Federal Judge Rules That "Life" Is Unconstitutional

Started by kramarat, December 10, 2012, 01:08:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

kramarat

Think it's a joke? Not.


http://myfox8.com/2012/12/10/judge-finds-nc-choose-life-plates-unconstitutional/

Okay fine, Mr federal judge. The plate for the opposition will read, "Choose Death". How's that? :angry:


kramarat

Quote from: Yawn on December 10, 2012, 01:19:07 PM
And this is why I say you HAVE TO resist and not give up and turn "social" issues over to the wicked.

Sure I'll resist. Big deal.

We only have one federal government, and they just ruled. Case closed.

I disagree with the ruling, (which shouldn't even be a federal matter), but aside from the life issue......... NC doesn't have the money to be creating these "special" plates anyway. They should stop making any of them. We've got a bunch of them, and they are a waste of time and money. If people want to make a statement, they can go buy a bumper sticker. But that's a different subject.

Yawn

QuoteWe only have one federal government, and they just ruled. Case closed.

You keep defaulting to that position. Case ISN'T closed. We've been thru this before.

As Al Sharpton would say, "Resist we much"

kramarat

Quote from: Yawn on December 10, 2012, 01:35:36 PM
You keep defaulting to that position. Case ISN'T closed. We've been thru this before.

As Al Sharpton would say, "Resist we much"

I'll always resist. The attorney general hasn't decided whether he will repeal or not.

Personally, I would satisfy the ACLU by releasing a plate with the opposite view. Which is what they want. They are calling it, "viewpoint discrimination", which is what the left practices daily.

The plate would read, "Choose Death", and that would also close the case.

mdgiles

Quote from: kramarat on December 10, 2012, 02:12:40 PM
I'll always resist. The attorney general hasn't decided whether he will repeal or not.

Personally, I would satisfy the ACLU by releasing a plate with the opposite view. Which is what they want. They are calling it, "viewpoint discrimination", which is what the left practices daily.

The plate would read, "Choose Death", and that would also close the case.
What would be really interesting, is when the ACLU started protesting over the "Choose Death" license plate. And you know they would, arguing that the opposite viewpoint to  "Choose Life" was "Choose Choice" or something. "Choose Death" is entirely too revealing.
"LIBERALS: their willful ignorance is rivaled only by their catastrophic stupidity"!

kramarat

#6
Quote from: mdgiles on December 10, 2012, 02:34:13 PM
What would be really interesting, is when the ACLU started protesting over the "Choose Death" license plate. And you know they would, arguing that the opposite viewpoint to  "Choose Life" was "Choose Choice" or something. "Choose Death" is entirely too revealing.

Legally, I don't think they would have a leg to stand on. They want the opposing view represented. If they attempted to prove in court that that wasn't the opposing view, they would be laughed out.

Two plates:

Choose Life

Choose Death

The ACLU wouldn't dare go after it. :biggrin:

Could you imagine being the ACLU lawyer that went in front of the judge and attempted to prove that death is not the opposite of life? :lol:

kramarat

If you can pin the left down to saying out loud what they want, they can be shamed.