I don't believe Roy Moore accusations until I see hard evidence

Started by taxed, November 09, 2017, 12:50:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Solar

Quote from: walkstall on November 15, 2017, 12:07:41 PM
OH MY, the TP is dead again.  I will have to order 10.000 more Headstones for this year and next year.  What is it about shill that they have to keep killing off the TP just to make a point.  IF the TP is dead then why oh why is the RINO's working so damn hard to kill they off all the time.   You say the TP is dead, yet you post on a TP board.   IF the TP is dead WHY does it keep popping up in the MSM and Congress?   

Solar I will put in a new order for Headstones as I only have 300 left from the last 10.000 I order for this year.  :lol:
One giant monument with enough room to inscribe our death every day, from here till 2200.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

walkstall

Quote from: Solar on November 15, 2017, 01:29:40 PM
One giant monument with enough room to inscribe our death every day, from here till 2200.

:ohmy: I will check and see if they make one that big.  :lol:
A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation.- James Freeman Clarke

Always remember "Feelings Aren't Facts."

Solar

Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Possum

Quote from: walkstall on November 15, 2017, 12:07:41 PM
OH MY, the TP is dead again.  I will have to order 10.000 more Headstones for this year and next year.  What is it about shill that they have to keep killing off the TP just to make a point.  IF the TP is dead then why oh why is the RINO's working so damn hard to kill they off all the time.   You say the TP is dead, yet you post on a TP board.   IF the TP is dead WHY does it keep popping up in the MSM and Congress?   

Solar I will put in a new order for Headstones as I only have 300 left from the last 10.000 I order for this year.  :lol:
I know hindsight is 20/20, but I sure wish I would have invested in the headstone business. :lol:

Hell, some of these graves must have a dozen headstones by now.

Hoofer

Well... it couldn't have come sooner.   The case against Roy Moore is falling apart.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/15/moores-attorney-questions-whether-yearbook-signature-is-real/

read the article, it's short, but also missing a couple of curious points, beginning with the "77" written in a different style, and now it's being said the B/W photo of the year book is obscuring the two different colors of ink (ie., someone added something to the text, some time later).

I got a question the MSM is missing:  If someone tried to rape you, molest you or you knew was really an evil, perverse person - why would you allow that person to preside over your Divorce trial without raising a fit?  If it's someone you pushed away previously, wouldn't you at least ASK for a new Judge?   Maybe it was one of those "messy" divorces that required a Judge, like the guy was trying to get away from a gold-digging woman... she was trying to take-him-for-every-thing... who knows?   Just curious.

IMHO, this is right out of the Democrat playbook, doesn't matter if they're guilty of it, but, since Republicans try to set a higher standard, well... hell's bells!   Make them LIVE UP to it, and what better way to take down a moral man (we hope), then tag him with the worst set of "sins" possible - he's a sexual predator.   We've already seen video after video of a former VP groping CHILDREN, and he gets a pass?

But, the story is falling apart in less than a week, and the brave congress is passing legislation against sexual harassment - with the LOOMING problem of women in their midst sounding off about the promiscuity in elevators, congressional offices and even on the floor of the house...???   Should we call it the "Whore House of Representatives?"   What's more, Paul Ryan & Mitch McConnell the two leaders, probably *KNOW* who the perpetrators are (it's so bad, they passed a law against themselves!) - but are covering for the guilty parties!?

It's OK to go back 38-40 years and skewer a 70 year old man, who has a unabashed decades long record of pro-life, pro-marriage & family, with hearsay, but be completely SILENT when they stand in your halls of Congress today!?  Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell are co-conspirators in covering up sexual assaults.  Again, if the problem is so bad as to address it by passing a bill - start naming names, Paul & Mitch!  We have a right-to-know who these criminals are, and you better deal with them - 'cause the evidence you've got against Roy Moore is pretty flimsy, but you've got all you need right there in Congress!
All animals are created equal; Some just take longer to cook.   Survival is keeping an eye on those around you...

ldub23

Quote from: Hoofer on November 16, 2017, 05:37:52 AM
Well... it couldn't have come sooner.   The case against Roy Moore is falling apart.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/15/moores-attorney-questions-whether-yearbook-signature-is-real/

read the article, it's short, but also missing a couple of curious points, beginning with the "77" written in a different style, and now it's being said the B/W photo of the year book is obscuring the two different colors of ink (ie., someone added something to the text, some time later).

I got a question the MSM is missing:  If someone tried to rape you, molest you or you knew was really an evil, perverse person - why would you allow that person to preside over your Divorce trial without raising a fit?  If it's someone you pushed away previously, wouldn't you at least ASK for a new Judge?   Maybe it was one of those "messy" divorces that required a Judge, like the guy was trying to get away from a gold-digging woman... she was trying to take-him-for-every-thing... who knows?   Just curious.

IMHO, this is right out of the Democrat playbook, doesn't matter if they're guilty of it, but, since Republicans try to set a higher standard, well... hell's bells!   Make them LIVE UP to it, and what better way to take down a moral man (we hope), then tag him with the worst set of "sins" possible - he's a sexual predator.   We've already seen video after video of a former VP groping CHILDREN, and he gets a pass?

But, the story is falling apart in less than a week, and the brave congress is passing legislation against sexual harassment - with the LOOMING problem of women in their midst sounding off about the promiscuity in elevators, congressional offices and even on the floor of the house...???   Should we call it the "Whore House of Representatives?"   What's more, Paul Ryan & Mitch McConnell the two leaders, probably *KNOW* who the perpetrators are (it's so bad, they passed a law against themselves!) - but are covering for the guilty parties!?

It's OK to go back 38-40 years and skewer a 70 year old man, who has a unabashed decades long record of pro-life, pro-marriage & family, with hearsay, but be completely SILENT when they stand in your halls of Congress today!?  Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell are co-conspirators in covering up sexual assaults.  Again, if the problem is so bad as to address it by passing a bill - start naming names, Paul & Mitch!  We have a right-to-know who these criminals are, and you better deal with them - 'cause the evidence you've got against Roy Moore is pretty flimsy, but you've got all you need right there in Congress!

I wish just one reporter would ask Paul or Mitch if they agree that the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" is  no longer a valid  concept and should be replaced with guilty  unless proven innocent.

Hoofer

Boy, it REALLY sucks to be a LIBERAL... and get caught with your hands all over the... a.. ah... er...



Al Frankin never should have held office - not they got a reason to dump him.   Unfortunately, it mean another whack-job replacement.  Apparently.... Al has a history of chasing skirts, and this deal with Judge Moore is swinging the door wide open (we hope), to draining the DC swamp.   Really SUCKS when Liberals get stuck in pickle, a picture is worth a thousand words, and then the lady goes on the air to say it was unwanted.   

My, my, my... what's a liberal to do?  2006 was a L-O-N-G time ago, he was only joking, right?   It's amusing to hear the liberals AND McConnell to stutter & pop, tripped up by their own FALSE sense of morality.
All animals are created equal; Some just take longer to cook.   Survival is keeping an eye on those around you...

redbeard

Quote from: Hoofer on November 16, 2017, 05:37:52 AM
Well... it couldn't have come sooner.   The case against Roy Moore is falling apart.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/15/moores-attorney-questions-whether-yearbook-signature-is-real/

read the article, it's short, but also missing a couple of curious points, beginning with the "77" written in a different style, and now it's being said the B/W photo of the year book is obscuring the two different colors of ink (ie., someone added something to the text, some time later).

I got a question the MSM is missing:  If someone tried to rape you, molest you or you knew was really an evil, perverse person - why would you allow that person to preside over your Divorce trial without raising a fit?  If it's someone you pushed away previously, wouldn't you at least ASK for a new Judge?   Maybe it was one of those "messy" divorces that required a Judge, like the guy was trying to get away from a gold-digging woman... she was trying to take-him-for-every-thing... who knows?   Just curious.

IMHO, this is right out of the Democrat playbook, doesn't matter if they're guilty of it, but, since Republicans try to set a higher standard, well... hell's bells!   Make them LIVE UP to it, and what better way to take down a moral man (we hope), then tag him with the worst set of "sins" possible - he's a sexual predator.   We've already seen video after video of a former VP groping CHILDREN, and he gets a pass?

But, the story is falling apart in less than a week, and the brave congress is passing legislation against sexual harassment - with the LOOMING problem of women in their midst sounding off about the promiscuity in elevators, congressional offices and even on the floor of the house...???   Should we call it the "Whore House of Representatives?"   What's more, Paul Ryan & Mitch McConnell the two leaders, probably *KNOW* who the perpetrators are (it's so bad, they passed a law against themselves!) - but are covering for the guilty parties!?

It's OK to go back 38-40 years and skewer a 70 year old man, who has a unabashed decades long record of pro-life, pro-marriage & family, with hearsay, but be completely SILENT when they stand in your halls of Congress today!?  Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell are co-conspirators in covering up sexual assaults.  Again, if the problem is so bad as to address it by passing a bill - start naming names, Paul & Mitch!  We have a right-to-know who these criminals are, and you better deal with them - 'cause the evidence you've got against Roy Moore is pretty flimsy, but you've got all you need right there in Congress!
Moore missed the best defense he should have used from the start! The Sugar daddy defense. Isn't it terrible how these pretty young girls get away with taking advantage an older guy for his money? And every time a new one pops up you just say SEE!! use humor! Republicans still have a sense of humor Dim's don't! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Cryptic Bert


Solar



Allred, the bumbling idiot lib. :lol: :lol: :lol:

TUR: Does your client, Beverly Young Nelson, remember him signing it?

ALLRED: She remembers — well, she remembers being with him. It was on the counter. She alleges that he took it, that he signed it and she was thrilled that he had signed it, because, as far as she knew, he was a D.A. and that was an important position.

TUR: So she saw him sign it?

ALLRED: I don't believe at the time she had a clue whether he was an assistant D.A. or a D.A., but he signed it, she took it. As far as she knows, I mean, there's no reason for her to think it's anybody's but his signature.

TUR: But did she see him sign it?

ALLRED: You know, I don't — I haven't asked her if she saw him, but we did describe what happened that evening in question. What she alleges was that she put it on the counter; that I think she asked to sign — or that he did sign it. That's all.

TUR: I ask this, because it seems you're not 100% sure that it is his signature, and if you're not 100% sure that it is his signature, why would you show it at a press conference?

ALLRED: Well, why would — you know, why does anybody doubt that it is his signature?
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

taxed

Quote from: Solar on November 17, 2017, 08:21:14 AM

Allred, the bumbling idiot lib. :lol: :lol: :lol:

TUR: Does your client, Beverly Young Nelson, remember him signing it?

ALLRED: She remembers — well, she remembers being with him. It was on the counter. She alleges that he took it, that he signed it and she was thrilled that he had signed it, because, as far as she knew, he was a D.A. and that was an important position.

TUR: So she saw him sign it?

ALLRED: I don't believe at the time she had a clue whether he was an assistant D.A. or a D.A., but he signed it, she took it. As far as she knows, I mean, there's no reason for her to think it's anybody's but his signature.

TUR: But did she see him sign it?

ALLRED: You know, I don't — I haven't asked her if she saw him, but we did describe what happened that evening in question. What she alleges was that she put it on the counter; that I think she asked to sign — or that he did sign it. That's all.

TUR: I ask this, because it seems you're not 100% sure that it is his signature, and if you're not 100% sure that it is his signature, why would you show it at a press conference?

ALLRED: Well, why would — you know, why does anybody doubt that it is his signature?

You know when Katy Tur takes you down, you're a moron.  I got the sense that Allred tried to distance herself from the yearbook the instant Tur asked her.
#PureBlood #TrumpWon

Hoofer

Quote from: taxed on November 18, 2017, 01:43:53 PM
You know when Katy Tur takes you down, you're a moron.  I got the sense that Allred tried to distance herself from the yearbook the instant Tur asked her.
Trying desperately to be credible, while not offending a friend, eh?   Oh to have been a fly-on-the-wall after stupid interviews like that...

Or would it just simply be, "I can't believe I went on NATIONAL TELEVISION with THIS CRAP!!!  Who came up with this MORON!?  Give me that puppy story, kitten in the tree - WTF are you trying to do to me!?!?!?  Just put a "D" after my name & call me Katy TURD!!!"   well. we can only hope.
All animals are created equal; Some just take longer to cook.   Survival is keeping an eye on those around you...

Cryptic Bert

Wait....


TUR: Does your client, Beverly Young Nelson, remember him signing it?

ALLRED: She remembers — well, she remembers being with him. It was on the counter. She alleges that he took it, that he signed it and she was thrilled that he had signed it, because, as far as she knew, he was a D.A. and that was an important position.

TUR: So she saw him sign it?

ALLRED: I don't believe at the time she had a clue whether he was an assistant D.A. or a D.A., but he signed it, she took it. As far as she knows, I mean, there's no reason for her to think it's anybody's but his signature.

Ms.Independence

My two cents on Moore.  McConnell raised a boat load of money to ensure that he was defeated and it didn't work.  McConnell is known to use funds from the NRSC to ensure that no conservative or undesirables are seated in his country club.  IMHO, this is the handiwork of McConnell and cronies as they see Moore as a threat.  As for the accusers; Moore has been in the political arena for 40 years and you would think that they would have brought up these allegations long before now to end his career; all of a sudden because he's running for the Senate, now, they're coming forward?  I'm not buying it.  As for the year book; i find it hard to believe that a man who is much older than his accuser and who also holds public office would be stupid enough to write in a yearbook and then sign it and title it...just doesn't seem probable.

Perhaps equally concerning is the fact that Lee and Cruz both have distanced themselves from him which is surprising as certainly they know that he has been accused; not convicted.  There is no way after all this time to prove that he is guilty and secondly Cruz better than anyone knows McConnell's tactics and yet he has pulled his support.  He could have very easily left matters alone and stated that the issue was up to the voters in AL and called for him to step down IF indeed he was guilty.  To pull support only relays the message that they feel he is guilty. 
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...

Sauce

Quote from: Solar on November 25, 2017, 04:02:24 AM
In Your Opinion?

Those are the current leftist talking points running the Washington circuit.
Do you ever actually question the pablum leftist media feeds you? Try this on for size, put yourself in his position.
His lawyers are in the process of wrapping this nonsense up, they contact Trump's lawyers and explain a closing ploy, agree the case is closed, both attornies agree and thank one another for all the work.

In the meantime, the left is feverishly working with nothing outside of leftist media to spin this as a possible flip. This is pablum for the masses, the only thing they'll remember from all this bull shit is a Trump guy was investigated and 'almost turned on Trump. There was no almost, but that's what the LSM just convinced you is happening.
Nothing happens, and next week the left floats another story created out of whole cloth.

You claim you don't get your news from leftist sources, yet you come here and puke Washpo verbatim?

I am no rocket surgeon, but I don't see anything in what Ms. posted that sounds like she posted anything that is left wing propaganda.

And I honestly have no clue what you posted....again, no claim of being a political science major and also confess to not having read this thread completely.

I Swear I am not trying to be a contrarian, I just don't  get the intensity of your response not to mention the point you were making.