For years ive been arguing that the NBC law has been misinterpreted and that only children born of 2 US parents on US soil meet the requirement. My main argument for this is that if an American married a british Royal and they had a child it could become both King and president of the US. This is something the founders certainly would have opposed  . It has now happened

FactCheck: Could the new royal baby become President of the United States?

HE DOESN'T EVEN have a name yet, but the future of Britain's newest royal is already being debated.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex (better known as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle) announced the birth of their first child yesterday.

A boy, if you hadn't heard, weighing in at 7lbs. 3oz.

Upon his birth, the child became seventh in line to the British throne and speculation began almost immediately as to what his role will be.

Barring some Game of Thrones level machinations, it's incredibly unlikely that the young boy will ever become king.

But there have been several suggestions that young baby Sussex could aim even higher, say to the position of  'Leader of the Free World.'

Yes, it has been noted that owing to his mother's nationality the young child could one day become president of the United States.

The suggestion has been raised several times in the speculative coverage since the baby's birth yesterday and it raises the question as to whether this could actually happen.

So let's take a look: Could the new royal baby one day run to be President of the United States?

The claim
The new royal baby, son of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, could one day run to be US president.


https://www.thejournal.ie/royal-baby-us-citizenship-president-4622878-May2019/

Posting entire articles is a copyright violation. Second, it's a leftist European opinion piece that got a lot of so called "Facts" Wrong.
No prob though, just be sure and paste about a third of any given article and it should be fine.

The Nationality Act of 1940
https://americansabroad.org/files/3013/3478/0295/18-04-2012_1318_971.pdf

Quote from: Solar on May 08, 2019, 08:37:10 AM
Posting entire articles is a copyright violation. Second, it's a leftist European piece that got a lot of so called "Facts" Wrong.
No prob though, just be sure and paste about a third of any given article and it should be fine.

The Nationality Act of 1940
https://americansabroad.org/files/3013/3478/0295/18-04-2012_1318_971.pdf

Hmm. We cannot locate that page.

The page may have been moved or renamed with our recent site redesign.

Quote from: walkstall on May 08, 2019, 08:49:56 AM
Hmm. We cannot locate that page.

The page may have been moved or renamed with our recent site redesign.

https://fam.state.gov/FAM/08FAM/08FAM030106.html

This story is a distraction. Remember it now as it will go away quickly.

Quote from: supsalemgr on May 08, 2019, 10:03:10 AM
This story is a distraction. Remember it now as it will go away quickly.

Until he moves to the U.S.

Remember how long it took b o people to set him up.

Quote from: supsalemgr on May 08, 2019, 10:03:10 AM
This story is a distraction. Remember it now as it will go away quickly.

DOH!!! Good Point. Moved to distraction.

Quote from: supsalemgr on May 08, 2019, 10:03:10 AM
This story is a distraction. Remember it now as it will go away quickly.

Distraction....hell move it to the front pages.......

CNN says to hell if this boy can be president and king at the same time. CNN is worried if this baby boy is going to be Black enough........

CNN WONDERS: 'How Black Will the Royal Baby Be?'

A left-wing conspiracy theory news site wondered aloud Tuesday how "black" the royal British baby will be.

"How black will the royal baby be?"
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/cnn-wonders-how-black-will-the-royal-baby-be/

How is it a distraction. There is nothing preventing him from moving here ? The point is that the current interpretation of the NBC clause is clearly wrong. The purpose of the clause is to avoid anything other than total allegiance to the US and no other government unlike Obama who has dual allegiance

Quote from: penrod on May 08, 2019, 11:05:52 AM
How is it a distraction. There is nothing preventing him from moving here ? The point is that the current interpretation of the NBC clause is clearly wrong. The purpose of the clause is to avoid anything other than total allegiance to the US and no other government unlike Obama who has dual allegiance

When he move to the U.S. then it may not be a distraction, but until then it's just more wishful thinking. 

Quote from: penrod on May 08, 2019, 11:05:52 AM
How is it a distraction. There is nothing preventing him from moving here ? The point is that the current interpretation of the NBC clause is clearly wrong. The purpose of the clause is to avoid anything other than total allegiance to the US and no other government unlike Obama who has dual allegiance

Trump owns the narrative. The Marxists are being routed and need to talk about anything but how Trump is in the process of prosecuting and convicting Obozo and his entire Administration for weaponizing the govt and spying on an opponent, while interfering in the US election process.
You'll get the feel of the forum after you've been here awhile. We have an agenda, and it involves destroying the Marxist Dims and their cohorts in the media.

The fact that it was moved doesn't mean it was punished, it only means the left has been exposed, so anyone reading the MSM Distraction understands that the Right isn't buying the leftist bull shit.
The Poli forum is designed to set the Conservative narrative, the MSM distraction is by design, a way to expose how the left attempts to change the narrative.

It still gets just as many reads, so don't think it is somehow not news, it is, we just put it where it belongs.