Later the host suggested that guns don't prevent violence in schools (he cited the mass shootings at Columbine and Virginia Tech). "But you would concede that, as good as an idea as you think this is, it may not work. Because there have been cases where armed guards have not prevented this kind of massacre, this kind of carnage. I want you would concede that point, wouldn't you?," Gregory pleaded.

The NBC host would go on the rest of the segment to suggest that armed guards might not be effective in preventing mass murders at school. Which is perhaps an interesting theoretical argument.

But the NBC host seems to have no problem with armed guards protecting his kids everyday where they attend school in Washington, D.C.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/gregory-mocks-lapierre-proposing-armed-guards-sends-kids-high-security-school_691057.html

Why is it our responsibility to be disarm? When are we going to turn the tables and make these idiots prove that banning weapons could actually work?
No more compromising, prove it, or end of discussion, I've had it with these emotionally driven mental midgets telling me how to protect myself.

No one knows better than themselves that you are responsible for your own safety.

Gregory is a rabid lib, and a horrible choice for Meet the Press. I haven't watched it since Russert died. He was good.

SOMEBODY please start fighting this nationally! It's too easy if you have a brain.

If you're on these shows, DO YOUR HOMEWORK AND BE PREPARED.  These things happen more often than not. Expect that the host that's lecturing you is a hypocrite. Do your homework and then "take your shot, and take him out."