Quote from: RURdy4It on December 23, 2016, 03:00:13 PM
For All the Child Left Behinds...

Blades is an "intelligent" sub?

Oh, where to start.  In your own words:

QuoteThe President had nothing to do with this -- other than tell the Social Security Administration "this is what I want you to get done - find a way to do it.".

Sweetheart, that's what an "executive action" is.  First of all, there is no definition in the law for "executive actions".  That is when the President just "tells" an agency what he wants.  An executive order would legally tell an agency or department on what to do.  An "executive action", as Hussein has even said, is a recommendation.  It's adorable you take it seriously.

You did get an important point right: "People need to know how the government works".  I agree.  For example, you said "Trump can't just take this back".  Yes, he actually can.  He can "tell" them (via "executive action" -- where he "tells" them what he wants, like in your own words quoted above) to stop it.  If that didn't happen for whatever reason, he can issue an executive order.  In your video, you admitted that you didn't know if he could issue an executive order, which made me spit my coffee all over my monitor.  No wonder we have blades coming over here, sticking his nose in the CPF hole thinking he smells honey, only to get stung multiple times, forcing him to run back to your channel wimpering.  You really should take your own advice and learn how the government works, because you get gullible people to parrot your idiocy.

And, no, blades was correct -- he is an idiot.

To all RURdy4it's viewers, here's a quick lesson: yes, the President can issue an executive order to tell the SSA what to do.

And blades, this is not a "fake story", but thanks for taking the time to understand the issue before posting it.  As RURdy4it said, this hasn't really been out there.  Here's a new, innovative way to find some stories on this issue.  It's a very complicated tool, but should help you find stuff on the internet:  http://bfy.tw/98g6

After weekend bloodbath, Chicago police chief makes surprising admission about city's tough gun laws

The head of the Chicago Police Department is now admitting that more gun laws don't necessarily result in less gun violence because criminals don't "play by society's rules."

Chicago, a city run by Mayor Rahm Emanual, former White House chief of staff to President Barack Obama, reported double the number of killings throughout Christmas weekend this year than last year. At least 27 people were shot, 12 of them fatally, according to ABC News.

Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said during a news conference on Monday that most of the shootings between Friday evening and Sunday evening were "targeted attacks" by gang members going after rival gang members who were gathered for Christmas and holiday parties. The Chicago Tribune reported 90 percent of those fatally shot were involved in gang activities, had criminal histories or were previously known to police.

The deaths bring to more than 750 the number of gun-related deaths in Chicago just this year. As ABC News also noted, it's the first time in more than two decades that Chicago has seen more than 700 people die in a single year as a result of gun violence.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/12/26/after-weekend-bloodbath-chicago-police-chief-makes-surprising-admission-about-citys-tough-gun-laws/

Quote from: blades on December 26, 2016, 04:04:55 PM
After weekend bloodbath, Chicago police chief makes surprising admission about city's tough gun laws

The head of the Chicago Police Department is now admitting that more gun laws don't necessarily result in less gun violence because criminals don't "play by society's rules."

Chicago, a city run by Mayor Rahm Emanual, former White House chief of staff to President Barack Obama, reported double the number of killings throughout Christmas weekend this year than last year. At least 27 people were shot, 12 of them fatally, according to ABC News.

Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said during a news conference on Monday that most of the shootings between Friday evening and Sunday evening were "targeted attacks" by gang members going after rival gang members who were gathered for Christmas and holiday parties. The Chicago Tribune reported 90 percent of those fatally shot were involved in gang activities, had criminal histories or were previously known to police.

The deaths bring to more than 750 the number of gun-related deaths in Chicago just this year. As ABC News also noted, it's the first time in more than two decades that Chicago has seen more than 700 people die in a single year as a result of gun violence.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/12/26/after-weekend-bloodbath-chicago-police-chief-makes-surprising-admission-about-citys-tough-gun-laws/

What does this have to do with the 2nd Amendment?

This has been going on for years and b o has done nothing about it.

Quote from: walkstall on December 26, 2016, 04:21:11 PM
What does this have to do with the 2nd Amendment?

This has been going on for years and b o has done nothing about it.

If you don't know I can't help ya...SORRY.

Quote from: blades on December 26, 2016, 04:23:41 PM
If you don't know I can't help ya...SORRY.

Translation: I don't know either, I just felt like posting it here

Quote from: RURdy4It on December 23, 2016, 03:00:13 PM
For All the Child Left Behinds...

RURdy4it, I know blades is an "intelligent sub", as you put it, but can you keep him over there?  Maybe get an electronic fence or something.

Quote from: blades on December 26, 2016, 04:47:13 PM
TAXED YOUR A FUCKING NIGGER TO!!!

Quote from: taxed on December 26, 2016, 05:30:36 PM
RURdy4it, I know blades is an "intelligent sub", as you put it, but can you keep him over there?  Maybe get an electronic fence or something.

I'd recommend a hotwire, but he isn't really a fast learner and her electric bill would go through the roof.

Quote from: Solar on December 26, 2016, 05:39:53 PM
I'd recommend a hotwire, but he isn't really a fast learner and her electric bill would go through the roof.

Wonder if RURdy4it reported this:

Quote
Congress agreed to review a final rule by the Obama administration that would wrongly strip law-abiding Americans of their Second Amendment rights.

Last year, the Social Security Administration finalized a propose rule to ban certain recipients who use a representative payee from owning firearms. This ill-conceived action stripped the right to keep and bear arms without due process from some of the most vulnerable Americans.

The review process is expected to move forward in the house and receive a vote as early as next week. "We are pleased that congress is moving swiftly to ensure that law-abiding Americans' constitutional rights are respected," concluded Chris W. Cox, executive director, NRA-ILA.

Read more at http://louderwithcrowder.com/congress-obama-social-security-gun/

Quote from: Ghoulardi on January 26, 2017, 02:33:22 AM
Wonder if RURdy4it reported this:
Read more at http://louderwithcrowder.com/congress-obama-social-security-gun/

Funny. Isn't this what we tried to tell this moron, that it was not law until Congress cleared it?
Congress didn't clear it, so what we claimed was correct, that only Congress writes law.

If I told her that I was confiscating her land and property, would she so willingly and naively believe it? Sheesh, what a gullible twit..

Are you getting ready to apologize RURdy4it?

Quote
The House on Thursday struck down an Obama-era regulation that could block some recipients of disability benefits from buying guns.

The House voted 235-180 to roll back a rule that required the Social Security Administration to report people who receive disability benefits and have a mental health condition to the FBI's background check system. The database is used to determine eligibility for buying a firearm. 

Critics said the rule stripped Second Amendment rights from people who are not dangerously mentally ill, such as those who have eating disorders or mental disorders that prevent them from managing their own finances.

Read more at http://thehill.com/regulation/317634-house-republicans-block-obama-era-gun-rule

Quote from: Ghoulardi on February 05, 2017, 05:36:16 AM
Are you getting ready to apologize RURdy4it?
Read more at http://thehill.com/regulation/317634-house-republicans-block-obama-era-gun-rule

RURdy4it, wasn't that the bimbo twit that thought EO's were somehow law?

Quote from: RURdy4It on December 23, 2016, 03:00:13 PM
For All the Child Left Behinds...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CayQgWVjhh0&feature=youtu.be

http://www.guns.com/2017/03/01/trump-signs-repeal-of-obama-era-social-security-gun-ban/

Did you LISTEN to this MORON?

Executive orders are issued by Presidents executive actions are things that happen within the adimistration.............BECAUSE OF THE EXECUTIVE ORDER....IE "POLICY" NOT "LAW"

nobody tell this dummy any different let her continue to show how stupid she really is.

Quote from: taxed on March 01, 2017, 02:02:39 PM
http://www.guns.com/2017/03/01/trump-signs-repeal-of-obama-era-social-security-gun-ban/

But did the bimbo learn anything?
Wanna bet she thinks she was the reason it was even an issue, that in truth, it would have slipped through and became law without her making noise over it.