I'll sticky this while the left goes about their show of hate.
In the end, he will be confirmed, they just want to make a spectacle and create more division in the country, nothing more.
Remember when Fuglosi made the statement, "You'll have to vote for it, to see what's in it".
Well, eat this Chucky!!!
More than 42,000 documents released hours before Kavanaugh hearing begins
William Burck, a lawyer for former President George W. Bush, released more than 42,000 pages of documents regarding Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh late Monday night, sparking the ire of Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer.
Mr. Schumer sounded the alarm Monday night, saying the document dump "underscores just how absurd" the Kavanaugh confirmation process has been. He demanded that Republicans delay the hearings until the documents could be reviewed.
Senate Judiciary
✔
@senjudiciary
The Majority staff has now completed its review of each and every one of these pages. Chairman @ChuckGrassley and his team are prepped and ready for Judge Kavanaugh's hearing to begin tomorrow. #SCOTUS
Chuck Schumer
✔
@SenSchumer
🚨🚨 The Senate was just given an additional 42,000 pages of Kavanaugh documents the NIGHT BEFORE his confirmation hearing. This underscores just how absurd this process is. Not a single senator will be able to review these records before tomorrow.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/4/brett-kavanaugh-hearing-more-than-42000-documents-/
So far the hearing is an absolute circus. The democrats are being as childish as we know they are capable. So far probably ten or so protesters have been ousted. I just mentioned to Mrs. Sup that this show is going to backfire on the democrats. I hope Sen Grassly remains firm and does not allow the democrats side track the nomination process.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 04, 2018, 08:54:30 AM
So far the hearing is an absolute circus. The democrats are being as childish as we know they are capable. So far probably ten or so protesters have been ousted. I just mentioned to Mrs. Sup that this show is going to backfire on the democrats. I hope Sen Grassly remains firm and does not allow the democrats side track the nomination process.
Exactly!
A circus is just what the Marxists want, it's not about doing what is Right for the country but how much more of a divide can be created.
These people suck!
It is clear the democrats have nothing. Durbin calls for Kavanaugh to request a suspension to the hearing until all his papers can be presented. Then this afternoon, Blumenthal (who is becoming my most disliked dem) requests a vote to suspend the hearings until all documents can be produced. Apparently all the whiners have been removed.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 04, 2018, 11:44:25 AM
It is clear the democrats have nothing. Durbin calls for Kavanaugh to request a suspension to the hearing until all his papers can be presented. Then this afternoon, Blumenthal (who is becoming my most disliked dem) requests a vote to suspend the hearings until all documents can be produced. Apparently all the whiners have been removed.
I certainly hope Trump pressures the RINO to force a vote.
Lion Ted Cruz just spanked the democrats with the damn truth.
Enjoy...... :popcorn:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_6c2101sGE
Quote from: Bronx on September 04, 2018, 01:20:37 PM
Lion Ted Cruz just spanked the democrats with the damn truth.
Enjoy...... :popcorn:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_6c2101sGE
Damn, that was good, that's why I supported Ted.
Quote from: Bronx on September 04, 2018, 01:20:37 PM
Lion Ted Cruz just spanked the democrats with the damn truth.
Enjoy...... :popcorn:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_6c2101sGE
Wow. Excellent. This is why I wrote him in on the primaries. He may talk like a university educated career politician, but he still charecterizes the left perfectly. His heart seems to be in the right place even if it gets bogged down by the swamp every now and again.
Wow. Today was both pathetic and highly entertaining. The democrat's arguments about not having enough time to read the documents or that they haven't received enough of them might hold some weight if they hadn't already declared they would never vote for him...Some refused to meet with him. They screwed themselves with weeks of declarations of resistance to placate their radical base.
I would have just started throwing tear gas.
The democrats Kavanaugh strategy so far...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78b67l_yxUc
Oh, and by the way, Brett will be confirmed and libs heads will explode. A Day To Remember, the day we took back the court from the Marxists! :thumbup:
Quote from: Solar on September 04, 2018, 09:04:52 PM
Oh, and by the way, Brett will be confirmed and libs heads will explode. A Day To Remember, the day we took back the court from the Marxists! :thumbup:
Think this is a circus? Just imagine what it will like if Trump gets to replace Breyer or Ginsberg.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 05, 2018, 04:24:58 AM
Think this is a circus? Just imagine what it will like if Trump gets to replace Breyer or Ginsberg.
Can't wait.. :thumbsup:
Im watching now and the protesters just keep acting up every few minutes. I get the impression that they arent being thrown out. And then grassley says something about letting them have their free speech and is letting them eat into his time. Horse shit. Throw em out and let em protest outside.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 05, 2018, 07:00:55 AM
Im watching now and the protesters just keep acting up every few minutes. I get the impression that they arent being thrown out. And then grassley says something about letting them have their free speech and is letting them eat into his time. Horse shit. Throw em out and let em protest outside.
Aren't these people just sick? Brett is exactly what we need to protect our rights.
This is disgusting behavior by the left and needs to be exposed for what it is, a paid protest, just like all the other disruptive shit the left does with OWS, ANTIFA, BLM, this is just an extension of those groups.
This is just more evidence of the desperation on the left and proof they know they've lost.
Each senator gets 30 minutes in this round. Other than responding to democrat BS the GOP members should thank Judge Kavanaugh for his service and waive their time. Get this charade over with.
About those so called "protestors"
I''m not sure the pics posted, so click the links at the bottom.
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationliberation.com%2Ffiles%2Farrest-kav637r.png&hash=339c3046ed2dd49e4181a78de0ab576780b4ac00)
Here she's being paid outside for her faux outrage.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DmR65GkU4AAI4dW.jpg)
https://twitter.com/AdamSchindler/status/1037088943018270720/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1037088943018270720&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationliberation.com%2F%3Fid%3D59005
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=59005
Quote from: Solar on September 05, 2018, 09:44:06 AM
About those so called "protestors"
I''m not sure the pics posted, so click the links at the bottom.
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationliberation.com%2Ffiles%2Farrest-kav637r.png&hash=339c3046ed2dd49e4181a78de0ab576780b4ac00)
Here she's being paid outside for her faux outrage.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DmR65GkU4AAI4dW.jpg)
https://twitter.com/AdamSchindler/status/1037088943018270720/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1037088943018270720&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationliberation.com%2F%3Fid%3D59005
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=59005
Ahh, so this is what happens to actors who dont make it in hollywood
No surprises here is there?
Hard to believe they're so blatant, but they don't care anymore. All the masks have been thrown off. Complete and total spazzout with not a care in the world.
Quote from: AndyJackson on September 05, 2018, 01:54:58 PM
Hard to believe they're so blatant, but they don't care anymore. All the masks have been thrown off. Complete and total spazzout with not a care in the world.
They know the libs will never hear about it because they only tune in to Madcow, who will never mention it.
You know what we should do?
We should get that speed talker who read the Obamacare documents to read these documents.
Payback would be funny and a bitch.
One thing just dawned on me. You know how the left loves to always express their weird little fears and suspicions as "existential threats" ? Always claiming that everything the GOP or conservatives do, is such ?
Well I'll be darned if Trump is not the genuine thing.
They've gone from just expressing this as a BS stance / story, to knowing it's actually true in the form of Trump.
Poor silly little bastards. It's actually true after their lying about it for 50 years. The boy who cried wolf is no longer being taken seriously, but now he's getting his ass chewed right off while everybody ignores his screams.
Is anyone else watching this circus? Brett is one solid Conservative, smart to boot.
I noticed something, he can write as well as listen to the questions, this is way beyond multitasking, this guy is smart. :thumbup:
Quote from: Solar on September 05, 2018, 06:00:52 PM
Is anyone else watching this circus? Brett is one solid Conservative, smart to boot.
I noticed something, he can write as well as listen to the questions, this is way beyond multitasking, this guy is smart. :thumbup:
This should scare the hell out of the lib's.
To shed bit of light on the subject, the Charge of Disorderly conduct in the District O Columbus used to be a $10.00 fine....I think it is now raised to $25, no matter, when a person is charged with D/O they have to option to forfeit collateral and walk out the door after being printed and cleared for warrants OR they can "Post" the fine and request a court date. Either way after coughing up the fine they walk (unless there are warrants) or unless their conduct in the station is so outrageous and disruptive they are denied and remanded to Central Cell Block and arraigned.
SO what you are seeing her may be the "Money man" renumerating the arrestee for amount of the fine as well as services rendered.
Take the two minutes to hear Sasse succinctly summarize our Representative govt.
Well worth it.
https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/1037052337234366465
Libs Heads Explode! Mega Leftist Lisa Blatt who voted for Obozo Twice, supports Kavanaugh.
Short video
http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/05/lisa-blatt-kavanaugh/
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Will they call her a traitor to the socialist cause?
Quote from: tac on September 06, 2018, 07:34:27 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Will they call her a traitor to the socialist cause?
I will bet they do not call her a "maverick". :lol:
Quote from: tac on September 06, 2018, 07:34:27 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Will they call her a traitor to the socialist cause?
But, but, but she voted for Obozo twice and supported Hillary, as well as worships Ginsberg. :lol:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/06/kavanaugh-questioning-enters-final-stretch-as-dems-seem-to-lay-traps.html
QuoteNew Jersey Sen. Cory Booker injected chaos into Judge Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation hearing Thursday by releasing confidential Kavanaugh emails with the backing of fellow Democrats in possible violation of Senate rules, calling it an act of "civil disobedience" and drawing condemnation from the Republicans on the committee.
"I am going to release the e-mail about racial profiling and I understand that the penalty comes with potential ousting from the Senate," Booker said at the beginning of the third day of Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing.
After announcing plans to do so, Booker released 12 pages of emails -- which had been marked "committee confidential" -- online for the public to read. The emails included internal post-9/11 discussions surrounding issues of racial profiling.
The New Jersey Democrat said he would "knowingly" violate the Senate rules to release the emails. Some of the other Democrats on the committee expressed their support for Booker's effort.
Booker on Thursday drew attention to one 2002 email in particular from Kavanaugh that had the subject line "racial profiling."
In the email, Kavanaugh, who was working as a lawyer in the Bush White House, said he "generally" favored race-neutral security measures, but said they need to "grapple" with the "interim question of what to do before a truly effective and comprehensive race-neutral system is developed and implemented."
Kavanaugh wrote that the "interim question" is of "critical importance to the security of the airlines and American people in the next 6 months or so, especially given Al Qaeda's track record of timing between terrorist incidents."
A day earlier, in a dramatic exchange, Booker implied Kavanaugh had been open to racial profiling tactics, citing the email exchange between Kavanaugh and a colleague. However, Booker did not provide Kavanaugh a copy of the emails to review while questioning him about it, prompting an objection from Sen. Mike Lee, who charged that it was inappropriate to "cross-examine" Kavanaugh about documents that he "can't see."
Booker said Thursday he would release it anyway, saying the document is a "great illustration of the absurdity of the process" because there's nothing in it that's "national security-related."
"I come from a long line, as all of us do as Americans, that understand what that kind of civil disobedience is and I understand the consequences," Booker said.
Can we just line these marxists against the wall and shoot them? Summery trial and summery execution?
The sucky part of this is that i dont think ANYTHING will happen to him, thus opening the door for others to break the rules too, causing more chaos. Almost as if the gop doesnt care.
Quote from: Solar on September 06, 2018, 06:12:18 AM
Take the two minutes to hear Sasse succinctly summarize our Representative govt.
Well worth it.
https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/1037052337234366465
As my senator, I have a love/hate relationship with sasse. He seems like a pure conservative and i love most of what comes out of his mouth, but then he turns around and hates on trump...they should be the best of friends because they both believe the same things. Why be enemies with the guy on your side? If he was a rino i wld understand but i dont think he is. I hope he comes around someday.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 06, 2018, 10:13:41 AM
As my senator, I have a love/hate relationship with sasse. He seems like a pure conservative and i love most of what comes out of his mouth, but then he turns around and hates on trump...they should be the best of friends because they both believe the same things. Why be enemies with the guy on your side? If he was a rino i wld understand but i dont think he is. I hope he comes around someday.
I don't follow him as much as you do, but I do remember early on he sided a lot with the RINO, but seems to have changed his tune since Trump was elected.
Quote from: mrclose on September 06, 2018, 02:29:54 PM
He's hung himself!
LIAR: Cory Booker Exposed as Complete Fraud Over Kavanaugh Documents
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/09/06/liar-corey-booker-completely-lied-about-kavanaugh-documents-n2516498
Booker's grandstanding fell apart faster than his story about his non-existent friend "T-Bone."
That's another Booker Lied story but a Huge one!
Karmas a bitch, isnt it?
The left will Pin medals on Corey's bony inverted chest for Lying cheating and breaking the law.
Not only did his attempt to portray himself as a martyr blow up in his face the documents he was proudly waving about did nothing but prove Kavanaugh does not support racial profiling.
Booker's presidential campaign is going to be fun.
Quote from: mrclose on September 06, 2018, 02:29:54 PM
He's hung himself!
LIAR: Cory Booker Exposed as Complete Fraud Over Kavanaugh Documents
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/09/06/liar-corey-booker-completely-lied-about-kavanaugh-documents-n2516498
Booker's grandstanding fell apart faster than his story about his non-existent friend "T-Bone."
That's another Booker Lied story but a Huge one!
Just another reminder to stay out of the way of the democrats. Left to their own devices they are self destructing. Our concern should be Ryan and McConnell bailing them out.
Quote from: The Boo Man... on September 06, 2018, 06:21:50 PM
Not only did his attempt to portray himself as a martyr blow up in his face the documents he was proudly waving about did nothing but prove Kavanaugh does not support racial profiling.
Booker's presidential campaign is going to be fun.
Can see it now - Booker's face on Gary Coleman saying "whachoo talkin' 'bout ?" and on that other guy, saying "Did I do that ?"
That and Kamala-Toe Harris / Mad Max Muddy Waters, and their greatest hits.
Man, there's not even enough air time left for Sharpton, Jackson-Lee, McKinney, Green anymore. But you do have to get R-E-S-P-I-C-T in there somewhere.
The good news is this is a non story today. The democrats spent a lot of effort and what they had of political capital on stopping Kavanaugh and it went nowhere.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 07, 2018, 12:14:40 PM
The good news is this is a non story today. The democrats spent a lot of effort and what they had of political capital on stopping Kavanaugh and it went nowhere.
Hmm... Will she pay taxes on that or is it under the table?
Someone needs to ask the IRS, sorry the IRS has no problems if their on the Left.
Quote from: mrclose on September 07, 2018, 11:32:57 AM
Kavanaugh protestor receives cash.
Caught on camera.
(If you get the popup at link to login, just left-click somewhere on the page and it will go away.)
(https://s20.postimg.cc/xmd4oc6f1/222222222222222222.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
The man handing money to the Kavanaugh hearing protester is Vinay Krishnan. Consultant/organizer at Center for Popular Democracy.
An Organization ON THE RECORD as have received funding from George Soros.
He locked his account this morning, but has now closed it. @vinayrkrishnan
https://twitter.com/search?q=vinayrkrishnan
See Reply #17. :wink:
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 07, 2018, 12:14:40 PM
The good news is this is a non story today. The democrats spent a lot of effort and what they had of political capital on stopping Kavanaugh and it went nowhere.
Will there be any turncoat RINO? If not, Brett should pass easily.
Republicans have 50 seats in the Senate to Democrats' 49. Confirmation only requires a simple majority, so Republicans technically have the votes if everyone sticks to party lines.
(https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/09/bb-KavanaughConfirmations-featuredimage-640x480-v1-640x480.jpg)
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/07/live-updates-brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearings-conclude/
Quote from: Solar on September 07, 2018, 01:46:44 PM
Will there be any turncoat RINO? If not, Brett should pass easily.
Republicans have 50 seats in the Senate to Democrats' 49. Confirmation only requires a simple majority, so Republicans technically have the votes if everyone sticks to party lines.
(https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/09/bb-KavanaughConfirmations-featuredimage-640x480-v1-640x480.jpg)
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/07/live-updates-brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearings-conclude/
Ill bet some dems vote for him too
Dam he nailed it 100% 11.50 min long, not a waste of your time.
Sen. Ben Sasse unloads on Congress at Kavanaugh hearing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJK2JveCAbI
When will they have the actual vote? Is that scheduled yet? I know they wanted him in by october cuz scotus is back in session then
Quote from: T Hunt on September 07, 2018, 03:38:26 PM
Ill bet some dems vote for him too
I think so as well, too many live in moderate districts.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 07, 2018, 04:22:47 PM
When will they have the actual vote? Is that scheduled yet? I know they wanted him in by october cuz scotus is back in session then
Sept. 20 is the preliminary date, could be sooner, possibly later, but that is the scheduled vote at this time.
Quote from: Solar on September 07, 2018, 05:30:00 PM
Sept. 20 is the preliminary date, could be sooner, possibly later, but that is the scheduled vote at this time.
Is that for the committee or the entire senate?
Quote from: T Hunt on September 07, 2018, 06:18:37 PM
Is that for the committee or the entire senate?
Senate.
Thank God we don't have to worry about the vote of Traitor McCain.
Quote from: SueAnn on September 07, 2018, 07:49:29 PM
Thank God we don't have to worry about the vote of Traitor McCain.
:thumbup: good point
Quote from: Solar on September 07, 2018, 01:46:44 PM
Will there be any turncoat RINO? If not, Brett should pass easily.
Republicans have 50 seats in the Senate to Democrats' 49. Confirmation only requires a simple majority, so Republicans technically have the votes if everyone sticks to party lines.
(https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/09/bb-KavanaughConfirmations-featuredimage-640x480-v1-640x480.jpg)
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/07/live-updates-brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearings-conclude/
With Kyl the GOP now has 51 votes.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/top-democrat-refers-confidential-info-about-kavanaugh-of-a-sexual-nature-to-fbi/ar-BBNivgn
If anyone would like a pure definition of desperation, here it is. Feinstein has been holding onto this for a couple of months. She says she did not divulge it out of respect for the accuser's privacy. Pure BS. She hadn't mentioned it before because she thought it was worthless. However, the pressure from the left on democrats is so strong they will do anything now. I hope Grassly and McConnell remain strong and do not fold to democrat BS.
The woman has revealed herself and Jeff Flake along with the democrats are calling for a delay of the vote. This gives the red state democrats and excuse to vote no. They might actually win this one.
Quote from: The Boo Man... on September 16, 2018, 06:12:38 PM
The woman has revealed herself and Jeff Flake along with the democrats are calling for a delay of the vote. This gives the red state democrats and excuse to vote no. They might actually win this one.
Thats Bullshit. I cant believe something so obvious cld work. Flake needs to stop his treatments too...
Ok, update. So what im reading on fox is that flake is just saying the accuser shld testify before congress. Hopefully before the vote.
QuoteSouth Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican on the committee, said late Sunday he'd "gladly listen" to Ford so that he could compare her accusations "against all the other information" the panel has on Kavanaugh. But, he said, if Ford does testify, "it should be done immediately" so as not to delay the confirmation vote.
QuoteJeff Flake of Arizona, told Fox News that he was "uncomfortable moving forward with a 'yes' vote until we hear from" Ford.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/16/california-professor-christine-ford-claims-kavanaugh-sexually-assaulted-her-it-derailed-me.html
Quote from: The Boo Man... on September 16, 2018, 06:12:38 PM
The woman has revealed herself and Jeff Flake along with the democrats are calling for a delay of the vote. This gives the red state democrats and excuse to vote no. They might actually win this one.
From a girl that can not remember how she got there or how she got home. And only had one beer. :lol:
This just in:
It's purported that as Brett was entering puberty, he looked at girls with a renewed interest.
This was years after having been weaned and stopped wetting the bed, some doctors call this "Normal Behavior".
Liberals call it 'a point for exploitation'', never letting a crisis go to waste.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Unfortunately, we are going have to deal with this story all week. I know just a little about the accuser from news reports. She is a professor in Palo Alto. So we probably have a far leftist who has come out of the woodwork. I don't care what Jeff Flake says. He should be ignored. Maybe Grassly should call the woman to capitol hill tomorrow and question her. If it is a pure "she says, he says" hold the vote as scheduled on Thursday.
https://www.ajc.com/news/who-christine-blasey-ford-brett-kavanaugh-accuser/y6KiC7AscvbH1rpPHRS5LK/
Here is a little more info. To me it speaks for itself.
SHe didn't know it was a "Rape attempt" until her therapist told her it was...typical leftist nut bag.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on September 17, 2018, 05:57:35 AM
SHe didn't know it was a "Rape attempt" until her therapist told her it was...typical leftist nut bag.
This is interesting evidence. Something isn't right about this, and I think everyone knows that. The timing of this just screams of a politically motivated attack. For so many years this woman was silent until now? In the eyes of any logical person, it seems way to fishy.
FNC just showed a statement from Susan Collins which was encouraging to me. Basically she was questioning the timing of these revelations. Let's just hope the RINO's in the senate do not fold.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 17, 2018, 06:51:51 AM
FNC just showed a statement from Susan Collins which was encouraging to me. Basically she was questioning the timing of these revelations. Let's just hope the RINO's in the senate do not fold.
This is truly a time for the rinos to earn the base's vote for Nov. Stay strong! Hold the line! (Basically, the opposite of what they normally do)
The left, and the media in particular, desperatly wants to prove to themselves that they still got it. That they still have the power to control things in DC.
Simple solution.
Sue the lying ho, the lawyer, and Feinstein for 100 million each. Make them bring the proof in this venue, and get destroyed in this venue.
And not Kavanaugh. His wife, on behalf of the damage done to their family / kids. Show up with an even more sympathetic player, in the little girls.
Have the guy she claims was there, do the same.
The dumbass can't even say where or when it happened. She's apparently already scrubbed all of her radical leftist social media. The lawyer is a radical leftist agitator. It's the most obvious scam that ever happened. Yet, we'll just let it go as we did with Bork and Thomas. It will now be done to every Trump nominee forever.
Trump had better get a little feel for revenge at this point. This should be the rubicon for the left's bullshit. If we don't fight hard and nasty on this one, why even worry about it ?
Flake is happily jumping into this to take over the McCain role. Graham has his new butt buddy in Flake. He looked like he was becoming pro-Trump when McCain croaked and left him dangling; now he has Flake to give him the backbone to be asshole # 2 again.
Quote from: AndyJackson on September 17, 2018, 08:19:13 AM
Simple solution.
Sue the lying ho, the lawyer, and Feinstein for 100 million each. Make them bring the proof in this venue, and get destroyed in this venue.
And not Kavanaugh. His wife, on behalf of the damage done to their family / kids. Show up with an even more sympathetic player, in the little girls.
Have the guy she claims was there, do the same.
The dumbass can't even say where or when it happened. She's apparently already scrubbed all of her radical leftist social media. The lawyer is a radical leftist agitator. It's the most obvious scam that ever happened. Yet, we'll just let it go as we did with Bork and Thomas. It will now be done to every Trump nominee forever.
Trump had better get a little feel for revenge at this point. This should be the rubicon for the left's bullshit. If we don't fight hard and nasty on this one, why even worry about it ?
Flake is happily jumping into this to take over the McCain role. Graham has his new butt buddy in Flake. He looked like he was becoming pro-Trump when McCain croaked and left him dangling; now he has Flake to give him the backbone to be asshole # 2 again.
Not just Trump. If the left can't have there way, out come rape one way or the other.
Everyone knows the Dims will do anything to stop the confirmation vote before mid-terms in an effort to take Congress and turn Kavanaugh out.
It's not a surprise that either the Dims would put someone up like this or that a lib with a plausible story would fall on their sword to obfuscate toward confusion of the Pub confirmation votes.
Diane Feinstein fails to report a rape allegation that she's know about since July and gets no punishment? What? Shouldn't Sessions be cuffing her now?
Feinstein should be held in contempt or something like it - jailed for a year. The accuser should testify under oath before congress. The vote on Kavanaugh should go forward - even if it goes down because of the accusation. Any other legal action can otherwise take it's natural course.
Judge Brett Kavanaugh's mother, a state court judge in Maryland, briefly presided over the foreclosure of a property owned by the parents of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the California researcher who accused the Supreme Court nominee of sexual assault.
A Daily Caller News Foundation investigation shows Judge Martha Kavanaugh was connected to a foreclosure action implicating the Blaseys, but her involvement was minimal and never resulted in seizure of the property at issue.
Maryland court records show that Judge Martha Kavanaugh issued rulings in an action initiated in 1996 by the United Mortgage & Loan Investment Corp (UMLIC) to foreclose on a Potomac, Maryland, property owned by Ralph and Paula Blasey — Ford's parents.
The foreclosure case took place some 15 years after the events Ford alleges with Brett Kavanaugh.
The case was adjudicated in the Montgomery County Circuit Court. Public records show that Martha Kavanaugh did not rule on decisions related to possible seizure of the property. Rather, it appears the Blaseys reached a settlement with their bank before their property was lost.
Martha Kavanaugh granted uncontested motions brought by UMLIC to dismiss the case after the settlement was reached. This appears to be the extent of her involvement in the matter. Other judges handled the case in its earlier phases.
The full court records were not available for review.
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/17/kavanaugh-ford-foreclosure/
Kavanaugh and Accuser to Testify at Monday Hearing, Thursday Vote Is Off
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/17/kavanaugh-and-accuser-to-testify-at-monday-hearing-thursday-vote-is-off/
Grahmnesty just said on hannity that the vote will be wednesday. After the hearing monday, which kavanaugh will be at, but ford hasent RSVPed yet.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 17, 2018, 06:23:10 PM
Grahmnesty just said on hannity that the vote will be wednesday. After the hearing monday, which kavanaugh will be at, but ford hasent RSVPed yet.
Is there a link some place with this info?
Quote from: walkstall on September 17, 2018, 09:22:56 PM
Is there a link some place with this info?
I just saw it on hannity. Here is a link to tonight's show. Grahamnesty is on about the 35min mark. He says vote is on wednesday about 36:40
https://youtu.be/V1wWvgSZPGM
Quote from: T Hunt on September 17, 2018, 09:30:49 PM
I just saw it on hannity. Here is a link to tonight's show. Grahamnesty is on about the 35min mark. He says vote is on wednesday about 36:40
https://youtu.be/V1wWvgSZPGM
Thanks this covered a lot of what will be going down.
My apologies if this was posted or addressed by anyone. I happened to read it elsewhere and it linked to Wikipedia and I was struck with how eerily familiar it sounds. Of course not every detail. Kavanaugh's situation could be this script rewritten with slight adjustments
In 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas, a federal Circuit Judge, to succeed retiring Associate Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. Senate hearings on his confirmation were initially completed with Thomas's good character being presented as a primary qualification for the high court because he had only been a judge for slightly more than one year. There had been little organized opposition to Thomas's nomination, and his confirmation seemed assured until a report of a private interview of Hill by the FBI was leaked to the press. The hearings were then reopened, and Hill was called to publicly testify. Hill said in the October 1991 televised hearings that Thomas had sexually harassed her while he was her supervisor at the Department of Education and the EEOC. When questioned on why she followed Thomas to the second job after he had already allegedly harassed her, she said working in a reputable position within the civil rights field had been her ambition. The position was appealing enough to inhibit her from going back into private practice with her previous firm. She only realized later in her life that this ambitious venture was a poor judgment and also explained that "at that time, it appeared that the sexual overtures ... had ended."
During court session, Republican Senator Orrin Hatch implied that "Hill was working in tandem with 'slick lawyers' and interest groups bent on destroying Thomas' chances to join the court." Thomas said he considered Hill a friend whom he had helped at every turn, so when accusations of harassment came from her they were particularly hurtful and he said, "I lost the belief that if I did my best, all would work out."
Four female witnesses reportedly waited in the wings to support Hill's credibility, but they were not called, due to what the Los Angeles Times described as a private, compromise deal between Republicans and the Senate Judiciary Committee Chair, Democrat Joe Biden. According to Time magazine, one of the witnesses, Angela Wright, may not have been considered credible on the issue of sexual harassment because she had been fired from the EEOC by Thomas.
Hill agreed to take a polygraph test. While senators and other authorities noted that polygraph results cannot be relied upon and are inadmissible in courts, Hill's results did support her statements. Thomas did not take a polygraph test. He made a vehement and complete denial, saying that he was being subjected to a "high-tech lynching for uppity blacks" by white liberals who were seeking to block a black conservative from taking a seat on the Supreme Court. After extensive debate, the United States Senate confirmed Thomas to the Supreme Court by a vote of 52–48, the narrowest margin since the 19th century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Hill
64 'partners'? Sounds like the school slut. :rolleyes:
After watching this unfold today it is clearly seen by any blind person this is a pure sham. What pisses me off is the GOP senators are acting like scared children. I ask, of what? Now, there is a question as to whether the accuser wants to meet with the committee and supposedly the republicans don't know what to do. To me it is simple. If she doesn't show, they vote. Nothing has changed except for an non substantiated charge - period. It is time to tell the senate democrats to pound sand. F--- them!
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 18, 2018, 11:35:09 AM
After watching this unfold today it is clearly seen by any blind person this is a pure sham. What pisses me off is the GOP senators are acting like scared children. I ask, of what? Now, there is a question as to whether the accuser wants to meet with the committee and supposedly the republicans don't know what to do. To me it is simple. If she doesn't show, they vote. Nothing has changed except for an non substantiated charge - period. It is time to tell the senate democrats to pound sand. F--- them!
This whole story is a disgrace. Clearly, this woman (who is undoubtedly a piece of liberal trash) is somehow trying to throw this vote by making these false claims, and I do not say that lightly. The fact that for thirty years she didn't bother to say anything and now all of a sudden she is coming forward with this just goes to show her political motive. Even so her story is inconsistent, and with evidence showing her to have suffered through substantial mental problems through her teens puts this in even more shallow water. Personally, I don't believe this story in its entirety. Anything could have happened, really only her, Brett, and the third man know it to bring this up now of all times is just disgusting to me.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 18, 2018, 11:35:09 AM
After watching this unfold today it is clearly seen by any blind person this is a pure sham. What pisses me off is the GOP senators are acting like scared children. I ask, of what? Now, there is a question as to whether the accuser wants to meet with the committee and supposedly the republicans don't know what to do. To me it is simple. If she doesn't show, they vote. Nothing has changed except for an non substantiated charge - period. It is time to tell the senate democrats to pound sand. F--- them!
It's very possible the GOP has more on this fraud than they're letting on.
They could be setting the Dims up here.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 18, 2018, 11:35:09 AM
After watching this unfold today it is clearly seen by any blind person this is a pure sham. What pisses me off is the GOP senators are acting like scared children. I ask, of what? Now, there is a question as to whether the accuser wants to meet with the committee and supposedly the republicans don't know what to do. To me it is simple. If she doesn't show, they vote. Nothing has changed except for an non substantiated charge - period. It is time to tell the senate democrats to pound sand. F--- them!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/grassley-suggests-last-minute-kavanaugh-hearing-could-be-canceled-if-accuser-doesn-t-accept-invite.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29
Grassley threatens to nix 11th-hour session if Kavanaugh accuser won't respond to invite
Quote from: Solar on September 18, 2018, 11:54:43 AM
It's very possible the GOP has more on this fraud than they're letting on.
They could be setting the Dims up here.
I totally agree with you the GOP has a lot of ammo on this babe. She scrubbed all her social media stuff, took a polygraph in August - ???, her lawyer is card carrying leftist. The question is, will the GOP senators have the courage to go after her? They are walking scared seven year old girls.
I am beginning to think you are correct, first the letter coming to Feinstein, even though it was address to her, was
second hand. Why didn't Ford send it directly to Feinstein. That makes me question whether the Reps didn't have wind
of it, and had a few bases covered. I am surprised the FBI said it was too old to investigate, which is obviously true.
Appearances are at this time, Madame64 has gone into hiding, or at least refuses to respond to invitations to appear
before the committee.
Quote from: harry12 on September 18, 2018, 12:50:39 PM
I am beginning to think you are correct, first the letter coming to Feinstein, even though it was address to her, was
second hand. Why didn't Ford send it directly to Feinstein. That makes me question whether the Reps didn't have wind
of it, and had a few bases covered. I am surprised the FBI said it was too old to investigate, which is obviously true.
Appearances are at this time, Madame64 has gone into hiding, or at least refuses to respond to invitations to appear
before the committee.
The fact that Feinstein sat on this for so long is probably the most damaging piece of evidence as to the instability of these claims. Had the Dems been serious about then they would have pushed it forward a lot sooner they are now, and this would have been investigated and sorted out weeks ago, which is why so many people are looking at this saying that it's politically motivated. Its an extreme delay tactic being used by the Dems to try and push this election, and I hope and pray it does not work. The fact that she won't show just goes more to Brett's case here. She knows she is going to get ripped apart and discredited up there because the allegations are not what she says they are.
Quote from: harry12 on September 18, 2018, 12:50:39 PM
I am beginning to think you are correct, first the letter coming to Feinstein, even though it was address to her, was
second hand. Why didn't Ford send it directly to Feinstein. That makes me question whether the Reps didn't have wind
of it, and had a few bases covered. I am surprised the FBI said it was too old to investigate, which is obviously true.
Appearances are at this time, Madame64 has gone into hiding, or at least refuses to respond to invitations to appear
before the committee.
This is why I think they have a huge bomb to drop. They did know about this long beforehand, and I say this based on the fact that they had already lined up 64 women from his past as character witnesses, signed letters stating he is a great guy.
Hell, I couldn't come up with 30 if my life depended on it, so they had been working on this for quite some time.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 18, 2018, 12:38:58 PM
I totally agree with you the GOP has a lot of ammo on this babe. She scrubbed all her social media stuff, took a polygraph in August - ???, her lawyer is card carrying leftist. The question is, will the GOP senators have the courage to go after her? They are walking scared seven year old girls.
Why are they more scared of lossing dem voters which they never had in the first place, and not at all scared of losing gop base voters who will be furious if they let the dems win???
They shld be more scared of losing us than the dems.
Quote from: Abe on September 18, 2018, 11:02:50 AM
My apologies if this was posted or addressed by anyone. I happened to read it elsewhere and it linked to Wikipedia and I was struck with how eerily familiar it sounds. Of course not every detail. Kavanaugh's situation could be this script rewritten with slight adjustments
In 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas, a federal Circuit Judge, to succeed retiring Associate Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. Senate hearings on his confirmation were initially completed with Thomas's good character being presented as a primary qualification for the high court because he had only been a judge for slightly more than one year. There had been little organized opposition to Thomas's nomination, and his confirmation seemed assured until a report of a private interview of Hill by the FBI was leaked to the press. The hearings were then reopened, and Hill was called to publicly testify. Hill said in the October 1991 televised hearings that Thomas had sexually harassed her while he was her supervisor at the Department of Education and the EEOC. When questioned on why she followed Thomas to the second job after he had already allegedly harassed her, she said working in a reputable position within the civil rights field had been her ambition. The position was appealing enough to inhibit her from going back into private practice with her previous firm. She only realized later in her life that this ambitious venture was a poor judgment and also explained that "at that time, it appeared that the sexual overtures ... had ended."
During court session, Republican Senator Orrin Hatch implied that "Hill was working in tandem with 'slick lawyers' and interest groups bent on destroying Thomas' chances to join the court." Thomas said he considered Hill a friend whom he had helped at every turn, so when accusations of harassment came from her they were particularly hurtful and he said, "I lost the belief that if I did my best, all would work out."
Four female witnesses reportedly waited in the wings to support Hill's credibility, but they were not called, due to what the Los Angeles Times described as a private, compromise deal between Republicans and the Senate Judiciary Committee Chair, Democrat Joe Biden. According to Time magazine, one of the witnesses, Angela Wright, may not have been considered credible on the issue of sexual harassment because she had been fired from the EEOC by Thomas.
Hill agreed to take a polygraph test. While senators and other authorities noted that polygraph results cannot be relied upon and are inadmissible in courts, Hill's results did support her statements. Thomas did not take a polygraph test. He made a vehement and complete denial, saying that he was being subjected to a "high-tech lynching for uppity blacks" by white liberals who were seeking to block a black conservative from taking a seat on the Supreme Court. After extensive debate, the United States Senate confirmed Thomas to the Supreme Court by a vote of 52–48, the narrowest margin since the 19th century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Hill
Just to follow up.
This story comes out an hour ago.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/dems-make-new-demands-on-kavanaugh-hearing-as-republicans-cry-foul.html
"Feinstein, meanwhile, put out a statement underscoring there had been 22 witnesses at the 1991 Anita Hill hearing, pressing for more witnesses in this case."
Almost an admission they are doing it again.
OOPS! Dims don't have a witness. :biggrin:
Man identified as witness to alleged Kavanaugh sexual assault, Mark Judge, says has no memory of incident, does not want to speak publicly - Reuters
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-09-18%20Judge%20to%20Grassley,%20Feinstein%20(Kavanaugh%20Nomination).pdf
It is clear the democrats and this babe have nothing. I am not concerned about them. It is the gutless GOP senators that concern me.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 19, 2018, 04:46:45 AM
It is clear the democrats and this babe have nothing. I am not concerned about them. It is the gutless GOP senators that concern me.
The gutless rinos have been our problem for quite some time. However we are seeing the end of that game. We got lucky, the obama years and legacy ( :lol: :lol:) are behind us and the damage is being reversed. Many of the rinos saw the light and retired and there will be no blue wave. the lsm is being exposed time after time for what the are. It is a great time to be a citizen of this great country.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 19, 2018, 04:46:45 AM
It is clear the democrats and this babe have nothing. I am not concerned about them. It is the gutless GOP senators that concern me.
Exactly. This did accomplish one thing. It's gives them the excuse to say they can't vote for Kavanaugh. Naturally we already know it's the gutless ones but we have quite a few gutless RINOs.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 19, 2018, 04:46:45 AM
It is clear the democrats and this babe have nothing. I am not concerned about them. It is the gutless GOP senators that concern me.
Agree,, the RINO scum made this worse.
Truth is, most sane people would never have entertained such ludicrous accusations in the first place, but the gop'E leadership are not happy with Trump's choice, they do not want Conservatives on the court, only SCOTUS picks owned by the left will do as they're told.
John Roberts was one of those picks, he was easily compromised, so he did as he was told.
(Personal opinion)
I believe these leftists convinced him to take a weekend flight to a private island to relax, he thought, fine,, I trust these guys, known them for years, let's go.
They took pics of him with an under age girl at pedo island. I believe that was the dirt they had on him and would keep using it, till Trump came along and saved his worthless ass.
Trump said resign and I'll make all of this go away. The rest is history.
I never, for a moment bought that lousy cover story about an illegal adoption for one second.
Truth is, this shit never happens to Real Conservatives with solid convictions, and Roberts was no Conservative.
Kavanaugh is a true Conservative.
Quote from: s3779m on September 19, 2018, 05:21:44 AM
The gutless rinos have been our problem for quite some time. However we are seeing the end of that game. We got lucky, the obama years and legacy ( :lol: :lol:) are behind us and the damage is being reversed. Many of the rinos saw the light and retired and there will be no blue wave. the lsm is being exposed time after time for what the are. It is a great time to be a citizen of this great country.
There is a little encouraging news this morning. Even Corker has said if the babe does not show on Monday - vote. The democrats and this babe are doing a good job of enabling the RINO's to go ahead and approve Kavanaugh. They are making fools of themselves.
Our CONgress must look like a ship of fools to the rest of the world. :rolleyes:
Quote from: tac on September 19, 2018, 09:01:46 AM
Our CONgress must look like a ship of fools to the rest of the world. :rolleyes:
They don't just look like it - they are!
wooops, looks like some of these assclowns may be hearing the scary footsteps of "civil suit" behind them.
That'll happen when you lie to the whole world, to support a public lie that's drenched in slander, libel, defamation.
Wow, normally this level of ham handedness is expected from the GOP. They pulled the pin and accidentally dropped the grenade down their trousers. Grassley should be applauded for holding firm.
Quote from: The Boo Man... on September 19, 2018, 08:02:01 PM
Wow, normally this level of ham handedness is expected from the GOP. They pulled the pin and accidentally dropped the grenade down their trousers. Grassley should be applauded for holding firm.
Once again I agree with Boo. Grassly is handling this well. Every move he makes pushes the accuser and democrats more into a corner. The game for the next few days is when will the democrats cry "uncle"? I am glad to see him establish a deadline of Friday at 10:00AM to fulfill requirements. I bet this babe is saying, "What the f--- have I done?"
Quote from: mrclose on September 20, 2018, 12:02:12 PM
Kavanaugh Accuser Opens Negotiations on Testimony Next Week
Uhhhh .... NO! :thumbdown:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/20/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey.html
The Dims backed a psychotic loser, they own it and we're exposing them.
The House will move without considering what the gnat wants.
Quote from: mrclose on September 20, 2018, 12:12:34 PM
We're talking Republicans here. :lol:
RINO are more afraid of the Base than they are of a leftist troll.
Quote from: Solar on September 20, 2018, 12:27:19 PM
RINO are more afraid of the Base than they are of a leftist troll.
I trust you are right. They should be more afraid of the base, but not sure all of them understand - YET. The key to this Kanvanaugh confirmation is Grassly and McConnell holding firm. Let the democrats kick and scream. It is kind of fun to watch.
Quote from: mrclose on September 20, 2018, 03:01:00 PM
The Professor!
(https://i.postimg.cc/zfjZPfqN/99999999999999.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
That's one ugly dude.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :scared:
Quote from: Solar on September 20, 2018, 03:09:22 PM
That's one ugly dude.
IF she ask you for a date don't turn her down.
Quote from: walkstall on September 20, 2018, 05:18:31 PM
IF she ask you for a date don't turn her down.
She? Are you sure? :scared:
Quote from: Solar on September 20, 2018, 05:29:14 PM
She? Are you sure? :scared:
Not in this day and age. :popcorn:
Quote from: Solar on September 20, 2018, 03:09:22 PM
That's one ugly dude.
Looks like Micheal Moore lost some weight.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on September 20, 2018, 08:29:04 PM
Looks like Micheal Moore lost some weight.
OMG it does, a little Botox, clean clothes, ya know, kind of like Frankenstein's monster getting a makeover.
Quote from: Solar on September 20, 2018, 03:09:22 PM
That's one ugly dude.
I guess a requirement to be a leftist, democrat woman is to be ugly.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 21, 2018, 04:40:53 AM
I guess a requirement to be a leftist, democrat woman is to be ugly.
Yep, inside and out!
President Trump pulled the rug out from under the Dems, essentially calling their bluff, about letting that lady testify. Now they have to keep moving forward on a doomed path, which won't stop the confirmation vote anyway. Meanwhile, he holds the card with the FISA app. The longer he keeps the bad guys on defense, the more mistakes they make and worse they look -- as new previously unknown data, and confirmed data, is released daily.
He's exhausting them.
Quote from: mrclose on September 22, 2018, 12:43:21 PM
There is a HUGE problem that just arose!
(Not yet being discussed but one that I foresee as a problem)
According to the law in Maryland, there is no statue of limitations on sexual assaults!
The problem?
What if this woman were to file charges with the police in Maryland ... would the senate actually hold a vote to confirm a SC Judge who is under a 'now active' investigation?
There may not be a statue of limitations but I bet there is also a law about filing fake charges. If her lawyer wants to keep her out of jail, I would guess there will be no chargers filed.
Quote from: s3779m on September 22, 2018, 01:56:18 PM
There may not be a statue of limitations but I bet there is also a law about filing fake charges. If her lawyer wants to keep her out of jail, I would guess there will be no chargers filed.
She playing with the Big Dogs now. They will ask every one they can who she sleep with in high school and college. Along with her drinking habits.
Quote from: mrclose on September 22, 2018, 12:43:21 PM
There is a HUGE problem that just arose!
(Not yet being discussed but one that I foresee as a problem)
According to the law in Maryland, there is no statue of limitations on sexual assaults!
The problem?
What if this woman were to file charges with the police in Maryland ... would the senate actually hold a vote to confirm a SC Judge who is under a 'now active' investigation?
This was floated a few days ago and the left dropped it like they would a Holy Bible.
They know full well they have nothing, all they have are accusations, and if I were to say, Anita Hill, what comes to mind?
Point being, they want to stain his appointment and link every appointment with a mark that all libs will remember.
That's all this is.
He will be confirmed, as I said in the OP.
Quote from: s3779m on September 22, 2018, 01:56:18 PM
There may not be a statue of limitations but I bet there is also a law about filing fake charges. If her lawyer wants to keep her out of jail, I would guess there will be no chargers filed.
What is the crime? If you can find one he was 17, a minor at the time. What was the law and how was it enforced 37 years ago? would it even have been investigated at the time? Standards may have changed in the last 37 years but at the time this would not have been considered an assault!
Quote from: redbeard on September 22, 2018, 08:01:05 PM
What is the crime? If you can find one he was 17, a minor at the time. What was the law and how was it enforced 37 years ago? would it even have been investigated at the time? Standards may have changed in the last 37 years but at the time this would not have been considered an assault!
That's the part that pisses me off about the gop'E even entertaining this bullshit. Not one person has pointed out damages, let alone evidence of a law being broken.
I thought everyone knew the rule about arguing with idiots? The gallery soon forgets which ones were the idiots.
I sure hope she's charged with making false allegations.
Quote from: redbeard on September 22, 2018, 08:01:05 PM
What is the crime? If you can find one he was 17, a minor at the time. What was the law and how was it enforced 37 years ago? would it even have been investigated at the time? Standards may have changed in the last 37 years but at the time this would not have been considered an assault!
The "crime" I am referring to would be the crime of filling a false criminal report.
Quote from: Solar on September 22, 2018, 02:38:48 PM
This was floated a few days ago and the left dropped it like they would a Holy Bible.
They know full well they have nothing, all they have are accusations, and if I were to say, Anita Hill, what comes to mind?
Point being, they want to stain his appointment and link every appointment with a mark that all libs will remember.
That's all this is.
He will be confirmed, as I said in the OP.
I have no doubt he will be confirmed but when he is seated is another matter, anytime after OCT 1st and the left wins as he wont be seated in time for the upcoming session. There are alot of things coming down the pike and to have another Constitutionalist on the court who will uphold the rule of law is desperately needed.
Quote from: AmericanMom on September 23, 2018, 11:39:21 AM
I have no doubt he will be confirmed but when he is seated is another matter, anytime after OCT 1st and the left wins as he wont be seated in time for the upcoming session. There are alot of things coming down the pike and to have another Constitutionalist on the court who will uphold the rule of law is desperately needed.
I assure you, the left will not win. The entire nation despises the left.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DnzbCp1XkAA20O_.jpg)
Quote from: AmericanMom on September 23, 2018, 11:39:21 AM
I have no doubt he will be confirmed but when he is seated is another matter, anytime after OCT 1st and the left wins as he wont be seated in time for the upcoming session. There are alot of things coming down the pike and to have another Constitutionalist on the court who will uphold the rule of law is desperately needed.
He may not be confirmed by 10/1, but that does n0t take him out of the entire session. He would miss only the cases where he does not hear oral arguments.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 23, 2018, 01:37:25 PM
He may not be confirmed by 10/1, but that does n0t take him out of the entire session. He would miss only the cases where he does not hear oral arguments.
Thanks, I was hearing the whole session which made no sense. Be hard to have the committee vote and the full senate vote by the 1st, it could be done if the republicans stand up.
Quote from: mrclose on September 23, 2018, 03:07:10 PM
Would you then please explain this?
Start the video at 1:29
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNlcjdfUDTI
The bigger question, as I've been pointing out, is why are the RINO entertaining lunacy?
They should have said "Too Damn Bad" you had your chance and blew it, but they didn't, which raises the question, are they helping the left?
Quote from: mrclose on September 22, 2018, 12:43:21 PM
There is a HUGE problem that just arose!
(Not yet being discussed but one that I foresee as a problem)
According to the law in Maryland, there is no statue of limitations on sexual assaults!
The problem?
What if this woman were to file charges with the police in Maryland ... would the senate actually hold a vote to confirm a SC Judge who is under a 'now active' investigation?
By her description it is not technically "Sexual assault" which requires
penetration, what she describes 2nd degree assault under Md law. A misdemeanor.
http://www.maryland-defense-lawyer.com/assault/
Quote from: mrclose on September 23, 2018, 03:07:10 PM
Would you then please explain this?
Start the video at 1:29
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNlcjdfUDTI
Confirm what? Don't ask us to look at a video and try to figure out what the question.
More Lies!
The woman at the center of the story, Deborah Ramirez, who is fifty-three, attended Yale with Kavanaugh, where she studied sociology and psychology. Later, she spent years working for an organization that supports victims of domestic violence. The New Yorker contacted Ramirez after learning of her possible involvement in an incident involving Kavanaugh.
The allegation was conveyed to Democratic senators by a civil-rights lawyer. For Ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome, and prompted difficult choices. She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident. In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh's role in the alleged incident with certainty.
After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh's role in the incident. "I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted," she said.
In a statement, Kavanaugh wrote, "This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so. This is a smear, plain and simple. I look forward to testifying on Thursday about the truth, and defending my good name--and the reputation for character and integrity I have spent a lifetime building--against these last-minute allegations."
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez
Quote from: Solar on September 23, 2018, 05:13:08 PM
More Lies!
The woman at the center of the story, Deborah Ramirez, who is fifty-three, attended Yale with Kavanaugh, where she studied sociology and psychology. Later, she spent years working for an organization that supports victims of domestic violence. The New Yorker contacted Ramirez after learning of her possible involvement in an incident involving Kavanaugh.
The allegation was conveyed to Democratic senators by a civil-rights lawyer. For Ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome, and prompted difficult choices. She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident. In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh's role in the alleged incident with certainty.
After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh's role in the incident. "I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted," she said.
In a statement, Kavanaugh wrote, "This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so. This is a smear, plain and simple. I look forward to testifying on Thursday about the truth, and defending my good name--and the reputation for character and integrity I have spent a lifetime building--against these last-minute allegations."
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez
The New Yorker????
Quote from: mrclose on September 23, 2018, 05:08:52 PM
It's about a 61 second clip of the entire video where Carlson discounts your statement.
(That is why I said to start at 1:29)
Fine.
Don't bother.
What exactly is your point ?
Carlson is obviously spoofing any asshole that sneaks in with bullshit claims at the 25th hour.
WTF is your point ? It's as though you're giving these lying shitheads some sort by of legitimacy.
Please by all means tell me I'm wrong. Elsewise you'll be no more like intelligent that a randomized lying accuser with no facts to offer.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 23, 2018, 06:07:12 PM
The New Yorker????
:biggrin:
They're in competition with the NY Slimes.
Quote from: Solar on September 23, 2018, 05:13:08 PM
More Lies!
The woman at the center of the story, Deborah Ramirez, who is fifty-three, attended Yale with Kavanaugh, where she studied sociology and psychology. Later, she spent years working for an organization that supports victims of domestic violence. The New Yorker contacted Ramirez after learning of her possible involvement in an incident involving Kavanaugh.
The allegation was conveyed to Democratic senators by a civil-rights lawyer. For Ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome, and prompted difficult choices. She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident. In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh's role in the alleged incident with certainty.
After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh's role in the incident. "I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted," she said.
In a statement, Kavanaugh wrote, "This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so. This is a smear, plain and simple. I look forward to testifying on Thursday about the truth, and defending my good name--and the reputation for character and integrity I have spent a lifetime building--against these last-minute allegations."
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez
This is all a part of the whole.
1) Democrat-dominated educational systems have turned out the most ignorant, the most emotionally-driven population the USA has ever suffered.
2) This
GREAT ISSUE fits the democrat view of ugly, aggressive, white men so perfectly it is guaranteed to succeed.
3) In the progressive congregation the Liberal Church has an inexhaustible supply of bewildered, lonely, attention-seeking females and this SEX thing simply cannot be run out as the democrats run out the clock as they hope to take the congress in Nov.
Quote from: Belenus on September 24, 2018, 07:00:57 AM
This is all a part of the whole.
1) Democrat-dominated educational systems have turned out the most ignorant, the most emotionally-driven population the USA has ever suffered.
2) This GREAT ISSUE fits the democrat view of ugly, aggressive, white men so perfectly it is guaranteed to succeed.
3) In the progressive congregation the Liberal Church has an inexhaustible supply of bewildered, lonely, attention-seeking females and this SEX thing simply cannot be run out as the democrats run out the clock as they hope to take the congress in Nov.
Spot on!
It's true, the left has destroyed an entire generation. They taught them that logic and commonsense were secondary to how one "Feels" about any given situation.
And sadly, they were also taught "Privilege", white privilege in particular, is the new evil, that all sins originate from "Old White Men", therefore the Constitution is racist and sexist and must be done away with.
Yeah, and we've been hearing a growing chorus to rewrite our unfair Founding Documents, in favor of socialism, or as most off us recognize their true goal of communism.
It is time for GOPe to show some backbone. This whole thing is a sham. Just call the damn vote! :wub: The story will be over in less than two weeks.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 24, 2018, 02:56:24 PM
It is time for GOPe to show some backbone. This whole thing is a sham. Just call the damn vote! :wub: The story will be over in less than two weeks.
Not if the judge is going to clear his name 100%. This BS has to stop some place or the Dem's will keep on using it.
https://www.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford
Wow that woman is out to make money on this.
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's legal team has sent a letter (which can be seen below via NBC's Frank Thorp) to the Senate Judiciary Committee amid continuous negotiations ahead of Thursday's scheduled hearing.
In the letter addressed to Sen. Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Ford's legal team cited Sen. Majority Leader's Mitch McConnell's (R-KY) speech on the Senate floor on Monday afternoon as "flatly inconsistent" to Grassley's promise of a "fair and credible process."
"In our view, the hiring of an unnamed 'experienced sex crimes prosecutor' as Mr. Davis described in his email, is contrary to the Majority's repeated emphasis on the need for the Senate and this Committee's members to fulfill their constitutional obligations," attorney Michael Bromwich wrote. "It is also inconsistent with your stated wish to avoid a 'circus,' as well as Dr. Blasey Ford's repeated requests through counsel that senators conduct the questioning. This is not a criminal trial for which the involvement of an experienced sex crimes prosecutor would be appropriate."
Ford's team requested the identity of the sex crimes prosecutors the Committee would invite to the hearing along with their resume.
The letter also blasts the the White House's refusal to order an FBI investigation into Ford's allegation.
"The hearing plan that Mr. Davis described does not appear designed to provide Dr. Blasey Ford with fair and respectful treatment," Bromwich said.
https://www.mediaite.com/online/hearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful/
So, Ford accuses Kavanaugh of a sex crime and yet thinks being interview by an expert on sex crimes is unfair.
Quote from: The Boo Man... on September 24, 2018, 08:19:47 PM
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's legal team has sent a letter (which can be seen below via NBC's Frank Thorp) to the Senate Judiciary Committee amid continuous negotiations ahead of Thursday's scheduled hearing.
In the letter addressed to Sen. Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Ford's legal team cited Sen. Majority Leader's Mitch McConnell's (R-KY) speech on the Senate floor on Monday afternoon as "flatly inconsistent" to Grassley's promise of a "fair and credible process."
"In our view, the hiring of an unnamed 'experienced sex crimes prosecutor' as Mr. Davis described in his email, is contrary to the Majority's repeated emphasis on the need for the Senate and this Committee's members to fulfill their constitutional obligations," attorney Michael Bromwich wrote. "It is also inconsistent with your stated wish to avoid a 'circus,' as well as Dr. Blasey Ford's repeated requests through counsel that senators conduct the questioning. This is not a criminal trial for which the involvement of an experienced sex crimes prosecutor would be appropriate."
Ford's team requested the identity of the sex crimes prosecutors the Committee would invite to the hearing along with their resume.
The letter also blasts the the White House's refusal to order an FBI investigation into Ford's allegation.
"The hearing plan that Mr. Davis described does not appear designed to provide Dr. Blasey Ford with fair and respectful treatment," Bromwich said.
https://www.mediaite.com/online/hearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful/
So, Ford accuses Kavanaugh of a sex crime and yet thinks being interview by an expert on sex crimes is unfair.
I kind of like this. It shows a little "hard ball" from the GOP. I say there is a 50/50 chance she does not show. This gives her a good excuse - for her. VOTE!!!
Senate Majority Leader Vows Kavanaugh Will Be Confirmed Soon
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell clearly doesn't think the sexual assault allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh will be anything more than a stumbling block on his path to confirmation to the Supreme Court.
"President Trump has nominated a stunningly successful individual. You've watched the fight. You've watched the tactics, but here's what I want to tell you: in the very near future Judge Kavanaugh will be on the United States Supreme Court," the Kentucky Republican said.
When McConnell made the comment during a speech at the Value Voters Summit in Washington, the Senate Judiciary Committee was still talking with attorneys about possible testimony from college professor Christine Blasey Ford about her claim that Kavanaugh attempted to rape her while in high school.
And the majority leader's speech came just after President Donald Trump fired off a tweet suggesting that the allegations should have been reported to police in Montgomery County, Maryland, at the time.
"If you want to have longtime impact on what kind of country we're going to have for the next generation, the single most consequential thing we can do is these lifetime appointments of these men and women to the court that believe the job of a judge is to follow the law," he said.
https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/senate-majority-leader-vows-kavanaugh-will-confirmed-soon
Quote from: Solar on September 25, 2018, 12:09:31 PM
Senate Majority Leader Vows Kavanaugh Will Be Confirmed Soon
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell clearly doesn't think the sexual assault allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh will be anything more than a stumbling block on his path to confirmation to the Supreme Court.
"President Trump has nominated a stunningly successful individual. You've watched the fight. You've watched the tactics, but here's what I want to tell you: in the very near future Judge Kavanaugh will be on the United States Supreme Court," the Kentucky Republican said.
When McConnell made the comment during a speech at the Value Voters Summit in Washington, the Senate Judiciary Committee was still talking with attorneys about possible testimony from college professor Christine Blasey Ford about her claim that Kavanaugh attempted to rape her while in high school.
And the majority leader's speech came just after President Donald Trump fired off a tweet suggesting that the allegations should have been reported to police in Montgomery County, Maryland, at the time.
"If you want to have longtime impact on what kind of country we're going to have for the next generation, the single most consequential thing we can do is these lifetime appointments of these men and women to the court that believe the job of a judge is to follow the law," he said.
https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/senate-majority-leader-vows-kavanaugh-will-confirmed-soon
Disclosure on my post: McConnell was talking to a conservative group and we know how politicians "preach to the choir".
McConnell has a reputation of being a good vote counter. I think Paul and Murkowski are on board. The legitimate question mark is Collins. Also Corker and Flake are assholes who hate Trump and retiring.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 25, 2018, 12:50:39 PM
Disclosure on my post: McConnell was talking to a conservative group and we know how politicians "preach to the choir".
McConnell has a reputation of being a good vote counter. I think Paul and Murkowski are on board. The legitimate question mark is Collins. Also Corker and Flake are assholes who hate Trump and retiring.
Yep, and Mitch has a connection to every leftist in politics, so I'm pretty certain he knows how they're all going to vote.
Even the aforementioned know it would be suicidal to back such a baseless claim.
Quote from: Solar on September 25, 2018, 01:25:12 PM
Yep, and Mitch has a connection to every leftist in politics, so I'm pretty certain he knows how they're all going to vote.
Even the aforementioned know it would be suicidal to back such a baseless claim.
yeah, if he calls the vote and it fails, every talk about Mitch's legacy will begin with the vote.
A vote has been scheduled for Friday. The GOP is holding firm.
We'll see how firm they are when they tally the votes. :popcorn:
Quote from: tac on September 25, 2018, 06:14:41 PM
We'll see how firm they are when they tally the votes. :popcorn:
We will see who the RINO's are.
Army Col. Awarded $8.4 Million After Woman's Sex Assault Allegations Blown Apart.
more @
https://www.westernjournal.com/army-col-assault-allegations-blown/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-WJ&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=western-journal
Quote from: Solar on September 25, 2018, 01:25:12 PM
Yep, and Mitch has a connection to every leftist in politics, so I'm pretty certain he knows how they're all going to vote.
Even the aforementioned know it would be suicidal to back such a baseless claim.
What are the odds that the 3 dems in Trump winning states that are up for re-election will crossover if needed? Manchin, Heidcamp, and the guy from Indiana...
Quote from: Fishman on September 25, 2018, 09:13:55 PM
What are the odds that the 3 dems in Trump winning states that are up for re-election will crossover if needed? Manchin, Heidcamp, and the guy from Indiana...
That's why I'm not worried about the likes of Flake, too many Dims have too much at stake.
Notice how he media never talked to any of them?
It seems we are getting down to the short rows. The GOP has recruited a 26 year experience female prosecutor to question the accuser. I would think the accuser is petrified. I would love to see her leave the democrats "standing at the altar" and not show.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 26, 2018, 04:10:54 AM
It seems we are getting down to the short rows. The GOP has recruited a 26 year experience female prosecutor to question the accuser. I would think the accuser is petrified. I would love to see her leave the democrats "standing at the altar" and not show.
I don't believe they ever planned on going all the way with this. Remember this?
"The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."
It was all Kabuki theater, create an impression that Brett can't be trusted, and you've created a scenario where all his future decisions can be placed into question.
Quote from: Solar on September 26, 2018, 04:31:05 AM
I don't believe they ever planned on going all the way with this. Remember this?
"The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."
It was all Kabuki theater, create an impression that Brett can't be trusted, and you've created a scenario where all his future decisions can be placed into question.
I would say if she don't go. She will lose he ass in a civil cases big time also.
Quote from: Solar on September 26, 2018, 04:31:05 AM
I don't believe they ever planned on going all the way with this. Remember this?
"The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."
It was all Kabuki theater, create an impression that Brett can't be trusted, and you've created a scenario where all his future decisions can be placed into question.
This is an interesting point. I agree with you that the Dems never planned on going all the way with it. I think what they hoped would happen was that these accusations would come out and the Republicans would fold in the wake of all the MeToo accusations as to avoid a controversy. Since then the Dems have been fighting to keep this thing alive and continue to build upon the lie as best they can in the hopes of putting forth enough evidence for reasonable doubt, which I worry they may get given the 'All men are guilty of sexual assault' mentality they push so ignorantly. I think they also realize that if this fails, the legitimacy of their movement will be destroyed.
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on September 26, 2018, 06:49:25 AM
This is an interesting point. I agree with you that the Dems never planned on going all the way with it. I think what they hoped would happen was that these accusations would come out and the Republicans would fold in the wake of all the MeToo accusations as to avoid a controversy. Since then the Dems have been fighting to keep this thing alive and continue to build upon the lie as best they can in the hopes of putting forth enough evidence for reasonable doubt, which I worry they may get given the 'All men are guilty of sexual assault' mentality they push so ignorantly. I think they also realize that if this fails, the legitimacy of their movement will be destroyed.
When this first broke, I was pissed that the GOP even entertained it as even remotely valid, I thought they should have told them to pound sand, but as time went by and the media ramped up their attacks, the Dims doubled and tripled down on stupid, so much so, the Dim Pimp known as Avanati, Stormy's attorney, swallowed the bait that another witness had come forward and he was willing to pay her.
He was exposed for the hack he is and the Dims were
leftist with egg on their face by relation.
What I think the GOP did, was play this out as credible, even getting the left to do a reverse on the law by claiming "Guilty by accusation".
This will be used against them in the midterm elections in the form of ads.
I could be wrong, due to the fact the Establishment loves stealing defeat from the jaws of victory, but it appears that this time, smarter heads are calling the shots over the leftist Establishment hacks.
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on September 26, 2018, 06:49:25 AM
This is an interesting point. I agree with you that the Dems never planned on going all the way with it. I think what they hoped would happen was that these accusations would come out and the Republicans would fold in the wake of all the MeToo accusations as to avoid a controversy. Since then the Dems have been fighting to keep this thing alive and continue to build upon the lie as best they can in the hopes of putting forth enough evidence for reasonable doubt, which I worry they may get given the 'All men are guilty of sexual assault' mentality they push so ignorantly. I think they also realize that if this fails, the legitimacy of their movement will be destroyed.
One must understand this is just not about the judge now. This is about every boy growing up. All it will take is a girl saying he did this. Under the Dem's rule he is guilty until he can prove himself innocent.
I just heard McConnell give the strongest senate floor speech I can remember. He sounded pissed about the democrat tactics and called out individual democrat senators for their shenanigans. I am hopeful this signals he has the votes.
A very good read
10 Red Flags About Sexual Assault Claims, From An Employment Lawyer
snip~
Without naming any particular accusation, I offer these factors for consideration to the fair-minded who remain open to the possibility that guilt or innocence is not simply a question of politics. I also remind the reader that politicizing these accusations have allowed men like Harvey Weinstein, Al Franken, Matt Lauer, Les Moonves, Bill Clinton, and Keith Ellison to escape accountability. Nobody seems to care if they walk the walk so long as they talk the talk.
1. The accuser uses the press instead of the process.
Every company has a slightly different process for harassment and assault complaints. Often it begins with a neutral investigator being assigned to interview the accuser first, then potential corroborating witnesses. When an accuser is eager to share with the media but reluctant to meet with an investigator, it's a flag.
2. The accuser times releasing the accusation for an advantage.
For example, when the accuser holds the allegation until an adverse performance rating of the accuser is imminent, or serious misconduct by the accuser is suddenly discovered, or the accused is a rival for a promotion or a raise, or the accused's success will block an accuser's political objective. It's a flag when the accusation is held like a trump card until an opportunity arises to leverage the accusation.
3. The accuser attacks the process instead of participating.
The few times I've been attacked for "harassing" the victim, it has always followed an otherwise innocuous question about the accusation, such as: Where, when, how, why, what happened? I don't argue with accusers, I just ask them to explain the allegation. If I'm attacked for otherwise neutral questions, it's a red flag.
4. When the accused's opportunity to mount a defense is delegitimized.
more @
http://thefederalist.com/2018/09/25/10-red-flags-sexual-assault-claims-employment-lawyer/
Thanks for posting that Walks, it was a very interesting, and appropriate article. :thumbsup:
Quote from: mrclose on September 26, 2018, 02:25:31 PM
The latest accuser, Julie Swetnick was older than Kavanaugh (16 and 18) and is claiming she, as an adult, went to parties where kids were drugging and raping other kids and never reported any of it to anybody.
And she kept going back to watch more kids fill up on alcohol and drugs and rape each other.
She graduated three years ahead of Kavanaugh so she would've been a college student attending high school rape parties orchestrated by 15 yr. olds.
Someone should point out to this woman that she needs competent legal representation because she's being advised to admit to various felonies for which there is no statute of limitations in the state of Maryland.
As far as having multiple "security clearances" ... I've had more than a few in my lifetime.
They are usually called "building passes" to secure building sites!
Many general contractors in the Washington area have them.
Her 15 min of fame may give her a life time in jail.
Quote from: walkstall on September 26, 2018, 02:35:18 PM
Her 15 min of fame may give her a life time in jail.
Jim Croce -
Well, she was standing by my dressing room after the show
Asking for my autograph and asked if she could go
Back to my motel room
But the rest is just a tragic tale
Because five short minutes of lovin'
Done brought me twenty long years in jail
How to watch the Kavanaugh Senate hearing on Thursday
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/how-watch-kavanaugh-senate-hearing-thursday-n913431
snip~
On Thursday morning, Supreme Court justice candidate Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and it will be covered live by NBC and MSNBC.
Rachel Mitchell, a Republican-chosen outside attorney who specializes in sex crimes, will question both sides about the allegations.
The hearing before the 21 committee members is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. ET.
The coverage can be viewed starting at 9:30 a.m. through a livestream on NBCNews.com, NBC News' YouTube page, as well as on the NBC News mobile app, and on NBC News' on Roku, Apple TV and Amazon Fire — plus a live blog on website that will provide real-time coverage.
Quote from: walkstall on September 26, 2018, 04:08:18 PM
How to watch the Kavanaugh Senate hearing on Thursday
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/how-watch-kavanaugh-senate-hearing-thursday-n913431
snip~
On Thursday morning, Supreme Court justice candidate Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and it will be covered live by NBC and MSNBC.
Rachel Mitchell, a Republican-chosen outside attorney who specializes in sex crimes, will question both sides about the allegations.
The hearing before the 21 committee members is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. ET.
The coverage can be viewed starting at 9:30 a.m. through a livestream on NBCNews.com, NBC News' YouTube page, as well as on the NBC News mobile app, and on NBC News' on Roku, Apple TV and Amazon Fire — plus a live blog on website that will provide real-time coverage.
Or, avoid the bull shit commentary from lying leftists and tune into FOX or CSPAN at 7:00 AM West coast time. :thumbup:
Looks like a leftist circle jerk to me.
A decade ago, Julie Swetnick made a sexual harassment complaint against her former employer, New York Life Insurance. Representing her was the firm run by Debra Katz, who now reps Christine Blasey Ford. She was ultimately paid a financial settlement.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoDsLVJU0AAspxt.jpg)
https://www.wsj.com/articles/attorney-avenatti-releases-affidavit-from-woman-describing-kavanaugh-at-parties-in-1980s-1537974634 ...
Quote from: Solar on September 26, 2018, 05:24:26 PM
Looks like a leftist circle jerk to me.
A decade ago, Julie Swetnick made a sexual harassment complaint against her former employer, New York Life Insurance. Representing her was the firm run by Debra Katz, who now reps Christine Blasey Ford. She was ultimately paid a financial settlement.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoDsLVJU0AAspxt.jpg)
https://www.wsj.com/articles/attorney-avenatti-releases-affidavit-from-woman-describing-kavanaugh-at-parties-in-1980s-1537974634 ...
They smell money. :popcorn:
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on September 26, 2018, 06:49:25 AM
This is an interesting point. I agree with you that the Dems never planned on going all the way with it. I think what they hoped would happen was that these accusations would come out and the Republicans would fold in the wake of all the MeToo accusations as to avoid a controversy. Since then the Dems have been fighting to keep this thing alive and continue to build upon the lie as best they can in the hopes of putting forth enough evidence for reasonable doubt, which I worry they may get given the 'All men are guilty of sexual assault' mentality they push so ignorantly. I think they also realize that if this fails, the legitimacy of their movement will be destroyed.
I think the Republicans showing cold feet are attempting to cling to any perceived leverage against the President. The Iran deal set Jeff Flake off. It's like driving into an oncoming train but putting on your seat belt.
Kavanaugh accuser Ford to testify that she 'believed he was going to rape' her.
Every place I look the MSM does not give Kavanaugh a snow ball chance in hell. I think when this is all over Kavanaugh will become a very rich man. As I feel he will go all the way to clear his name.
BREAKING: Senate Judiciary Committee Interviewing 2 Men Who Believe They Had "Encounter" With Ford, NOT KAVANAUGH
more @
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/senate-judiciary-committee-interviewing-2-men-who-believe-they-had-encounter-with-christine-ford-not-brett-kavanaugh/
You really can't make this stuff up folks. I'll tell you what Hollywood has nothing on the democrats.
Christine Ford was giving a polygraph test and only two questions was asked.... :lol: :lol:
They were really digging for the truth huh..... :lol: :lol: :lol:
Christine Blasey Ford's attorneys release polygraph results on Kavanaugh allegations
Following Ford's interview she was given a polygraph examination with the following two questions:
Question 1...Is any part of your statement false?
Question 2...Did you make up any part of your statement?
Ford answered "no" to both questions. "Blasey's responses to the above relevant questions are not indicative of deception," the report read. Two more analyses of Ford's responses also suggested she had been truthful.
READ MORE....... :lol:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/christine-blasey-ford-attorneys-release-polygraph-results-on-kavanaugh-allegations/
Dr. Ford's testimony is over. From what I saw there was nothing new. Now Judge Kavanaugh has to endure the deomcrat clwos for 50 minutes.
When is the vote going to take place? The democrats have had their fun trying to derail the confirmation and it's time to vote! :cursing:
Quote from: Bronx on September 27, 2018, 09:58:35 AM
You really can't make this stuff up folks. I'll tell you what Hollywood has nothing on the democrats.
Christine Ford was giving a polygraph test and only two questions was asked.... :lol: :lol:
They were really digging for the truth huh..... :lol: :lol: :lol:
Christine Blasey Ford's attorneys release polygraph results on Kavanaugh allegations
Following Ford's interview she was given a polygraph examination with the following two questions:
Question 1...Is any part of your statement false?
Question 2...Did you make up any part of your statement?
Ford answered "no" to both questions. "Blasey's responses to the above relevant questions are not indicative of deception," the report read. Two more analyses of Ford's responses also suggested she had been truthful.
READ MORE....... :lol:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/christine-blasey-ford-attorneys-release-polygraph-results-on-kavanaugh-allegations/
Oh Good God! That isn't even enough to calibrate the machine, you need at least a minimum of ten innocuous questions to lead into the real questioning.
This goes way beyond fraud. Brett needs to sue her ass when all is said and done.
Quote from: tac on September 27, 2018, 11:29:07 AM
When is the vote going to take place? The democrats have had their fun trying to derail the confirmation and it's time to vote! :cursing:
The committee vote is supposed to take place the morning of 9/28.
Thanks sup.
I can't speak on the veracity of this, but if true, is anyone really surprised?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoH_YXKU8AAz04M.jpg:small)
The fact is that one of them is lying, deluded, or she has the wrong guy. I discount the third given her continue recollection of Kavanaugh's friend.
The problem is that Ford is not experienced in these circumstances and appears sincere and truthful. I thought she would probably start testifying then pass out or something - to continue the delay. But she simply testified and what she said was very believable.
They both seem truthful to me. So the question that the congressmen are evaluating is whether Kavanaugh is lying.
On the one hand, probably no one wants to own up to what they did in their worst High School moments. However, it should be irrelevant to establishing Kavanaugh's character. But if he's lying, he's doing so under oath and that becomes relevant.
On the other hand, the appearance of Ford is all to convenient to fill the Dims desperate desire to delay confirmation in hopes they can take the election and choose a lib.
Quite a conundrum. This should never have come to this hearing - such a bad idea. It's not a court, and that's obvious the way the "prosecutor" is questioning in five minute slots. And the questions are in deposition format. They should have finished the hearings and voted. The claims of Ford should have been settled in a court of law - and it would have been thrown out. Now we are seeing a total train wreck. I predict that some of the GOP will not vote him in. The Pubs will take a hit for voting with this accusation hanging over Kavanaugh's head. Kavanaugh's reputation and life's work will be severely damaged. Plus the Dims will get their delay. Such a terrible outcome. Perish the thought ... I pray that I'm wrong, but fear that the writing is on the wall.
I'm going to broach a conspiracy theory here.
Is it possible, considering the link between this incestuous mess, Ford, her attorney and the "Resist Movement" etc, that there's a possibility that Ford was induced to believe under her so called "Therapy", that just maybe, they planted a seed that she would come to the conclusion, it was Kavanaugh?
I believe something did happen to her as a kid, but no one in their Right mind could ever believe it was Brett, especially considering two guys came forward and admitted it was them.
I believe there needs to be an investigation, but not on Brett, rather, her so called therapists and the Marxist connection all the way up the chain to the Dim party.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/two-men-claiming-to-be-the-one-involved-in-ford-encounter-not-kavanaugh-interviewed-by-senate-staffers
Quote from: Solar on September 27, 2018, 02:41:28 PM
I'm going to broach a conspiracy theory here.
Is it possible, considering the link between this incestuous mess, Ford, her attorney and the "Resist Movement" etc, that there's a possibility that Ford was induced to believe under her so called "Therapy", that just maybe, they planted a seed that she would come to the conclusion, it was Kavanaugh?
I believe something did happen to her as a kid, but no one in their Right mind could ever believe it was Brett, especially considering two guys came forward and admitted it was them.
I believe there needs to be an investigation, but not on Brett, rather, her so called therapists and the Marxist connection all the way up the chain to the Dim party.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/two-men-claiming-to-be-the-one-involved-in-ford-encounter-not-kavanaugh-interviewed-by-senate-staffers
Given the stakes, it's not beyond possibility. You know that the Dims would have done ANYTHING to throw this into turmoil. It would have been good if someone would have asked Ford whether she regularly participates in therapy - and it would have been investigated. Although it may have been made very difficult to detect - they would have went to extremes to keep it under cover. But the conspiracy idea makes us sound crazy. There would need to be proof or some indicator from Ford for anyone to consider it.
The whole use of Mitchell seemed like a total fail. Any other perspectives on that? I'd like to see the silver lining in Mitchell's participation.
Quote from: topside on September 27, 2018, 03:03:00 PM
Given the stakes, it's not beyond possibility. You know that the Dims would have done ANYTHING to throw this into turmoil. It would have been good if someone would have asked Ford whether she regularly participates in therapy - and it would have been investigated. Although it may have been made very difficult to detect - they would have went to extremes to keep it under cover. But the conspiracy idea makes us sound crazy. There would need to be proof or some indicator from Ford for anyone to consider it.
Nothing crazy about it, theses are Marxists we're talking about, people who would sell out their own mother to get ahead.
Just look to Chicago politics for proof of what I speak.
I can't see any other plausible explanation for why she said it, even Kav` has proof that he was nowhere near the party at the time via his calendar of events he kept at the time.
And no, I don't think Ford is lying, I think she believes she is saying exactly what she was told through "Memory Reclamation", Recall therapy (repressed memory), which has been proven to be nothing short of brain washing.
Even Megyn Kelly wasnt impressed with her.
Quote from: Solar on September 27, 2018, 03:34:06 PM
Nothing crazy about it, theses are Marxists we're talking about, people who would sell out their own mother to get ahead.
Just look to Chicago politics for proof of what I speak.
I can't see any other plausible explanation for why she said it, even Kav` has proof that he was nowhere near the party at the time via his calendar of events he kept at the time.
And no, I don't think Ford is lying, I think she believes she is saying exactly what she was told through "Memory Reclamation", Recall therapy (repressed memory), which has been proven to be nothing short of brain washing.
Well, it could be. I hope someone finds some proof of it. I'm reminded of the Sherlock Holmes statement, "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
So the testimonies are in. The kangaroo court has adjourned. If Congress is going to treat this like a hearing, let's decide a verdict. While the accusers testimony was compelling, the evidence via sworn statement did not support it. There is more than reasonable doubt, therefore, Brett Kavanaugh is innocent. The false claims against his character should not impact the vote. If it does, then Congress is negating our entire legal system.
Case closed.
Let me weigh in having "interviewed" countless suspects, victims and witnesses.
First the GOP pulled the right move, getting a female prosecutor to ask her questions...and YES they were softball questions, again, a smart move, this is how a "Victim" is handled and usually handled by the defense....very very delicately. Here is why that is a smart move.
There is an outside chance, a very outside chance that this woman is telling the truth....that she was the victim of some unwanted sexual assault attempt at some party long ago. However, I seriously doubt it involved Kav. Her memory is blurred by many years and lets face it, she was probably drunk.
My theory on this is the power of suggestion comes into play, somebody, her therapist, her friends, her peer group or all of the above convinced her it was Kavenaugh. This is such an overwhelming and psychological mind fuck that very likely, she beleives it or beleives she beleives it.
Look at that face, look at those eyes, this woman isn't that stable to begin with, she has ISSUES I'm guessing she has been on prozac for a long, long time. Now just an aside, notice how she is wearing these superfly glasses to disguise her eyes? Who else did that?...Madam Hillary during Benghazi
There is no corroboration here, actually refute from a number of witnesses and aquiantences on BOTH sides. And since I am partly convinced that this woman did undergo some sort of traumatic event in her young life it shows you just how sick and demented the leftist machine is. They will take this disturbed woman and destroy her life, cause her mental anguish, drug her to the gills and break her fragile mind all to their on evil purpose and slap themselves on the back over it.
I can only hope the average America has enough sense to see it through that same lense and act accordingly to get these scum out of office in November.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 05, 2018, 07:00:55 AM
Im watching now and the protesters just keep acting up every few minutes. I get the impression that they arent being thrown out. And then grassley says something about letting them have their free speech and is letting them eat into his time. Horse shit. Throw em out and let em protest outside.
"Doctor" Ford is a proven
LIAR.
She stated she could not come to DC because she feared flying.
Yet under oath, she admitted today she has flown all over the Pacific Ocean: Hawaii, Tahiti, Fiji.
She is a total fraud.
I didn't get to see Ford's testimony this morning so I'm watching clips now. I am not saying she was not at some point assaulted but there are so many red flags. Feinstien advised her on what attorneys to hire. Also she doesn't know if her attorneys are charging her or if it is pro bono. She is 100 percent sure it was Kavanaugh but has no idea when it happened or where it happened.
Quote from: The Boo Man... on September 27, 2018, 06:32:25 PM
I didn't get to see Ford's testimony this morning so I'm watching clips now. I am not saying she was not at some point assaulted but there are so many red flags. Feinstien advised her on what attorneys to hire. Also she doesn't know if her attorneys are charging her or if it is pro bono. She is 100 percent sure it was Kavanaugh but has no idea when it happened or where it happened.
But didn't know how she got there or how she left.
That's because she had false memories planted, I'm almost certain of it.
Quote from: Solar on September 27, 2018, 06:42:44 PM
But didn't know how she got there or how she left.
That's because she had false memories planted, I'm almost certain of it.
Something's off. Either way she had no corroborating evidence and Kavanaugh had plenty to refute her accusations.
Townhall's Senate source says they have the votes:
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/27/breaking-we-have-the-votes-n2523402
QuoteWith the Senate Judiciary Committee holding a vote at 9:30 A.M. tomorrow, a Senate insider has told Townhall that Kavanaugh has the votes to make it out of committee and the votes to be confirmed on the floor for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. Sens. Flake (R-AZ), Collins (R-ME), Murkowski (R-AK), and Manchin (D-WV) are expected to vote in favor of Kavanaugh. All the Republicans are voting yes. Also, in the rumor mill, several Democrats may break ranks and back Kavanaugh. That's the ball game, folks.
Quote from: taxed on September 27, 2018, 08:22:18 PM
Townhall's Senate source says they have the votes:
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/27/breaking-we-have-the-votes-n2523402
(https://i.imgur.com/z2Cdrsy.png)
Lindsey Graham napalmed the village.
Quote from: mrclose on September 27, 2018, 02:22:35 PM
Lindsey Graham was on Fire!
For those that may have missed it ....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj-HJ5Quni8
As most know I am not a Graham fan, but he told it like it is here!
I found this article interesting.
http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ford-testimony-credibility-memory-20180928-story.html#
Quote from: midcan5 on September 28, 2018, 04:22:24 AM
I found this article interesting.
http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ford-testimony-credibility-memory-20180928-story.html#
The article makes the case that her body language was consistent with telling the truth.
But there is still the problem that they say that none of her friends nor Judge (under threat of perjury) support her story. What is your counter to that? Essentially, besides her testimony, there is no solid evidence.
How could you possibly want to destroy a man's honorable and notable career for these past many years with something that is claimed to have happened in High School and cannot be proven.
Make no claim or indirection otherwise. This is not about seeking the truth. It's all about delaying confirmation of this supreme court seat.
Quote from: midcan5 on September 28, 2018, 04:22:24 AM
I found this article interesting.
http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ford-testimony-credibility-memory-20180928-story.html#
What is so interesting about leftist spin?
A timeline of events. You can see it at the link.
ummary of Actions by Chairman Grassley and the Senate Judiciary Committee Related to Allegations Made and Disputed Regarding Judge Brett Kavanaugh
A 38-year member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chairman Grassley has worked to secure a thorough, credible and effective committee process as the U.S. Senate meets its constitutional duty of advice and consent in considering the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. Grassley reopened the hearing after four days and 32 hours of testimony from the nominee during the week of September 4, including a closed session available to all Judiciary Committee members to scrutinize any issues or concerns about the nominee that involve confidentiality. Chairman Grassley has planned a hearing day scheduled for September 27 to give a fair and professional forum for Dr. Christine Blasey Ford to share allegations she made about the nominee in a July 30 letter and subsequently in a September 16 newspaper story, and for the nominee to respond to questions and address those allegations.
Additionally, Chairman Grassley has conducted extensive review and investigation of the allegations made by Dr. Ford and comments and statements made by others both in news media reports and in messages to other senators that have been given to the Judiciary Committee. A description of those efforts is provided here.
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/summary-of-actions-by-chairman-grassley-and-the-senate-judiciary-committee-related-to-allegations-made-and-disputed-regarding-judge-brett-kavanaugh
"Neither her parents nor her two siblings have come out to voice support for Ford, and they did not sign a family letter of support for her and her claims circulated by her husband," the news source reported.
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/09/28/joe-digenova-dr-ford-a-deeply-troubled-person-has-a-history-of-psychological-discord-678387
Here is my take on the deal Flake suggested. First, the confirmation has been moved favorably out of committee. Basically, they have turned the deal over to McConnell and the committee washed their hands of the process. As I understand it McConnell now makes the call on whether to delay the vote for confirmation so the FBI can do a "limited" investigation. What Flake has done has given the democrats cover and they can move on. Damn, I will be glad when Flake is gone.
If the reps cant get this nomination thru then the midterms will be a bigger disaster than i even thought it would be.2019 will be interesting with Trump being impeached. I expect plenty of reps in congress will support it thinking they can get Rubio to run in 2020. By the time 2020 is over reps might only have 40 senate seats and 150 house seats.
Quote from: ldub23 on September 28, 2018, 11:53:56 AM
If the reps cant get this nomination thru then the midterms will be a bigger disaster than i even thought it would be.2019 will be interesting with Trump being impeached. I expect plenty of reps in congress will support it thinking they can get Rubio to run in 2020. By the time 2020 is over reps might only have 40 senate seats and 150 house seats.
Impeachment is an empty effort and would cause the democrats to go down in flames in 2020.
IF a democrat controlled house impeaches Trump the senate would never convict him and remove him from office.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 28, 2018, 12:14:46 PM
Impeachment is an empty effort and would cause the democrats to go down in flames in 2020. IF a democrat controlled house impeaches Trump the senate would never convict him and remove him from office.
We will have to see about that. I expect now the dems will have the senate majority after Nov and i further think quite a few rep senators will support impeachment to "cleanse" the party. I have no doubt Most reps in congress despise Trump and think getting rid of him will make the party pure again. As far as the dems going down in flames in 2020 i seriously doubt that unless Trump survives. If alot of reps end up supporting impeachment then a whole hell of alot of Trump voters will spit on the rep party in 2020.
Also, if dems control the senate in 2020 we all better pray no conservative on the court croaks or quits. Trump wont have a chance in hell of getting any nomination passed unless they are liberal.
Quote from: ldub23 on September 28, 2018, 12:25:35 PM
We will have to see about that. I expect now the dems will have the senate majority after Nov and i further think quite a few rep senators will support impeachment to "cleanse" the party. I have no doubt Most reps in congress despise Trump and think getting rid of him will make the party pure again. As far as the dems going down in flames in 2020 i seriously doubt that unless Trump survives. If alot of reps end up supporting impeachment then a whole hell of alot of Trump voters will spit on the rep party in 2020.
I would suggest you refill your positive pills. There is no way in hell 67 senators would vote to convict Trump and remove him from office.
Quote from: supsalemgr on September 28, 2018, 12:54:46 PM
I would suggest you refill your positive pills. There is no way in hell 67 senators would vote to convict Trump and remove him from office.
How many rep senators secretly want Trump gone? The ones up for re-election in 2020 will want someone else at the top of the ticket.
Quote from: ldub23 on September 28, 2018, 04:24:05 PM
How many rep senators secretly want Trump gone? The ones up for re-election in 2020 will want someone else at the top of the ticket.
LOL How many rep senators secretly want Trump to stay. But don't have the ball to come out and say it. Just look at the economy and the job numbers. Hell b o had 8 years and he could not even do that for the blacks.
Quote from: ldub23 on September 28, 2018, 04:24:05 PM
How many rep senators secretly want Trump gone? The ones up for re-election in 2020 will want someone else at the top of the ticket.
How many Dems walked away from the Marxist Party....how many you think will continue to walk away after this latest sickening circus we just witnessed?
Quote from: ldub23 on September 28, 2018, 11:53:56 AM
If the reps cant get this nomination thru then the midterms will be a bigger disaster than i even thought it would be.2019 will be interesting with Trump being impeached. I expect plenty of reps in congress will support it thinking they can get Rubio to run in 2020. By the time 2020 is over reps might only have 40 senate seats and 150 house seats.
What does any of that have to do with how the Right will vote? Do you seriously think people would stay home and let the left take power, just because the Dims stalled the vote?
The crap you're parroting is leftist and RINO talking points, no Conservative is going to sit home, in fact, this would only reinforce their hatred of the left further.
With that said, Kav will be seated regardless, this is all Kabuki theater.
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2018, 08:43:21 PM
What does any of that have to do with how the Right will vote? Do you seriously think people would stay home and let the left take power, just because the Dims stalled the vote?
The crap you're parroting is leftist and RINO talking points, no Conservative is going to sit home, in fact, this would only reinforce their hatred of the left further.
With that said, Kav will be seated regardless, this is all Kabuki theater.
Yep, unless the FBI coerces one of the 3 "witnesses" in an interview to change their previous sworn affidavits, there is no there, there. Dems will still not vote for him even when they get their precious FBI report, exonerating him for the most part or at the very worst announcing they are unable to confirm any of the story 36 years later
Quote from: MichaelJ on September 28, 2018, 11:52:58 PM
Yep, unless the FBI coerces one of the 3 "witnesses" in an interview to change their previous sworn affidavits, there is no there, there. Dems will still not vote for him even when they get their precious FBI report, exonerating him for the most part or at the very worst announcing they are unable to confirm any of the story 36 years later
The funny part is, they won't be investigating Kav, they'll be looking into the background of the leftist loon, and God only knows what kind of craziness is hidden there.
But wait, did the NY Slimes lie? no, but they didn't do their homework either.
Like giddy children, they followed the pedophile offering them a surprise.
American Bar Association and Yale Law School Urge F.B.I. Inquiry Into Kavanaugh
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/us/politics/judge-kavanaugh-american-bar-association-fbi.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur#commentsContainer
"The correspondence by Robert Carlson, President of the American Bar Association...was not received by the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary prior to its issuance...The ABA's rating for Judge Kavanaugh is not affected by Mr. Carlson's letter."
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoNj47EWkAA5uMg.jpg:small)
Senate Judiciary
✔
@senjudiciary
"The correspondence by Robert Carlson, President of the American Bar Association...was not received by the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary prior to its issuance...The ABA's rating for Judge Kavanaugh is not affected by Mr. Carlson's letter."
2:43 PM - Sep 28, 2018
https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/09/28/wow-it-turns-out-the-american-bar-association-story-on-brett-kavanaugh-was-fake-news/
When I left my house yesterday morning all the news was reporting how the vote looked to be signed seald and delivered, when I returned home less than 2 hours later it was in chaos, the vote to move out of Committee was starting and everyone was yelling.. It took me by surprise and my frustration when I learned that Flake had a meeting with dems and looked to be moving tword an FBI investigation had me livid.. I watched the circus until it was reported that Trump had ordered the FBI in and I turned it all off..
Figuring all was lost I spent time working around the farm... Last night I came in and sat down and started reading different news stories and opinions and here is my conclusion:
Flake had to provide cover for the fence sitters, he agreed to allowing a FBI investigation limited to no more than one week and only about the current charges. The investigation is thus limited to time and scope. Where things got hectic was that the dems thought that he was agreeing basically to the investigation and nothing more, they were caught off guard when the vote to continue Judge Kav out of committee and onto the senate floor took place.. That passed with a 11-10 margin (like we always knew it would)
what this means...
The FBI can come back today or Monday and say that there is no basis for an investigation, the complainant does not know the date or place the attack happened and the witnesses she herself names do not agree with her.
The vote for Judge Kav has already been moved out of the committee so that hurdle is cleared, Flake gave the fence sitters cover to say , hey.. we had the FBI to investigate and now we move on to confirm..
Just another way to look at this, it may or may not be a long shot but we shall see.
Trump Calls On FBI To Open 'Supplemental Investigation' Into Kavanaugh Limited To 'Less Than One Week'
https://www.dailywire.com/news/36480/trump-calls-fbi-open-supplemental-investigation-frank-camp (https://www.dailywire.com/news/36480/trump-calls-fbi-open-supplemental-investigation-frank-camp)
I kinda thought it important to post this, the left wing media seems to neglect the limitations on this investigation.
Quote from: AmericanMom on September 29, 2018, 07:00:25 AM
When I left my house yesterday morning all the news was reporting how the vote looked to be signed seald and delivered, when I returned home less than 2 hours later it was in chaos, the vote to move out of Committee was starting and everyone was yelling.. It took me by surprise and my frustration when I learned that Flake had a meeting with dems and looked to be moving tword an FBI investigation had me livid.. I watched the circus until it was reported that Trump had ordered the FBI in and I turned it all off..
Figuring all was lost I spent time working around the farm... Last night I came in and sat down and started reading different news stories and opinions and here is my conclusion:
Flake had to provide cover for the fence sitters, he agreed to allowing a FBI investigation limited to no more than one week and only about the current charges. The investigation is thus limited to time and scope. Where things got hectic was that the dems thought that he was agreeing basically to the investigation and nothing more, they were caught off guard when the vote to continue Judge Kav out of committee and onto the senate floor took place.. That passed with a 11-10 margin (like we always knew it would)
what this means...
The FBI can come back today or Monday and say that there is no basis for an investigation, the complainant does not know the date or place the attack happened and the witnesses she herself names do not agree with her.
The vote for Judge Kav has already been moved out of the committee so that hurdle is cleared, Flake gave the fence sitters cover to say , hey.. we had the FBI to investigate and now we move on to confirm..
Just another way to look at this, it may or may not be a long shot but we shall see.
I totally agree with you that Flake did this to provide cover for the fence sitters. :thumbup:
Quote from: harry12 on September 29, 2018, 07:53:22 AM
Trump Calls On FBI To Open 'Supplemental Investigation' Into Kavanaugh Limited To 'Less Than One Week'
https://www.dailywire.com/news/36480/trump-calls-fbi-open-supplemental-investigation-frank-camp (https://www.dailywire.com/news/36480/trump-calls-fbi-open-supplemental-investigation-frank-camp)
I kinda thought it important to post this, the left wing media seems to neglect the limitations on this investigation.
The MSM only post what make them look good.
Blasey Ford's best friend to tell FBI she has no knowledge of Kavanaugh or party.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/29/leland-keyser-to-tell-fbi-she-has-no-knowledge-of-/
Quote from: walkstall on September 29, 2018, 11:39:33 AM
Blasey Ford's best friend to tell FBI she has no knowledge of Kavanaugh or party.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/29/leland-keyser-to-tell-fbi-she-has-no-knowledge-of-/
It would be perfect if she says she was the one who drove Ford home lol
Very courageous. These dirtbags make these horrible jokes and then delete them. Stick behind what you say.
I'm watching FNC and they are showing Flake speaking and taking questions in BOSTON, MA. What the hell is a senator from AZ doing speaking in one of the lib centers of the USA? A--hole!
Quote from: supsalemgr on October 01, 2018, 11:14:28 AM
I'm watching FNC and they are showing Flake speaking and taking questions in BOSTON, MA. What the hell is a senator from AZ doing speaking in one of the lib centers of the USA? A--hole!
I bet he's on a job interview to become a lobbyist just like that other ass whip Eric Cantor.
Prosecutor Who Questioned Ford Shreds Her Case In Five-Page Memo
ByRYAN SAAVEDRA
Rachel Mitchell, the prosecutor who questioned Christine Blasey Ford last week during a hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wrote a five-page memo that was released on Sunday that outlines why she would not bring criminal charges against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
Mitchell's memo notes nine significant problems with Ford's testimony and underscores that her case is "even weaker" than a "he said, she said" case.
"A 'he said, she said' case is incredibly difficult to prove," Mitchell states. "But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard."
Here are the nine problems outlined in Mitchell's memo:
1. Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened:
In a July 6 text to the Washington Post, she said it happened in the "mid 1980s."
In her July 30 letter to Senator Feinstein, she said it happened in the "early 80s."
Her August 7 statement to the polygrapher said that it happened one "high school summer in early 80's," but she crossed out the word "early" for reasons she did not explain.
A September 16 Washington Post article reported that Dr. Ford said it happened in the "summer of 1982."
Similarly, the September 16 article reported that notes from an individual therapy session in 2013 show her describing the assault as occurring in her "late teens." But she told the Post and the Committee that she was 15 when the assault allegedly occurred. She has not turned over her therapy records for the Committee to review.
While it is common for victims to be uncertain about dates, Dr. Ford failed to explain how she was suddenly able to narrow the timeframe to a particular season and particular year
read the rest here https://www.dailywire.com/news/36519/prosecutor-questioned-ford-shreds-her-case-5-page-ryan-saavedra
Christine Ford Published 2008 Article on Self-Hypnosis Used to Retrieve and "Create Artificial Situations"
Christine Ford has not turned over her therapist's notes to the Senate regarding her suppressed memories about Judge Kavanaugh abusing her decades earlier.
This may be because if the memories were revealed through hypnosis they would be "absolutely inadmissible" in the court of law in many states, including New York and Maryland.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/huge-christine-ford-published-2008-article-on-self-hypnosis-used-to-retrieve-and-create-artificial-situations/
Quote from: Solar on October 02, 2018, 04:20:37 AM
Christine Ford Published 2008 Article on Self-Hypnosis Used to Retrieve and "Create Artificial Situations"
Christine Ford has not turned over her therapist's notes to the Senate regarding her suppressed memories about Judge Kavanaugh abusing her decades earlier.
This may be because if the memories were revealed through hypnosis they would be "absolutely inadmissible" in the court of law in many states, including New York and Maryland.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/huge-christine-ford-published-2008-article-on-self-hypnosis-used-to-retrieve-and-create-artificial-situations/
Be patient, got to give her "Ghost writer" time to re do the notes to conform with what lies she told.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on October 02, 2018, 05:14:14 AM
Be patient, got to give her "Ghost writer" time to re do the notes to conform with what lies she told.
I love her claim she forgot her cell phone in 1982, just so happened to be the year Motorola introduced the first cell phone, about 2 lbs, nearly the same price as a new car.
This moron has more mental issues, that a schizophrenic suffering 50 personality disorders.
Quote from: The Boo Man... on September 30, 2018, 06:17:44 PM
Very courageous. These dirtbags make these horrible jokes and then delete them. Stick behind what you say.
x 2
They backtrack when it's needed, not when it is necessary.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on October 02, 2018, 05:14:14 AM
Be patient, got to give her "Ghost writer" time to re do the notes to conform with what lies she told.
I understand the FBI asked for her therapists notes, and she declined (nice word for refused). Unfortunately,
the FBI does not have the authority to subpoena the notes. I believe in a court of law she would have to
turn them over, because she used excerpts from them in her complaint. Same with the Lie Detector test.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DojBwEYW0AAdEkU.jpg)
The lying bitch has been busted and should be prosecuted for perjury.
Quote from: Solar on October 03, 2018, 05:17:15 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DojBwEYW0AAdEkU.jpg)
Much more detail on the above post and how deep it goes, probably tying back into the rot in the DOJ and FBI
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/03/christine-blasey-ford-friend-in-delaware-was-career-fbi-agent-and-likely-together-during-accusation-letter-construct/ (https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/03/christine-blasey-ford-friend-in-delaware-was-career-fbi-agent-and-likely-together-during-accusation-letter-construct/)
If her story keeps unraveling we may see democrats calling for a vote. :lol: :lol:
I love watching this story fall apart. This is going to go down as one of the most blatant, disgraceful smear against a supreme court nominee in modern history.
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on October 03, 2018, 07:55:16 AM
I love watching this story fall apart. This is going to go down as one of the most blatant, disgraceful smear against a supreme court nominee in modern history.
Until Trump gets to replace Ginsberg or Breyer.
Quote from: supsalemgr on October 03, 2018, 09:15:07 AM
Until Trump gets to replace Ginsberg or Breyer.
That's going to be a blood bath compared to the current hearing.
Quote from: tac on October 03, 2018, 09:40:01 AM
That's going to be a blood bath compared to the current hearing.
That will be a full blown physical insurrection......but hopefully they will be a shell of themselves when that goes down after the fica apps and communications of the DOJ then the OIG report hopefully double taps them into extinction
Quote from: supsalemgr on October 03, 2018, 09:15:07 AM
Until Trump gets to replace Ginsberg or Breyer.
If Trump nominated me to replace one of the I would say no way. I wouldn't put my family through that. If the tried to paint Kavanaugh as a serial gang rapist the next nominee will be accused of murder.
So, the FBI report exonerates Kav, the Dims are seen by the people as evil and obstructive as well as destructive of the process.
McCON is calling for a Cloture vote on Kav, meaning a simple vote, no long winded speech from leftists dragging the process out.
So what does the left do now? Well, they had planned on doing their best to destroy Kav all through out Nov, but after the mess they made in trying to keep Kav off the court, they brought out a mentally disturbed woman, made her the poster child for women of assault victims as the whole world watched them get exposed for the frauds they are.
What I find humorous are the polls showing a bit of a split about the truthfulness of Ford being split along party lines, when in fact that is a misleading question, because it was never about the truth, it was about whether or not Kav lied and had they polled that question, the results would have shown the majority supports him.
But what the Dims did is apparently going to take a toll on them during the Midterms, according to a new poll.
It's been nearly two years now and the Dims haven't gotten a break at any time. :lol:
Dems to pay in November for overplaying Kavanaugh hand
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/dems-to-pay-in-november-for-overplaying-kavanaugh-hand
https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-house-finds-no-corroboration-of-sexual-misconduct-allegations-against-kavanaugh-in-fbi-report-1538625927?mod=hp_lead_pos1
Quote from: Solar on October 04, 2018, 05:41:17 AM
So, the FBI report exonerates Kav, the Dims are seen by the people as evil and obstructive as well as destructive of the process.
McCON is calling for a Cloture vote on Kav, meaning a simple vote, no long winded speech from leftists dragging the process out.
So what does the left do now? Well, they had planned on doing their best to destroy Kav all through out Nov, but after the mess they made in trying to keep Kav off the court, they brought out a mentally disturbed woman, made her the poster child for women of assault victims as the whole world watched them get exposed for the frauds they are.
What I find humorous are the polls showing a bit of a split about the truthfulness of Ford being split along party lines, when in fact that is a misleading question, because it was never about the truth, it was about whether or not Kav lied and had they polled that question, the results would have shown the majority supports him.
But what the Dims did is apparently going to take a toll on them during the Midterms, according to a new poll.
It's been nearly two years now and the Dims haven't gotten a break at any time. :lol:
Dems to pay in November for overplaying Kavanaugh hand
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/dems-to-pay-in-november-for-overplaying-kavanaugh-hand
https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-house-finds-no-corroboration-of-sexual-misconduct-allegations-against-kavanaugh-in-fbi-report-1538625927?mod=hp_lead_pos1
The big question on Nov. 7 will be, "What happened?" The good news is the democrats are in such denial they will not acknowledge what happened.
Quote from: supsalemgr on October 04, 2018, 08:15:50 AM
The big question on Nov. 7 will be, "What happened?" The good news is the democrats are in such denial they will not acknowledge what happened.
Hillary Clinton is an excellent example of the denial factor. She has come up with every excuse known to man, except for one. Herself!
Quote from: The Boo Man... on October 03, 2018, 06:40:20 PM
If Trump nominated me to replace one of the I would say no way. I wouldn't put my family through that. If the tried to paint Kavanaugh as a serial gang rapist the next nominee will be accused of murder.
I don't think anyone would. Ben Shapiro made a good point about this the other day that good people will now think twice in running for a public office if these smears and attacks continue without reason. It's horrible to see that any slight mistake you make in life can now be brought back to haunt you, even years later.
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on October 04, 2018, 09:02:03 AM
I don't think anyone would. Ben Shapiro made a good point about this the other day that good people will now think twice in running for a public office if these smears and attacks continue without reason. It's horrible to see that any slight mistake you make in life can now be brought back to haunt you, even years later.
This is the main reason I didn't further my political public life, I know I've pissed people off, pissed off x girl friends.
No one has a clean past, but why would any normal person want to air their private past for the ghouls to feed on?
It takes a lot not to punch some leftist out, and I know for a fact I'd lay some lib out in a heartbeat and wind up being sued.
Nope, not worth it.
Quote from: Solar on October 04, 2018, 09:18:31 AM
This is the main reason I didn't further my political public life, I know I've pissed people off, pissed off x girl friends.
No one has a clean past, but why would any normal person want to air their private past for the ghouls to feed on?
It takes a lot not to punch some leftist out, and I know for a fact I'd lay some lib out in a heartbeat and wind up being sued.
Nope, not worth it.
The amazing thing in my eyes is that i'm sure half these ghouls attacking Brett and other nominees have done just as bad if not worse things in their past. Dick Blumenthal, the awful senator from my state lied about his service to this country and no one seems to care? Yet Brett drinks in high school and makes some fart jokes, now its the end of the world. The Hypocracy isn't funny anymore its just pathetic.
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on October 04, 2018, 09:29:44 AM
The amazing thing in my eyes is that i'm sure half these ghouls attacking Brett and other nominees have done just as bad if not worse things in their past. Dick Blumenthal, the awful senator from my state lied about his service to this country and no one seems to care? Yet Brett drinks in high school and makes some fart jokes, now its the end of the world. The Hypocracy isn't funny anymore its just pathetic.
This is what gets me the most, these lying Dems and RINO's have done far worse that Kavenaugh or anyone else. Nobody gave a crap when Obamao said he did coke, smoked dope and got stoned out of his mind. How many of them have done coke, weed, or wosre?
That brings up another point, how is Kavenaugh an honor student in HS, back in the day when you actually had to have passing grade averages to even get into college let alone Law school and he graduates with Honors from Law school. How does he manage that when he is getting rip roaring drunk and going to all these parties every weekend debauching young girls?
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on October 04, 2018, 09:40:52 AM
This is what gets me the most, these lying Dems and RINO's have done far worse that Kavenaugh or anyone else. Nobody gave a crap when Obamao said he did coke, smoked dope and got stoned out of his mind. How many of them have done coke, weed, or wosre?
That brings up another point, how is Kavenaugh an honor student in HS, back in the day when you actually had to have passing grade averages to even get into college let alone Law school and he graduates with Honors from Law school. How does he manage that when he is getting rip roaring drunk and going to all these parties every weekend debauching young girls?
How dare you bring up his actual accomplishments and background. It is interesting the democrats hardly, if ever, mentioned any of his rulings.
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on October 04, 2018, 09:29:44 AM
The amazing thing in my eyes is that i'm sure half these ghouls attacking Brett and other nominees have done just as bad if not worse things in their past. Dick Blumenthal, the awful senator from my state lied about his service to this country and no one seems to care? Yet Brett drinks in high school and makes some fart jokes, now its the end of the world. The Hypocracy isn't funny anymore its just pathetic.
They're Dims, virtue and morality are not a part of their makeup.
It would be a shame and sham if Murkowski and Collins voted against Kavanaugh.
I'm assuming that the Dim Lemmings will be held under threat to vote against - no Dims will vote for. I would guess that any Dim that votes with Kavanaugh will be blacklisted and run out of politics (or worse).
But if Murkowski and Collins vote against and all other Pubs vote with Kavanaugh, that puts the count at 49. If that happens, Kavanaugh would not get appointed, right? Because we need a tie ... 50 votes; then Pence pushes it over the top.
Quote from: topside on October 04, 2018, 08:24:08 PM
It would be a shame and sham if Murkowski and Collins voted against Kavanaugh.
I'm assuming that the Dim Lemmings will be held under threat to vote against - no Dims will vote for. I would guess that any Dim that votes with Kavanaugh will be blacklisted and run out of politics (or worse).
But if Murkowski and Collins vote against and all other Pubs vote with Kavanaugh, that puts the count at 49. If that happens, Kavanaugh would not get appointed, right? Because we need a tie ... 50 votes; then Pence pushes it over the top.
They'll support him, but I'm halfway expecting a couple of Dims in Red states to vote yes for Kav.
Quote from: Solar on October 04, 2018, 09:48:10 PM
They'll support him, but I'm halfway expecting a couple of Dims in Red states to vote yes for Kav.
Do they have any one that brave on the Dims side?
Talk Self-Limiting Terms in Congress.
Quote from: walkstall on October 05, 2018, 03:00:11 AM
Do they have any one that brave on the Dims side?
Talk Self-Limiting Terms in Congress.
I think when it comes down to it, survival instincts will kick in , over party demands.
I had to post this, it was too damn funny to pass up.
:biggrin:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dos1a6OU8AEZ_gR.jpg:large)
I still can't believe the Ms. Ford could fabricate the entire tale and hold up under oath, in front of the entire country. But there are no witnesses - even those she said were there don't support her story. How can that be, right?
The best explaination I have is aligned with Solar's brain washing idea; that she was seeded and prepared with hope that her testimony - even without witness support - could delay or even upend the confirmation.
For me, elephant in the room is how did it get done. Over what time. Who did it. And how can it be detected in the future. It feels like there would be evidence if you were looking for it under the brain washing hypothesis. Like detecting photos that have been photoshopped.
I would think that detecting such conditions might fall in line with advancing polygraph indicators. And that those such investigative tools are probably undergoing an upgrade with the recent advent of machine learning which is very good at detecting patterns and anomalies.
Quote from: Solar on October 04, 2018, 09:48:10 PM
They'll support him, but I'm halfway expecting a couple of Dims in Red states to vote yes for Kav.
Just said that to someone as well. Maybe Manchin for one.
Judiciary Committee Releases Executive Summary of Report on Kavanaugh
Leah Barkoukis
The Senate Judiciary Committee released an executive summary from the FBI's supplementary background investigation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Thursday.
"At the Senate Judiciary Committee's request, the FBI opened a supplemental background investigation into Judge Kavanaugh. It's his seventh FBI background investigation in 25 years, going back to 1993. The request was for an investigation into current credible allegations against Judge Kavanaugh," reads the opening paragraph of the document compiled by Chairman Grassley's staff.
The document indicates that 11 people were contacted to interview, 10 of whom followed through. Eight of these individuals were related to Ford's allegations while two alleged eyewitnesses were from Deborah Ramirez's allegations. The individuals interviewed had potential firsthand knowledge of the allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh.
more here>>https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2018/10/05/judiciary-committee-releases-executive-summary-of-report-on-kavanaugh-n2525753
Quote from: topside on October 05, 2018, 06:27:46 AM
I still can't believe the Ms. Ford could fabricate the entire tale and hold up under oath, in front of the entire country. But there are no witnesses - even those she said were there don't support her story. How can that be, right?
The best explaination I have is aligned with Solar's brain washing idea; that she was seeded and prepared with hope that her testimony - even without witness support - could delay or even upend the confirmation.
For me, elephant in the room is how did it get done. Over what time. Who did it. And how can it be detected in the future. It feels like there would be evidence if you were looking for it under the brain washing hypothesis. Like detecting photos that have been photoshopped.
I would think that detecting such conditions might fall in line with advancing polygraph indicators. And that those such investigative tools are probably undergoing an upgrade with the recent advent of machine learning which is very good at detecting patterns and anomalies.
I wish I had saved it, but I read where she had several pretests, and the final one only asked two questions.
This whole thing was fabricated from the start.
She said that she cried through the whole thing. I am not expert on a polygraph but there is no way that it could detect changes when a person is sobbing. I believe that she believes her story. However, memory gets distorted and it is not uncommon for a memory to be altered by the suggestion of others. Repeat a story often enough and soon your brain can picture it clear as can be. Secondly, she does seem to have some kind of issue going on so it is possible that it is created totally in her mind. Back in my college days I met an old friend that I had dated occasionally who had changed so drastically that as we watched a movie she was saying all kinds of things mostly that I would not want to see her again. I got her home as soon as I could. The next day I was met at the door by my sister who said that girl called and said I raped her. That I put drugs in her cigarettes and she woke up at home naked. He supposed State Police boyfriend was going to come an arrest me. I laughed at the story as I did not even kiss her or even give her a hug good by. It could be a story where she was trying to scare me, but a few years later I was dating someone else who happens to be in a class with this earlier girl. The girl warned her about me and told the story about how I raped her. I guess that girl figured out it was BS because the night before a snow storm forced her to stay at my dorm, so we slept on the same bed and I never did more than kiss her good night. Yes we were dating but not physical.
Lastly the things that stand out in her mind are beyond belief. a 13 year old girl thinks she may be killed by a hand over her mouth. You can perfectly survive breathing through your nose. I think that either you believe you are about to be killed or you do not. You do not think that someone might inadvertently kill you by holding their hand over your mouth.
My point is that some much of that story just does not make sense but it is the story that she has created in her head. Oh what excited guy would wrestle with his friend when they are trying to get with a girl. Did she listen to them talking or just imagine that they were talking. She is either a bit off or has a memory that is not accurate and to imply that bringing back a supposed repressed memory will bring it back in absolute detail is I am sure not how it works.
Quote from: raptor5618 on October 05, 2018, 11:55:02 AM
My point is that some much of that story just does not make sense but it is the story that she has created in her head. Oh what excited guy would wrestle with his friend when they are trying to get with a girl. Did she listen to them talking or just imagine that they were talking. She is either a bit off or has a memory that is not accurate and to imply that bringing back a supposed repressed memory will bring it back in absolute detail is I am sure not how it works.
Amen to that Lie to yourself enough you will start to believe it.
Collins and Manchin have both declared as "yeas" for Cavanaugh. Barring Flake doing a "Flake" it looks like confirmation.
Quote from: Abe on October 05, 2018, 06:56:12 AM
Just said that to someone as well. Maybe Manchin for one.
You called it! :thumbup:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoxQGdWW0AMnAuE.jpg:large)
Quote from: Solar on October 05, 2018, 03:24:48 PM
You called it! :thumbup:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoxQGdWW0AMnAuE.jpg:large)
(https://i.imgur.com/MnG5BAb.png)
Quote from: mrclose on October 05, 2018, 01:22:23 PM
Say hello to Justice Kavanaugh!
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.animatedimages.org%2Fdata%2Fmedia%2F673%2Fanimated-dance-smiley-image-0024.gif&hash=acc1d7b47df7ca9cff04b8a15b306b4b4dfae47a) (http://www.animatedimages.org/cat-dance-smileys-and-smilies-673.htm)(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.animatedimages.org%2Fdata%2Fmedia%2F673%2Fanimated-dance-smiley-image-0024.gif&hash=acc1d7b47df7ca9cff04b8a15b306b4b4dfae47a) (http://www.animatedimages.org/cat-dance-smileys-and-smilies-673.htm)(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.animatedimages.org%2Fdata%2Fmedia%2F673%2Fanimated-dance-smiley-image-0024.gif&hash=acc1d7b47df7ca9cff04b8a15b306b4b4dfae47a) (http://www.animatedimages.org/cat-dance-smileys-and-smilies-673.htm)(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.animatedimages.org%2Fdata%2Fmedia%2F673%2Fanimated-dance-smiley-image-0024.gif&hash=acc1d7b47df7ca9cff04b8a15b306b4b4dfae47a) (http://www.animatedimages.org/cat-dance-smileys-and-smilies-673.htm)
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.animatedimages.org%2Fdata%2Fmedia%2F673%2Fanimated-dance-smiley-image-0058.gif&hash=e754c7c2633cb2aa9b394c0efa2384b5580bbe0f) (http://www.animatedimages.org/cat-dance-smileys-and-smilies-673.htm)
It ain't over til its over!
As I watched this circus unfold this week a question came to me. Has GOPe seen the light? One has to acknowledge that McConnell, Grassly, Graham and Collins are solid core GOPe. I must say I have been pleasantly surprised at their performance this week. One wonders if they have figured out working with democrats is a hopeless and losing situation and/or it is time to get on the Trump train.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Do1oxlhUcAARrIi.jpg:large
Do you know why we sticky threads?
Walks, want to move this where it belongs?
Thanks.
http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/political-discussion-and-debate/brett-kavanaugh-senate-confirmation-hearing/msg366574/#new
Dems tried hard and failed harder to make this work in their favor. I think majority of people have seen this for what it is now. The left's spin of this has finally been exposed, and I think people are tired of this.
They've been on a losing streak for roughly two years now, so instead of cutting their losses, they tripled down and played their final card, the victim card, they lost miserably.
I see no recovery from this.
Quote from: supsalemgr on October 06, 2018, 04:40:28 AM
It ain't over til its over!
It's over now.......taaaadaaaa!!!
And to the opposition, I say...... :ttoung:
Quote from: Solar on October 06, 2018, 11:55:47 AM
They've been on a losing streak for roughly two years now, so instead of cutting their losses, they tripled down and played their final card, the victim card, they lost miserably.
I see no recovery from this.
If the republican strategy was to expose the dims for what they are, it worked. Trouble is, I am not convinced that was their strategy. I was pleased that there were some republicans to step forward, Collins had quite a speech and outlined all the thinking that went into her decision on what was pretty freaking obvious to the rest of us, but she did make the right decision. Graham surprised me, one hell of a speech, I wish he had been making those kind of speeches all along, hope he keeps it up. Grassley,
had one tough job, I am glad of the final result, not sure how I feel about Grassley's role in all of it but he did get it done. McConnell, I guess I have to admit he now has had a role in helping to shape the court, that's all I am saying there, don't want to jinx it.
Quote from: Solar on October 06, 2018, 11:55:47 AM
They've been on a losing streak for roughly two years now, so instead of cutting their losses, they tripled down and played their final card, the victim card, they lost miserably.
I see no recovery from this.
I saw this one:
2010: Democrats lost the House
2014: Democrats lost the Senate
2016: Democrats lost the White House
2018: Democrats lost SCOTUS
Quote from: taxed on October 06, 2018, 03:14:29 PM
I saw this one:
2010: Democrats lost the House
2014: Democrats lost the Senate
2016: Democrats lost the White House
2018: Democrats lost SCOTUS
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Dims slaughtered in 2018 Midterms. Yeah, I know it's a bit early, but I just wanted to be the first to say it, though, I've been saying it all along. :biggrin:
It's a very good day for our republic.
Quote from: topside on October 06, 2018, 05:45:15 PM
It's a very good day for our republic.
I will go to sleep with a smile on my face, big time. :thumbsup:
Just checked NBC to see.
https://www.nbcnews.com/ (https://www.nbcnews.com/)
No honoring of Kavanaugh's inauguration and the final decision for our nation - only publicizing the meager protest. Still trying to make this about disrespecting women. Doesn't that just about say it all about the MSM bias.
When BO was pontificating while the country burned, my head was in my hands. But I accepted the ill founded decision of the people and what the election had regurgitated - moved on. Not so with these cry babies. How so much time to protest? There are plenty of jobs available now.
Dims ... it sucks to suck. Some of you lemmings need to act independent, do what's right, and not treat your party as your god. Susan Collins is a hero. Anyone who listens to her speech should see that as she clearly stated the objective facts. And she's not a conservative - a moderate who seems rational with her beliefs. Not about how the ends justifies the means ... the Dim motto.
(https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2018/10/1862/1048/justice.jpg)
After his swearing-in ceremony Justice Kavanaugh released a statement.
"I'm in, bitches!"
Can't wait for all the disgusting libs to take to the streets. I really, really hope this man can finally have his peace and begin to heal the wounds inflicted to him by the left. Justice Kavanaugh deserves this seat more then anyone, and I am so happy he's finally made it.
Q sent me here. This is a must watch clip of Fuglosi admitting they smear as a tactic.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4674689/wrap-smear
I'm taking the occasion of Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation to make my first post on this forum.
I'm retired, and I've lived in Asia for the last 20-years, and I'm a little shocked at what I've seen on the news. (From my point of view, America is continually going downhill) Based on what I've seen online, and TV news, I believe that we should all demand that Law, Order, and Decorum should be restored to Washington DC.
I believe it should start with the Congress. The Congress must set a better example for America, in terms of behavior, but the Congress must also lead on the issue of Ethics.
As we go into the mid-term elections, I believe that we should keep alive the issue of Left-Wing scams, and Liberal mob-rule.
To the point, I want to see nothing less than an immediate FBI investigation, complete with subpoenas and warrants, of Senator Feinstein and Dr. Christine Margaret Blasey Ford.
The FBI should follow all trails that connect Dr. Ford to Senator Feinstein, including the money trail, the email trail, the text messages, the phone call records, Dr. Ford's "GoFundMe" accounts, all of it.
I want to see the FBI develop a criminal organization chart that connects Democratic Senators, their staff, their attorneys, and the handlers and trainers who recruited and groomed Dr. Ford, and of course show us the links to left wing mega contributors, who finance the Democrats.
If thoroughly investigated, I believe the resulting Criminal Charges will likely include:
* Criminal Conspiracy
* Lying Under Oath
* Falsifying Evidence (Example: Creating a Fake Polygraph Record)
* Tampering with Evidence (Example: Changing the Psycho-Therapist's Patient Records)
* Money Laundering ("GoFundMe", etc.)
* Profiting from the Proceeds of Crime ("GoFundMe", any future Book Deals, etc., etc.)
I will be satisfied when Senator Feinstein, Dr. Ford, and her coaches, handlers, and attorneys, and all of the other left wing conspirators are in orange jumpsuits.
Just my opinion.
Respectfully submitted,
IronWorker
Regarding the "leak" of Ford's information to the press.
Based on some of the things I've heard away from Feinstein, I don't think she leaked the Ford information.
But from what I've heard of Ford's former FBI "friend", I'm guessing she may have been an operative sent to work with Ford and would guess that she leaked the FBI information.
It's the best theory that fits from what I see. And I don't see how the Pubs could possibly not push an investigation to help bring some order back to the process ... as Iron Worker suggests.
Quote from: IronWorker on October 07, 2018, 01:49:17 AM
I'm taking the occasion of Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation to make my first post on this forum.
I'm retired, and I've lived in Asia for the last 20-years, and I'm a little shocked at what I've seen on the news. (From my point of view, America is continually going downhill) Based on what I've seen online, and TV news, I believe that we should all demand that Law, Order, and Decorum should be restored to Washington DC.
I believe it should start with the Congress. The Congress must set a better example for America, in terms of behavior, but the Congress must also lead on the issue of Ethics.
As we go into the mid-term elections, I believe that we should keep alive the issue of Left-Wing scams, and Liberal mob-rule.
To the point, I want to see nothing less than an immediate FBI investigation, complete with subpoenas and warrants, of Senator Feinstein and Dr. Christine Margaret Blasey Ford.
The FBI should follow all trails that connect Dr. Ford to Senator Feinstein, including the money trail, the email trail, the text messages, the phone call records, Dr. Ford's "GoFundMe" accounts, all of it.
I want to see the FBI develop a criminal organization chart that connects Democratic Senators, their staff, their attorneys, and the handlers and trainers who recruited and groomed Dr. Ford, and of course show us the links to left wing mega contributors, who finance the Democrats.
If thoroughly investigated, I believe the resulting Criminal Charges will likely include:
* Criminal Conspiracy
* Lying Under Oath
* Falsifying Evidence (Example: Creating a Fake Polygraph Record)
* Tampering with Evidence (Example: Changing the Psycho-Therapist's Patient Records)
* Money Laundering ("GoFundMe", etc.)
* Profiting from the Proceeds of Crime ("GoFundMe", any future Book Deals, etc., etc.)
I will be satisfied when Senator Feinstein, Dr. Ford, and her coaches, handlers, and attorneys, and all of the other left wing conspirators are in orange jumpsuits.
Just my opinion.
Respectfully submitted,
IronWorker
Welcome to the forum Ironworker.
Good first post, and I'm surprised a bit to discover you are able to get unfiltered news,, enough anyway, to deduce the left is the real problem.
If one were to get a steady diet of American news only, one would conclude that Trump was the Devil incarnate and about to start WWIII.
I have faith, I do expect to see perp walks by Marxists Dims in the coming years, only because justice can be a slow process.
Quote from: IronWorker on October 07, 2018, 01:49:17 AM
I'm taking the occasion of Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation to make my first post on this forum.
I'm retired, and I've lived in Asia for the last 20-years, and I'm a little shocked at what I've seen on the news. (From my point of view, America is continually going downhill) Based on what I've seen online, and TV news, I believe that we should all demand that Law, Order, and Decorum should be restored to Washington DC.
I believe it should start with the Congress. The Congress must set a better example for America, in terms of behavior, but the Congress must also lead on the issue of Ethics.
As we go into the mid-term elections, I believe that we should keep alive the issue of Left-Wing scams, and Liberal mob-rule.
To the point, I want to see nothing less than an immediate FBI investigation, complete with subpoenas and warrants, of Senator Feinstein and Dr. Christine Margaret Blasey Ford.
The FBI should follow all trails that connect Dr. Ford to Senator Feinstein, including the money trail, the email trail, the text messages, the phone call records, Dr. Ford's "GoFundMe" accounts, all of it.
I want to see the FBI develop a criminal organization chart that connects Democratic Senators, their staff, their attorneys, and the handlers and trainers who recruited and groomed Dr. Ford, and of course show us the links to left wing mega contributors, who finance the Democrats.
If thoroughly investigated, I believe the resulting Criminal Charges will likely include:
* Criminal Conspiracy
* Lying Under Oath
* Falsifying Evidence (Example: Creating a Fake Polygraph Record)
* Tampering with Evidence (Example: Changing the Psycho-Therapist's Patient Records)
* Money Laundering ("GoFundMe", etc.)
* Profiting from the Proceeds of Crime ("GoFundMe", any future Book Deals, etc., etc.)
I will be satisfied when Senator Feinstein, Dr. Ford, and her coaches, handlers, and attorneys, and all of the other left wing conspirators are in orange jumpsuits.
Just my opinion.
Respectfully submitted,
IronWorker
Don't worry... Things have never been better and the criminals will get rolled up.
Just a reminder:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_gmOsnjrZw
Quote from: IronWorker on October 07, 2018, 01:49:17 AM
I'm taking the occasion of Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation to make my first post on this forum.
I'm retired, and I've lived in Asia for the last 20-years, and I'm a little shocked at what I've seen on the news. (From my point of view, America is continually going downhill) Based on what I've seen online, and TV news, I believe that we should all demand that Law, Order, and Decorum should be restored to Washington DC.
I believe it should start with the Congress. The Congress must set a better example for America, in terms of behavior, but the Congress must also lead on the issue of Ethics.
As we go into the mid-term elections, I believe that we should keep alive the issue of Left-Wing scams, and Liberal mob-rule.
To the point, I want to see nothing less than an immediate FBI investigation, complete with subpoenas and warrants, of Senator Feinstein and Dr. Christine Margaret Blasey Ford.
The FBI should follow all trails that connect Dr. Ford to Senator Feinstein, including the money trail, the email trail, the text messages, the phone call records, Dr. Ford's "GoFundMe" accounts, all of it.
I want to see the FBI develop a criminal organization chart that connects Democratic Senators, their staff, their attorneys, and the handlers and trainers who recruited and groomed Dr. Ford, and of course show us the links to left wing mega contributors, who finance the Democrats.
If thoroughly investigated, I believe the resulting Criminal Charges will likely include:
* Criminal Conspiracy
* Lying Under Oath
* Falsifying Evidence (Example: Creating a Fake Polygraph Record)
* Tampering with Evidence (Example: Changing the Psycho-Therapist's Patient Records)
* Money Laundering ("GoFundMe", etc.)
* Profiting from the Proceeds of Crime ("GoFundMe", any future Book Deals, etc., etc.)
I will be satisfied when Senator Feinstein, Dr. Ford, and her coaches, handlers, and attorneys, and all of the other left wing conspirators are in orange jumpsuits.
Just my opinion.
Respectfully submitted,
IronWorker
Welcome to the Forum, Ironworker, I too have lived and worked in Asia for many years, I'm back in the USA now. The feelings against the left in Our Country is growing daily as people begin to realize what the "Democratic" party has become. Speaking from years of experience in Law Enforcement, one must have patience when putting together an investigation into wrongdoing and when it involves the magnitude of the leftists recent attacks one must be sure to gather up all the bit players, its takes time, time and patience.
Senator Susan Collins will vote "Yes" on Saturday to confirm Judge Kavanaugh.. She delivered a great, enlightening speech. It was memorable. But it did not diminish the screaming chants of "shame, shame, shame" emanating from the mindless "collective" over-running the halls of the Capital Building, like mad, rabid rats...Nor did it change the minds of their Borg masters.. No need to name them as you know them well, but I will do so anyways so you can visit their Facebook pages. Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Richard Durbin, Sheldon Whitehouse, Mazie Hirono, et al.
Susan Collins is now getting death threats and Soros funded groups are busy planning a campaign of personal harassment to continue unabated until she is unseated before or at her next reelection date. Please visit her Facebook page and voice your support of her.
Quote from: IronWorker on October 07, 2018, 01:49:17 AM
I'm taking the occasion of Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation to make my first post on this forum.
I'm retired, and I've lived in Asia for the last 20-years, and I'm a little shocked at what I've seen on the news. (From my point of view, America is continually going downhill) Based on what I've seen online, and TV news, I believe that we should all demand that Law, Order, and Decorum should be restored to Washington DC.
I believe it should start with the Congress. The Congress must set a better example for America, in terms of behavior, but the Congress must also lead on the issue of Ethics.
As we go into the mid-term elections, I believe that we should keep alive the issue of Left-Wing scams, and Liberal mob-rule.
To the point, I want to see nothing less than an immediate FBI investigation, complete with subpoenas and warrants, of Senator Feinstein and Dr. Christine Margaret Blasey Ford.
The FBI should follow all trails that connect Dr. Ford to Senator Feinstein, including the money trail, the email trail, the text messages, the phone call records, Dr. Ford's "GoFundMe" accounts, all of it.
I want to see the FBI develop a criminal organization chart that connects Democratic Senators, their staff, their attorneys, and the handlers and trainers who recruited and groomed Dr. Ford, and of course show us the links to left wing mega contributors, who finance the Democrats.
If thoroughly investigated, I believe the resulting Criminal Charges will likely include:
* Criminal Conspiracy
* Lying Under Oath
* Falsifying Evidence (Example: Creating a Fake Polygraph Record)
* Tampering with Evidence (Example: Changing the Psycho-Therapist's Patient Records)
* Money Laundering ("GoFundMe", etc.)
* Profiting from the Proceeds of Crime ("GoFundMe", any future Book Deals, etc., etc.)
I will be satisfied when Senator Feinstein, Dr. Ford, and her coaches, handlers, and attorneys, and all of the other left wing conspirators are in orange jumpsuits.
Just my opinion.
Respectfully submitted,
IronWorker
Welcome to the forum. Like Solar, I hope you have some good news sources. Look forward to more conversations with you.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kavanaughs-supporters-celebrate-supreme-court-confirmation-on-social-media-with-supernumberbeers4brett/ar-BBO2EvE?li=BBnb7Kz
QuoteConservatives and other supporters of new Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh posted on social media Saturday night with the hashtags #Beers4Brett and #BeersForBrett. Kavanaugh was confirmed earlier in the day with by a 50-48 vote in the Senate, and was sworn in shortly afterward.
The hashtag appeared to be a reference to Kavanaugh's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he said "I still like beer."
Kavanaugh's supporters posted pictures of beer or they posed with their beer. Even Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn got in on the action, posting a picture of champagne and writing "Not quite #Beers4Brett but #Bubbly4Brett instead."
The pictures and hashtag were seen as insensitive to many who noted that Kavanaugh had been accused of sexual assault. Kavanaugh denied the allegations.
#beers4brett
#bubbly4brett
#booze4brett
#bottle2buffoons
Quote from: origincountry11 on October 07, 2018, 08:13:12 AM
Senator Susan Collins will vote "Yes" on Saturday to confirm Judge Kavanaugh.. She delivered a great, enlightening speech. It was memorable. But it did not diminish the screaming chants of "shame, shame, shame" emanating from the mindless "collective" over-running the halls of the Capital Building, like mad, rabid rats...Nor did it change the minds of their Borg masters.. No need to name them as you know them well, but I will do so anyways so you can visit their Facebook pages. Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Richard Durbin, Sheldon Whitehouse, Mazie Hirono, et al.
Susan Collins is now getting death threats and Soros funded groups are busy planning a campaign of personal harassment to continue unabated until she is unseated before or at her next reelection date. Please visit her Facebook page and voice your support of her.
Welcome OC11.
I think the country is waking up to the scheme of how the left pays actors to act the fools at these so called protests.
These people have no moral compass, values, the could care less a the damage they do, all because some Dim waved a couple hundred bucks in their face if they'd protest.
I posted a video on it a few posts back about Fuglosi explaining how the left assassinates character via the leftist media.
Here's the video.
Quote from: Solar on October 06, 2018, 09:26:57 PM
Q sent me here. This is a must watch clip of Fuglosi admitting they smear as a tactic.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4674689/wrap-smear
Has Conservative outlets shown this clip?
It should be shown every hour, to show what Democrats are about and to show what she is about.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on October 07, 2018, 09:59:28 AM
Has Conservative outlets shown this clip?
It should be shown every hour, to show what Democrats are about and to show what she is about.
You're the first to even respond to it, I guess I'll have to make a separate post for it.
Quote from: Solar on October 07, 2018, 11:00:24 AM
You're the first to even respond to it, I guess I'll have to make a separate post for it.
Oh - I watched it. Just didn't feel the need to respond. I think it says it all. Probably others did the same. Trump should show this at the beginning of every meeting and rally he attends. Not only is Pelosi devious ... she's also stupid enough to reveal it.
More would watch the video if you would block out peolise's face. I watched it before breakfast, no damn warning or nuthin.
Hell of a way to start the day. :cursing: :cursing: :cursing:
Quote from: s3779m on October 07, 2018, 02:44:05 PM
More would watch the video if you would block out peolise's face. I watched it before breakfast, no damn warning or nuthin.
Hell of a way to start the day. :cursing: :cursing: :cursing:
Maybe Elizabeth Warren can put on one of these:
https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/petition-to-pull-yandys-sexy-native-american-halloween-costumes-gains-steam (https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/petition-to-pull-yandys-sexy-native-american-halloween-costumes-gains-steam)
You may not eat for days.
Another questionable fact about Dr. Ford... Although she completed her course work and was granted a Doctorate Degree in Psychology, she never did the required one year internship nor did she pass the rigorous examinations required by the State of California or any other state in order to be granted a Psychologist license to legally practice as a psychologist. The words "Research Psychologist " following her name were scrubbed from the Palo Alto University website. I do not expect she will be working there too much longer. We will soon see and hear her, (minus the "baby talk" ) doing the rounds on the MSM circuit, plugging her future book. But, she better tread carefully, less she be sued for Defamation of Character by Justice Kavanaugh. P.s. I am willing to guess that if someone were to investigate, they might find proof of instances where she practiced psychology without a license. If Republicans seeking to enter public service are now going to have to be squeaky clean way back to HS and even middle school, those making false accusations better likewise be clean. The pendulum swings both ways.
Like
Comment
Today is the first time I have posted. It will take me some time to learn the rope as I have never been on a forum before.
Who would have thought a rino would save the day and crush the leftists...
Quote from: origincountry11 on October 07, 2018, 05:23:08 PM
Today is the first time I have posted. It will take me some time to learn the rope as I have never been on a forum before.
Welcome. We were all new at one time. You are doing just fine.
I have been watching and listening to democrats since Justice Kavanaugh was confirmed. Their utterances border on the hilarious as they are absolutely unglued. I hope they keep it up as sane people will see right through them. The democrat party is split right now as many are concerned the lunatic left will continue to drive folks away - THEY ARE CORRECT!
Quote from: SueAnn on October 07, 2018, 09:13:24 PM
Welcome. We were all new at one time. You are doing just fine.
Yep, completely unhinged.
An what do you want to bet, this week, not a peep about him, they need a new victim to bleed out with false allegations, and they don't realize the people are watching and waiting to see who they'll attack next.
Whoever they go after will be a confirmation of their tactics of divide and conquer and we'll be Right there to highlight these tactics.
How Complex was the Judge Kavanaugh scam, conducted by Senator Feinstein, Dr. Ford, and their shadowy handlers?
Means, Motive, and Opportunity - - I believe there are two possible scenarios of how the scam evolved - -
#1 - - General Liberal Silliness - - In this scenario, Dr. Ford was already anti-Trump, and I'm sure that she realized the impact of the #MeToo movement, (..for which there is no defense..) and perhaps on her own, she simply performed a little "creative writing", and wrote a letter, which ended up in the hands of Feinstein. In this scenario, Dr. Ford probably did not realize how badly the Democrats would use her, and she probably did not realize that "normal people" would seek real verifiable evidence and corroboration from believable witnesses.
When the simplicity of Dr. Ford's initial letter suddenly became a complex circus, I suspect that Dr. Ford had a sure enough "Oh Shit" moment, and various Democrats, (including Feinstein's office) stepped in, and quickly provided two handlers, Michael Bromwich and Debra Katz. The handlers created every lie, including data from a non-existent polygraph test, and references to a psychotherapist, etc., etc., and the rest is history.
#2 - - A Deeper and Pervasive Conspiracy - - In my alternate scenario, a well-funded cabal of Democrat conspirators likely developed their "war plans" strategy beginning on 17-November-2017, when this list was released to the public by the White House - -
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-supreme-court-list/
Firstly, the Democrat conspirators likely had access to big money, they had clear objectives, and the possible methods were not too difficult. I would like to look real hard at the money trail from the usual suspects, including George Soros, and the Clinton Foundation. Their objectives were obvious: To resist any confirmation of a Trump nominee to SCOTUS. So far, in my "Option #2", it's all politics as usual. But what of their methods? This is actually easy to imagine, and it goes like this - -
(a.) The well-funded Democrat conspirators would have employed professional investigators, tasked with researching every possible nominee on the 17-November-2017 list. Using that background data, and using Kavanaugh as my example, the investigators would have tried to identify just about every person in Kavanaugh's life, who may have known him in any way, in school, college, and during his professional career. This stage of the scam involved gathering publicly available data, and was probably not illegal. The objective would be to recruit any friendly ally, who may have known Bret Kavanaugh in any capacity. Dr. Ford's name could have come up in this search, simply as someone who attended Georgetown Prep during some of the same years that Bret Kavanaugh attended.
(b.) Next, the researchers would have taken all of the names found above, and cross-referenced them with police records and medical records. This is where the data search became illegal. Using insiders in the FBI, or in state police agencies, the researchers would have looked for anything on the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database. Juicy prospects like Dr. Ford probably had nothing there, and neither did any of Judge Kavanaugh's actual friends, but that did not deter the conspirators. Next, in another equally illegal move, the conspirators would have cross-referenced medical records. According to this article - -
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/11/electronic-medical-records-government-medicine-101/
- - there are approximately 35 Federal Agencies that have access to your Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare patient records. ("Bingo").
(c.) In the illegal medical database search, Dr. Ford's name would have popped up as someone who received psychiatric care. With this information in hand, a Democrat "recruiter" would have been tasked with recruiting Dr. Ford, coaching her, training her, creating "evidence", and then finally writing the letter, and the rest is history. If this scenario is in any way true, then you can expect the Democrats to already have everything in place for future challenges to any proposed nominee who was on the 17-November-2017 list.
So, what is my objective in writing this excessively long screed on this forum? Here is what I propose - - If you believe that any of my suppositions could be true, then I encourage you to share your words and your ideas in a letter or email to your Congressman. Demand that Dr. Ford and Senator Feinstein be investigated.
Let me know if any Congressman actually does anything with this. I am of the opinion that President Trump definitely understands what's going on, based on his recent stump speeches, complete with "Lock Her Up" chants from his audience, anytime that he mentions the "Feinstein Hoax".
Now is the time to keep this issue red-hot. This attempted scam by Feinstein can serve to motivate our fellow citizens to register to vote, and hopefully vote a straight Republican ticket in the critical mid-term elections.
A picture is worth a 1,000 words - - This is a link to a "Criminal Association Chart" that I developed - -
https://www.docdroid.net/b8ZvnhS/criminal-organizational-chart-of-dr-ford.pdf
That PDF file shows everything that I'm thinking in this case.