want it a civil rights lawsuit on their "Career Ending Hands".
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Bronx on June 03, 2020, 08:37:37 AM
Quote from: joesixpack on June 03, 2020, 08:31:15 AM
I'm of the opinion that the officers acted inappropriately and possibly illegally



Then you also believe the two 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judges Jacqueline Nguyen and Barry Silverman, Nguyen is an Obama appointee and Silverman, a Clinton appointee that suspended the Bill of Rights acted inappropriately and possibly illegally.

So why did you leave them out from your response and why are you ignoring these liberal judges acting illegally......?
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Billy's bayonet on June 03, 2020, 03:43:48 PM
Quote from: joesixpack on June 02, 2020, 09:27:15 PM
https://twitter.com/bentaub91/status/1267840280214069248?s=09


If so, what would the penalty be for the officers?

How do you know what he was arrested for?  All you have to go by is some likely redacted video by a bunch of obvious ANTIFA wanna be's.  Im surprised you fell for that one, I want to see what preceeded this arrest, and what the circumstances are from BOTH sides before I pass judgement, but I can tell you my support is NOT on the side of a bunch of self style "revolutioarny" punks wearing black who are out to exacerbate everything to make bad situations worse.
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Solar on June 03, 2020, 03:57:22 PM
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on June 03, 2020, 03:43:48 PM
How do you know what he was arrested for?  All you have to go by is some likely redacted video by a bunch of obvious ANTIFA wanna be's.  Im surprised you fell for that one, I want to see what preceeded this arrest, and what the circumstances are from BOTH sides before I pass judgement, but I can tell you my support is NOT on the side of a bunch of self style "revolutioarny" punks wearing black who are out to exacerbate everything to make bad situations worse.
He didn't fall for it, he is pushing an agenda.
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Calypso Jones on June 03, 2020, 04:34:35 PM
Regarding Chauvin kneeling on the neck of Floyd:

I don't think this is about race.  This is personal.   These two knew each other because they have worked in some capacity with each other...possibly in an illegal operation.

Can't wait for that connection to be revealed.   
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: Solar on June 03, 2020, 05:21:38 PM
Quote from: Calypso Jones on June 03, 2020, 04:34:35 PM
Regarding Chauvin kneeling on the neck of Floyd:

I don't think this is about race.  This is personal.   These two knew each other because they have worked in some capacity with each other...possibly in an illegal operation.

Can't wait for that connection to be revealed.
Please, do not derail topics. There are already a tn on that subject. This is about Joe claiming the First was just violated.
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: taxed on June 04, 2020, 01:14:07 AM
"Freedom of Speech!".  So now communists love the Constitution?  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: taxed on June 04, 2020, 01:15:52 AM
Quote from: joesixpack on June 02, 2020, 09:27:15 PM

If so, what would the penalty be for the officers?

I'm not sure it's legal to be intoxicated in public.
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: joesixpack on June 15, 2020, 05:46:58 PM
Quote from: Bronx on June 03, 2020, 08:37:37 AM


Then you also believe the two 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judges Jacqueline Nguyen and Barry Silverman, Nguyen is an Obama appointee and Silverman, a Clinton appointee that suspended the Bill of Rights acted inappropriately and possibly illegally.

So why did you leave them out from your response and why are you ignoring these liberal judges acting illegally......?

If you feel that strongly about it make a thread on the 9th Circuit. I don't think that a judge rendering a decision is against the law, I'm pretty sure that's what they're supposed to do
Title: Re: Is this not a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Post by: T Hunt on June 15, 2020, 07:35:23 PM
Quote from: joesixpack on June 02, 2020, 09:27:15 PM
https://twitter.com/bentaub91/status/1267840280214069248?s=09


If so, what would the penalty be for the officers?

What a moron this guy is. No, black people are not afraid. SOME black ppl who watch too much CNN are afraid of myths, but thats it.
Plus how do you know this guy didnt have some kind of warrent or isnt wanted for some other rioting or looting and the cops just realized it? Context is the key and the left loves to leave it out.