Conservative Political Forum

General Category => Political Discussion and Debate => Topic started by: garyjones027 on March 06, 2018, 07:00:05 PM

Title: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: garyjones027 on March 06, 2018, 07:00:05 PM
China is a communist country.  I was wondering how it deals with their high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Solar on March 06, 2018, 07:09:38 PM
Does anyone really want to go to Communist countries?
Last time I checked, the entire world was invading Western cultures, particularly the US.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Cryptic Bert on March 06, 2018, 07:18:08 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 06, 2018, 07:00:05 PM
China is a communist country.  I was wondering how it deals with their high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities.

They take it very seriously. China has illegals coming from North Korea mainly. They deport them and encourage the people to report any illegal aliens.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: garyjones027 on March 07, 2018, 10:33:04 AM
Quote from: The Boo Man... on March 06, 2018, 07:18:08 PM
They take it very seriously. China has illegals coming from North Korea mainly. They deport them and encourage the people to report any illegal aliens.

Why do they take it seriously?  It is a communist country.  Communist Democrats here in the US wants open borders, high illegal immigration, and sanctuary cities.  If China does not support this, then it is not a communist country.  If China does support hard borders, then we can't claim that the Democrats are actually practicing communism.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: supsalemgr on March 07, 2018, 11:47:41 AM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 07, 2018, 10:33:04 AM
Why do they take it seriously?  It is a communist country.  Communist Democrats here in the US wants open borders, high illegal immigration, and sanctuary cities.  If China does not support this, then it is not a communist country.  If China does support hard borders, then we can't claim that the Democrats are actually practicing communism.

What is your point? Democrats here desire open borders because they need voters. The ChiComs do not need voters and do not want the problems open borders bring. Both are about power.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Solar on March 07, 2018, 11:59:53 AM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 07, 2018, 10:33:04 AM
Why do they take it seriously?  It is a communist country.  Communist Democrats here in the US wants open borders, high illegal immigration, and sanctuary cities.  If China does not support this, then it is not a communist country.  If China does support hard borders, then we can't claim that the Democrats are actually practicing communism.
Is this what you use as a measure of communism? How about the loss of Liberty/Freedoms, a bigger and bigger oppressive govt, higher taxes, as in the damage Obozo did to our energy production via his commie Green Energy policies.
Communist Nations control all aspects of energy, that is what the Dim party was trying to do, Nationalize our energy mkt.
It's because of them our energy costs have skyrocketed along with everything connected, from food (think ethanol subsidies) to transportation including rail, trucking, and agriculture.

This is some of the baby steps the Marxists have taken over the years, and it will NEVER stop.
Open borders at the moment is the tool being used for one reason, to gain votes, but you can be certain, once they seize power, they'll close them, and not for the purpose of keeping illegals out, but keeping us from escaping the oppression they've wrought upon this Nation.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Walter Josh on March 07, 2018, 12:04:10 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 07, 2018, 10:33:04 AM
Why do they take it seriously?  It is a communist country.  Communist Democrats here in the US wants open borders, high illegal immigration, and sanctuary cities.  If China does not support this, then it is not a communist country.  If China does support hard borders, then we can't claim that the Democrats are actually practicing communism.
------------------------------
What the heck are you talking about???
China has existed as an organized culture/society since the Qin and Han Dynasties of 200 BC.
Their Emperors were uniformly autocrats who ruled w/o either approval or consent.
As such, establishing the ideology of communism required an effortless transition; done by Li Dazhao, a disciple of Lenin, in 1921.

Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: AndyJackson on March 07, 2018, 02:25:31 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 07, 2018, 10:33:04 AM
Why do they take it seriously?  It is a communist country.  Communist Democrats here in the US wants open borders, high illegal immigration, and sanctuary cities.  If China does not support this, then it is not a communist country.  If China does support hard borders, then we can't claim that the Democrats are actually practicing communism.
Your little semantics and wordgames are annoying.

Either somebody is adhering to (or espousing) the tenets of communism, or they're not.

Nobody wants to listen to annoying bullshit about their view on borders.  Stop with the dumb shit already.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Cryptic Bert on March 07, 2018, 03:04:36 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 07, 2018, 10:33:04 AM
Why do they take it seriously?  It is a communist country.  Communist Democrats here in the US wants open borders, high illegal immigration, and sanctuary cities.  If China does not support this, then it is not a communist country.  If China does support hard borders, then we can't claim that the Democrats are actually practicing communism.

I don't know how to respond to that.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: walkstall on March 07, 2018, 03:20:40 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 07, 2018, 10:33:04 AM
Why do they take it seriously?  It is a communist country.  Communist Democrats here in the US wants open borders, high illegal immigration, and sanctuary cities.  If China does not support this, then it is not a communist country.  If China does support hard borders, then we can't claim that the Democrats are actually practicing communism.

What's the WE shit!  Democrats have been actually practicing communism, for a great many years.  I would say longer then you are old.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Solar on March 07, 2018, 03:24:47 PM
Quote from: walkstall on March 07, 2018, 03:20:40 PM
What's the WE shit!  Democrats have been actually practicing communism, for a great many years.  I would say longer then you are old.
Wherein lies the problem, lack of historical reference.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: walkstall on March 07, 2018, 03:37:29 PM
Quote from: Solar on March 07, 2018, 03:24:47 PM
Wherein lies the problem, lack of historical reference.

(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmaggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com%2Fuploads%2Fquote-in-america-the-young-are-always-ready-to-give-to-those-who-are-older-than-themselves-oscar-wilde-31-46-21.jpg&hash=95bcc2c9d6123d4c6f73f1d2669ca9e72656c987)
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Billy's bayonet on March 07, 2018, 04:22:43 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 07, 2018, 10:33:04 AM
Why do they take it seriously?  It is a communist country.  Communist Democrats here in the US wants open borders, high illegal immigration, and sanctuary cities.  If China does not support this, then it is not a communist country.  If China does support hard borders, then we can't claim that the Democrats are actually practicing communism.


Are you Fkg Serious??????

Do you understand that COMMUNISM is in the end a totalitarian regime run by a select group of dictators that exercise supreme power?  How that end is acheived is not the issue....THE END RESULT IS.

The Marxist party that is now calling themselves "democrats" long ago decided they could NOT take America by force toppling the Govt from within as they did in China, Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Russia....no bloody revolution here.

Instead they decided to BECOME the Govt... in the past twenty years they have managed to implement this tactic, at one point they held the Exec, legislature and were just about even up in the Judiciary. The problem is there are still to many of "us" so they had to do something and do it fast....that was where the open borders came in....welcome all the third world masses who are nothing ore than ilegal voters, spread them through out the "Red" States and sieze total control of the House and Senate.

You are seeing this with the Deep state and the 9th circuit court, the Judiciary is full of these Marxist plants. 

Once they gain total control watch how they lock down the place...NOBODY LEAVES, NOBODY COMES IN unless they are a fellow Marxist.

To answer your original question, the half dozen Asian countries I've been in including China deal very harshly with
unwanted illegals.  Thailand within the past three years or so caught a bunch of these Burmese Rohinga "refugee's" living on some uninhabited Island off the Siam Gulf, they used the army to round them up at bayont point load them on a leaky boat and towed them out to sea past the 12 mile limit and said Bye Bye.

Singapore will deport you for spitting on the sidewalk, literally, they don;t allow Indonesians into the country unless by special permit and in some cases will stop you at the airport if they dont like your looks and tell you to get your ass back on the plane.  That happened with a bunch of soccer hooligans from England.

Misbehave in some of those countries as an Expat or as a tourist, including talking back to an official and they wil literally whip your ass, throw you in a vehicle and drive you to the airport and force you on the next flight out of the country. I SAW IT DONE numerous times.

Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Solar on March 07, 2018, 05:03:08 PM
Quote from: walkstall on March 07, 2018, 03:37:29 PM
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmaggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com%2Fuploads%2Fquote-in-america-the-young-are-always-ready-to-give-to-those-who-are-older-than-themselves-oscar-wilde-31-46-21.jpg&hash=95bcc2c9d6123d4c6f73f1d2669ca9e72656c987)
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Nailed it!!!
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: TylerSimkins on March 07, 2018, 05:57:03 PM
China is communist but strong. They don't have a political left that destroys it.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: walkstall on March 07, 2018, 06:21:58 PM
Quote from: TylerSimkins on March 07, 2018, 05:57:03 PM
China is communist but strong. They don't have a political left that destroys it.


The political left get a bullet to the back of the head.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Solar on March 07, 2018, 07:11:16 PM
Quote from: TylerSimkins on March 07, 2018, 05:57:03 PM
China is communist but strong. They don't have a political left that destroys it.
Pick one name and stick with it or I'll do a blanket delete of all your names and posts and there won't be any evidence of you ever having existed here..
Got It?
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Sick Of Silence on March 07, 2018, 07:29:25 PM
Quote from: walkstall on March 07, 2018, 06:21:58 PM
The political left get a bullet to the back of the head.

And the problem is???
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: garyjones027 on March 07, 2018, 11:49:25 PM
I am confused.

In Communist China, they support hard borders.

In the US Communist Democratic party, they support open borders.  Once they take power over the US, they will close the borders. 

So, I was wondering once the Communist Democrats take over, they will close the borders and stop illegal immigration?
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: AndyJackson on March 08, 2018, 09:20:56 AM
Quote from: TylerSimkins on March 07, 2018, 05:57:03 PM
China is communist but strong. They don't have a political left that destroys it.
China is communist in govt structure, and capitalist economically.  They chose the capitalist economy because it makes those in power billionaires, and the communist govt. because it's the best template for modern dictatorship.  They also learned a good lesson from the Russia - USSR - Russia transformation.  Russia learned that a command / communist economy made everybody poor and bankrupt, and when they rose from the ashes as Russia again, they quickly went back to a capitalist approach to making money.  Mafia-style capitalism, but capitalism nonetheless.

Today's left, whatever country, is dedicated to communism in all ways, even though they won't get there in most cases.

Russia and China just happen to have seen the light, and would rather have billions and trillions, than go broke again.  And their economies have no connection at all to anybody's "left".  The classical left wants Marxism 100%, no matter how many times it fails, and no matter the fact that China / Russia have blown their theory out of the water with the hybrid approach.

Borders and immigration have zero connection to any of this.  Those are just handy methods to bring down a capitalist country into chaos.  As soon as communism would take hold, the borders would be closed to strengthen the dictator's power and security.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: AndyJackson on March 08, 2018, 09:23:49 AM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 07, 2018, 11:49:25 PM
I am confused.

In Communist China, they support hard borders.

In the US Communist Democratic party, they support open borders.  Once they take power over the US, they will close the borders. 

So, I was wondering once the Communist Democrats take over, they will close the borders and stop illegal immigration?
See post directly above.

Plus it's sort of obvious / logical.

Are you just trying to be obtuse ?  Aggravation as a tactic ?  Trolling ?
Title: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 10:28:28 AM
How are LGBT rights a part of communism?  LGBT rights are not recognized in China, North Korea, Vietnam, Venezuela, and Cuba. 
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: walkstall on March 09, 2018, 10:45:35 AM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 10:28:28 AM
How are LGBT rights a part of communism?  LGBT rights are not recognized in China, North Korea, Vietnam, Venezuela, and Cuba.


What part of destroying America do you not understand Troll?
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Solar on March 09, 2018, 12:00:35 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 10:28:28 AM
How are LGBT rights a part of communism?  LGBT rights are not recognized in China, North Korea, Vietnam, Venezuela, and Cuba.
Seriously, are you really that fuckin stupid?
The commies in the Dim party use these freak groups as tools, useful idiots to divider America. This is straight out of the book, Rules for Radicals by Alinsky, one of Obozos mentors. You do know that Obozo is a Marxist, right?
There have always been gays, and they were always left alone and allowed to live their lives in peace, no one cared what they did in private but the left saw a voter base in people quietly living their lives, by making them out to be victims. Keep in mind, it started with gays, but that wasn't a big enough voting block, so they added all the freaks under the acronym, LGBTQ etc.
Just as they've done with the black community, they saw a way to keep them trapped in poverty by paying them a pittance to exist and a guaranteed voting block.
This is how the left works, they don't give a shit about these people, they only see votes as an end to a means, destroying the US and turning us into a socialist shithole, with an end goal of communism.

Look at the illegals, the left cares more about illegals than they do American citizens. Care to take a guess as to why?
Because they need a new voter block because the country rejected Obozos Marxist policies. This may come as a shock to you, but the Dim party is dead for an entire generation, 3 full decades, and that's because it'll take that long for a new voting block to be ignorant of the damage they've inflicted upon this nation.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 12:08:12 PM
Quote from: walkstall on March 09, 2018, 10:45:35 AM

What part of destroying America do you not understand Troll?

How is gay rights destroying America? Gay marriage is legalized in most Western countries.  So, are those western countries communist?
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Solar on March 09, 2018, 12:20:34 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 12:08:12 PM
How is gay rights destroying America? Gay marriage is legalized in most Western countries.  So, are those western countries communist?
There's a reason you can't grasp the bigger picture here, and that's because you're too young to have watched the left slowly unfold this plot worldwide.
The left has been incrementally creating disruptions for decades, just like this global warming bullshit. First, they claimed it was global cooling, and when that failed, it was warming, when that failed, it became climate destruction.
Problem is, they selected a bunch of underpaid scientists to build their case under the banner of the communist UN, add to that, they even created a new class of scientists, (Climate Scientists), where these people were awarded billions in grants to work toward a single goal, and failed because consensus is not science.
Add to that, they were caught fudging numbers, as well as NASA creating bogus results, look it up, it was just in the news, but you didn't hear it because you only tune into the LSM.

Point is, all the things wrong in this country can be traced right back to leftists, including the GOP.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: supsalemgr on March 09, 2018, 12:43:39 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 12:08:12 PM
How is gay rights destroying America? Gay marriage is legalized in most Western countries.  So, are those western countries communist?

Gay rights are not destroying the country. However, the people who have hijacked the movement are intent on destroying America and they don't care how. As Solar points out, they could care less about the folks they say they are trying to protect. These folks are just another tool of the left.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Walter Josh on March 09, 2018, 01:12:41 PM
The Scandinavian nations led by Finland, each of whom were relatively ambivalent towards homosexuality; initiated an extensive early 20th century study of such behavior.
Their statistics concluded that male homosexuality aggregated 1.8-2.2% of the populations of the European nations while female homosexuality was half of that. This conclusion was retested over each of the succeeding five generations and validated every time. So what's all the noise about?
Absolutely nothing but an neurotic yet raucous minority desperately needy of attention.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 01:18:15 PM
Quote from: Solar on March 09, 2018, 12:20:34 PM
There's a reason you can't grasp the bigger picture here, and that's because you're too young to have watched the left slowly unfold this plot worldwide.
The left has been incrementally creating disruptions for decades, just like this global warming bullshit. First, they claimed it was global cooling, and when that failed, it was warming, when that failed, it became climate destruction.
Problem is, they selected a bunch of underpaid scientists to build their case under the banner of the communist UN, add to that, they even created a new class of scientists, (Climate Scientists), where these people were awarded billions in grants to work toward a single goal, and failed because consensus is not science.
Add to that, they were caught fudging numbers, as well as NASA creating bogus results, look it up, it was just in the news, but you didn't hear it because you only tune into the LSM.

Point is, all the things wrong in this country can be traced right back to leftists, including the GOP.

So, I am guessing that the Dems want a communist USA that is very dysfunctional with high illegal immigration, high crime rates, intolerance, etc.  I am sure China and Vietnam has these problems to deal with.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: walkstall on March 09, 2018, 01:38:37 PM
Quote from: supsalemgr on March 09, 2018, 12:43:39 PM
Gay rights are not destroying the country. However, the people who have hijacked the movement are intent on destroying America and they don't care how. As Solar points out, they could care less about the folks they say they are trying to protect. These folks are just another tool of the left.

Sorry but Gay rights is destroying this country.  They should have the same rights as you and I have, no more no less.  What they do in their own house and bed room is up to them. 
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Solar on March 09, 2018, 01:53:38 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 01:18:15 PM
So, I am guessing that the Dems want a communist USA that is very dysfunctional with high illegal immigration, high crime rates, intolerance, etc.  I am sure China and Vietnam has these problems to deal with.
How is it you fail to make the connection between destroying our culture leads to revolution?
This is the main goal of communists, destroy the people's trust in govt, then incite riots, which you've already witnessed when the Dim party-backed OWS, then BLM and now ANTIFA, all backed by the communist movement, look it up.

They were fertilizing the country for rebellion/civil war. Once they accomplish cultural destruction, civil war follows, the left comes in and brings about rule, (see Mouslinni Fascism), once this is accomplished, the communist movement is complete, they remove the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The left failed miserably, they thought they could steal the election, but thank God, our Founders installed an Electoral College to stop Mob Rule/Democracy.

Is any of this making sense to you yet?
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: walkstall on March 09, 2018, 02:15:19 PM
Quote from: Solar on March 09, 2018, 01:53:38 PM
How is it you fail to make the connection between destroying our culture leads to revolution?
This is the main goal of communists, destroy the people's trust in govt, then incite riots, which you've already witnessed when the Dim party-backed OWS, then BLM and now ANTIFA, all backed by the communist movement, look it up.

They were fertilizing the country for rebellion/civil war. Once they accomplish cultural destruction, civil war follows, the left comes in and brings about rule, (see Mouslinni Fascism), once this is accomplished, the communist movement is complete, they remove the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The left failed miserably, they thought they could steal the election, but thank God, our Founders installed an Electoral College to stop Mob Rule/Democracy.

Is any of this making sense to you yet?


He/she/it is just coming in to push it agenda.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Solar on March 09, 2018, 02:48:09 PM
Quote from: walkstall on March 09, 2018, 02:15:19 PM

He/she/it is just coming in to push it agenda.
Oh, I know, I keep deleting his other sock puppets.
Thing is, he's a kid and has no clue what the left is attempting to do the US, and he allows us an opportunity to educate our readership.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: AndyJackson on March 09, 2018, 03:20:00 PM
Is this idiot 14 years old ?  Sounds like he's chugging through his first social studies class in HS, that discusses communism.  Taught by a LGBT / illegal immigration SJW.

Cuba, USSR-Russia, China, Venezuela, and Vietnam are already dictatorships, which outlaw whatever the hell they want to.  Typically guns, LGBT, religion, and immigration.  And the opposing party lol.

USA hasn't outlawed anything except crime thus far.  But the proponents of everything / anything anti-USA support every victim group (LGBT / illegals), to sow strife and discord.

There's today's lesson; Just stop already, numbnuts.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: AndyJackson on March 09, 2018, 03:22:55 PM
Quote from: supsalemgr on March 09, 2018, 12:43:39 PM
Gay rights are not destroying the country. However, the people who have hijacked the movement are intent on destroying America and they don't care how. As Solar points out, they could care less about the folks they say they are trying to protect. These folks are just another tool of the left.
Gay rights as defined by any different rights than anybody else, are absolutely fuqqing us up.  And that's what they do, keep inventing new subspecies of LGBT to get newly invented rights that don't exist for anybody else.

Ditto illegals and other various miscreants.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 03:38:55 PM
Quote from: Solar on March 09, 2018, 01:53:38 PM
How is it you fail to make the connection between destroying our culture leads to revolution?
This is the main goal of communists, destroy the people's trust in govt, then incite riots, which you've already witnessed when the Dim party-backed OWS, then BLM and now ANTIFA, all backed by the communist movement, look it up.

They were fertilizing the country for rebellion/civil war. Once they accomplish cultural destruction, civil war follows, the left comes in and brings about rule, (see Mouslinni Fascism), once this is accomplished, the communist movement is complete, they remove the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The left failed miserably, they thought they could steal the election, but thank God, our Founders installed an Electoral College to stop Mob Rule/Democracy.

Is any of this making sense to you yet?

So, the only solution is to ban the Dem party.  By banning them, these problems will not arise. So, how can the Dem party be banned?
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Solar on March 09, 2018, 05:12:28 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 03:38:55 PM
So, the only solution is to ban the Dem party.  By banning them, these problems will not arise. So, how can the Dem party be banned?
Well, that's just silly, is that what you think we should do?
You can't ban thought, but you can arrest traitors.
McCarthy tried to clean out commies and they mocked him. There was a time when being a commie was against the law.
We need another McCarthy moment, we need to start arresting these traitors, these lawbreakers and traitors, and that's what Trump is currently in the process of doing, exposing the Marxists for who they are, legally, and it may entail half the Dim party. 
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: walkstall on March 09, 2018, 06:16:37 PM
Quote from: Solar on March 09, 2018, 05:12:28 PM
Well, that's just silly, is that what you think we should do?
You can't ban thought, but you can arrest traitors.
McCarthy tried to clean out commies and they mocked him. There was a time when being a commie was against the law.
We need another McCarthy moment, we need to start arresting these traitors, these lawbreakers and traitors, and that's what Trump is currently in the process of doing, exposing the Marxists for who they are, legally, and it may entail half the Dim party.


Myself I'm for jailing teacher that teach BS history or any other BS. 
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Solar on March 09, 2018, 06:30:46 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 03:38:55 PM
So, the only solution is to ban the Dem party.  By banning them, these problems will not arise. So, how can the Dem party be banned?
Gary, do you think the economy sucked under Obozo because American industry was failing, that entrepreneurs didn't want to open businesses?
It was being done on purpose, Obozo pushed Commie Green Energy and claimed it was to save the planet, yet wind turbines killed more birds than any natural or manmade disaster in history, and is still killing them daily by the tens of thousands, using solar panels also helped drive up energy prices 3 fold, this too was all part of the plan, to kill off American Capitalism, by killing off our ability to produce cheap energy.

I predicted more than 5 years ago, that the moment we get a Conservative in the WH, the nation's producers would explode, because he would get govt out of the way, and he did and still is, in fact, I said it will be the biggest boom in history, and it is proving I was Right.

Did you think OWS was really about Wall Street?
Read the OP.  https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/political-discussion-and-debate/an-inside-look-at-the-ows-movement/

http://www.cpusa.org/article/solidarity-with-occupy-wall-street/

Take the Women's movement, did you really believe the leftist media when they told you it was all about women?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/extremism-has-been-baked-into-womens-march-from-the-beginning/article/2651173

Did you really think the BLM movement was really about black lives?
Or that ANTIFA was really against Fascism?

I'll leave those two for you to research yourself, but I think you get the point, that none of these groups are about positive change, no, they were all the created by the Marxist movement.
In fact, you'd be hardpressed to find one leftist movement in the last 20 years that wasn't hatched in a Marxist think tank. In fact, I can't think of a single thing the Dim party backed in the last two decades that didn't have an communist alternative agenda.

Marxism, Fabianism, Socialists, Progressives, call them what you will, but every one of these groups has the same cause at hand, that of Communism, the only thing they differ in, is what will be the next name they'll label themselves under.

***"We're the International Socialists Organization... Our goal is to raise political consciousness to build a revolutionary party and work for a revolution here in the United States."***

***"The problem is capitalism... We need a new system that's going to put people first and put profit back to the wasteland of history."***

***"Socialism is the solution. We need a society where everything is produced to meet human needs and wants rather than to make money off of them."***
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Sick Of Silence on March 09, 2018, 10:35:34 PM
Quote from: walkstall on March 09, 2018, 06:16:37 PM

Myself I'm for jailing teacher that teach BS history or any other BS.

How far should we go? Should we include those who intentionally speak those similar lies such as media, etc?
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Sick Of Silence on March 09, 2018, 10:56:37 PM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 03:38:55 PM
So, the only solution is to ban the Dem party.  By banning them, these problems will not arise.

I don't have a problem with that. Because we all know damn well that you Liberals will do whatever it took to ban Conservatives. We have all seen it or experienced it. Speaking on college campuses. Speaking on social media. Blackballing entertainers who have the wrong opinion. Whatever. Direct or indirect, it doesn't matter.

You Liberals have done this to us Conservatives. So, I sure as hell would ban you guys in a heartbeat.

QuoteSo, how can the Dem party be banned?

I would use the same dirty tricks as you guys have used.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: walkstall on March 10, 2018, 02:22:42 AM
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on March 09, 2018, 10:35:34 PM
How far should we go? Should we include those who intentionally speak those similar lies such as media, etc?

Why not?
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: supsalemgr on March 10, 2018, 04:57:51 AM
Quote from: walkstall on March 09, 2018, 01:38:37 PM
Sorry but Gay rights is destroying this country.  They should have the same rights as you and I have, no more no less.  What they do in their own house and bed room is up to them.

I was not suggesting a double standard. Gay rights to me is the same rights as everyone has, nothing more.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Billy's bayonet on March 10, 2018, 05:27:29 AM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 10:28:28 AM
How are LGBT rights a part of communism?  LGBT rights are not recognized in China, North Korea, Vietnam, Venezuela, and Cuba.


You don't get it do you?

NO ONES RIGHTS ARE RECOGNIZED IN CHINA NORTH KOREA VENEZUELA ETC ETC ETC.

Totalitarian Communist regimes trod on EVERYONE.

In such a society, everyone is supposed to be equal, in other words everyone is poor, everyone has the same social status, everyone IS THE SAME in the eyes of the Govt.  You are a cog in the wheel, a slave, do what you are supposed to do, shut up and don't make waves. The Govt knows best, not you.

"Making waves" means that you have a relationship with someone of your own sex rather than the opposite sex, such relationship cannot produce a child to continue "the struggle", therefore it is considered "counter revolutionary"
thus discouraged.


Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Solar on March 10, 2018, 05:36:11 AM
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on March 10, 2018, 05:27:29 AM

You don't get it do you?

NO ONES RIGHTS ARE RECOGNIZED IN CHINA NORTH KOREA VENEZUELA ETC ETC ETC.

Totalitarian Communist regimes trod on EVERYONE.

In such a society, everyone is supposed to be equal, in other words everyone is poor, everyone has the same social status, everyone IS THE SAME in the eyes of the Govt.  You are a cog in the wheel, a slave, do what you are supposed to do, shut up and don't make waves. The Govt knows best, not you.

"Making waves" means that you have a relationship with someone of your own sex rather than the opposite sex, such relationship cannot produce a child to continue "the struggle", therefore it is considered "counter revolutionary"
thus discouraged.
I'm guessing college kid that's been groomed to accept communism as a good thing, capitalism as evil, Conservatives as oppressors.
Coming here must be a real eyeopener, never once hearing the truth of communism and how its killed hundreds of millions.

While Capitalism is about freedom and the right to choose one's destiny equally and freely, or fail, but it's up to the individual what they do with the fruits of their labor, not the govt.
Funny how even the poorest in this country live like Kings comparatively to commie nations, yet if you listen to the media you'd think we abuse our own.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Solar on March 10, 2018, 05:38:14 AM
Quote from: supsalemgr on March 10, 2018, 04:57:51 AM
I was not suggesting a double standard. Gay rights to me is the same rights as everyone has, nothing more.
Yep, gay rights are nothing more than "Special Rights" carved out and given to a leftist chosen class in an effort to give the appearance of victim class.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: T Hunt on March 10, 2018, 06:06:01 AM
(I know this is long but please bear with me. The big picture is important here and Dim sheep usually think in small picture terms so it is critical to lay it all out at once.)

How are lgbt rights part of communism?
First i need to clarify a few things for u...to start, communism and 'modern secular progressive liberalism' are twins but not identical twins, and they work together thick as thieves. Communism, fascism, islam, progressivism, even southern redneck racism (remnants of confederate dems) are all part of the family of leftism, they all end with totalitarianism, racism, evil.
(Yes fascism is leftist, not right wing as the LSM portray it as. I think honest anarchy wld be the truly radical far right; no gvt, absolute freedom.)
The american left, thru the progressive dem party, trys to achieve this goal of leftist totalitarianism a little differently. While communism relies on a sudden REVOLUTION, the saul alinsky school of liberals is currently attempting a multi generational EVOLUTION to gradually transform the fundementals of America, and this usually has socialism as a transitional phase to get everyone used to gvt controls. This is already having some 'success' in europe.

The left hates traditional judeo-christian cultural values much more than they love any 'values' of their own. They use gvt to force thier unatural antiwestern 'culture' on everyone. When some 'christians' try to use gvt to force their culture on others, like banning homosexuality completly, well they are equally guilty of commiting the crime of leftism as secular progressives. When redneck racists try to use gvt to impose laws on blacks they are just as guilty of leftism as the racist blm and black panthers. (In fact the dems have always been racists, only they used to be white racists but now they are black and brown racist, and the white racists no longer have a home cuz we wont take em.) So to be fair, members of the gop can be leftists too, just in a different way as dems.

The left uses gay rights as a tool, as a weapon, to gain power. Now this cld manifest as supporting gay rights or banning gay rights, depending on the country, culture, and the practical situation wherever they r trying to gain control and spread their cancer.
Some gay rights fit into modern american liberalism but others dont. Gays have always had the same constitutional  rights as the rest of us, life, liberty, poh. The particular 'right' in question today is gay marriage and forcing its acceptance onto ppl who can see the harmful effects it has on individuals and society at large. The constitution doesnt give any particular specific rights regarding marriages, except that morality is the purview of the states not the feds.
U must understand, gay marriage has up until now been a cultural issue, it is the left who has turned it political. The tru right (classical liberals of the founders mould) have never wanted to use politics to end homosexual behavior. We have always been fine with equality under the law, nothing more nothing less.

Now marriage itself has 2 aspects which are intertwined: the first is cultural/moral. The second is political/legal, (for tax purposes, etc.). The cultural and moral aspects are up to the churches, and it is a churches freedom to have a ceremony for a dog and a libtard and call them 'married' if they want to, but in name only, not legally.
The bible says homosexuality is a sin, so christians are allowed to hold and to EXPRESS this belief. Gays do not have the right to stop them from expressing this, but gays dont have to listen. Likewise, gays can express their disagreement but no one has to listen. We have the right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion, not the right to force others to shut up and listen to us. At least not on the federal level...

On the political and legal aspect of it, the only level of gvt with any jurisdiction on morality is the state level. The constitution reserves laws of morality to the states not the feds, so each state can be their own experiment, and if u dont like it move.
Now the states have options. One state can embrace a traditional judeo-christian view of marriage. (An islamic view wldnt be possible as it conflicts with the constituional right to liberty) Another state may choose another option, to not recognize marriages at all but to instead only have civil unions, which wld even apply to 2 friends living together as roomates. The states were meant to be fertile testing grounds for a variety of diverse IDEAS within the framework of the constitution.

Finally, to be technical u cld say that supporting lgbt rights dont fit COMMUNISM as much as it fits LEFTISM and leftism uses gay rights to advance its political and cultural agenda one way or another wherever it is, (whether communist, socialist, progressive, islamic, etc.) In America that means emracing gay marriage in order to upend traditional judeo-christian cultural norms, to sow divide thru identity politics, and to gain votes. In iran it means throwing gays off buildings to emrace traditional islamic cultural norms, to unite their country, and to gain support. Different leftist places use gay rights differently but it is always to gain power and advance leftism. Like guns, neither good nor bad except in how they are used. The left doesnt see gay rights as good or bad, only how they can be USED for the cause.
Title: Re: How are LGBT rights part of communism?
Post by: Bronx on March 10, 2018, 09:44:15 AM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 09, 2018, 10:28:28 AM
How are LGBT rights a part of communism?  LGBT rights are not recognized in China, North Korea, Vietnam, Venezuela, and Cuba.

Because LGBT and communism always attack from the back.......!
Title: Should it be a federal crime to criticize president Trump?
Post by: garyjones027 on March 10, 2018, 12:18:23 PM
I think anyone who criticizes president Trump should be charged with HIGH TREASON!
Title: Re: Should it be a federal crime to criticize president Trump?
Post by: Solar on March 10, 2018, 12:30:29 PM
WTF...More trolling?

So you want to do away with the First Amendment?
Title: Re: Should it be a federal crime to criticize president Trump?
Post by: supsalemgr on March 10, 2018, 12:31:59 PM
I think he is getting close to the line. What an inane post.
Title: Re: Should it be a federal crime to criticize president Trump?
Post by: Solar on March 10, 2018, 12:36:16 PM
Quote from: supsalemgr on March 10, 2018, 12:31:59 PM
I think he is getting close to the line. What an inane post.
Yeah, this is the shit kids pull on social media in hopes of drawing out some moron Trump supporter to agree with him, then he copies the post and posts it as evidence that Trump supporters are nothing but radicals.
The problem for him is, this is an adult forum, where all the members here have an IQ three times that of lib trolls.
Title: Re: Should it be a federal crime to criticize president Trump?
Post by: Walter Josh on March 10, 2018, 01:41:27 PM
Hmm.............................
In the Forum, Roman Senators openly criticized their Emperors for their failures; w/decorum and tact!
Mr. Jones' unserious suggestion is beyond absurd.
Title: Re: Should it be a federal crime to criticize president Trump?
Post by: Solar on March 10, 2018, 02:00:28 PM
Quote from: Walter Josh on March 10, 2018, 01:41:27 PM
Hmm.............................
In the Forum, Roman Senators openly criticized their Emperors for their failures; w/decorum and tact!
Mr. Jones' unserious suggestion is beyond absurd.
Nort Korea has a solution for those that criticize Kim. :lol:
Title: COMMUNISM AND LIBERALISM ARE DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES!!!!!
Post by: garyjones027 on March 10, 2018, 05:42:42 PM
Communism and liberalism are two different political ideologies. Communism cannot be termed liberalism and liberalism cannot be termed as communism as the two have distinct features that separate them.

Liberalism is an ideology that believes in individual freedom. Liberalism is a political ideology that thinks that an individual is free from all interferences and restrictions. On the other hand, communism does not give any emphasis to individual freedom. Communism is a political ideology that stands for equality of all. Communism pertains to the welfare of the society or community. It stands for a stateless or class less society.

In communism, power is equally shared by everyone. But in Liberalism there is no power sharing but every one considers being free from the other. While Communism gives priority to the welfare of a society, liberalism gives priority to the rights of an individual. Communism does not think that an individual is above others.

When talking about economy, Liberalism thinks of a free market but in Communism, it is the community or society that controls the economy and means of production. The profit is equally shared in communism.

When Liberalism focuses on a balance between individual and community responsibilities, Communism focuses entirely on community responsibility.

Communism is an ideology that entirely revolves round the good will of a community. On the other hand, Liberalism has its base on individuals only.

Summary
1. Liberalism is a political ideology that thinks that an individual is free from all interferences and restrictions. Communism does not give any emphasis to individual freedom. It is a political ideology that stands for equality of all.
2. In communism, power is equally shared by everyone. But in Liberalism there is no power sharing but every one considers being free from the other.
3. Communism gives priority to the welfare of a society, liberalism gives priority to the rights of an individual.
4. There may be some form of government in Liberalism but in Communism there is no government as it implies a class less and state less society.
5. Liberalism focuses on a balance between individual and community responsibilities. Communism focuses entirely on community responsibility.



Title: Re: COMMUNISM AND LIBERALISM ARE DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES!!!!!
Post by: Solar on March 10, 2018, 06:14:12 PM
Great, after all we've explained, and still, you don't get one simple equation, that Liberalism/Progressivism leads to communism. Period!

Walks, merge this bull shit with his other thread.
Thanks.
Title: Re: COMMUNISM AND LIBERALISM ARE DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES!!!!!
Post by: Solar on March 10, 2018, 06:45:32 PM
Before Walks moves this, I have a question.
Is this conservative, liberal or Classic Liberal in nature and do you agree with it? In Other words, whose party platform do you think it aligns with?

It is shameful and unacceptable that any child should live in poverty, and that anyone should go hungry, homeless, without medicine, or without a living wage in our nation of such great wealth.
I have more examples, I just wanted to know your thought about it.

Meet the Needs of Working, Unemployed and Farm Families

-Unemployment insurance for all workers.
- Moratorium on farm foreclosures
- Labor law reform to remove barriers to workers who want to join a union.
- No privatization of Social Security. Increase benefits.
- Universal prescription drug coverage administered by Medicare. Universal health care system.
- Restore social safety net. Welfare reform that includes job training, supports and living wages.
- Full funding for equal, quality, bi-lingual public education. No vouchers.

Make Corporate Giants Pay
- Repeal tax cuts to the rich and corporations.
- Close corporate tax loopholes.
- Restitution to workers' pensions.
- Strong regulation of financial industry.
- Regulation and public ownership of utilities
- Prosecute corporate polluters. Public works program to clean our air, water and land
- Aid to cities and states. Federally funded infrastructure repair and social service programs
Title: Re: COMMUNISM AND LIBERALISM ARE DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES!!!!!
Post by: Walter Josh on March 10, 2018, 06:54:24 PM
Hmm........... is this part of an ongoing series of guest posts on the isms of the world???
Anyway, the narrative below, which I agree with, is not a personal opinion but rather comes from the Britannica.
----------------------------------------
The spawn of communism and liberalism was the (French) Enlightenment, the essence of which was a revolt against the established social order of the 18th century represented by the French Monarchy and Catholic Church.
The Enlightenment promoted both economic progressivism, which led to Marxism, as well as cultural/social freedom from restraint, expressed in liberalism.
---------------------------------------------
However, it should be obvious that the high minded ideas and ideals espoused by  Voltaire, Rousseau, d' Lambert, Montesquieu, St.Just and Diderot; are light years from what has evolved in our time.
Case in point: does anyone believe that the Liberalism of Lord Palmerston has anything to do w/the liberalism of Nancy Pelosi???
Title: Re: COMMUNISM AND LIBERALISM ARE DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES!!!!!
Post by: Solar on March 10, 2018, 07:37:04 PM
Quote from: Walter Josh on March 10, 2018, 06:54:24 PM
Hmm........... is this part of an ongoing series of guest posts on the isms of the world???
Anyway, the narrative below, which I agree with, is not a personal opinion but rather comes from the Britannica.
----------------------------------------
The spawn of communism and liberalism was the (French) Enlightenment, the essence of which was a revolt against the established social order of the 18th century represented by the French Monarchy and Catholic Church.
The Enlightenment promoted both economic progressivism, which led to Marxism, as well as cultural/social freedom from restraint, expressed in liberalism.
---------------------------------------------
However, it should be obvious that the high minded ideas and ideals espoused by  Voltaire, Rousseau, d' Lambert, Montesquieu, St.Just and Diderot; are light years from what has evolved in our time.
Case in point: does anyone believe that the Liberalism of Lord Palmerston has anything to do w/the liberalism of Nancy Pelosi???
Yep, there's a reason the left is in constant flux where their nomenclature is concerned, take Liberal for example, usurped from Classic liberalism, the original Conservative.
Progressive was first used in the communist manifesto by Marx "progressive income tax", and when the left trashed the meaning of liberalism, they readopted the term Progressive.
I wrote a short essay on the subject stating that the Dim party has trashed the term Progressive as well, and is about to adopt, for the first time in the party's history, "Social Democrat party USA.
It's who and what they are, and they've already adopted the platform, so why lie about themselves any longer?
Title: Re: COMMUNISM AND LIBERALISM ARE DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES!!!!!
Post by: Sick Of Silence on March 10, 2018, 08:27:51 PM
Quote from: Solar on March 10, 2018, 06:45:32 PM
It is shameful and unacceptable that any child should live in poverty, and that anyone should go hungry, homeless, without medicine, or without a living wage in our nation of such great wealth.

Whose responsibility is it? We don't want people living in hard times but it seams whenever this discussion comes up, it involves in involuntary taking of money from it's citizens without any responsibility from those who are receiving that help. We have to have our taxes taken from us to many times reward bad behavior as well as non citizens.
Title: Re: COMMUNISM AND LIBERALISM ARE DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES!!!!!
Post by: Walter Josh on March 10, 2018, 09:40:29 PM
Quote from: Solar on March 10, 2018, 07:37:04 PM
Yep, there's a reason the left is in constant flux where their nomenclature is concerned, take Liberal for example, usurped from Classic liberalism, the original Conservative.
Progressive was first used in the communist manifesto by Marx "progressive income tax", and when the left trashed the meaning of liberalism, they readopted the term Progressive.
I wrote a short essay on the subject stating that the Dim party has trashed the term Progressive as well, and is about to adopt, for the first time in the party's history, "Social Democrat party USA.
It's who and what they are, and they've already adopted the platform, so why lie about themselves any longer?
-----------------------------
On the mark.
All this back and forth brings to mind 'Humpty Dumpty's Theory of Language' (From Lewis Carroll's "Alice Through the Looking Glass").
Scene from Wonderland w/ HD on a high wall looking down on the road and Alice walking along the road, looking up.
HD:   That glory was indeed spectacular.
Alice: I don't know what you mean by glory.
HD:    When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean; more or less.
Alice: The question is whether you can make words mean so many different things.
HD:    Actually, the question is which is to be master; that is all.
--------------------------
Wonder if Mr.Jones would appreciate Carroll's wisdom articulated here?


Title: Re: COMMUNISM AND LIBERALISM ARE DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES!!!!!
Post by: supsalemgr on March 11, 2018, 05:50:09 AM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 10, 2018, 05:42:42 PM
Communism and liberalism are two different political ideologies. Communism cannot be termed liberalism and liberalism cannot be termed as communism as the two have distinct features that separate them.

Liberalism is an ideology that believes in individual freedom. Liberalism is a political ideology that thinks that an individual is free from all interferences and restrictions. On the other hand, communism does not give any emphasis to individual freedom. Communism is a political ideology that stands for equality of all. Communism pertains to the welfare of the society or community. It stands for a stateless or class less society.

In communism, power is equally shared by everyone. But in Liberalism there is no power sharing but every one considers being free from the other. While Communism gives priority to the welfare of a society, liberalism gives priority to the rights of an individual. Communism does not think that an individual is above others.

When talking about economy, Liberalism thinks of a free market but in Communism, it is the community or society that controls the economy and means of production. The profit is equally shared in communism.

When Liberalism focuses on a balance between individual and community responsibilities, Communism focuses entirely on community responsibility.

Communism is an ideology that entirely revolves round the good will of a community. On the other hand, Liberalism has its base on individuals only.

Summary
1. Liberalism is a political ideology that thinks that an individual is free from all interferences and restrictions. Communism does not give any emphasis to individual freedom. It is a political ideology that stands for equality of all.
2. In communism, power is equally shared by everyone. But in Liberalism there is no power sharing but every one considers being free from the other.
3. Communism gives priority to the welfare of a society, liberalism gives priority to the rights of an individual.
4. There may be some form of government in Liberalism but in Communism there is no government as it implies a class less and state less society.
5. Liberalism focuses on a balance between individual and community responsibilities. Communism focuses entirely on community responsibility.

"In communism, power is equally shared by everyone."

Do you actually believe that statement?
Title: Re: COMMUNISM AND LIBERALISM ARE DIFFERENT POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES!!!!!
Post by: Solar on March 11, 2018, 06:30:14 AM
Quote from: Walter Josh on March 10, 2018, 09:40:29 PM
-----------------------------
On the mark.
All this back and forth brings to mind 'Humpty Dumpty's Theory of Language' (From Lewis Carroll's "Alice Through the Looking Glass").
Scene from Wonderland w/ HD on a high wall looking down on the road and Alice walking along the road, looking up.
HD:   That glory was indeed spectacular.
Alice: I don't know what you mean by glory.
HD:    When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean; more or less.
Alice: The question is whether you can make words mean so many different things.
HD:    Actually, the question is which is to be master; that is all.
--------------------------
Wonder if Mr.Jones would appreciate Carroll's wisdom articulated here?
Spot on! And sir, you have an amazing recall, I had completely forgotten those lines, but they do apply quite well.
And no, I do not believe he ever made the connection, he's obviously too young to have made any historical connections of any kind to any political group, he doesn't even know that there is no such thing as a liberal in the Dim party anymore, they all abandoned it when the Marxist showed they have no interest in helping the country, only destroying it.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: walkstall on March 11, 2018, 08:33:09 AM
Clean up in aisle one through three.           

I have merged all of young garyjones027 trolling posts into one.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Solar on March 11, 2018, 09:13:42 AM
Quote from: walkstall on March 11, 2018, 08:33:09 AM
Clean up in aisle one through three.           

I have merged all of young garyjones027 trolling posts into one.
Thank you, sir.
Something tells me, his next appearance will be in the form of a sock puppet reanimating this thread in about a week with another BS post.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: walkstall on March 11, 2018, 10:07:19 AM
Quote from: Solar on March 11, 2018, 09:13:42 AM
Thank you, sir.
Something tells me, his next appearance will be in the form of a sock puppet reanimating this thread in about a week with another BS post.


You give it that long.   :lol:
Title: Re: Should it be a federal crime to criticize president Trump?
Post by: Sick Of Silence on March 11, 2018, 10:57:00 AM
Quote from: garyjones027 on March 10, 2018, 12:18:23 PM
I think anyone who criticizes president Trump should be charged with HIGH TREASON!

You mean the same way you Liberals treated Conservatives when we dare say something about the anointed one?
Title: Re: Should it be a federal crime to criticize president Trump?
Post by: Solar on March 11, 2018, 11:24:00 AM
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on March 11, 2018, 10:57:00 AM
You mean the same way you Liberals treated Conservatives when we dare say something about the anointed one?
You racist! :biggrin:
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: T Hunt on March 11, 2018, 12:12:45 PM
Gary,

What is the difference between the 'classical liberalism' of our founders and the modern day 'progressive liberalism' of obama?
If your answer is, "Nothing", you may be libtarded.
You prbly caught it from fake news.

Modern Conservatives=Classical Liberals
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Walter Josh on March 11, 2018, 02:11:03 PM
Indeed Mr. Hunt.
Now if you could adopt Mr Jones for a week or so and show him the error of his ways.
Just a thought.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Possum on March 11, 2018, 02:49:00 PM
Quote from: Walter Josh on March 11, 2018, 02:11:03 PM
Indeed Mr. Hunt.
Now if you could adopt Mr Jones for a week or so and show him the error of his ways.
Just a thought.
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Teach him something. Trolls just don't have it like they used to. If that's the best gary can do, he is wasting everyone's time. It's way too lame. Yeah, I remember the good ol days when the trolls would do their research with the lsm media and come here heavily armed to post a lengthy article of what I am sure they thought was outstanding facts just to be chewed up and spit out. Several would come back with more "facts" and get chewed up again. and again. Some might say thats a waste of time, but for every troll that got chewed up, there were other viewer,(myself included) who learned alot. So, Gary, please go to the lsm and get something so the next time you post it can at least be interesting.


maybe we need a troll school?
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Solar on March 11, 2018, 03:52:36 PM
Quote from: T Hunt on March 11, 2018, 12:12:45 PM
Gary,

What is the difference between the 'classical liberalism' of our founders and the modern day 'progressive liberalism' of obama?
If your answer is, "Nothing", you may be libtarded.
You prbly caught it from fake news.

Modern Conservatives=Classical Liberals
I already asked, he's chosen to run off, but he'll be back with another sock puppet and bump the thread with another fantasy lib reply.

I'll never understand these myopic kids with born in blinders. They get butt hurt when they hear the truth, then run around in circles trying to disprove actual historical evidence, as if those of us that lived it, saw it all wrong. :blink:
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Solar on March 11, 2018, 04:06:30 PM
Quote from: s3779m on March 11, 2018, 02:49:00 PM
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Teach him something. Trolls just don't have it like they used to. If that's the best gary can do, he is wasting everyone's time. It's way too lame. Yeah, I remember the good ol days when the trolls would do their research with the lsm media and come here heavily armed to post a lengthy article of what I am sure they thought was outstanding facts just to be chewed up and spit out. Several would come back with more "facts" and get chewed up again. and again. Some might say thats a waste of time, but for every troll that got chewed up, there were other viewer,(myself included) who learned alot. So, Gary, please go to the lsm and get something so the next time you post it can at least be interesting.


maybe we need a troll school?
I know I called him a troll, but I see him more as troll lite. He believes what he says is the truth, and for him, it is, only because he's never learned the actual truth, the full picture of history, only what our fucked up school system indoctrinated him with.
I like them posting, but honestly, I prefer a more challenging class, not one that forces you to teach the very basics, which is what Gary has done, made us define the very basics of political systems, something most people are prepared for when they venture into a political climate.

It's akin to watching the history channel for real history...Sarcasm there big time. :laugh:

Or Gilligans Island and thinking he could survive if he ever made the misfortune of being stranded on a South Seas island.
Maybe he better rent the complete edition of Survivor too, so he can be an expert from day one, no learning process for him... :biggrin:
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: AndyJackson on March 13, 2018, 08:44:38 AM
If the guy's a little schmuck in high school, I get it.  I try to be nice to kids regardless of their dumbassery.  But if they tromp into an adult conversation with childish ignorance and teen-angst arrogance....... then all bets are off.  Time to STFU and go back and do some legitimate study.

If he's an adult, the fuggim.  He's an annoying twat that should be kicked square in the ass, or the internet equivalent anyway.  Hopefully he gets a real kick in the ass in real life too.  If he goes out in public.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Solar on March 13, 2018, 09:04:26 AM
Quote from: AndyJackson on March 13, 2018, 08:44:38 AM
If the guy's a little schmuck in high school, I get it.  I try to be nice to kids regardless of their dumbassery.  But if they tromp into an adult conversation with childish ignorance and teen-angst arrogance....... then all bets are off.  Time to STFU and go back and do some legitimate study.

If he's an adult, the fuggim.  He's an annoying twat that should be kicked square in the ass, or the internet equivalent anyway.  Hopefully he gets a real kick in the ass in real life too.  If he goes out in public.
I'd venture a guess a teacher has convinced him capitalism is evil, communism has yet to be applied correctly.
Yeah, the lib dream, that oppressive govt hasn't yet been used properly, the Progressive wet dream of forcing people to your will and way of thinking will make them happy, they just have yet to appreciate the Progressives style of slavery.
This nimrod has been given ample evidence from people who've lived long enough to witness the failures of communism and appreciate what a Constitutional Republic has to offer.

It's obvious he has no interest in learning the truth, because it will expose the fact that he was lied to, and worst of all, he'll have to admit his level of gullibility puts him at a 5th-grade level.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: AndyJackson on March 13, 2018, 09:56:06 AM
Quote from: Solar on March 13, 2018, 09:04:26 AM
I'd venture a guess a teacher has convinced him capitalism is evil, communism has yet to be applied correctly.
Yeah, the lib dream, that oppressive govt hasn't yet been used properly, the Progressive wet dream of forcing people to your will and way of thinking will make them happy, they just have yet to appreciate the Progressives style of slavery.
This nimrod has been given ample evidence from people who've lived long enough to witness the failures of communism and appreciate what a Constitutional Republic has to offer.

It's obvious he has no interest in learning the truth, because it will expose the fact that he was lied to, and worst of all, he'll have to admit his level of gullibility puts him at a 5th-grade level.
Communism-Socialism-Marxism-Juche-Etc. are believed by people who are barely older, mentally, than Santa's kids.  Or Jerry's kids.  They have to be perpetually angry and snotty, because that's the only way to deal with their shame, never admit it, and stay on the offensive no matter the shame.

Another perfect example is the Global Warming people.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Solar on March 13, 2018, 10:44:17 AM
Quote from: AndyJackson on March 13, 2018, 09:56:06 AM
Communism-Socialism-Marxism-Juche-Etc. are believed by people who are barely older, mentally, than Santa's kids.  Or Jerry's kids.  They have to be perpetually angry and snotty, because that's the only way to deal with their shame, never admit it, and stay on the offensive no matter the shame.

Another perfect example is the Global Warming people.
Yep, give them just enough information, keep them ignorant of the important details, like how many millions communism has killed vs how many lives have been saved/improved, via capitalism/freedom of association.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: Cryptic Bert on March 13, 2018, 06:45:35 PM
Sounds like someone from the Romper Room has made their way here.
Title: Re: How does China deal with high levels of illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Post by: walkstall on March 13, 2018, 07:05:43 PM
Quote from: The Boo Man... on March 13, 2018, 06:45:35 PM
Sounds like someone from the Romper Room has made their way here.

LOL I don't think it's that smart.