Conservative Political Forum

General Category => Political Discussion and Debate => Topic started by: Solar on June 24, 2017, 07:33:45 AM

Title: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Solar on June 24, 2017, 07:33:45 AM
Interesting, the newMarxist hard left Dims are pushing out what we once thought of as the hardcore leftists.
They are running to the media and pushing their agenda and see Fuglosi as an impediment, yet completely ignore Perez comments about having a purity test of an "Abortion Only" party.
Just more evidence of how out of touch the party has become with mainstream Americans.

How weird is this? They see Fuglosi as a moderate. :lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkIqPzAyDv4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xu3RHaAVrkM
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: supsalemgr on June 24, 2017, 07:44:39 AM
Pelosi is a moderate. That is all one needs to know to know where the democrat party is now.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Solar on June 24, 2017, 08:16:50 AM
Quote from: supsalemgr on June 24, 2017, 07:44:39 AM
Pelosi is a moderate. That is all one needs to know to know where the democrat party is now.
How weird is that? When a hardcore leftist no longer has a place amongst Marxists in the Dim party...
OK, sure it's humorous to us that Cruella is finally getting the boot, but not by people that recognized her failings as a leftist, but rather a party that sees her as a moderate, a right leaning leftist?

I sometimes question if the Commies are merely waiting us out another generation because they are willing to sacrifice 30 years waiting for us to all die off, knowing the right will more than likely be weakened by a leftist gop'E come 2050 and they can seize the country.
I see no other explanation for their behavior. They know the country rejected their agenda, yet they move further left?

Now we have the gop'E moving left of center and filling the gap vacated the Dims left when they collapsed?
We are still at a crossroads in this country, and it's imperative more than ever we purge the gop'E of the Marxists and force the party further to the right, or we won't have a country to save.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: quiller on June 24, 2017, 08:42:49 AM
Quote from: Solar on June 24, 2017, 08:16:50 AM
Now we have the gop'E moving left of center and filling the gap vacated the Dims left when they collapsed?
We are still at a crossroads in this country, and it's imperative more than ever we purge the gop'E of the Marxists and force the party further to the right, or we won't have a country to save.

You may be asking the wrong question. Instead: what do conservatives wish to conserve?

Quote

PREAMBLE:

History will record that in the year 2008, conservatives lost the election half a year before any convention was ever held. The presumptive-nominee of the Republican party is barely more conservative, and is arguably no more conservative, than the extreme hard-case left-wing liberal presumptive nominee of the democrat party.

This sorry state of affairs has been achieved by completely plutocratic means — the few dictating the tastes of the many. This is a betrayal of negligence to the American People, because they have been deprived of the chance to vote on what they think of conservatism. It is a triumph of insidious propaganda, because it is only through propaganda that we hear there is any exhaustion or fatigue setting in with conservative ideals. In fact, the situation is worse than that because the evidence we can collect clearly indicates the conservative ideals are as popular with the electorate as they ever have been, if not even moreso.

No, according to the evidence, if the electorate is disenchanted in 2008 with conservatism, at all, it is in fact disenchanted with conservative figureheads. And if it is disenchanted with conservative figureheads, it is disenchanted with them because they are acting like liberals. And so, in sum, what has happened is that we have surrendered the right, privilege, and task of representing the conservative movement, to the figureheads with the highest name recognition; and they, in turn, sold it out.

Conservatives are dedicated to exploiting every possible opportunity, from here on out, to make sure this never happens again.

Therefore, WE SUBMIT TO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, and to the consideration of the electorate, this body of conservative principles. Further, we call on conservative candidates, in the year 2008 and beyond, to accept each of the following in our platform, before they can represent themselves as sincere, true and emblematic champions of the cause.

http://www.peekinthewell.net/blog/conservative-platform/
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Solar on June 24, 2017, 11:40:40 AM
Quote from: quiller on June 24, 2017, 08:42:49 AM
You may be asking the wrong question. Instead: what do conservatives wish to conserve?

http://www.peekinthewell.net/blog/conservative-platform/
Nah, we're long passed conserving, we're at war with the party.
The article is dated, we now know who the enemy is and who represents Conservatives. The days of pulling up a Conservative scorecard and seeing McStain in the # 1 slot, followed by the likes of a Dole, Bush all with an A+ Conservative rating, those days are long gone, they are no longer able to lie and get away with impunity, nor set the narrative.
Today, we are at war with the party!

This is a perfect example of why I say the Dims electing a Marxist was the best thing to ever happen to the nation.
Obozo exposed just who his allies were in the GOP and all used to claim Conservative status.
Yes, the Dim party showed us just how many leftists the party contains and that the leadership of the party as well as the RNC are mirror images of the Marxists in the Dim party.

Had we not had the rude awakening from our placid slumber, this country would have been full blown socialist by 2040, but the dim party got ahead of itself by pushing a full blown Marxist on the country, something the country wasn't ready for, and in the process exposed their allied support within the GOP.

The rest of the article goes on to define Conservatism, an area I think I'm equally qualified, if not more so, to define better than 99% of the pundits in the country.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: quiller on June 24, 2017, 12:42:08 PM
What IS conservatism, except to slow the pace of societal suicide? By what possible standard can an impartial observer look at today's Republican leadership and call them conservative? And yet our schools teach kids THESE spineless trash are the bad guys, for not spending more of other people's money.

What IS conservatism? Just what ARE we trying to conserve?
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Solar on June 24, 2017, 01:52:09 PM
Quote from: quiller on June 24, 2017, 12:42:08 PM
What IS conservatism, except to slow the pace of societal suicide?

Home 
Home About Us What Is Conservatism?

What Is Conservatism?
This is a question that eludes many people, including conservatives.  It is often incorrectly described as an ideology.  It is not an ideology, which is an adherence to a rigid set of beliefs regardless of human experience.  An ideology must ignore conservative principals.

Conservatism is a way of life.  A conservative treats others with respect, and will never infringe upon one's life, liberty, or property.

An exemplary conservative does not exist.  Conservatism is not shipped with an instruction manual.  It consists of natural law, God's law, i.e, "do unto others", and common sense.

Conservatism is the absence of government control over the individual.  The individual decides how he defines the states' power in protecting his liberties.  Every human being has God given inalienable rights.

Conservative principals have been honed by years of human experience, based on reason, history, thinking, reading, observation, and traditions.

The conservative believes in the social contract that binds a healthy and working harmonic society, even something as innocuous as accepting which side of the road to drive on.  We embrace change, but slow, adaptive change, as opposed to the cultural disruptions anti-conservatism demands.  We favor the preservation of established customs, as values agreed upon edicts a binding society.

Free market principals are sacred to conservatives, where voluntary agreement or exchange occurs between parties without government intrusion.  A free market is the foundation of a free, peaceful society.

The doctrine of the equality of mankind and the desirability of political and economic and social equality helps define the conservative.  A conservative believes in egalitarianism where color or race plays no part in a conservative's life.  There is no such thing as "special rights", as such a failing would result in someone else's liberties being trampled.

Conservatism is not a political party, and especially not defined as a modern day Republican.

Another route we might consider for examples of conservatism, such as life lessons, is "lead by example", or be the best you can be in a particular job in life. Even with the most menial of jobs, always be the best, because for one, you never knows who's watching, and there is more than a 50/50 chance it will open the next door in your life.

If for nothing else, personal integrity (honesty), satisfaction in knowing you did your best. This is what allows a conservative to always take the high road over that of the unprincipled liberal.

Copyright 2016, Conservative Hardliner


QuoteBy what possible standard can an impartial observer look at today's Republican leadership and call them conservative? And yet our schools teach kids THESE spineless trash are the bad guys, for not spending more of other people's money.

What IS conservatism? Just what ARE we trying to conserve?

Like I said, the leadership is not in the least bit Conservative, socially nor fiscally, they are leftists in ever sense and description of the word.
Conservatives are fighting to preserve our Republic and all that entails, before the Marxists in the country completely unravel it, to that of a European socialist Democracy without Liberty or individual Rights. Mob rule is what these leftists want.
Don't be fooled, the RNC could give a shit about this country. I'm speaking specifically of the gop'E.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Ghoulardi on June 24, 2017, 05:20:57 PM
Quote from: quiller on June 24, 2017, 12:42:08 PM
What IS conservatism, except to slow the pace of societal suicide? By what possible standard can an impartial observer look at today's Republican leadership and call them conservative? And yet our schools teach kids THESE spineless trash are the bad guys, for not spending more of other people's money.

What IS conservatism? Just what ARE we trying to conserve?

Way back when I'd often ask conservatives the same question. After enough people looked at me like they recieved a side dish they didn't order, I decided to sus it out for myself.

True conservatives are trying to conserve at least two things:

1). The principles of capitalism
2). The principles and traditions of a constitutional republic

Now modern conservatives, those that wear the label as if it says Dockers or Lee or Armani, who knows? To those conservatives, conservatism is anti-liberal, anything liberals are for they seem to be against. Which is ironic, because liberalism seems to be anti-conservative, anything conservatives are for libs are against.

(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_ucsLES1xz1I%2FS5110rDnn-I%2FAAAAAAAAABE%2F9wOyul5u6Z8%2FS660%2Fcarousel1.jpg&hash=2d380fe22f1764a2ac34e06d3db178b7d486f8cd)
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Cryptic Bert on June 24, 2017, 07:02:33 PM
I like her. She should stay.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Solar on June 24, 2017, 08:59:08 PM
Quote from: The Boo Man... on June 24, 2017, 07:02:33 PM
I like her. She should stay.
As long as she's there, the party will remain in total turmoil and disarray.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Cryptic Bert on June 24, 2017, 09:07:50 PM
Quote from: Solar on June 24, 2017, 08:59:08 PM
As long as she's there, the party will remain in total turmoil and disarray.

She's lost her mind. I'm waiting for the day her dentures fall out and she strips naked and attacks an invisible squirrel.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Possum on June 25, 2017, 03:46:49 AM
Quote from: The Boo Man... on June 24, 2017, 09:07:50 PM
She's lost her mind. I'm waiting for the day her dentures fall out and she strips naked and attacks an invisible squirrel.
that would be a step up from standing there telling us we need to pass it to see what it is in it.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Hoofer on June 25, 2017, 04:31:51 AM
Quote from: The Boo Man... on June 24, 2017, 09:07:50 PM
She's lost her mind. I'm waiting for the day her dentures fall out and she strips naked and attacks an invisible squirrel.

Though I cannot see it, the visual image is burned into my mind!

Dems will keep that ole battle-ax until she decides to quit on her own, or gasp!  :scared:  flips to GOPE.  (neither likely to happen)
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: quiller on June 25, 2017, 06:05:22 AM
Quote from: The Boo Man... on June 24, 2017, 09:07:50 PM
She's lost her mind. I'm waiting for the day her dentures fall out and she strips naked and attacks an invisible squirrel.

I've got $100 the squirrel takes her.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Solar on June 25, 2017, 06:34:22 AM
Quote from: The Boo Man... on June 24, 2017, 09:07:50 PM
She's lost her mind. I'm waiting for the day her dentures fall out and she strips naked and attacks an invisible squirrel.
And to think, it was all over jealously. She caught Harry Reid naked, screwing their pet squirrel while singing "I got the whole world in my hands".

Now, erase that visual. I have eye bleach in the lobby for a buck. :biggrin:
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Hoofer on June 25, 2017, 07:00:45 AM
Quote from: quiller on June 25, 2017, 06:05:22 AM
I've got $100 the squirrel takes her.

Tries to hide acorns in those sunken eyes, while she's giggling, teeth rattling....
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: quiller on June 25, 2017, 07:08:27 AM
Quote from: Hoofer on June 25, 2017, 07:00:45 AM
Tries to hide acorns in those sunken eyes, while she's giggling, teeth rattling....

Reminds me of the opening of Tales from the Crypt.

"Tonight's tale of twisted terror, kiddies, is The Corpse That Tried to Run Congress...."
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Cryptic Bert on June 25, 2017, 06:13:14 PM
Quote from: quiller on June 25, 2017, 06:05:22 AM
I've got $100 the squirrel takes her.
:lol:
That's a safe bet.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Cryptic Bert on June 25, 2017, 06:13:55 PM
Quote from: Solar on June 25, 2017, 06:34:22 AM
And to think, it was all over jealously. She caught Harry Reid naked, screwing their pet squirrel while singing "I got the whole world in my hands".

Now, erase that visual. I have eye bleach in the lobby for a buck. :biggrin:

I'll take a gallon.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Solar on June 25, 2017, 06:39:04 PM
Quote from: The Boo Man... on June 25, 2017, 06:13:55 PM
I'll take a gallon.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Cryptic Bert on June 25, 2017, 08:26:21 PM
Quote from: quiller on June 25, 2017, 06:05:22 AM
I've got $100 the squirrel takes her.

It would be fun to watch her flail around fighting an invisible squirrel. Except for the fact that she's naked.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: walkstall on June 25, 2017, 08:31:00 PM
Quote from: The Boo Man... on June 25, 2017, 08:26:21 PM
It would be fun to watch her flail around fighting an invisible squirrel. Except for the fact that she's naked.

ONE of the many things you could not un-see in a life time.   :ohmy:
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Cryptic Bert on June 25, 2017, 08:55:03 PM
Quote from: walkstall on June 25, 2017, 08:31:00 PM
ONE of the many things you could not un-see in a life time.   :ohmy:

Not without cataracts.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Billy's bayonet on June 26, 2017, 07:06:06 AM
Quote from: supsalemgr on June 24, 2017, 07:44:39 AM
Pelosi is a moderate. That is all one needs to know to know where the democrat party is now.

She is a "Moderate" in their eyes, she "declared" that the other day when she said she would Pray for Trump That is when and why the Marxist party of Hell declared war on Nancy and decided she had to go. How dare she make any concession of reconciliation and decency towards the Trump admin.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/11/09/nancy-pelosi-pray-donald-trump-success/93542288/

Now here is the kicker, THE DEVIL YOU KNOW IS BETTER THAN THE DEVIL YOU DON'T....that is why I'd rather see the Marxists keep Nancy rather than get rid of her and replace her ....with WHAT?....or WHOM?....another Kamala Harris likely....that's what you would get in her district of San Freako

Nancy Plasterface is a doddering whack job Liberal, YOU DO NOT WANT HER REPLACED WITH A BOLSHEVIK OR KHMER ROUGE which is what Kamala Harris is.



Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: taxed on June 29, 2017, 02:05:09 AM
The Dems really are in a little pickle.  They're standing in a frame-only house with no roof while it's raining pretending that they're not wet.  They don't have a core.  It's just a bunch of overlap of different political groups that exist to get government dollars.

Pelosi is the last of their worries.  Universities are starting to soften up and allow more conservative speakers coming through.  Along with the media house of cards collapse, them giving up ground in precious academia pretty much means the flag has been captured.  Liberalism just can't survive where free thought happens.
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: Solar on June 29, 2017, 05:38:03 AM
Quote from: taxed on June 29, 2017, 02:05:09 AM
The Dems really are in a little pickle.  They're standing in a frame-only house with no roof while it's raining pretending that they're not wet.  They don't have a core.  It's just a bunch of overlap of different political groups that exist to get government dollars.

Pelosi is the last of their worries.  Universities are starting to soften up and allow more conservative speakers coming through.  Along with the media house of cards collapse, them giving up ground in precious academia pretty much means the flag has been captured.  Liberalism just can't survive where free thought happens.
LOL! Yep, the big tent finally caught fire, so they all ran to a building without a roof, while pretending everything is alright.
I can see Fuglosi waving her hands slowly across in front, repeating "it's all OK, we're still in power", while Obama's mother sacrifices chickens and sprays the congregation with blood.
"Don't worry, Fuglosi exclaims, Hillary is bringing the spirit milk, we have virgins to sacrifice...
Title: Re: Dims: Time For Fuglosi To Go
Post by: taxed on June 29, 2017, 05:46:02 AM
Quote from: Solar on June 29, 2017, 05:38:03 AM
LOL! Yep, the big tent finally caught fire, so they all ran to a building without a roof, while pretending everything is alright.
I can see Fuglosi waving her hands slowly across in front, repeating "it's all OK, we're still in power", while Obama's mother sacrifices chickens and sprays the congregation with blood.
"Don't worry, Fuglosi exclaims, Hillary is bringing the spirit milk, we have virgins to sacrifice...

That's when Podesta shows up with a mystery sampler box...