At this point the democrats are desperate to get rid of Hillary. They have another problem on their hands. Hollywood. They are desperate for cash but taking money from these Hollywood hypocrites will not look good and it has neutralized the sexist arguments about Trump. He said some terrible things but the lefts biggest donor actually did terrible things and it was ignored for decades.

Quote from: The Boo Man... on October 11, 2017, 07:16:34 PM
At this point the democrats are desperate to get rid of Hillary. They have another problem on their hands. Hollywood. They are desperate for cash but taking money from these Hollywood hypocrites will not look good and it has neutralized the sexist arguments about Trump. He said some terrible things but the lefts biggest donor actually did terrible things and it was ignored for decades.

Other than a sudden, unexpected, natural death - oh, heck, even Alex Jones would blame that on the CIA or someone.
If Democrats can funnel money through a Chinese laundry worker, Hollywood should have no problem.

What could lead to a plea bargain, or serious prison time for Lynch or Clinton?

http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/13/fbi-finds-new-documents-about-clinton-lynch-tarmac-meeting/

Quote"It is stunning that the FBI 'found' these Clinton-Lynch tarmac records only after we caught the agency hiding them in another lawsuit."

"Judicial Watch will continue to press for answers about the FBI's document games in court. In the meantime, the FBI should stop the stonewall and release these new records immediately," he added.

The FBI has until Nov. 30 to hand the newly discovered documents over to Judicial Watch.

Run out and grab a couple of bags of Popcorn & get ready to fire up the popper, folks!   

The question:  Is a Clinton, (Bill?) and Loretta Lynch going to get sent up the river?
Will Bill Clinton or Loretta Lynch plead the 5th?
Will Hillary ... finally clear her life of Bill, and turn state's evidence against him for colluding with Lynch & Comey to effect the outcome of an investigation?  (She's got it in her... what a fitting end to that womanizer!)
Will Loretta Lynch collapse under the threat of Prison time and turn on Hillary, Bill and 'connect' Barak Obama to this and other atrocities?
Will the Democrats instinctively circle-the-wagons and attempt to protect Lynch - or cast her aside and treat her as the real scape-goat?
Will Trump seize on this media distraction to unwind another Obama regulation, push through tax cuts, etc.?   (Gotta admit, he timed this Obama care / Treasury defunding perfectly - while everyone was running for the hills away from Harvey Weinstein!)

Sometimes... it's better to be outside the political process... to watch the corrupted ones squirm!

Quote from: Hoofer on October 13, 2017, 06:02:11 PM
What could lead to a plea bargain, or serious prison time for Lynch or Clinton?

http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/13/fbi-finds-new-documents-about-clinton-lynch-tarmac-meeting/

Run out and grab a couple of bags of Popcorn & get ready to fire up the popper, folks!   

The question:  Is a Clinton, (Bill?) and Loretta Lynch going to get sent up the river?
Will Bill Clinton or Loretta Lynch plead the 5th?
Will Hillary ... finally clear her life of Bill, and turn state's evidence against him for colluding with Lynch & Comey to effect the outcome of an investigation?  (She's got it in her... what a fitting end to that womanizer!)
Will Loretta Lynch collapse under the threat of Prison time and turn on Hillary, Bill and 'connect' Barak Obama to this and other atrocities?
Will the Democrats instinctively circle-the-wagons and attempt to protect Lynch - or cast her aside and treat her as the real scape-goat?
Will Trump seize on this media distraction to unwind another Obama regulation, push through tax cuts, etc.?   (Gotta admit, he timed this Obama care / Treasury defunding perfectly - while everyone was running for the hills away from Harvey Weinstein!)

Sometimes... it's better to be outside the political process... to watch the corrupted ones squirm!

This could get good. Finally.

This is rich. The Dims are throwing the very entity under the bus, they need to get them elected, the white male.




But, when I arrived at the townhouse of Stanley Greenberg, the veteran Democratic strategist, on Capitol Hill, later that morning, it was not the distractions of the Trump White House that had him worked up. Greenberg was still fuming about Hillary Clinton.
Clinton was guilty of "malpractice" in how she conducted her 2016 Presidential campaign, Greenberg told me. Even worse, he said, Democrats were repeating the same political mistakes a year later. "Look at Virginia right now," Greenberg said, as soon as we sat down in his second-floor office. "We have a candidate"—Ralph Northam, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee—"running as Hillary Clinton.
He is running on the same kind of issues, and has the same kind of view of the world. It's the Republicans who talk about the economy, not the Democrats." This was the approach that doomed Clinton against Trump. The electorate was angry in 2016 and remains angry now, Greenberg said, and Northam, a Norfolk doctor, didn't get it. Neither did Clinton and the team of Obama veterans who staffed her Brooklyn headquarters. "If you live in the metro areas with the élites, you don't wake up angry about what's happening in people's lives," Greenberg said.

His rant was notable for a variety of reasons, not least because Greenberg was the pollster who helped Bill Clinton win the White House in 1992, and he has been a participant in every Democratic nominee's Presidential campaign since, including Hillary Clinton's. His criticism illuminates an urgent question for the Democratic Party, not just in next week's governor's race in Virginia but in the midterm elections of 2018 and beyond. Could Trump, as deeply polarizing and unpopular as he is, even be reëlected?
Greenberg and other prominent Democrats still furious about last year's Clinton campaign think it's entirely possible, unless the Party figures out, and fast, a way to tackle the problem that sealed Clinton's fate in 2016: how to appeal to the disaffected white working-class voters who provided Trump's unlikely win a year ago.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-democratic-civil-war-is-getting-nasty-even-if-no-one-is-paying-attention

But wait, it gets even better.

DNC: White men shouldn't apply for tech jobs

White men need not apply.

The political organization, which routinely makes grand statements about inclusion, recently sent an email to its employees looking to recruit people for eight open spots including IT Systems Administrator, Product Manager and Chief Security Officer.

Cisgender is a term for people whose gender identity matches the sex that they were assigned to at birth.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/01/dnc-white-men-shouldnt-apply-for-tech-jobs.html



She included the following caveat:

I personally would prefer that you not forward to cisgender straight white males, since they're already in the majority.

In response to this email, an anonymous DNC source told The Daily Wire the following:

Clearly the DNC is doubling down on a failed strategy that has alienated staffers and voters alike. We want to be judged based on the quality of our work, not on identity politics. How can we trust the leadership of the DNC if they don't even trust us?
http://www.dailywire.com/news/22939/exclusive-dnc-official-discriminates-against-elliott-hamilton#

Quote from: Solar on November 02, 2017, 12:00:41 PM
This is rich. The Dims are throwing the very entity under the bus, they need to get them elected, the white male.




But, when I arrived at the townhouse of Stanley Greenberg, the veteran Democratic strategist, on Capitol Hill, later that morning, it was not the distractions of the Trump White House that had him worked up. Greenberg was still fuming about Hillary Clinton.
Clinton was guilty of "malpractice" in how she conducted her 2016 Presidential campaign, Greenberg told me. Even worse, he said, Democrats were repeating the same political mistakes a year later. "Look at Virginia right now," Greenberg said, as soon as we sat down in his second-floor office. "We have a candidate"—Ralph Northam, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee—"running as Hillary Clinton.
He is running on the same kind of issues, and has the same kind of view of the world. It's the Republicans who talk about the economy, not the Democrats." This was the approach that doomed Clinton against Trump. The electorate was angry in 2016 and remains angry now, Greenberg said, and Northam, a Norfolk doctor, didn't get it. Neither did Clinton and the team of Obama veterans who staffed her Brooklyn headquarters. "If you live in the metro areas with the élites, you don't wake up angry about what's happening in people's lives," Greenberg said.

His rant was notable for a variety of reasons, not least because Greenberg was the pollster who helped Bill Clinton win the White House in 1992, and he has been a participant in every Democratic nominee's Presidential campaign since, including Hillary Clinton's. His criticism illuminates an urgent question for the Democratic Party, not just in next week's governor's race in Virginia but in the midterm elections of 2018 and beyond. Could Trump, as deeply polarizing and unpopular as he is, even be reëlected?
Greenberg and other prominent Democrats still furious about last year's Clinton campaign think it's entirely possible, unless the Party figures out, and fast, a way to tackle the problem that sealed Clinton's fate in 2016: how to appeal to the disaffected white working-class voters who provided Trump's unlikely win a year ago.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-democratic-civil-war-is-getting-nasty-even-if-no-one-is-paying-attention

But wait, it gets even better.

DNC: White men shouldn't apply for tech jobs

White men need not apply.

The political organization, which routinely makes grand statements about inclusion, recently sent an email to its employees looking to recruit people for eight open spots including IT Systems Administrator, Product Manager and Chief Security Officer.

Cisgender is a term for people whose gender identity matches the sex that they were assigned to at birth.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/01/dnc-white-men-shouldnt-apply-for-tech-jobs.html



She included the following caveat:

I personally would prefer that you not forward to cisgender straight white males, since they're already in the majority.

In response to this email, an anonymous DNC source told The Daily Wire the following:

Clearly the DNC is doubling down on a failed strategy that has alienated staffers and voters alike. We want to be judged based on the quality of our work, not on identity politics. How can we trust the leadership of the DNC if they don't even trust us?
http://www.dailywire.com/news/22939/exclusive-dnc-official-discriminates-against-elliott-hamilton#

Stay out of their way. No need to waste our ammunition if they have formed a circular firing squad.

Quote from: supsalemgr on November 02, 2017, 01:02:36 PM
Stay out of their way. No need to waste our ammunition if they have formed a circular firing squad.

Yes, the hate is strong in the Dim party. I've never seen a party so Hell bent on attacking the majority of the nation, and how they ever came to the conclusion that this is a winning ticket, is way beyond my comprehension.

Quote from: Solar on November 02, 2017, 12:00:41 PM
This is rich. The Dims are throwing the very entity under the bus, they need to get them elected, the white male.




But, when I arrived at the townhouse of Stanley Greenberg, the veteran Democratic strategist, on Capitol Hill, later that morning, it was not the distractions of the Trump White House that had him worked up. Greenberg was still fuming about Hillary Clinton.
Clinton was guilty of "malpractice" in how she conducted her 2016 Presidential campaign, Greenberg told me. Even worse, he said, Democrats were repeating the same political mistakes a year later. "Look at Virginia right now," Greenberg said, as soon as we sat down in his second-floor office. "We have a candidate"—Ralph Northam, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee—"running as Hillary Clinton.
He is running on the same kind of issues, and has the same kind of view of the world. It's the Republicans who talk about the economy, not the Democrats." This was the approach that doomed Clinton against Trump. The electorate was angry in 2016 and remains angry now, Greenberg said, and Northam, a Norfolk doctor, didn't get it. Neither did Clinton and the team of Obama veterans who staffed her Brooklyn headquarters. "If you live in the metro areas with the élites, you don't wake up angry about what's happening in people's lives," Greenberg said.

His rant was notable for a variety of reasons, not least because Greenberg was the pollster who helped Bill Clinton win the White House in 1992, and he has been a participant in every Democratic nominee's Presidential campaign since, including Hillary Clinton's. His criticism illuminates an urgent question for the Democratic Party, not just in next week's governor's race in Virginia but in the midterm elections of 2018 and beyond. Could Trump, as deeply polarizing and unpopular as he is, even be reëlected?
Greenberg and other prominent Democrats still furious about last year's Clinton campaign think it's entirely possible, unless the Party figures out, and fast, a way to tackle the problem that sealed Clinton's fate in 2016: how to appeal to the disaffected white working-class voters who provided Trump's unlikely win a year ago.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-democratic-civil-war-is-getting-nasty-even-if-no-one-is-paying-attention

But wait, it gets even better.

DNC: White men shouldn't apply for tech jobs

White men need not apply.

The political organization, which routinely makes grand statements about inclusion, recently sent an email to its employees looking to recruit people for eight open spots including IT Systems Administrator, Product Manager and Chief Security Officer.

Cisgender is a term for people whose gender identity matches the sex that they were assigned to at birth.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/01/dnc-white-men-shouldnt-apply-for-tech-jobs.html



She included the following caveat:

I personally would prefer that you not forward to cisgender straight white males, since they're already in the majority.

In response to this email, an anonymous DNC source told The Daily Wire the following:

Clearly the DNC is doubling down on a failed strategy that has alienated staffers and voters alike. We want to be judged based on the quality of our work, not on identity politics. How can we trust the leadership of the DNC if they don't even trust us?
http://www.dailywire.com/news/22939/exclusive-dnc-official-discriminates-against-elliott-hamilton#

By the way, "Democracy for America (DFA)" is the old ACORN.
From the post above:
"We have a candidate"—Ralph Northam, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee—"running as Hillary Clinton.

Dims throw one of their own under the bus, so they can kiss Virginia Governorship goodbye.

'RACIST CAMPAIGN': Liberal Group Slams Democratic Candidate Ralph Northam, Pulls Support from his "racist campaign."
"We refuse to be silent any longer and even remotely complicit in the disastrous, racist, and voter-turnout-depressing campaign Ralph

Democracy for America (DFA) slammed Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ralph Northam as "gutless" and "morally debased" announcing that they pulled all support from his "racist campaign."

The far-left progressive group harshly criticized Northam for cracking under pressure and flip-flopping on key immigration issues after being called out by Republicans and President Donald Trump.

"Northam, Virginia's sitting lieutenant governor, has insisted he opposes sanctuary cities while also accusing Gillespie of fabricating the issue for political advantage," the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported.

President Trump launched an attack against Northam over Twitter for his weak stances on immigration in early October that led to criticism over his pro-sanctuary city stances.