CPUSA endorsing a sitting president

Started by clipper100, November 13, 2012, 03:38:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

clipper100

I Couldn't believe when I saw the CPUSA endorse Hussein.

First time in history the Kommies endorsed a sitting president.


Sci Fi Fan

And the KKK endorsed Mitt Romney.  So what?


Solar

Quote from: Sci Fi Fan on November 13, 2012, 03:43:23 PM
And the KKK endorsed Mitt Romney.  So what?
Got nothin, do ya. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
The CPUSA is the communist party in the US, they endorsed Husein.
It's what we've all been saying all along, that he's a God Damn Marxist/Fabian Socialist!
How much more proof do you need?
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Ragin Rebel

Why wouldn't they endorse one of their own. Obama has been a member of the New Party since the mid 90's. Like his father Frank Marshall Davis, Obama is a card carrying Communist.
"I think I have an ongoing conversation with God. Throughout the day I'm constantly asking myself questions about what I'm doing, why I am doing it."
:Barack Hussein Obama
"The people who don't want to disclose the truth, are people with something to hide."-Barack Hussein Obama

Sci Fi Fan

Quote from: Solar on November 13, 2012, 04:27:46 PM
Got nothin, do ya. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
The CPUSA is the communist party in the US, they endorsed Husein.
It's what we've all been saying all along, that he's a God Damn Marxist/Fabian Socialist!
How much more proof do you need?

So your logic is:

X party endorses Obama -> Obama supports X party.

Well, the Klan endorsed Romney!

So...plug the KKK into X, and substitute Obama for Romney.

This is your logic, not mine.

kramarat

Quote from: Solar on November 13, 2012, 04:27:46 PM
Got nothin, do ya. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
The CPUSA is the communist party in the US, they endorsed Husein.
It's what we've all been saying all along, that he's a God Damn Marxist/Fabian Socialist!
How much more proof do you need?

The poor kid sure does spend a lot of time grasping at straws. He wants to be right so bad he can taste it. He just keeps coming up empty handed.

Lets keep him around...............he's great entertainment, in small doses. :biggrin:

Yawn

I'd rather talk about what we can do during the next 2 & 4 years so that IF we have a shot at fixing this, we can.  This guy is a massive time waster. I'm tired of his vomit in every thread.

Sci Fi Fan

Quote from: Yawn on November 13, 2012, 04:39:51 PM
I'd rather talk about what we can do during the next 2 & 4 years so that IF we have a shot at fixing this, we can. 

Hint: whining about voter fraud isn't one of them.

Solar

Quote from: Sci Fi Fan on November 13, 2012, 04:32:39 PM
So your logic is:

X party endorses Obama -> Obama supports X party.

Well, the Klan endorsed Romney!

So...plug the KKK into X, and substitute Obama for Romney.

This is your logic, not mine.
First off, the Klan is not a political party, and one chapter, does not make the whole of a movement.
The CPUSA however, is a political party, and they agree with Husein's platform, by every logical thinking persons standards, it's safe to assume he is more commie than he is a free enterprise POTUS.

Your weak move to equate Mitt with the Klan is in the least pathetic and most consider despicable.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Sci Fi Fan

#9
Quote from: Solar on November 13, 2012, 04:45:01 PM
First off, the Klan is not a political party,

Irrelevant distinction.  You seem to think that an organization supporting you means that you support it.  If the Klan decided that it was a political organization, would my point suddenly change?

Quoteand one chapter, does not make the whole of a movement.

So Romney only supports the ideals of that one chapter, according to your line of reasoning.  KK.

Quote
Your weak move to equate Mitt with the Klan is in the least pathetic and most consider despicable.

You don't understand how an Reductio ad absurdum works. 

Let me educate you: that Romney obviously does not support the Klan is my entire point!  Your logic fails because it leads us to ridiculous conclusions if we apply to to anybody other than what you find convenient.

Yawn

QuoteLet me educate you: that Romney obviously does not support the Klan is my entire point!  Your logic fails because it leads us to ridiculous conclusions if we apply to to anybody other than what you find convenient.

What you refuse to accept is that Obama DOES accept all the principle of Marxism.  You do too to a great degree.

Solar

Quote from: Sci Fi Fan on November 13, 2012, 04:47:12 PM
Irrelevant distinction.
To the contrary, but you knew that and didn't like the truth/.
Quote
So Romney only supports the ideals of that one chapter, according to your line of reasoning.  KK.

You don't understand how an Reductio ad absurdum works.
Actually I do, and you used it in the wrong context.
Quote
Let me educate you: that Romney obviously does not support the Klan is my entire point!  Your logic fails because it leads us to ridiculous conclusions if we apply to to anybody other than what you find convenient.

Wrong son, your attempt to link Mitt to the Klan is absurd to the extreme.
You can forget using that claim as a defense and distraction from the truth, the the fact that the commies like Husein.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Sci Fi Fan

Quote from: Solar on November 13, 2012, 05:04:52 PM
To the contrary, but you knew that and didn't like the truth/.

You still haven't established a reason why endorsements by political organizations are fundamentally more revealing than endorsements by not-overtly-political organizations.

Quote
Actually I do, and you used it in the wrong context.

No, you just didn't understand it.   :rolleyes:

Quote
Wrong son, your attempt to link Mitt to the Klan is absurd to the extreme.

See, this is an example of you needing to polish up your debating skills.  I made it quite clear that my post made the exact opposite link. 

Quote
You can forget using that claim as a defense and distraction from the truth, the the fact that the commies like Husein.

Ok, let's say that commies like Hussein.  That doesn't make Hussein a commie.  Racists like Romney.  Does that make Romney a racist? 

Now, respond to the above with your new-found understanding of what a reducio ad absurdum argument is.  Maybe you won't repeat precisely what I explained to you isn't so (twice now).

Darth Fife

Quote from: Solar on November 13, 2012, 04:45:01 PM
First off, the Klan is not a political party, and one chapter, does not make the whole of a movement.
The CPUSA however, is a political party, and they agree with Husein's platform, by every logical thinking persons standards, it's safe to assume he is more commie than he is a free enterprise POTUS.

Your weak move to equate Mitt with the Klan is in the least pathetic and most consider despicable.

More importantly, Obama agrees with the CPUSA's party platform! Romney, on the other hand, does not support (or even tolerate) the KKK's position on, well, just about anything.


Yawn

Even the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) has now objected to the Democrat Party, suing the Democrats and its leadership for "stealing" their party platform and relabeling it as "progressive".

According to political hotwire and many other sources, CPUSA claims that the entire so-called "new" Democratic agenda is, in fact, the product of a decades-long, painstaking campaign by CPUSA theorists... http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/09-566/