Seems as though there is more hard evidence that Wray has covered up and hide evidence as it pertains to Flynn. The author suggests that he should be fired or he should resign. Never did trust Wray from the beginning. This guy is not a team player. Trump may not fire him till after the election, but its clear that Wray needs to go.....
[url]https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett/url]
Quote from: drifter106 on May 05, 2020, 03:54:09 PM
Seems as though there is more hard evidence that Wray has covered up and hide evidence as it pertains to Flynn. The author suggests that he should be fired or he should resign. Never did trust Wray from the beginning. This guy is not a team player. Trump may not fire him till after the election, but its clear that Wray needs to go.....
[url]https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett/url]
Fired or resign?!?! He ought to be
HUNG!(https://media2.giphy.com/media/l2JejlXI4wC95Nniw/200.gif)
Lets hope Wray is fired.
Who appointed Wray to head of the FBI?
Quote from: Killer Clouds on May 05, 2020, 05:56:43 PM
Who appointed Wray to head of the FBI?
Trump....and thats one thing I am trying to understand. Why?????
Quote from: Mercy Otis Warren on May 05, 2020, 04:18:05 PM
Fired or resign?!?! He ought to be HUNG!
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/l2JejlXI4wC95Nniw/200.gif)
For cooperating with the Attorney General and John Durham?
Did you vote for Hillary?
Quote from: drifter106 on May 05, 2020, 05:59:14 PM
Trump....and thats one thing I am trying to understand. Why?????
Because he cleaned out the FBI, removed the criminal element, revamping the procedures that allowed this criminal activity to destroy the institution, cracks down on leaks, and cooperates with Barr like Stockton-to-Malone.
He's been an outstanding FBI Director. I know everyone's used to Comey who jumps in front of the cameras, but Wray is a boring nuts-and-bolts guy, which is exactly what the department needed.
really? So why is he dragging the reports on Flynn? You say he cleaned out the FBI...didn't do a very good job. One of the bad guys is our in San Fransisco heading up a dept.
If you chose to believe that....thats your affair. I am not going to take the time where you are saying misleading statements and proving you wrong.
Quote from: drifter106 on May 05, 2020, 06:19:36 PM
really? So why is he dragging the reports on Flynn?
It was material used in Durham's investigation. Why would he release that?
Quote
You say he cleaned out the FBI...didn't do a very good job. One of the bad guys is our in San Fransisco heading up a dept.
He cleaned out the coup-plotters. He's actively cleaning up the FBI. Can you post an example of wrongdoing by the head of the SF Field Office for my knowledge?
Quote
If you chose to believe that....thats your affair. I am not going to take the time where you are saying misleading statements and proving you wrong.
You said he dragged his feet on reports, when in reality, he already turned that material over to Durham. I'm not sure why cooperating with Durham is a problem, and how that's "dragging his feet".
Quote from: drifter106 on May 05, 2020, 05:59:14 PM
Trump....and thats one thing I am trying to understand. Why?????
Just reinforces my point that Trump's weakness is his choice of personnel.
Quote from: taxed on May 05, 2020, 06:37:33 PM
It was material used in Durham's investigation. Why would he release that?
He cleaned out the coup-plotters. He's actively cleaning up the FBI. Can you post an example of wrongdoing by the head of the SF Field Office for my knowledge?
You said he dragged his feet on reports, when in reality, he already turned that material over to Durham. I'm not sure why cooperating with Durham is a problem, and how that's "dragging his feet".
Yeah...the wrong material!! how in HELL can you say he cooperated?? LOL
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/04/26/report-fbi-director-wray-behind-suppression-of-stunning-exculpatory-evidence-in-flynn-case/
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 05, 2020, 06:46:12 PM
Yeah...the wrong material!! how in HELL can you say he cooperated?? LOL
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/04/26/report-fbi-director-wray-behind-suppression-of-stunning-exculpatory-evidence-in-flynn-case/
(* sigh *)
From today:
https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1257759586733428736
https://twitter.com/actual_chaos/status/1257790691016572928
Quote from: taxed on May 05, 2020, 07:49:23 PM
https://twitter.com/actual_chaos/status/1257790691016572928
Thats PR bullshit....haven't we heard Trump say "flowery" things about people? But you know he wasn't speaking from his heart. When RBG dies don't you think he will be anxious to get another conservative on the bench? Yea...he will dress it up and give her a lot of praise (flowery words). But you and everyone else knows that he is waiting for it to happen. When everything is laid out we will see who is gonna cover their ass.
In so far as Wray....why didn't he weed out some of the people in the FBI that are mentioned in this link? The people that Comey sent over to the WH to interview Flynn. They told Flynn you don't need a lawyer....They were part of the setup to get Flynn fired and/or part of the big picture to get Trump.
As of now they have been transferred to other places in the FBI, they are part of the deep state.
Wray is gonna do what he has to do to cover his butt.. I trust him just as far as CJ can spit.
this can shed some light on it...
[img]https://townhall.com/columnists/mattvespa/2020/05/05/after-fbis-flynn-entrapment-scheme-exposed-the-institution-needs-a-healthy-dose-of-institutional-colon-blow-n2568187/img]
here is another link on squeaky clean Mr. Wray from Rep. Jim Jordan on fox news....
scroll down on the left side...
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6154323686001#sp=show-clips
Quote from: drifter106 on May 05, 2020, 09:40:02 PM
Thats PR bullshit....haven't we heard Trump say "flowery" things about people? But you know he wasn't speaking from his heart. When RBG dies don't you think he will be anxious to get another conservative on the bench? Yea...he will dress it up and give her a lot of praise (flowery words). But you and everyone else knows that he is waiting for it to happen. When everything is laid out we will see who is gonna cover their ass.
"I hate Wray, but I don't know why!!" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote
In so far as Wray....why didn't he weed out some of the people in the FBI that are mentioned in this link? The people that Comey sent over to the WH to interview Flynn. They told Flynn you don't need a lawyer....They were part of the setup to get Flynn fired and/or part of the big picture to get Trump.
McCabe is gone. Actually, he was fired. Actually, he's about to get arrested. Boente flipped, and outed McCabe on that email where he said McCabe had him change the 302s.
Quote
As of now they have been transferred to other places in the FBI, they are part of the deep state.
Like who? Some flipped, and some are complicit directly. You'd need to name someone specific.
Quote
Wray is gonna do what he has to do to cover his butt.. I trust him just as far as CJ can spit.
If you ever figure out why, let me know....
Quote
this can shed some light on it...
[img]https://townhall.com/columnists/mattvespa/2020/05/05/after-fbis-flynn-entrapment-scheme-exposed-the-institution-needs-a-healthy-dose-of-institutional-colon-blow-n2568187/img]
I couldn't get past the paywall without registering....
I'm trying to imagine what it would be like if you were as pissed at Van Grack, et al, as you are with Wray, who protected the investigations.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6154323686001#sp=show-clips
Bill Priestap
here is one of them....guess what, he is gonna retire. Can't think of who his buddy was and not gonna take the time to find him but he is as guilty as this guy. Now back to my initial claim about Wray...why didn't he fire him when he SHOULD HAVE?
This is self explanatory don't you think?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/deep-state-fbi-agent-bill-priestap-caught-in-a-lie-referring-to-lisa-and-peter-strzok-affair/
Quote from: drifter106 on May 05, 2020, 10:06:03 PM
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6154323686001#sp=show-clips
Who was "hiding the docs"? It can't be Wray, if he was providing documents to Durham.
Any ideas?
Also, why are you assuming Wray was complicit in this? What evidence do you have that Wray is trying to conspire in a cover-up?
Quote from: drifter106 on May 05, 2020, 10:19:15 PM
Bill Priestap
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Bill Priestap was the first one to flip! He was cooperating from Day 1... Comey and Yates were trying to leave him holding the bag...
Quote
here is one of them....guess what, he is gonna retire. Can't think of who his buddy was and not gonna take the time to find him but he is as guilty as this guy. Now back to my initial claim about Wray...why didn't he fire him when he SHOULD HAVE?
Once you fire them, the IG couldn't interview them. With Preistap, why fire the guy who cooperated and outed everyone? Preistap is a good guy in the story, actually. This is actually a point of agreement by most of the independent researchers.
Quote
This is self explanatory don't you think?
Yes.
Quote
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/deep-state-fbi-agent-bill-priestap-caught-in-a-lie-referring-to-lisa-and-peter-strzok-affair/
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
The Gateway Pundit, early on, thought "Bill" was Bill Clinton... TGP is an absolute joke. Regarding the "lie", he said "I'd guess"... that gives you wiggle room and not a lie. The fact TGP doesn't know this is hilarious...
Quote
have a good one taxed...gonna go to bed...talk at u tomorrow :smile:
Have a good evening!!
One of the brains behind the coup plot is not happy with Wray.
https://twitter.com/rexxurection/status/1257841121352249345
Rex is spot on:
https://twitter.com/rexxurection/status/1257782817280241664
He may be spot on but he is on the wrong spot....smoke hasn't cleared yet.
Quote from: drifter106 on May 05, 2020, 11:58:33 PM
He may be spot on but he is on the wrong spot....smoke hasn't cleared yet.
Would you at least acknowledge that materials Wray has been accused of hiding were actually turned over to Durham and the IG?
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 05, 2020, 06:46:12 PM
Yeah...the wrong material!! how in HELL can you say he cooperated?? LOL
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/04/26/report-fbi-director-wray-behind-suppression-of-stunning-exculpatory-evidence-in-flynn-case/
A source with "direct knowledge of the situation" told the Daily Caller that Boente was acting in coordination with the Trump-appointed Wray.
(https://media1.tenor.com/images/239bfd3bce14ff3cc2a65bd83adb185d/tenor.gif?itemid=5494019)
Who are you going to believe a source or a person that puts his name to it.
Now read this article without any secret or special sources....... :thumbsup:
Wray pushes back through spokesman as GOP criticism of FBI intensifiesHale, an assistant director for public affairs, said the FBI director, now in the third year of his tenure, had been providing full cooperation to two special prosecutors looking at the FBI's conduct in the Russia case as well as the Justice Department's chief watchdog.
"Under Director Wray's leadership, the FBI has fully cooperated and been transparent with the review being conducted by U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen, just as it has been with U.S. Attorney John Durham and was with Inspector General Michael Horowitz," the spokesman said.
"With regard to certain documents in the Michael Flynn matter from the 2016-2017 time period that are now the subject of reporting by the press, the FBI previously produced those materials to the Inspector General and U.S. Attorney Durham," he added. "The Flynn investigation was initiated and conducted during this time period, under prior FBI leadership. Since taking office, Director Wray has stressed the importance of strictly abiding by established processes, without exception."
READ MORE HERE.........
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/wray-pushes-back-through-spokesman-gop-criticism-fbi-intensifies
Quote from: Bronx on May 06, 2020, 04:08:32 AM
A source with "direct knowledge of the situation" told the Daily Caller that Boente was acting in coordination with the Trump-appointed Wray.
(https://media1.tenor.com/images/239bfd3bce14ff3cc2a65bd83adb185d/tenor.gif?itemid=5494019)
Who are you going to believe a source or a person that puts his name to it.
Now read this article without any secret or special sources....... :thumbsup:
Wray pushes back through spokesman as GOP criticism of FBI intensifies
Hale, an assistant director for public affairs, said the FBI director, now in the third year of his tenure, had been providing full cooperation to two special prosecutors looking at the FBI's conduct in the Russia case as well as the Justice Department's chief watchdog.
"Under Director Wray's leadership, the FBI has fully cooperated and been transparent with the review being conducted by U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen, just as it has been with U.S. Attorney John Durham and was with Inspector General Michael Horowitz," the spokesman said.
"With regard to certain documents in the Michael Flynn matter from the 2016-2017 time period that are now the subject of reporting by the press, the FBI previously produced those materials to the Inspector General and U.S. Attorney Durham," he added. "The Flynn investigation was initiated and conducted during this time period, under prior FBI leadership. Since taking office, Director Wray has stressed the importance of strictly abiding by established processes, without exception."
READ MORE HERE.........
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/wray-pushes-back-through-spokesman-gop-criticism-fbi-intensifies
I found the source!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41ENCM70xr0
Quote from: taxed on May 06, 2020, 04:13:23 AM
I found the source!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41ENCM70xr0
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
This one might kick the hornets' nest...
https://conservativehardliner.com/christopher-wray-has-been-doing-excellent-job
this is what I will acknowledge...
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett
https://www.foxnews.com
Quote from: drifter106 on May 06, 2020, 09:11:19 AM
this is what I will acknowledge...
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett
https://www.foxnews.com
For the record, you will not acknowledge that Wray turned over the evidence to Durham and Horowitz.
Good stuff.
Quote from: taxed on May 06, 2020, 09:33:42 AM
For the record, you will not acknowledge that Wray turned over the evidence to Durham and Horowitz.
Good stuff.
Taxed I'm with you on this. Until I see proof and not from damn secret source that Wray is one of the bad guys.
Now to throw a wrench in the game. If I was ever to sit on a FBI case I would have to take a really hard look at the evidence they produce and still I don't know if I can convict knowing all that what happen to Michael Flynn a Three Star General of the United States Army.
Quote from: Bronx on May 06, 2020, 10:45:05 AM
Taxed I'm with you on this. Until I see proof and not from damn secret source that Wray is one of the bad guys.
Now to throw a wrench in the game. If I was ever to sit on a FBI case I would have to take a really hard look at the evidence they produce and still I don't know if I can convict knowing all that what happen to Michael Flynn a Three Star General of the United States Army.
How amazing is it that we have proof that he turned over evidence to the people who are going to prosecute these criminals, yet they're saying he was hiding it? I swear, it's like I'm in the Twilight Zone.
I got ratio'd to death in the comments sectioned of that article... "He's been holding up Judicial Watch"... I guess Wray was supposed to release grand jury material to FOIA requests? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
The biggest takeaway for me is NOBODY KNEW that Wray turned that shit over. They are running an airtight operation over there.
Quote from: taxed on May 06, 2020, 09:33:42 AM
For the record, you will not acknowledge that Wray turned over the evidence to Durham and Horowitz.
Good stuff.
I knew it was FOX!
Quote from: Solar on May 06, 2020, 11:12:06 AM
I knew it was FOX!
I tell ya', I have a newfound respect for propagandists...
Quote from: taxed on May 06, 2020, 10:51:27 AM
How amazing is it that we have proof that he turned over evidence to the people who are going to prosecute these criminals, yet they're saying he was hiding it? I swear, it's like I'm in the Twilight Zone.
I got ratio'd to death in the comments sectioned of that article... "He's been holding up Judicial Watch"... I guess Wray was supposed to release grand jury material to FOIA requests? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
The biggest takeaway for me is NOBODY KNEW that Wray turned that shit over. They are running an airtight operation over there.
I warned you about being friends with Sgt. Friday............. :lol: :lol: :lol:
I believe the media on our side has been writing checks that couldn't be cashed since day one. People are just tired of everything being reported and nothing happens. Remember I exploded when AG Barr let I think it was Comey or one of them freaks off the hook for lying. I believe in that case AG Barr should have kept silent. Also, I think people want action because it has been a long three years since the deep state has been exposed.
People don't realize it takes a very long time to build a solid case. They see the democrats get quick convictions on false charges. Our side doesn't believe in false charges, or I hope we don't, but they want quick results like convictions, and they want them NOW.
Quote from: taxed on May 06, 2020, 11:12:49 AM
I tell ya', I have a newfound respect for propagandists...
It really does explain why so many on the Right have made up their minds. Just one more reason not to listen to talking heads, especially RINO.
Quote from: Bronx on May 06, 2020, 11:17:23 AM
I warned you about being friends with Sgt. Friday............. :lol: :lol: :lol:
I believe the media on our side has been writing checks that couldn't be cashed since day one. People are just tired of everything being reported and nothing happens. Remember I exploded when AG Barr let I think it was Comey or one of them freaks off the hook for lying. I believe in that case AG Barr should have kept silent. Also, I think people want action because it has been a long three years since the deep state has been exposed.
People don't realize it takes a very long time to build a solid case. They see the democrats get quick convictions on false charges. Our side doesn't believe in false charges, or I hope we don't, but they want quick results like convictions, and they want them NOW.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I've been going back and forth with Sarge... he thinks it's hilarious...
Quote from: Solar on May 06, 2020, 11:17:39 AM
It really does explain why so many on the Right have made up their minds. Just one more reason not to listen to talking heads, especially RINO.
This is one of those things where I don't know how to process it. By nature I have to have some sliver of sanity that I can latch onto and control. If people flat out are so committed that they will say a guy who's been protecting evidence for prosecutions that EVERYONE is wanting and turning that evidence over to the prosecutors is "holding onto and hiding stuff", then my brain just goes into shutdown mode because it doesn't know how to deal with that person....
Quote from: taxed on May 06, 2020, 11:32:22 AM
This is one of those things where I don't know how to process it. By nature I have to have some sliver of sanity that I can latch onto and control. If people flat out are so committed that they will say a guy who's been protecting evidence for prosecutions that EVERYONE is wanting and turning that evidence over to the prosecutors is "holding onto and hiding stuff", then my brain just goes into shutdown mode because it doesn't know how to deal with that person....
Things are happening pretty fast, your article may be up when the FOX is forced to tell the truth about Wray.
It's pretty easy to trust Q all these months later over the word of the Establishments arm FOX.
The fact that the FIB is still protecting it's coup attemptees and lawbreakers gives a clue.
Chris Wray's FBI continues to cover for Team ... - TheHill
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/455228...
Chris Wray's FBI continues to cover for Team Comey's Russia shenanigans. The FBI is going to court to fight the public release of a small number of documents the State Department sent to agents from Christopher Steele, the British intelligence operative and Hillary Clinton-paid political muckraker, during the 2016 election.
GOP Senators to FBI: Produce 'All' Records on Collusion ...
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/04/17/gop...
Apr 17, 2020 · FBI Director Christopher Wray must produce "all records" from the bureau's Russia collusion investigation that evidence declassified this week revealed to be "infected by Russian disinformation," two Republican senators wrote in a letter Thursday.
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Christopher Wray's FBI Caught in ...
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/breaking...
Author: Joe Hoft
We reported on September 19th... that Texas businessman Ed Butowsky filed a lawsuit where he ...
Roger Stone's Indictment. Trump friend Roger Stone was indicted after being charged by the ...
We also reported – When Ty Clevenger requested documents from the FBI related to any ...
We didn't believe the FBI never investigated the Seth Rich murder even though the NSA said the ...
See full list on thegatewaypundit.com
Gregg Jarrett: Flynn cover-up — FBI's Wray must go ...
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi...
1 day ago · Wray also suppressed evidence that the FBI knew ex-British spy Christopher Steele was a charlatan who composed a phony "dossier" of Russian disinformation that served as the premise for the ...
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 06, 2020, 12:02:03 PM
The fact that the FIB is still protecting it's coup attemptees and lawbreakers gives a clue.
Chris Wray's FBI continues to cover for Team ... - TheHill
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/455228...
Chris Wray's FBI continues to cover for Team Comey's Russia shenanigans. The FBI is going to court to fight the public release of a small number of documents the State Department sent to agents from Christopher Steele, the British intelligence operative and Hillary Clinton-paid political muckraker, during the 2016 election.
GOP Senators to FBI: Produce 'All' Records on Collusion ...
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/04/17/gop...
Apr 17, 2020 · FBI Director Christopher Wray must produce "all records" from the bureau's Russia collusion investigation that evidence declassified this week revealed to be "infected by Russian disinformation," two Republican senators wrote in a letter Thursday.
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Christopher Wray's FBI Caught in ...
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/breaking...
Author: Joe Hoft
We reported on September 19th... that Texas businessman Ed Butowsky filed a lawsuit where he ...
Roger Stone's Indictment. Trump friend Roger Stone was indicted after being charged by the ...
We also reported – When Ty Clevenger requested documents from the FBI related to any ...
We didn't believe the FBI never investigated the Seth Rich murder even though the NSA said the ...
See full list on thegatewaypundit.com
Gregg Jarrett: Flynn cover-up — FBI's Wray must go ...
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi...
1 day ago · Wray also suppressed evidence that the FBI knew ex-British spy Christopher Steele was a charlatan who composed a phony "dossier" of Russian disinformation that served as the premise for the ...
None of those links work.
BTW, have you figured out what evidence Wray suppressed? Or is Hannity covering that tonight...
Gregg Jarrett: Flynn cover-up — FBI's Wray must go. Americans need director they can trust
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett (https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett)
Kellyanne Conway: FBI Director Wray, James Comey must address concerns about Flynn case
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kellyanne-conway-fbi-director-wray-comey-should-testify-in-congress (https://www.foxnews.com/media/kellyanne-conway-fbi-director-wray-comey-should-testify-in-congress)
Trump slams FBI Director Christopher Wray for backing DOJ Russia report findings
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/10/trump-slams-fbi-director-christopher-wray-over-doj-russia-report-reaction.html (https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/10/trump-slams-fbi-director-christopher-wray-over-doj-russia-report-reaction.html)
Pressure mounts on Wray as FBI behavior in Russia case comes into clearer focus
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/pressure-mounts-christopher-wray-fbi-behavior-russia (https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/pressure-mounts-christopher-wray-fbi-behavior-russia)
Quote from: Mercy Otis Warren on May 06, 2020, 01:28:35 PM
Gregg Jarrett: Flynn cover-up — FBI's Wray must go. Americans need director they can trust
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett (https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett)
Kellyanne Conway: FBI Director Wray, James Comey must address concerns about Flynn case
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kellyanne-conway-fbi-director-wray-comey-should-testify-in-congress (https://www.foxnews.com/media/kellyanne-conway-fbi-director-wray-comey-should-testify-in-congress)
Trump slams FBI Director Christopher Wray for backing DOJ Russia report findings
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/10/trump-slams-fbi-director-christopher-wray-over-doj-russia-report-reaction.html (https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/10/trump-slams-fbi-director-christopher-wray-over-doj-russia-report-reaction.html)
Pressure mounts on Wray as FBI behavior in Russia case comes into clearer focus
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/pressure-mounts-christopher-wray-fbi-behavior-russia (https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/pressure-mounts-christopher-wray-fbi-behavior-russia)
(https://i.imgflip.com/40e17f.jpg)
Quote from: taxed on May 06, 2020, 01:16:55 PM
None of those links work.
BTW, have you figured out what evidence Wray suppressed? Or is Hannity covering that tonight...
Knowing what the FIB has done...how do you justify your trust in this man?
and as for Hannity...I may see about 5 minutes of his show so I don't know what he will be speaking about. I do know that he has been more right than wrong.
https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/24/fbi-director-christopher-wray-fought-to-withhold-exculpatory-evidence-mike-flynn-case/
https://conservativechoicecampaign.com/no-wonder-he-wont-act-sidney-powell-reveals-chris-wray-was-the-one-to-promote-terrorist-of-a-prosecutor-andrew-weissmann-video/
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 06, 2020, 01:46:39 PM
Knowing what the FIB has done...how do you justify your trust in this man?
You know he wasn't there when all that happened, right? That was the 6'8" freak show named Comey...
Quote
and as for Hannity...I may see about 5 minutes of his show so I don't know what he will be speaking about. I do know that he has been more right than wrong.
You guys (those you get your narrative from) were saying that Mueller was going to hurt Trump. I kept hearing how the investigation was NEVER going to end. I kept hearing how Flynn is screwed and will never get justice. On and on, the "but nothing's happening" crowd continues to be wrong and put their lack of trust for Trump on full display.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 06, 2020, 01:49:02 PM
https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/24/fbi-director-christopher-wray-fought-to-withhold-exculpatory-evidence-mike-flynn-case/
The question us sane people have is if he was withholding evidence, how did Durham get it from his hands? Can you get into the physics of how that happened?
Quote
https://conservativechoicecampaign.com/no-wonder-he-wont-act-sidney-powell-reveals-chris-wray-was-the-one-to-promote-terrorist-of-a-prosecutor-andrew-weissmann-video/
Where did Powell reveal that? Ask yourself this basic, simple question: from where did the special counsel get those documents?
Well then you answer this. WHY did he hide exculpatory evidence *IN THE FIRST place.
*caps for emphasis only.
We would have known nothing about it had Powell not done some digging. Perhaps one of the clerks in the Flynn's former attorneys office gave her a clue.
Withholding evidence is NOT the purview of the FIB.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 06, 2020, 02:01:26 PM
Well then you answer this. WHY did he hide exculpatory evidence *IN THE FIRST place.
Who had it?
Quote
*caps for emphasis only.
We would have known nothing about it had Powell not done some digging. Perhaps one of the clerks in the Flynn's former attorneys office gave her a clue.
Withholding evidence is NOT the purview of the FIB.
Incorrect. The evidence was uncovered by the special prosecutor, appointed by Barr, to investigate the Flynn prosecutors.
Mueller has hurt The President. Rather than to say The president is innocent because there is no evidence to show otherwise, He said,
'there is no evidence to show this president is guilty. This insinuates that this president is guilty, we just can't find the evidence.
He left hope in the black hearts of the left. And did not ruin himself in the eyes of his co conspirators.
You are certainly quick to give these guys the cover as the left does. I don't get this. IN spite of everything....you contend Wray is innocent? And mueller is ethical? Look further into their histories.
Quote from: taxed on May 06, 2020, 09:33:42 AM
For the record, you will not acknowledge that Wray turned over the evidence to Durham and Horowitz.
Good stuff.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wray-facing-heat-from-gop-critics-in-aftermath-of-flynn-reveal
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 06, 2020, 02:07:31 PM
Mueller has hurt The President.
Incorrect. The Mueller report not only came away with "no obstruction and no collusion", it exposed the corruption and criminals in the FBI and DOJ.
Quote
Rather than to say The president is innocent because there is no evidence to show otherwise, He said,
'there is no evidence to show this president is guilty. This insinuates that this president is guilty, we just can't find the evidence.
It was a coverup operation. Mueller let it run its course, and now look where we're at: Flynn's prosecutors are going to jail, AND his previous counsel run by Eric Holder are in a world of hurt. It also pissed off the country the more they learned it was a witch hunt.
Quote
He left hope in the black hearts of the left. And did not ruin himself in the eyes of his co conspirators.
I'm not seeing a lot of hope on the left.
Quote
You are certainly quick to give these guys the cover as the left does. I don't get this. IN spite of everything....you contend Wray is innocent? And mueller is ethical? Look further into their histories.
What did Mueller do? What did Wray do? You haven't answered those questions. You just keep posting Greg Jarrett links. I'd love to hear YOUR take on why you think this.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 06, 2020, 02:12:51 PM
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wray-facing-heat-from-gop-critics-in-aftermath-of-flynn-reveal
This video completely proves Wray did nothing wrong. Wray was not part of the Mueller team.
You know this, right?
dam CJ...you got a can of whip ass in your back pocket??? :lol:
I think ya'll be jumping the gun ad perhaps putting too much stock in what media plants are saying. I know how much skullduggery goes on in Major Law Enforcement organizations first hand. I can tell you that the few snakes like Comey, Strozk et al are just the tip of the iceberg. They had 8 years under the Kenyan to totally revamp the organization and still infest it. Wray has his work cut out for him, and dont think for one second there aren't FOC (Friends of Comey) trying every thing they can to cast a cloud over Wray.
Wait...be patient.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on May 06, 2020, 05:03:56 PM
I think ya'll be jumping the gun ad perhaps putting too much stock in what media plants are saying. I know how much skullduggery goes on in Major Law Enforcement organizations first hand. I can tell you that the few snakes like Comey, Strozk et al are just the tip of the iceberg. They had 8 years under the Kenyan to totally revamp the organization and still infest it. Wray has his work cut out for him, and dont think for one second there aren't FOC (Friends of Comey) trying every thing they can to cast a cloud over Wray.
Wait...be patient.
Exacrtly Billy! Not to mention Q said "Trust Wray", and we know from experience that the Trump Admin uses a lot of sleight of hand as in, "Look over there", while Wray pretends to back stab Trump, keeping the left completely off guard.
Then there's the fact Trump appointed Wray, if Wray was not doing his job as directed, he'd be out on his ass in a heartbeat.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on May 06, 2020, 05:03:56 PM
I think ya'll be jumping the gun ad perhaps putting too much stock in what media plants are saying. I know how much skullduggery goes on in Major Law Enforcement organizations first hand. I can tell you that the few snakes like Comey, Strozk et al are just the tip of the iceberg. They had 8 years under the Kenyan to totally revamp the organization and still infest it. Wray has his work cut out for him, and dont think for one second there aren't FOC (Friends of Comey) trying every thing they can to cast a cloud over Wray.
Wait...be patient.
what he said....
Quote from: Solar on May 06, 2020, 05:57:01 PM
Exacrtly Billy! Not to mention Q said "Trust Wray", and we know from experience that the Trump Admin uses a lot of sleight of hand as in, "Look over there", while Wray pretends to back stab Trump, keeping the left completely off guard.
Then there's the fact Trump appointed Wray, if Wray was not doing his job as directed, he'd be out on his ass in a heartbeat.
Trump aslo appointed Sessions, Mathis and Tillerson. Were they team players?
How quickly we forget....
In the end, I hope I am wrong about Wray...but to many instances of his actions or lack thereof leads me to believe he is on the wrong side. If and when all the smokes clear and it shows he is a team player, I will humbly come before ye, on my knees and beg for your pardon! :lol:
Quote from: drifter106 on May 06, 2020, 06:12:39 PM
Trump aslo appointed Sessions, Mathis and Tillerson. Were they team players?
How quickly we forget....
Like I said, we aren't privy to the underpinnings of the Trump plan. We don't know if he appoints people to smoke out moles, or do the job they were hired to do.
I tend to trust Q, he seems to know what's going on behind the scenes and he said "Trust Wray", that's good enough for me.
Like Billy, I too have a background in law enforcement as an investigator, nowhere near as extensive as his. But I never take anything at face value, especially when it comes from the media, especially FOX and CNN.
Why hasn't Trump fired Wray?
Quote from: Solar on May 06, 2020, 06:28:03 PM
Like I said, we aren't privy to the underpinnings of the Trump plan. We don't know if he appoints people to smoke out moles, or do the job they were hired to do.
I tend to trust Q, he seems to know what's going on behind the scenes and he said "Trust Wray", that's good enough for me.
Like Billy, I too have a background in law enforcement as an investigator, nowhere near as extensive as his. But I never take anything at face value, especially when it comes from the media, especially FOX and CNN.
Why hasn't Trump fired Wray?
Trump hasn't fired Wray because Trump is shitty at making personnel decisions.
Quote from: drifter106 on May 06, 2020, 06:12:39 PM
Trump aslo appointed Sessions
That was a good move. It seems you disagree.
Quote
, Mathis and Tillerson. Were they team players?
So?
Quote
How quickly we forget....
Forget what?
Quote
In the end, I hope I am wrong about Wray...but to many instances of his actions or lack thereof leads me to believe he is on the wrong side. If and when all the smokes clear and it shows he is a team player, I will humbly come before ye, on my knees and beg for your pardon! :lol:
I have no insight into Wray's soul, but if I'm going to label someone as evil and a traitor to the country, I need some sort of evidence. Properly keeping grand jury material safe from traitors like Schiff and Feinstein, while providing it to the prosecutors in secret doesn't rise to the level of "traitor" to me.
I think history will be kind to Sessions, Rosenstein, and Wray. We're also about to get a bunch of new transcripts, so it will be interesting to see where things line up. Hopefully you can switch to an open mind on this whole thing, because it's incredibly fascinating (at least for me) to track the behind-the-scenes battle.
If I may give you two articles, both from Jeff Carlson, who I think is _the_ definitive source on Spygate.
This one is about the head up to, and shortly after, the election. It's about Admiral Mike Rogers (then-head of NSA) when he caught the illegal queries and shut it down. Also, after the election, he flew to NY to meet with Trump at Trump Tower to tell them Hussein was spying on him... he moved the transition team to his New Jersey property the next day.
https://themarketswork.com/2018/01/10/an-american-hero-the-death-of-a-fisa-narrative/
This one covers the "Nine days in May", from the moment Comey was fired up to the appointment of Mueller. It was a fascinating, dense sequence of events that, I believe, really saved things from going off the rails.
https://themarketswork.com/2018/12/08/nine-days-in-may-the-quiet-struggle-between-rosenstein-and-mccabe/
The first one is a little longer than the second, but they're good foundations for the entire story. It's my hope you can appreciate the story instead of calling people, who likely are good guys in the story, as "traitors"; I just post that because you seem to have a glimmer of an open mind. If you don't ready them, no biggie....
thanks for the links...FYI, I just watched OUT OF SHADOWS OFFICIAL clip from the "Q" thread. That was an eye opener for me. Yes, I do consider myself to be opened minded. However, as with most people there needs to be evidence, solid evidence to change my way of thinking or interrupting the facts. Doesn't bother me to admit that I am wrong but the information must be convincing.
At the moment, I am trying to learn more about this Q thing. Sent Solar a PM asking for more information as it pertains to Q. I have this gut feeling that I maybe in for an "eye opener".
As time moves forward I am becoming more skeptical of information that one gets these days. Especially after watching the video OUT OF SHADOWS.....
Quote from: drifter106 on May 06, 2020, 10:51:32 PM
thanks for the links...FYI, I just watched OUT OF SHADOWS OFFICIAL clip from the "Q" thread. That was an eye opener for me. Yes, I do consider myself to be opened minded. However, as with most people there needs to be evidence, solid evidence to change my way of thinking or interrupting the facts. Doesn't bother me to admit that I am wrong but the information must be convincing.
At the moment, I am trying to learn more about this Q thing. Sent Solar a PM asking for more information as it pertains to Q. I have this gut feeling that I maybe in for an "eye opener".
As time moves forward I am becoming more skeptical of information that one gets these days. Especially after watching the video OUT OF SHADOWS.....
That's a long road ahead....
Quote from: drifter106 on May 06, 2020, 10:51:32 PM
thanks for the links...FYI, I just watched OUT OF SHADOWS OFFICIAL clip from the "Q" thread. That was an eye opener for me. Yes, I do consider myself to be opened minded. However, as with most people there needs to be evidence, solid evidence to change my way of thinking or interrupting the facts. Doesn't bother me to admit that I am wrong but the information must be convincing.
At the moment, I am trying to learn more about this Q thing. Sent Solar a PM asking for more information as it pertains to Q. I have this gut feeling that I maybe in for an "eye opener".
As time moves forward I am becoming more skeptical of information that one gets these days. Especially after watching the video OUT OF SHADOWS.....
:thumbup: know what you mean, when we look to the government for answers we are in trouble.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 06, 2020, 02:07:31 PM
Mueller has hurt The President. Rather than to say The president is innocent because there is no evidence to show otherwise, He said,
'there is no evidence to show this president is guilty. This insinuates that this president is guilty, we just can't find the evidence.
He left hope in the black hearts of the left. And did not ruin himself in the eyes of his co conspirators.
You are certainly quick to give these guys the cover as the left does. I don't get this. IN spite of everything....you contend Wray is innocent? And mueller is ethical? Look further into their histories.
Please use the quote function so we know who you are referring to...Thanks..... :thumbsup:
Now to your concerns. It was illegal for Mueller to have the 2nd part of the report. That's the part you are missing...it wasn't Mueller's job to convict or exonerate. Here is Ratcliffe just destroying Mueller about what's troubling you in Mueller report.
Please watch the five minutes of the Ratcliffe and Mueller exchange. It's art. This is why the democrats, commies, rinos and some republicans (Burr) don't want Ratcliffe to head the DNI. He will expose and bring forth everything about this coup.
https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1257694425687482374
Quote from: Killer Clouds on May 06, 2020, 07:51:37 PM
Trump hasn't fired Wray because Trump is shitty at making personnel decisions.
If you only had a fraction of a clue as to just how fuckin stupid that comment was. Seriously!
Quote from: taxed on May 05, 2020, 05:59:30 PM
For cooperating with the Attorney General and John Durham?
Did you vote for Hillary?
Once again, you DON'T know people.
I voted for Trump!
Quote from: Mercy Otis Warren on May 07, 2020, 04:45:01 PM
Once again, you DON'T know people. I voted for Trump!
I'm very thankful you did.
Quote from: taxed on May 05, 2020, 06:57:48 PM
(* sigh *)
From today:
https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1257759586733428736
A twitter thread is your PROOF?
Quote from: Mercy Otis Warren on May 07, 2020, 04:47:39 PM
A twitter thread is your PROOF?
Well, he's an expert attorney on this subject, but see that little string of letters that are colored blue? That's a link. Click it and it brings up the article.
Quote from: drifter106 on May 05, 2020, 09:40:02 PM
Thats PR bullshit....haven't we heard Trump say "flowery" things about people? But you know he wasn't speaking from his heart. When RBG dies don't you think he will be anxious to get another conservative on the bench? Yea...he will dress it up and give her a lot of praise (flowery words). But you and everyone else knows that he is waiting for it to happen. When everything is laid out we will see who is gonna cover their ass.
In so far as Wray....why didn't he weed out some of the people in the FBI that are mentioned in this link? The people that Comey sent over to the WH to interview Flynn. They told Flynn you don't need a lawyer....They were part of the setup to get Flynn fired and/or part of the big picture to get Trump.
As of now they have been transferred to other places in the FBI, they are part of the deep state.
Wray is gonna do what he has to do to cover his butt.. I trust him just as far as CJ can spit.
this can shed some light on it...
[img]https://townhall.com/columnists/mattvespa/2020/05/05/after-fbis-flynn-entrapment-scheme-exposed-the-institution-needs-a-healthy-dose-of-institutional-colon-blow-n2568187/img]
here is another link on squeaky clean Mr. Wray from Rep. Jim Jordan on fox news....
scroll down on the left side...
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6154323686001#sp=show-clips
Thank you Drifter!
Inside FBI director Chris Wray's fate
https://www.axios.com/fbi-michael-flynn-chris-wray-trump-00c13ada-569b-4f5e-bfa3-354b794ea9e0.html (https://www.axios.com/fbi-michael-flynn-chris-wray-trump-00c13ada-569b-4f5e-bfa3-354b794ea9e0.html)
Pressure builds in Trumpworld to fire FBI director Christopher Wray
https://www.axios.com/fbi-christopher-wray-trump-bongino-gorka-36bfbf46-96e2-41cb-93c3-31b362319c3b.html (https://www.axios.com/fbi-christopher-wray-trump-bongino-gorka-36bfbf46-96e2-41cb-93c3-31b362319c3b.html)
Quote from: Mercy Otis Warren on May 07, 2020, 05:24:00 PM
Inside FBI director Chris Wray's fate
https://www.axios.com/fbi-michael-flynn-chris-wray-trump-00c13ada-569b-4f5e-bfa3-354b794ea9e0.html (https://www.axios.com/fbi-michael-flynn-chris-wray-trump-00c13ada-569b-4f5e-bfa3-354b794ea9e0.html)
Pressure builds in Trumpworld to fire FBI director Christopher Wray
https://www.axios.com/fbi-christopher-wray-trump-bongino-gorka-36bfbf46-96e2-41cb-93c3-31b362319c3b.html (https://www.axios.com/fbi-christopher-wray-trump-bongino-gorka-36bfbf46-96e2-41cb-93c3-31b362319c3b.html)
Fake news. The Trump circle doesn't leak. The only thing that just happened is whoever did leak this fake news just got busted. If you followed Trump, you'd know they leak out fake news to flush out leakers.
Wray is not getting fired, especially when Barr supports him.
Please don't post crap citing "sources" unless you're calling them out or busting them...
Quote from: taxed on May 07, 2020, 05:29:24 PM
Fake news. The Trump circle doesn't leak. The only thing that just happened is whoever did leak this fake news just got busted. If you followed Trump, you'd know they leak out fake news to flush out leakers.
Wray is not getting fired, especially when Barr supports him.
Please don't post crap citing "sources" unless you're calling them out or busting them...
Exactly!!!
"President Trump is not happy with FBI director Christopher Wray and would love to replace him,
according to three sources who've discussed the matter with the president."
I'll translate:
CNN and MSNBC asked Trump if he was content with Wray, Trump responds, "I hate Fake news, I'd love to replace you all"!!!Media prints story: "President Trump is not happy with FBI director Christopher Wray and would love to replace him"Who knows, but without naming an actual source, these should be taken with a grain of salt and a roll of TP.
Quote from: Solar on May 07, 2020, 05:38:00 PM
Exactly!!!
"President Trump is not happy with FBI director Christopher Wray and would love to replace him, according to three sources who've discussed the matter with the president."
I'll translate: CNN and MSNBC asked Trump if he was content with Wray, Trump responds, "I hate Fake news, I'd love to replace you all"!!!
Media prints story: "President Trump is not happy with FBI director Christopher Wray and would love to replace him"
Who knows, but without naming an actual source, these should be taken with a grain of salt and a roll of TP.
It blows my mind that people still fall for this... especially Axios of all publications...
Quote from: taxed on May 07, 2020, 05:39:16 PM
It blows my mind that people still fall for this... especially Axios of all publications...
Yeah, I miss it on occasion as well, depending on the article as to whether I skim it or not, but when it's in the opening paragraph as this one did, it should throw up red flags.
https://twitter.com/actual_chaos/status/1258571361133477895
Quote from: taxed on May 07, 2020, 06:42:20 PM
https://twitter.com/actual_chaos/status/1258571361133477895
Let us apply some critical thought here. Does anyone think for a second Trump didn't know what Wray had?
Point being, they discussed when it should be released, Flynn was probably briefed as well. Trump plays chess, the left fights over what Tiddly Wink to play.
Quote from: Solar on May 07, 2020, 06:48:32 PM
Let us apply some critical thought here. Does anyone think for a second Trump didn't know what Wray had?
Point being, they discussed when it should be released, Flynn was probably briefed as well. Trump plays chess, the left fights over what Tiddly Wink to play.
It's so stupid.... Two options:
1) Wray was protecting material used in investigations from Schiff, et al (even though it pissed off Jim Jordan, etc), and ONLY provided it to Durham and Horowitz...
or...
2) Wray, who wasn't there when everything happened, had some dying loyalty to the Mueller prosecutors and the coup plotters and worked tirelessly to hide material.
We know for a fact #1 is true, but people who've been manipulated into emotionally committed to Wray being a deep-stater will continue with #2.
Quote from: taxed on May 07, 2020, 06:54:03 PM
It's so stupid.... Two options:
1) Wray was protecting material used in investigations from Schiff, et al (even though it pissed off Jim Jordan, etc), and ONLY provided it to Durham and Horowitz...
or...
2) Wray, who wasn't there when everything happened, had some dying loyalty to the Mueller prosecutors and the coup plotters and worked tirelessly to hide material.
We know for a fact #1 is true, but people who've been manipulated into emotionally committed to Wray being a deep-stater will continue with #2.
Could you be wrong? Have you ever been wrong? Just curious....
I have...many times and I will be the first to admit it.
Quote from: drifter106 on May 07, 2020, 07:13:12 PM
Could you be wrong? Have you ever been wrong? Just curious....
I have...many times and I will be the first to admit it.
I've been in politics for years and the only time I can ever remember being wrong was when I refused to support Trump.
And I'll admit, I missed that one by miles, and I'm soooo damn glad I was admittedly wrong. :biggrin:
Light bulb goes off.....maybe Trump fires Wray and puts Michael Flynn head of the FBI......... :thumbsup:
QuoteI've been in politics for years and the only time I can ever remember being wrong was when I refused to support Trump.
And I'll admit, I missed that one by miles, and I'm soooo damn glad I was admittedly wrong.
well get ready cause you might be wrong for the second time. :smile:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett
Quote from: Bronx on May 07, 2020, 07:41:19 PM
Light bulb goes off.....maybe Trump fires Wray and puts Michael Flynn head of the FBI......... :thumbsup:
The President mentioned last week that he might hire him.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 07, 2020, 07:41:20 PM
well get ready cause you might be wrong for the second time. :smile:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett
Oh man, you got me there, a two day old opinion piece. :biggrin:
Quote from: Solar on May 07, 2020, 07:54:28 PM
Oh man, you got me there, a two day old opinion piece. :biggrin:
and that's bad how?
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 07, 2020, 07:59:39 PM
and that's bad how?
Well, for one thing his opinion is no more informed than mine, and if it carried any weight, we'd have heard about it by now.
Quote from: Solar on May 07, 2020, 08:23:00 PM
Well, for one thing his opinion is no more informed than mine, and if it carried any weight, we'd have heard about it by now.
well it's two days old and now you're hearing about it.
Quote from: drifter106 on May 07, 2020, 07:13:12 PM
Could you be wrong? Have you ever been wrong? Just curious....
I have been wrong. One time, when I was learning to crawl, I saw what I thought was my bottle under the couch. I made it all the way over to it and found out it was just a toy. Needless to say, I was pretty embarrassed.
Quote
I have...many times and I will be the first to admit it.
That does sound fascinating. Sometimes I wish I knew what that was like...
Quote from: Solar on May 07, 2020, 07:21:43 PM
I've been in politics for years and the only time I can ever remember being wrong was when I refused to support Trump.
And I'll admit, I missed that one by miles, and I'm soooo damn glad I was admittedly wrong. :biggrin:
If this is wrong, I don't want to be right!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Bronx on May 07, 2020, 07:41:19 PM
Light bulb goes off.....maybe Trump fires Wray and puts Michael Flynn head of the FBI......... :thumbsup:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 07, 2020, 07:41:20 PM
well get ready cause you might be wrong for the second time. :smile:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-fbi-christopher-wray-must-go-gregg-jarrett
Few people have been as clueless as Gregg Jarrett on Spygate. Jarrett has been behind this entire time. It's not just him, it's pretty much ALL of the main stream researchers.... except Chuck Ross at Daily Caller... Bartiromo was behind but I think she caught up before the others did... but those are the two I can think of off the top of my head.
Understand, with the transcripts and everything being dumped, most of this is just confirmation for us. We (the independents) had this puzzle mostly assembled 1 1/2 to 2 years ago.
Quote from: Solar on May 07, 2020, 08:23:00 PM
Well, for one thing his opinion is no more informed than mine, and if it carried any weight, we'd have heard about it by now.
Jarrett thought Mueller was going to bring down Trump... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on May 07, 2020, 08:53:55 PM
I have been wrong. One time, when I was learning to crawl, I saw what I thought was my bottle under the couch. I made it all the way over to it and found out it was just a toy. Needless to say, I was pretty embarrassed.
That does sound fascinating. Sometimes I wish I knew what that was like...
I bet your feces don't stink either...lmao
One can appreciate your sense of humor....:lol:
Quote from: drifter106 on May 07, 2020, 09:58:09 PM
I bet your feces don't stink either...lmao
One can appreciate your sense of humor....:lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 07, 2020, 08:24:35 PM
well it's two days old and now you're hearing about it.
If it carried any weight at all, the LSM would be bleeding all over it. You do know the left desperately needs a distraction, for their world crumbling down around them Right?
They don't want to talk about how they screwed over Flynn for the DNC, or how Schiff played them for the biased and complicit idiots they are, and it goes on and on like that for pages.
yet you want to believe opinion pieces over what we know to be fact? That Wray kept Schiff from seeing something that would have tipped the DNC off that they were destined for sedition charges.
Think about that, Trump knew all along what Wray was hanging onto, that if Trump for a second thought Wray was interfering with an investigation, he'd have canned him on the spot and had all his files entered into record, which would have been playing right into Schiffs hands.
He didn't, Durham has praised him for his work, Schiff is in panic mode and the Dims are facing the biggest scandal in history, a Sedition/treason trial going all the way to the top.
Do you really want to keep running with the LMS narrative?
AG Bill Barr has a word or two and he's talking to you touchy feely people on the republican side and the snowflakes on the democrat side. I'm the only one that gets immunity to what he has to say of this matter............ :thumbsup:
"I think it's so sad...nowadays these partisan feelings are so strong that people have lost any sense of justice".............AG Bill Barr
0:50 mark
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM67rq5CoQY
Quote from: taxed on May 07, 2020, 09:00:30 PM
Jarrett thought Mueller was going to bring down Trump... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ohhhh That's rich!!! :lol:
Quote from: Solar on May 08, 2020, 06:33:23 AM
If it carried any weight at all, the LSM would be bleeding all over it. You do know the left desperately needs a distraction, for their world crumbling down around them Right?
They don't want to talk about how they screwed over Flynn for the DNC, or how Schiff played them for the biased and complicit idiots they are, and it goes on and on like that for pages.
yet you want to believe opinion pieces over what we know to be fact? That Wray kept Schiff from seeing something that would have tipped the DNC off that they were destined for sedition charges.
Do you really want to keep running with the LMS narrative?
first you say if it had any truth to it the LSM would be running with it and then you accuse me of running with a LSM narrative? are you democrat? cause you seem to want it both ways and talk out of both sides of your mouth!
The LSM as you call it, I call it the EneMedia avoids the truth by 1. lying about it or 2. Failing to mention it. I expect them to go nutz over the Flynn decision...which they are. and I expect them to leave out anything that shows the lawlessness and complicity of democrats.
I don't get this Wray fixation with you. YOU know no more than I do about it yet you claim some kind of special insider knowledge.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 08, 2020, 07:32:09 AM
first you say if it had any truth to it the LSM would be running with it and then you accuse me of running with a LSM narrative? are you democrat? cause you seem to want it both ways and talk out of both sides of your mouth!
The LSM as you call it, I call it the EneMedia avoids the truth by 1. lying about it or 2. Failing to mention it. I expect them to go nutz over the Flynn decision...which they are. and I expect them to leave out anything that shows the lawlessness and complicity of democrats.
I don't get this Wray fixation with you. YOU know no more than I do about it yet you claim some kind of special insider knowledge.
LOL! now you're claiming victim status? :biggrin:
I'm not running with Wray anything, I simply trying to point out the elephant in the room.
I see you conveniently left out the most crucial part. Please, explain this away. Why did Trump not simply fire Wray for withholding evidence? Come on, you can do it I know you can. :biggrin:
Quote"Think about that, Trump knew all along what Wray was hanging onto, that if Trump for a second thought Wray was interfering with an investigation, he'd have canned him on the spot and had all his files entered into record, which would have been playing right into Schiffs hands.
He didn't, Durham has praised him for his work, Schiff is in panic mode and the Dims are facing the biggest scandal in history, a Sedition/treason trial going all the way to the top."
Quote from: Solar on May 08, 2020, 07:43:11 AM
LOL! now you're claiming victim status? :biggrin:
I'm not running with Wray anything, I simply trying to point out the elephant in the room.
I see you conveniently left out the most crucial part. Please, explain this away. Why did Trump not simply fire Wray for withholding evidence? Come on, you can do it I know you can. :biggrin:
how do you get this stuff. I am not claiming victim status. I am pointing out your inconsistency.
Wray is no elephant in the room. Why would The President not have fired him sooner? Perhaps because of democrat hysteria if he did? Perhaps knowing he needed to have his ducks in a row so to speak before he moved...and I think he is chipping away at it from the inside out.
I am confident that The President has learned much. He has said that the corruption was far worse than he had originally thought. I pray for godly, courageous, LOYAL, wise and cunning men to aid this president in navigating the corrupt political system set up by radicals in DC.
I see that happening with what he's accomplished. You know the story of department of terrorism and his coup on that one. right?
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 08, 2020, 07:49:41 AM
how do you get this stuff. I am not claiming victim status. I am pointing out your inconsistency.
Wray is no elephant in the room. Why would The President not have fired him sooner? Perhaps because of democrat hysteria if he did? Perhaps knowing he needed to have his ducks in a row so to speak before he moved...and I think he is chipping away at it from the inside out.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Wray is the elephant in the room no one wants to look at using critical thought.
Seriously, you really think Trump fears the LSM?
QuoteI am confident that The President has learned much. He has said that the corruption was far worse than he had originally thought. I pray for godly, courageous, LOYAL, wise and cunning men to aid this president in navigating the corrupt political system set up by radicals in DC.
I see that happening with what he's accomplished. You know the story of department of terrorism and his coup on that one. right?
Trump knew going in who and what the left were doing, he's known it for over a decade, he's played them every step of the way, set the traps to ensnare them, made them show their hand all throughout the game.
You give the left way to much credit, Trump is in the drivers seat and the left is about to unleash all they have left in hopes something sticks.
Wray works for Trump, he's been the good guy all along, another Flynn Patriot.
You ask why I'm so confident? Mostly because Q spelled all of this out for over a year now, laid out the pieces for us to put together. Q even stated Wray was a sleeper, meaning he was working both sides, and that's why you are confused like everyone else, that was part of the plan to protect Wray all along.
Who has been calling for Wray's head, who had the files to clear Flynn? Wray, the entire time was being painted as a leftist holdout, a traitor to the Right, and why would that happen?
Because Trump controls the narrative as he's always a dozen steps ahead of the left.
I won't try and convince you that you're wrong and I'm Right, I'll let all this unfold over the month as it all falls together.
Quote from: Solar on May 08, 2020, 08:09:16 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Wray is the elephant in the room no one wants to look at using critical thought.
Seriously, you really think Trump fears the LSM?
Dear GOD I DID NOT SAY THAT!!
QuoteTrump knew going in who and what the left were doing, he's known it for over a decade, he's played them every step of the way, set the traps to ensnare them, made them show their hand all throughout the game.
LOL I THOUGHT I was the Trump Head Cheerleader!! Way to go there.
QuoteYou give the left way to much credit, Trump is in the drivers seat and the left is about to unleash all they have left in hopes something sticks.
Of course I give them credit. They control the news. You didn't notice that? If they succeed in hamstringing the internet which so far they've failed, all news is toast.
QuoteWray works for Trump, he's been the good guy all along, another Flynn Patriot.
not convinced. And you don't know either. I guess we'll find out in the next few months.
QuoteYou ask why I'm so confident? Mostly because Q spelled all of this out for over a year now, laid out the pieces for us to put together. Q even stated Wray was a sleeper, meaning he was working both sides, and that's why you are confused like everyone else, that was part of the plan to protect Wray all along.
Who has been calling for Wray's head, who had the files to clear Flynn? Wray, the entire time was being painted as a leftist holdout, a traitor to the Right, and why would that happen?
time will tell.
QuoteBecause Trump controls the narrative as he's always a dozen steps ahead of the left.
Why do you seem to think I am the opposition? He rebuts the narrative and very well..but he needs his rallies. WE need his rallies for success in 2020. If the left media has their way of shutting him down, they can influence too many dunderheads with no pushback.
QuoteI won't try and convince you that you're wrong and I'm Right, I'll let all this unfold over the month as it all falls together.
you sure seem to be working hard at that and it is Unnecessary. I am for the President 100%. I also recognize that he fights an uphill battle right now not only with democrats and left media, but also with never trump repugs.
I HOPE you are right. I hope he takes them ALL out. I just think it's not happening between now and November 2020.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 08, 2020, 08:36:24 AM
Dear GOD I DID NOT SAY THAT!!
LOL I THOUGHT I was the Trump Head Cheerleader!! Way to go there.
Of course I give them credit. They control the news. You didn't notice that? If they succeed in hamstringing the internet which so far they've failed, all news is toast.
not convinced. And you don't know either. I guess we'll find out in the next few months.
time will tell.
Why do you seem to think I am the opposition? He rebuts the narrative and very well..but he needs his rallies. WE need his rallies for success in 2020. If the left media has their way of shutting him down, they can influence too many dunderheads with no pushback.
you sure seem to be working hard at that and it is Unnecessary. I am for the President 100%. I also recognize that he fights an uphill battle right now not only with democrats and left media, but also with never trump repugs.
I HOPE you are right. I hope he takes them ALL out. I just think it's not happening between now and November 2020.
Now stop that, you aren't supposed top agree with me! :biggrin:
My only reason for taking the Devils advocacy berth? I want people to not roll over and accept the majority narrative opinion, I want to birth critical thought here, ask the questions everyone wants to ignore.
I found it too easy to take the safe path, one that most likely was created for distraction.
I don't want to undermine Trump's plan here, I just don't want to see the good guy thrown under the bus. If I'm proven Right, and I think I will be, Wray will have proven to be one of the biggest Patriots of the movement.
It will also prove that Trump had complete control over this situation the entire time, even when he had to allow the base to be mislead.
I know you don't follow Q, but here is Q confirming Wray as a sleeper for Trump.Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: fce708 No.7243904
Jul 29 2019 12:14:03 (EST)
Anonymous ID: d7cbcd No.7243889
Jul 29 2019 12:13:22 (EST)
>>7243859
Wray is a sleeper
>>7243889
Future marker.
Q
This one confirms Q and his position to influence Trump, or vice versa...(https://qanon.pub/data/proofs/01b6f3c7b899e31528bf3355bd28f666957ecd7490ec8263a2ce562602ffaeb3.jpg)
https://saraacarter.com/house-judiciary-to-fbi-director-wray-wake-up-and-work-with-congress/
House judiciary to FBU director Wray...wake up and work with congress.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 20, 2020, 01:22:44 PM
https://saraacarter.com/house-judiciary-to-fbi-director-wray-wake-up-and-work-with-congress/
House judiciary to FBU director Wray...wake up and work with congress.
This just circles right back to Wray is a POS and should be fired. He never should have been there to begin with.
Oh lordy... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I thought they were supposed to hate Barr... or is that next week?
Gee, how convenient, a bold quote, yet no name attached.
"WRAY NEEDS TO WAKE UP AND WORK WITH CONGRESS. IF HE DOESN'T MAYBE IT'S TIME FOR HIM TO GO," SENIOR REPUBLICAN OFFICIAL
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Wanna bet that person is a RINO!!!
Quote from: Solar on May 20, 2020, 06:56:54 PM
Gee, how convenient, a bold quote, yet no name attached.
"WRAY NEEDS TO WAKE UP AND WORK WITH CONGRESS. IF HE DOESN'T MAYBE IT'S TIME FOR HIM TO GO," SENIOR REPUBLICAN OFFICIAL
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Wanna bet that person is a RINO!!!
It's Jim Jordan, who's great, but nobody died and made him king of the DoJ...
Quote from: taxed on May 20, 2020, 07:12:32 PM
It's Jim Jordan, who's great, but nobody died and made him king of the DoJ...
No where in the article does it say who said it, or did I miss something?
Quote from: Solar on May 20, 2020, 07:15:19 PM
No where in the article does it say who said it, or did I miss something?
I just knew it from the news today... Obamagate is pretty much all I follow right now...
I still stand by my initial statement...see no reason to change my attitude at this juncture. :thumbsup:
Quote from: drifter106 on May 21, 2020, 12:42:30 AM
I still stand by my initial statement...see no reason to change my attitude at this juncture. :thumbsup:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I hear Rip Van Wray has opened up an internal investigation.
I think this is the way it will go.
"We have performed our internal investigation and we have found no wrong doing."
My gut feeling about Wray is that is part of the swamp the FBI became under Obama. It would be tough, but I believe agency needs an outsider to clean it up. There is a meme going around Facebook that Trump should appoint General Flynn as director and the rats would scurry. :lol:
It would be Righteous justice for Flynn to be appointed to run the FIB.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 12:22:02 PM
I hear Rip Van Wray has opened up an internal investigation.
I think this is the way it will go.
"We have performed our internal investigation and we have found no wrong doing."
Who or what are you quoting?
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 12:36:06 PM
It would be Righteous justice for Flynn to be appointed to run the FIB.
Why would you want an intelligence professional leading a department in the DOJ? Would it not make more sense for Barr to handle that, while Flynn revamps intelligence agencies?
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 12:22:02 PM
I hear Rip Van Wray has opened up an internal investigation.
I think this is the way it will go.
"We have performed our internal investigation and we have found no wrong doing."
From someone with 22 years as a federal prosecutor:
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1263915561378955264
Calypso: "Wake up Wray! Do something! Hannity told me you're sleeping on the job!"
Wray: "I just launched an internal investigation into the FBI"
Calypso: "Nothing will happen! Fire Wray!"
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 01:18:16 PM
From someone with 22 years as a federal prosecutor:
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1263915561378955264
Calypso: "Wake up Wray! Do something! Hannity told me you're sleeping on the job!"
Wray: "I just launched an internal investigation into the FBI"
Calypso: "Nothing will happen! Fire Wray!"
you really shouldn't put words especially the way you did, in posters' mouths.
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 01:15:52 PM
Why would you want an intelligence professional leading a department in the DOJ? Would it not make more sense for Barr to handle that, while Flynn revamps intelligence agencies?
Because LOL it hasn't worked so well with the way they're doin' it!!
Perhaps it might be a shake up if we did to the FIB what we did for the presidency.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 01:26:30 PM
you really shouldn't put words especially the way you did, in posters' mouths.
Is it not an accurate summation?
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 01:38:41 PM
Is it not an accurate summation?
No it isn't. And it is not right for you to do such a thing. It would also be nice to address the topic rather than putting words in my mouth.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 01:40:30 PM
No it isn't. And it is not right for you to do such a thing. It would also be nice to address the topic rather than putting words in my mouth.
Wray is doing stuff and fixing the FBI?
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 01:49:02 PM
Wray is doing stuff and fixing the FBI?
is he? You keep saying so but i'm not seeing it yet.
https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-2/2020/05/22/fbi-director-orders-action-review-flynn-investigation/
here you go. Looks like he's limiting his investigation to current employees and not the former..such as strzok for investigation.
Oh well. no matter.
Mr. Wray appears to be republican alright. As republican as the Bush Family and as effective as Jeff Sessions.
LOL
and he's worth 24 to 43 million. He's not going to jeopardize that.
Oh I'd WELCOME it if he did the right thing. I'm just wondering when AND IF, that's gonna happen.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 02:03:58 PM
https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-2/2020/05/22/fbi-director-orders-action-review-flynn-investigation/
here you go. Looks like he's limiting his investigation to current employees and not the former..such as strzok for investigation.
Oh well. no matter.
Mr. Wray appears to be republican alright. As republican as the Bush Family and as effective as Jeff Sessions.
LOL
and he's worth 24 to 43 million. He's not going to jeopardize that.
Oh I'd WELCOME it if he did the right thing. I'm just wondering when AND IF, that's gonna happen.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Only you would have a problem with that.
Meanwhile, Durham, the PROSECUTOR, is dealing with Strzok, etc.
Sessions was an excellent Attorney General. Again, you parrot Hannity.
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 02:12:11 PM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Only you would have a problem with that.
Meanwhile, Durham, the PROSECUTOR, is dealing with Strzok, etc.
Sessions was an excellent Attorney General. Again, you parrot Hannity.
except..i don't watch Hannity. :smile:
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 02:20:51 PM
except..i don't watch Hannity. :smile:
I figured that had to be the reason as to why you didn't understand that FBI can't take disciplinary action against former employees. Who told you to think that Chris Wray should go after past employees?
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 02:22:51 PM
I figured that had to be the reason as to why you didn't understand that FBI can't take disciplinary action against former employees. Who told you to think that Chris Wray should go after past employees?
LOL nobody tells me how to think. wha? what are you doing? address the topic and leave me out of it. LOL
Mr. Wray knows that he can't take action against former employees...maybe that's why they quit or were fired...by Mr. Wray...who waited this long to look into the matter.
you know.. he's really not looking good in this. I hope for your sake it doesn't turn out like that.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 02:30:20 PM
LOL nobody tells me how to think. wha? what are you doing? address the topic and leave me out of it. LOL
Mr. Wray knows that he can't take action against former employees...maybe that's why they quit or were fired...by Mr. Wray...who waited this long to look into the matter.
you know.. he's really not looking good in this. I hope for your sake it doesn't turn out like that.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: OK....
Once upon a time, the FBI fought organized crime, Now they are organized crime
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 02:48:05 PM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: OK....
if you know you've been caught red handed you're gonna get out of there. One way or the other. They know they can't be prosecuted if they are no longer FIB...but I bet they're answerable to some 'binding legal authority'.
Quote
Meanwhile, Durham, the PROSECUTOR, is dealing with Strzok, etc.
Sessions was an excellent Attorney General. Again, you parrot Hannity.
2 questions...if Sessions was such an excellent attorney general, why did he get fired? President Trump was extremely disappoint in his LACK of enthusiasm as it pertains to being effective.
Hannity...you got a problem with Hannity? You got a problem with a guy who predicted so much and it has come to fruition.Yea, I watch/listen to him along with other people who I consider noteworthy. Not for sure who you chose to parrot after but Hannity is a true conservative warrior and is worth listening to for valid information as it pertains to politics.
Quote from: drifter106 on May 22, 2020, 03:02:18 PM
Meanwhile, Durham, the PROSECUTOR, is dealing with Strzok, etc.
Sessions was an excellent Attorney General. Again, you parrot Hannity.
2 questions...if Sessions was such an excellent attorney general, why did he get fired? President Trump was extremely disappoint in his LACK of enthusiasm as it pertains to being effective.
Hannity...you got a problem with Hannity? You got a problem with a guy who predicted so much and it has come to fruition.Yea, I watch/listen to him along with other people who I consider noteworthy. Not for sure who you chose to parrot after but Hannity is a true conservative warrior and is worth listening to for valid information as it pertains to politics.
good post there drifter.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 02:59:35 PM
if you know you've been caught red handed you're gonna get out of there. One way or the other. They know they can't be prosecuted if they are no longer FIB...but I bet they're answerable to some 'binding legal authority'.
Did you miss that part where they're working with Jeff Jensen?
Quote from: drifter106 on May 22, 2020, 03:02:18 PM
2 questions...if Sessions was such an excellent attorney general, why did he get fired? President Trump was extremely disappoint in his LACK of enthusiasm as it pertains to being effective.
Hannity...you got a problem with Hannity? You got a problem with a guy who predicted so much and it has come to fruition.Yea, I watch/listen to him along with other people who I consider noteworthy. Not for sure who you chose to parrot after but Hannity is a true conservative warrior and is worth listening to for valid information as it pertains to politics.
I can't sell you on Sessions. I believe it's a show Trump puts on for deception, straight out of Sun Tzu. All I can do is knock down any reasons you have for the perception of being supposedly ineffective.
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 03:07:28 PM
Did you miss that part where they're working with Jeff Jensen?
and you're buying that?
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 03:12:41 PM
Wow.
yeah. my sentiments exactly. You have mueller, then comey and now Wray who was sworn in my Sessions sometime in 2017. Wray is 2.5 years late in getting around to this investigations. Im sorry if I can't get worked up over justice comin'. I'll believe it when I see it in this instance. YOU DON"T let the FIB investigate themselves. I can tell you already the results of the investigations will be....nothing to see here. move along.
if i'm wrong i'll drop trou on court square and
kiss your butt you can kiss my butt. LOLOL
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 03:14:35 PM
yeah. my sentiments exactly. You have mueller, then comey and now Wray who was sworn in my Sessions sometime in 2017. Wray is 2.5 years late in getting around to this investigations. Im sorry if I can't get worked up over justice comin'. I'll believe it when I see it in this instance. YOU DON"T let the FIB investigate themselves. I can tell you already the results of the investigations will be....nothing to see here. move along.
if i'm wrong i'll drop trou on court square and kiss your butt you can kiss my butt. LOLOL
No, I mean we're too divergent.
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 03:23:31 PM
No, I mean we're too divergent.
as in 'moving away from the standard'? We didn't do that. Our unelected appointed political elites did that.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 03:39:10 PM
as in 'moving away from the standard'? We didn't do that. Our unelected appointed political elites did that.
You thought Mueller was going to bring down Trump. I knew that was insane. We're just divergent on how we see things.
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 04:24:39 PM
You thought Mueller was going to bring down Trump. I knew that was insane. We're just divergent on how we see things.
No. I never thought Mueller was going to bring down The President.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 05:58:19 PM
No. I never thought Mueller was going to bring down The President.
Interesting. I figured you'd think that Mueller was out to get Trump.
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 06:24:03 PM
Interesting. I figured you'd think that Mueller was out to get Trump.
Curious, does anybody recall the makeup of the committee to look into President Trumps so called "illegal activities"? Who picked them?
Quote from: drifter106 on May 22, 2020, 06:33:03 PM
Curious, does anybody recall the makeup of the committee to look into President Trumps so called "illegal activities"? Who picked them?
I could be wrong, as I remember Mueller picked them and they were all Dem's on his team.
Quote from: walkstall on May 22, 2020, 06:42:29 PM
I could be wrong, as I remember Mueller picked them and they were all Dem's on his team.
bingo!!!!
Quote from: drifter106 on May 22, 2020, 06:49:06 PM
bingo!!!!
That explains why everyone thought he was going after Trump.
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 07:47:51 PM
That explains why everyone thought he was going after Trump.
I don't even know if Mueller knew what he was doing. But i'd LOVE to know your take on it.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 22, 2020, 08:06:20 PM
I don't even know if Mueller knew what he was doing. But i'd LOVE to know your take on it.
Clearing Trump while letting the coup-plotters dig their graves...
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1265709865340563456
Quote from: taxed on May 22, 2020, 09:22:59 PM
Clearing Trump while letting the coup-plotters dig their graves...
absolutely not. He didn't conduct any investigation. His goon assistants did and I KNOW they would have loved to take out the president. Perhaps they thought with Mueller's alleged reputation that he could do it with 'word salad' but he couldn't. They were hoping for some kind of Democrat miracle or perhaps even something that would have caused this abomination to go on to November. But Mueller's intent was NEVER to clear The President of Anything.
Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy, but Stops Short ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/24/us/politics/mueller-report-summary.html
Mar 24, 2019Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy, but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, and his wife, Ann Standish, near the White House after ...
Mueller finds no Trump-Russia conspiracy, doesn't ...
https://www.courier-tribune.com/news/20190325/mueller-finds-no-trump-russia-conspiracy-doesn8217t-8216exonerate8217-trump-on-obstruction
Mueller finds no Trump-Russia conspiracy, doesn't 'exonerate' Trump on obstruction ... yet he concluded that the evidence "does not exonerate" the president, Barr wrote in his letter to ...
Quote from: Calypso Jones on June 02, 2020, 05:40:33 PM
absolutely not. He didn't conduct any investigation. His goon assistants did and I KNOW they would have loved to take out the president. Perhaps they thought with Mueller's alleged reputation that he could do it with 'word salad' but he couldn't. They were hoping for some kind of Democrat miracle or perhaps even something that would have caused this abomination to go on to November. But Mueller's intent was NEVER to clear The President of Anything.
You know the Director of the FBI doesn't get involved with investigations, right?
Quote from: taxed on June 02, 2020, 08:44:23 PM
You know the Director of the FBI doesn't get involved with investigations, right?
Is that written on paper somewhere...oh then i'm sure it's the truth. LOLOL
https://dailycaller.com/2020/06/24/fbi-christopher-wray-michael-flynn-investigation/
QuoteFBI Director Christopher Wray said in an interview aired Wednesday that he has "serious concerns" about how the bureau handled the investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
"I will say....the Flynn investigation, which took place before I started, and by the time I started was in the hands of the special counsel's office, is something that has in my view raised serious concerns and questions," Wray told Fox News anchor Bret Baier.
Wray noted that he has appointed the FBI's inspection division to "take a look at whether or not the FBI's policies and procedures need to be changed and if there are any current employees left to may bear any responsibility for misconduct."
Wray's remarks are his most pointed criticism to date of the FBI's investigation of Flynn, which started when Jim Comey served as director.
https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1275915573008965635
https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1275918793064296452
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Newsmax WH reporter just said that the WH staff has been preparing a list of Wray replacements for a few months now. There will be no change until Trump is re-elected. The one name on the list mentioned is the legal warrior for Gen. Flynn - Sydney Powell.
When asked about this possibility she smiled and said "I would be honored to be considered". She also suggested the DC powers would need a change of underwear if she were actually chosen.
Quote from: Skull on September 18, 2020, 09:48:33 AM
Newsmax WH reporter just said that the WH staff has been preparing a list of Wray replacements for a few months now. There will be no change until Trump is re-elected. The one name on the list mentioned is the legal warrior for Gen. Flynn - Sydney Powell.
When asked about this possibility she smiled and said "I would be honored to be considered". She also suggested the DC powers would need a change of underwear if she were actually chosen.
I'm not sure about Powell... she may have jumped the gun potentially with her Mandamus filing..........
Quote from: taxed on September 21, 2020, 08:30:30 PM
I'm not sure about Powell... she may have jumped the gun potentially with her Mandamus filing..........
I'm thinking Flynn, that would be a kick to the groin of the Deepstate! :thumbup:
https://twitter.com/NovemberMatters/status/1309249510229577728
Doin' his Job??!! Then where is he doing anything on these domestic terrorists.
PLUS, did you read about the latest from Molly Hemmingway about the number of fib agents and coup plotters who took out personal liability policies after the Election of DJT?? COVERING their sorry Asses. And those good agents...don't do squat about it.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on September 24, 2020, 03:46:02 PM
Doin' his Job??!! Then where is he doing anything on these domestic terrorists.
PLUS, did you read about the latest from Molly Hemmingway about the number of fib agents and coup plotters who took out personal liability policies after the Election of DJT?? COVERING their sorry Asses. And those good agents...don't do squat about it.
You do know insurance is not retroactive. Like taking out insurance after you have an accident, it just doesn't work that way.
This is E&O insurance Solar and that is exactly how it works. After election, before inauguration.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on September 24, 2020, 03:46:02 PM
Doin' his Job??!! Then where is he doing anything on these domestic terrorists.
PLUS, did you read about the latest from Molly Hemmingway about the number of fib agents and coup plotters who took out personal liability policies after the Election of DJT?? COVERING their sorry Asses. And those good agents...don't do squat about it.
https://twitter.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1309160372688093185
Quote from: Calypso Jones on September 24, 2020, 03:46:02 PM
Doin' his Job??!! Then where is he doing anything on these domestic terrorists.
PLUS, did you read about the latest from Molly Hemmingway about the number of fib agents and coup plotters who took out personal liability policies after the Election of DJT?? COVERING their sorry Asses. And those good agents...don't do squat about it.
You really have no idea what's going on here, do you?
Quote from: Calypso Jones on September 24, 2020, 03:57:41 PM
This is E&O insurance Solar and that is exactly how it works. After election, before inauguration.
WTF is E&O insurance? Link?
Quote from: Solar on September 24, 2020, 04:57:06 PM
WTF is E&O insurance? Link?
I'll catch you up on the phone... today has been fuckin' crazy with the news...
Quote from: taxed on September 24, 2020, 04:58:17 PM
I'll catch you up on the phone... today has been fuckin' crazy with the news...
It matters not what they take out as far as insurance, it is neither retroactive, or as you stated, cover illegal actions.
It means absolutely nothing.
Give me a call in the next 30.
No. It isn't retroactive, Meaning before policy date. What it means is....they were going to continue to attempt the coup/destruction even after his election.
Quote from: Solar on September 24, 2020, 04:57:06 PM
WTF is E&O insurance? Link?
E&O in no way applies. It is for executives and directors and actions they may takes. Also, liability insurance has exclusions for intentional acts.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on September 24, 2020, 08:48:59 PM
No. It isn't retroactive, Meaning before policy date. What it means is....they were going to continue to attempt the coup/destruction even after his election.
In truth it means nothing, no insurance can protect you if you break the law, they did. The whole claim was just hyperbole on the authors part in hopes of giving her claim credibility.
It did nothing of the sort, it detracts from the truth.
Quote from: Calypso Jones on September 24, 2020, 08:48:59 PM
No. It isn't retroactive, Meaning before policy date. What it means is....they were going to continue to attempt the coup/destruction even after his election.
No, that's not what it means at all.