In a way, it seems like a sound strategy to just let Obama take ownership of all of his bad policies, and sign off on them.
I agree with that, in this particular case, but he has a problem with creating a debate even when there isn't one already going on.He's also leading an effort by the RINOs to drive the Tea Party out of Congress. Like the Liberals, the RINOs believe the Tea Party candidates are the problem with the Republican Party.The guy is evil and needs to go, but WE are powerless to get him out. All we can do is give the more Constitutionalists candidates in office. WE failed to do that this time.
I disagree. I think being a good person is equal to being an honest person and that isn't monopolized by any party or label.
and he is saying he wants to tax the wealthy a bit more which doesn't hurt my feelings, he is also an advocate for equal rights,
and last, but not least, He's not a Mormon. :P Sorry, but anyone that believes they need to wear certain types of underwear as a pact to their god doesn't need their hands anywhere near nukes , just my opinion.
From everything I'm seeing and hearing, we're going to become a PART-TIME economy. People will be forced to depend on the government for healthcare. Larger companies will layoff employees to get below the minimum threshold where they're expected to provide healthcare or pay the fine. Larger employers will pay the fine and you'll still depend of government healthcare.They REALLY screwed this country up and now, because WE didn't fix it, it'll be set in stone.
Unfortunately the MSM made it the debate, not the Repub Party. I also underestimated their power over the masses. Idiots still listen to ABC, CBS, NBC, CNNNobody listens to MSLSD
I said you lied about my banning someone because of their political identity.Something I never do, I only ban if someone is disruptive to the forum.If I did, it not because of your political views, get that through your head.So now the truth comes out, it wasn't me, and I know for a fact that Taxed didn't ban you for your political views either.What part of Conservative Political Forum do you not get?You do not have the the First Amendment protections on this forum I afford Conservatives, and by insulting me or the forum/members, you get booted, it's that simple!Bull Shit, I afford everyone the ability to speak their piece, but when they get nasty or disrespectful they get a warning, ask Scififan, he's had several and he's still here and he's one of the biggest trolls on the forum.But his time is running short, he is disrupting the forum, we are a debate forum, not a pissing match forum.Can you understand that?
A debate forum that affords, and I am quoting you, "first amendment protections" only to Conservatives? That's not a debate forum. That's a kangaroo court.Now, I realize First Amendment protections do not apply to private entities. But when you stack the deck in favor of those who agree with you, you cease to be a debate forum.
Do you understand the First Amendment? As the FOUNDERS envisioned it?You were given the right to a difference of RELIGIOUS Opinion and POLITICAL Opinion.There were community standards that had nothing to do with the First Amendment.pornography would not have been granted 1st Amendment rights. Vulgarity would not be either. And neither would the "Shouting FIRE! in a crowded theater" The left seems to consistently violate all three.He told you to debate ISSUES and TOPICS. You have those rights.
The fact that you're still here speaks volumes to my leniency.If I played a heavy hand, you would have been gone for your insolence long ago.By the way, I'm still waiting for a response on that post you dodged twice yesterday.But everyone here knows you're not here for debate, rather just rude behavior, but atypical of a lib with a low intellect.You really do bore me you know.
So ignore me. Or boot me. It's your little pond, you know.
Why? You are a perfect example of liberalism failed.Now answer my questions on that other post, or is it you can't without looking like a fool?