Looks fishy.

Why would a New York indictment identify (at the beginning) copies to Sessions, Trump, and Grassley? The signature at the end also looks bogus; typically the name is typed and then it is signed. The name and signature are usually redacted. In this case, there is no typed name and the signature is completely illegible.

If false, why would someone go to so much trouble. Just wishful thinking I guess.

Quote from: topside on March 04, 2018, 05:14:35 PM
Looks fishy.

Why would a New York indictment identify (at the beginning) copies to Sessions, Trump, and Grassley? The signature at the end also looks bogus; typically the name is typed and then it is signed. The name and signature are usually redacted. In this case, there is no typed name and the signature is completely illegible.

If false, why would someone go to so much trouble. Just wishful thinking I guess.

Did you see Reply 15? I called and verified, it is real, in fact, Jan, the director I talked to, said he wrote the draft himself.
Problem is, most Grand jury indictments mean nothing unless a prosecutor follows through on them.