Ricky's last argument was about self publishing. What a sad way to go out.

Quote from: taxed on June 12, 2015, 02:27:28 PM
I think Ricky's last moment was posting something, so I envision the last moment as head-to-keyboard first...

I posted this  the morning he supposedly died. If you are correct, I was deeply glad to be of help.

Quote from: quiller on June 12, 2015, 03:00:16 PM
I posted this  the morning he supposedly died. If you are correct, I was deeply glad to be of help.

I think your book was too much for him to take.

Quote from: The Boo Man... on June 12, 2015, 02:35:20 PM
Ricky's last argument was about self publishing. What a sad way to go out.

Only when you haven't done it, squire!!!    (Then you complain because of how much work went into it...and hopefully learn from mistakes along your way. I complain. Just not here.)

Ricky (Darwinist) was a pedophile liberal waste of air, spreading hate wherever he went. He also knew nothing about self-publishing.

In searching my files, I did find this one, eerily tying-in with Taxed's remark.

Quote from: taxed on June 12, 2015, 03:03:53 PM


I think your book was too much for him to take.

As it happens I am in the final stages of preparing to move from Amazon and its proprietary e-book software for Kindle. With CPF management permission, I'll post more on that when it happens. Then (showing I come here solely to spam my products!) I'll be down the rabbit hole for a while, on #3.

Quote from: quiller on June 12, 2015, 03:10:48 PM
As it happens I am in the final stages of preparing to move from Amazon and its proprietary e-book software for Kindle. With CPF management permission, I'll post more on that when it happens. Then (showing I come here solely to spam my products!) I'll be down the rabbit hole for a while, on #3.

Does Kindle make the people who buy the book also buy their own printer, ink and paper, print and bind the book like Ricky claimed?

Quote from: quiller on June 12, 2015, 03:10:48 PM
As it happens I am in the final stages of preparing to move from Amazon and its proprietary e-book software for Kindle. With CPF management permission, I'll post more on that when it happens. Then (showing I come here solely to spam my products!) I'll be down the rabbit hole for a while, on #3.

Can't wait to see it...

Quote from: The Boo Man... on June 12, 2015, 03:13:22 PM
Does Kindle make the people who buy the book also buy their own printer, ink and paper, print and bind the book like Ricky claimed?

  To hear him talk, the entire bundle of equipment and supplies arrived with every e-book you download. EVERY e-book. We'd have to stack them behind the house after printing, or, I suppose, give them away to the street people.

I'm preparing a 6x9"-format for eventual softcover publication of both books, but not at Amazon. Kindle does offer print-on-demand but I'm not choosing their route.

Quote from: taxed on June 12, 2015, 03:14:33 PM
Can't wait to see it...

You didn't bite at my obsequious and servile attempt to flatter admin here, didja? 

Quote from: taxed on June 12, 2015, 03:14:33 PM
Can't wait to see it...

Me going down the rabbit hole? 

It should be noted that the Tea Party tends to avoid controversial and explosive social issues, generally with the understanding that attention to those issues would take away from the core interests of limited Constitutional government, meaning among other things,  free enterprise; and, The Bill of Rights.

Personally, I would add American Race Relations in that category of intentional distractions. It is important, but not as a core issue in America.

As the Tea Party has evolved, seems to have grown to include anti-communism, anti-authoritarianism. To me, that is entirely justified, under the category of Know Your Enemy.  Same, Islam, ISIS, Moslem Brotherhood, Communist infiltrators.

Quote from: red_dirt on June 16, 2015, 07:30:06 AM
It should be noted that the Tea Party tends to avoid controversial and explosive social issues, generally with the understanding that attention to those issues would take away from the core interests of limited Constitutional government, meaning among other things,  free enterprise; and, The Bill of Rights.

Personally, I would add American Race Relations in that category of intentional distractions. It is important, but not as a core issue in America.

As the Tea Party has evolved, seems to have grown to include anti-communism, anti-authoritarianism. To me, that is entirely justified, under the category of Know Your Enemy.  Same, Islam, ISIS, Moslem Brotherhood, Communist infiltrators.

You make some good points about the mission of TEA. We must be ever diligent as the left will continue to try and muddy the water by trying to draw TEA into the social issues they use a distractions and dividers.

Not sure where to post this, but consider it an important find on a subject dear to my heart but also one that everyone here could benefit from sifting through. It's five pages, not exceptional for a Forbes article, but a long read for the internet. Still, I urge all to read the full article. The subject is how a wealthy, tidy, inclusive, welcoming, US state; that is, the State of Connecticut, was transformed into a dump by Democratic looters who used every trick in the Cloward Piven playbook to occupy the state and strip it of the dead people's money.  It's all here, in  gruesome detail. I know, because my family lived through it.  So did the Bush family. In fact, they were in charge of the social engineering. (Of course, they made a clean getaway, hands clean)

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jimpowell/2013/08/01/how-did-rich-connecticut-morph-into-one-of-americas-worst-performing-economies/

I urge readers to get through the first two pages, which contain the obligatory but utterly false claims that the state was simply mismanaged by rich old white families. That is a lie, but a necessary one for Forbes to keep the Democratic savages happy.
More true that the heirs of Connecticut simply were consumed with cowardice and political correctness, unable to withstand the pressures of traitorous and opportunistic politicians.

Again, the misleading statement that the population of 3.5 million is the result of 300,000 more moving out than moving in. The truth is that the numbers who have moved out are much higher, but balanced by huge immigration from the Third World. What you really have there is a statewide evacuation to the "new" business centers, such as Des Moines, away from the Democratic machine, and an influx of Moslems, non white unskilled, welfare cases. The net loss of 300,000 is a way to get around the truth, which is skilled working people and top management has cleared out, replaced by global flotsam and jetsum.

Just so you guys will know, if we wind up with Bush and Christie, this is what we are in for.