Jesus...really people?

We are going to bash each other over some being more pessimistic then others?


...or optimistic?

Hoofer, I PRAY your right. and MRC I pray your wrong...but it aint gonna effect the outcome what either of you post.

Do we have a purity of faith test that needs to be met here?

Quote from: Sauce on May 03, 2016, 02:00:53 PM
Jesus...really people?

We are going to bash each other over some being more pessimistic then others?


...or optimistic?

Hoofer, I PRAY your right. and MRC I pray your wrong...but it aint gonna effect the outcome what either of you post.

Do we have a purity of faith test that needs to be met here?

I think you have possibly misunderstood Hoofer's post. He was merely cautioning about relaying information that is dubious without checking the source. I agree. Mr. Conservative made a mistake in posting it, IMO, at least I would not have.

Hoofer's post was not bashing at all. He did not insult or denigrate the poster at all. How do you define "bashing" ???

Quote from: Sauce on May 03, 2016, 02:00:53 PM
Jesus...really people?

We are going to bash each other over some being more pessimistic then others?


...or optimistic?

Hoofer, I PRAY your right. and MRC I pray your wrong...but it aint gonna effect the outcome what either of you post.

Do we have a purity of faith test that needs to be met here?

The "test" is whether the Candidate supports and propose's a political agenda which is Constitutional.

That is the only test, we should be applying to our political candidates.

If the answer to whether they support Constitutional Government, is no, then guess what.

They aren't a Conservative. Pretty difficult to get much simpler than that.

Quote from: Sauce on May 03, 2016, 02:00:53 PM
Jesus...really people?

We are going to bash each other over some being more pessimistic then others?


...or optimistic?

Hoofer, I PRAY your right. and MRC I pray your wrong...but it aint gonna effect the outcome what either of you post.

Do we have a purity of faith test that needs to be met here?

Believe me, Hoofer's source is beyond solid, while Mr Con has been called out for this kind of bull shit many times.
Honestly, I wonder sometimes.

Quote from: daidalos on May 03, 2016, 02:24:46 PM
The "test" is whether the Candidate supports and propose's a political agenda which is Constitutional.

That is the only test, we should be applying to our political candidates.

If the answer to whether they support Constitutional Government, is no, then guess what.

They aren't a Conservative. Pretty difficult to get much simpler than that.

No argument, sieur! But then I guess it comes down to whether one really believes in the Buckley Rule (voting for the MOST CONSERVATIVE candidate who can win). In the case of candidate Trump, since he is a question mark, the rule would have to be amended to include "voting for the candidate with the lowest number of confirmed far-leftist rhetoric, proclivities, record and affiliations". 

Quote from: Solar on May 03, 2016, 02:32:35 PM
Believe me, Hoofer's source is beyond solid, while Mr Con has been called out for this kind of bull shit many times.
Honestly, I wonder sometimes.

Certainly not questioning hoof ers source, I totally dig his opinions and look forward to reading them.  But I don't think Mr c is some is some terrible double trump agent is all.


My apologies to alll for blowing it out of proportion  and any mis interpretation I may have made.

Guess the stress of this sent me over the edge. 

Quote from: Solar on May 03, 2016, 02:32:35 PM
Believe me, Hoofer's source is beyond solid, while Mr Con has been called out for this kind of bull shit many times.
Honestly, I wonder sometimes.

Sadly...  as of 5:45 est, Cruz is trailing by 5 points.   It ain't over, but it's not looking like either candidate is going to blow out the other.   I'll pass on what ever texts I get, these people aren't reporters.   Predicting the big wins is easy, the tight ones like this ... give them fits.

Quote from: Hoofer on May 03, 2016, 02:52:56 PM
Sadly...  as of 5:45 est, Cruz is trailing by 5 points.   It ain't over, but it's not looking like either candidate is going to blow out the other.   I'll pass on what ever texts I get, these people aren't reporters.   Predicting the big wins is easy, the tight ones like this ... give them fits.

Ehh, it's way early.

Quote from: Sauce on May 03, 2016, 02:45:34 PM
Certainly not questioning hoof ers source, I totally dig his opinions and look forward to reading them.  But I don't think Mr c is some is some terrible double trump agent is all.


My apologies to alll for blowing it out of proportion  and any mis interpretation I may have made.

Guess the stress of this sent me over the edge. 

Don't anyone sweat it - we all know what we want, Ted Cruz as POTUS.  That's what counts.  It's not over yet, even if IN falls to the Liberals.   I think we understand from the MSM blitz, "It's over, It's over, It's over" for the last 2 weeks, tryinig to sway voters to Trump and discourage Cruz voters, hoping they won't turn out to vote.   These are wild-card things, no pollster can factor, because it changes the dynamic so quickly - yup, some people actually believe everything the MSM says, many are just in denial - their attitudes betray them.   So, I don't watch TV.

Not too many years ago, this story was out about a network calling the POTUS, HOURS before the California polls had closed.  They interviewed people who said, "Why bother waiting in line to vote, when it's already been decided...?"   A good example of the MSM creating a story, making it an issue, and following up with another story about the issue they created - and milking that story for weeks by stirring up even more discontent.   Why SILLY ME!!!   Did I just describe the Trump campaign stragety?
Like Limbaugh says, "If they MAKE you, they know they can BREAK you." - I think that's another reason they like Donald and hate Ted Cruz.... he is a threat to the establishment, Government, Political party, and media.   One more reason he is the man we need in the WH.

Take heart, Ted Cruz is not going away, he's going to be with us, for a LONG time, this is just the first battle to be fought.

Hugh Hewitt Gave Trump 51 delegates out of Indiana and the math still didnt give Trump 1237.

Live returns.

http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/indiana

Quote from: Bowhntr on May 03, 2016, 03:12:34 PM
Hugh Hewitt Gave Trump 51 delegates out of Indiana and the math still didnt give Trump 1237.

6:30pm  Must be a time traveller or ?   Not even 50,000 votes have been counted, and the polls are still open...!?

CNN Calls it for Cheeto Face

Unless the rules get changed, its gonna be Trump V Hillary and 4 years of hell there after.

The polls just closed, Already fox is saying Trump wins Indiana. Wtf? Didn't they even bother with counting the votes?

Quote from: daidalos on May 03, 2016, 04:03:56 PM
The polls just closed, Already fox is saying Trump wins Indiana. Wtf? Didn't they even bother with counting the votes?

Apparently 13 percent of the votes have already been tabulated, and Trump is far ahead. He's going to win Indiana, as most people expected. The question is whether Cruz can narrow the gap before the night's end.