Quote from: Solar on September 20, 2018, 05:29:14 PM
She? Are you sure? 

Not in this day and age.   

Quote from: Solar on September 20, 2018, 03:09:22 PM
That's one ugly dude.

Looks like Micheal Moore lost some weight.

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on September 20, 2018, 08:29:04 PM
Looks like Micheal Moore lost some weight.

OMG it does, a little Botox, clean clothes, ya know, kind of like Frankenstein's monster getting a makeover.

Quote from: Solar on September 20, 2018, 03:09:22 PM
That's one ugly dude.

I guess a requirement to be a leftist, democrat woman is to be ugly.

Quote from: supsalemgr on September 21, 2018, 04:40:53 AM
I guess a requirement to be a leftist, democrat woman is to be ugly.

Yep, inside and out!

President Trump pulled the rug out from under the Dems, essentially calling their bluff, about letting that lady testify.  Now they have to keep moving forward on a doomed path, which won't stop the confirmation vote anyway.  Meanwhile, he holds the card with the FISA app.  The longer he keeps the bad guys on defense, the more mistakes they make and worse they look -- as new previously unknown data, and confirmed data, is released daily.

He's exhausting them.

Quote from: mrclose on September 22, 2018, 12:43:21 PM
There is a HUGE problem that just arose!
(Not yet being discussed but one that I foresee as a problem)

According to the law in Maryland, there is no statue of limitations on sexual assaults!

The problem?

What if this woman were to file charges with the police in Maryland ... would the senate actually hold a vote to confirm a SC Judge who is under a 'now active' investigation?

There may not be a statue of limitations but I bet there is also a  law about filing fake charges. If her lawyer wants to keep her out of jail, I would guess there will be no chargers filed.

Quote from: s3779m on September 22, 2018, 01:56:18 PM
There may not be a statue of limitations but I bet there is also a  law about filing fake charges. If her lawyer wants to keep her out of jail, I would guess there will be no chargers filed.

She playing with the Big Dogs now.   They will ask every one they can who she sleep with in high school and college.   Along with her drinking habits.

Quote from: mrclose on September 22, 2018, 12:43:21 PM
There is a HUGE problem that just arose!
(Not yet being discussed but one that I foresee as a problem)

According to the law in Maryland, there is no statue of limitations on sexual assaults!

The problem?

What if this woman were to file charges with the police in Maryland ... would the senate actually hold a vote to confirm a SC Judge who is under a 'now active' investigation?

This was floated a few days ago and the left dropped it like they would a Holy Bible.
They know full well they have nothing, all they have are accusations, and if I were to say, Anita Hill, what comes to mind?
Point being, they want to stain his appointment and link every appointment with a mark that all libs will remember.
That's all this is.
He will be confirmed, as I said in the OP.

Quote from: s3779m on September 22, 2018, 01:56:18 PM
There may not be a statue of limitations but I bet there is also a  law about filing fake charges. If her lawyer wants to keep her out of jail, I would guess there will be no chargers filed.

What is the crime? If you can find one he was 17, a minor at the time. What was the law and how was it enforced 37 years ago? would it even have been investigated at the time? Standards may have changed in the last 37 years but at the time this would not have been considered an assault!

Quote from: redbeard on September 22, 2018, 08:01:05 PM
What is the crime? If you can find one he was 17, a minor at the time. What was the law and how was it enforced 37 years ago? would it even have been investigated at the time? Standards may have changed in the last 37 years but at the time this would not have been considered an assault!

That's the part that pisses me off about the gop'E even entertaining this bullshit. Not one person has pointed out damages, let alone evidence of a law being broken.

I thought everyone knew the rule about arguing with idiots? The gallery soon forgets which ones were the idiots.

I sure hope she's charged with making false allegations.

Quote from: redbeard on September 22, 2018, 08:01:05 PM
What is the crime? If you can find one he was 17, a minor at the time. What was the law and how was it enforced 37 years ago? would it even have been investigated at the time? Standards may have changed in the last 37 years but at the time this would not have been considered an assault!

The "crime" I am referring to would be the crime of filling a false criminal report.

Quote from: Solar on September 22, 2018, 02:38:48 PM
This was floated a few days ago and the left dropped it like they would a Holy Bible.
They know full well they have nothing, all they have are accusations, and if I were to say, Anita Hill, what comes to mind?
Point being, they want to stain his appointment and link every appointment with a mark that all libs will remember.
That's all this is.
He will be confirmed, as I said in the OP.

I have no doubt he will be confirmed but when he is seated is another matter, anytime after OCT 1st and the left wins as he wont be seated in time for the upcoming session.  There are alot of things coming down the pike and to have another Constitutionalist on the court who will uphold the rule of law is desperately needed.

Quote from: AmericanMom on September 23, 2018, 11:39:21 AM
I have no doubt he will be confirmed but when he is seated is another matter, anytime after OCT 1st and the left wins as he wont be seated in time for the upcoming session.  There are alot of things coming down the pike and to have another Constitutionalist on the court who will uphold the rule of law is desperately needed.

I assure you, the left will not win. The entire nation despises the left.