Who would'a thunk it? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
CONFIRMED: Comey Decided He Wasn't Going to Refer Hillary For Prosecution Long Before FBI Investigation Was Over
snip~
According to new transcripts released by the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday afternoon, former FBI Director James Comey made the decision not to refer then Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for prosecution long before ever interviewing key witnesses. Members of the Committee allege Comey made the decision months before FBI agents were finished with the criminal investigation into her mishandling of classified information during her time as Secretary of State.
more @
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2017/08/31/confirmed-comey-decided-he-wasnt-going-to-refer-hillary-for-prosecution-before-interviewing-key-witnesses-n2375767
Quote from: walkstall on October 17, 2017, 06:45:39 PM
Who would'a thunk it? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
CONFIRMED: Comey Decided He Wasn't Going to Refer Hillary For Prosecution Long Before FBI Investigation Was Over
snip~
According to new transcripts released by the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday afternoon, former FBI Director James Comey made the decision not to refer then Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for prosecution long before ever interviewing key witnesses. Members of the Committee allege Comey made the decision months before FBI agents were finished with the criminal investigation into her mishandling of classified information during her time as Secretary of State.
more @
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2017/08/31/confirmed-comey-decided-he-wasnt-going-to-refer-hillary-for-prosecution-before-interviewing-key-witnesses-n2375767
So what will happen? Nothing probably.
And there are still some people who think he shouldn't have been fired.
He was supposedly a stand up, uninterruptible person until now. I'm not buying it.
Quote from: supsalemgr on October 18, 2017, 04:02:07 AM
So what will happen? Nothing probably.
It's starting to appear that nothing is illegal in DC for politicians.
If they came out with unquestionable proof for the Rich killing by big DC players, I believe it would be ignored.
No complaints against the perps, no arrests, no discussion. Just sit there and say "yeah, so what ?"
Push is on to disbar James Comey after Clinton scandal.
snip~
A crusading lawyer filed a bar grievance this week accusing former FBI Director James Comey of lying to Congress and destroying potential evidence in the Clinton email scandal, in a process that could end up costing him his law license.
Ty Clevenger filed the grievance in New York, where Mr. Comey was a former U.S. attorney and is licensed to practice law.
Mr. Clevenger said Mr. Comey's testimony to Congress that he did not predetermine the outcome of the FBI's probe into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is belied by revelations this week that he in fact started drafting an exoneration months before even speaking with Mrs. Clinton.
more @
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/18/lawyer-files-have-comey-disbarred/?utm_source=onesignal&utm_campaign=pushnotify&utm_medium=push
How is this not obstruction of justice?
Whatever the dems were actually doing and scared shitless about after Trump's win......they faked up for Trump.
Russian Collusion - Clintons, Comey, Podestas really did it
Election Collusion - Clintons, Brazile, Wasserman actually did it
Obstruction of Justice - Comey, Mueller, Lynch really did this
Fraud and RICO in the election - Rice, Power, Rhodes
Huge Financial Fraud - Done in spades by the Clintons - Foundation, Haiti, Saudi Arabia, Russia
Undermining America - the 15 dems with the Awans, Huma & MB
Just dream up / invent everything the same for Trump, and hope it slows down the real investigation of the real crimes.
Anyone seen Mad Maxine?
...and here it is. With Sessions appointing Rosenstien is there any doubt that he is knee deep in corruption as well? The investigation into the Trump collusion is an attempt to bring him down. So ... I'm not sure, but is it to late for Trump to fire him?? With so many swamp creatures within the DOJ, even if he did fire him, who would he appoint?
Gregg Jarrett: The Clinton cover-up, brought to you by the same guys who are investigating Trump
....The answer may lie with the people who were in charge of the investigation and who knew of its explosive impact. Who are they?
Holder, Mueller, Comey & Rosenstein
Eric Holder was the Attorney General when the FBI began uncovering the Russian corruption scheme in 2009. Since the FBI reports to him, he surely knew what the bureau had uncovered.
What's more, Holder was a member of the "Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States" which approved the uranium sale to the Russians in 2010. Since the vote was unanimous, it appears Holder knowingly and deliberately countenanced a deal that was based on illegal activities and which gave Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America's uranium assets.
It gets worse. Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney, was supervising the case. There is no indication that any of these men ever told Congress of all the incriminating evidence they had discovered and the connection to Clinton. The entire matter was kept secret from the American public.
It may be no coincidence that Mueller (now special counsel) and Rosenstein (now Deputy Attorney General) are the two top people currently investigating whether the Trump campaign conspired with the Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election. Mueller reports to Rosenstein, while Comey is a key witness in the case. ........
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/18/gregg-jarrett-clinton-cover-up-brought-to-by-same-guys-who-are-investigating-trump.html
This is called coming to the conclusion you want then finding evidence to support it or ignoring evidence to support it. Then tailoring the "investigation" to support your conclusion.
Anybody who would have conducted such investigation in my former Dept, corrupt as it was, would have been suspended and possibly jailed for obstruction of justice.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on October 19, 2017, 03:24:22 PM
This is called coming to the conclusion you want then finding evidence to support it or ignoring evidence to support it. Then tailoring the "investigation" to support your conclusion.
Anybody who would have conducted such investigation in my former Dept, corrupt as it was, would have been suspended and possibly jailed for obstruction of justice.
As a politicians he should have been offered one last meal and a blindfold.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on October 19, 2017, 03:24:22 PM
This is called coming to the conclusion you want then finding evidence to support it or ignoring evidence to support it. Then tailoring the "investigation" to support your conclusion.
Anybody who would have conducted such investigation in my former Dept, corrupt as it was, would have been suspended and possibly jailed for obstruction of justice.
Yep, even Ca doesn't pull this shit, and we have Marxists running the State.
Quote from: Solar on October 19, 2017, 04:28:12 PM
Yep, even Ca doesn't pull this shit, and we have Marxists running the State.
Are you saying there is something good about Ca politics? :lol: :lol: