The Supreme Court is allowing nationwide enforcement of a new Trump administration rule that prevents most Central American immigrants from seeking asylum in the United States.
The justices' order late Wednesday temporarily undoes a lower-court ruling that had blocked the new asylum policy in some states along the southern border. The policy is meant to deny asylum to anyone who passes through another country on the way to the U.S. without seeking protection there.
Most people crossing the southern border are Central Americans fleeing violence and poverty. They are largely ineligible under the new rule, as are asylum seekers from Africa, Asia and South America who arrive regularly at the southern border.
The shift reverses decades of U.S. policy. The administration has said that it wants to close the gap between an initial asylum screening that most people pass and a final decision on asylum that most people do not win.
"BIG United States Supreme Court WIN for the Border on Asylum!" Trump tweeted.
https://apnews.com/a817cf3affb04f3d8ad3c4940366a5fe
This is the way it should be. You leave your country, you seek asylum in the first border you cross. It sets a bad president to allow immigrants to just travel at their will, passing through plenty of willing and able countries to take them in, just so they can come here. Situate yourself first, and if you wanting to make an asylum claim to the US, go right ahead. But to believe that anyone who comes here will be admitted is foolish and ignorant on behalf of the dems and their disgusting open border policies.
It is temporary but it looks positive, since there were only 2 dissenters. Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Quote from: carolina73 on September 12, 2019, 08:51:01 AM
It is temporary but it looks positive, since there were only 2 dissenters. Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
it may be temporary, but with the new scotus even the liberals know their world is fixing to change. :thumbup:
Quote from: carolina73 on September 12, 2019, 08:51:01 AM
It is temporary but it looks positive, since there were only 2 dissenters. Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Is Ginsburg still alive? If they say she is then is there any verified proof?
Can we take a break from the winning? I need to rest for a sec...
Quote from: taxed on September 12, 2019, 03:38:48 PM
Can we take a break from the winning? I need to rest for a sec...
:biggrin:
Just think how the libs "Feel"..
Quote from: Solar on September 12, 2019, 03:50:26 PM
:biggrin:
Just think how the libs "Feel"..
I think they're like a prison inmate who's raped nightly, and they're into their 3rd year...
Quote from: taxed on September 12, 2019, 04:03:16 PM
I think they're like a prison inmate who's raped nightly, and they're into their 3rd year...
Makes ya wonder if they'll ever say. "I need to dump this loser of a Dim party?"
Perfect opportunity for one of our Memes... :biggrin:
(https://conservativehardliner.com/sites/default/files/styles/max_1300x1300/public/2019-07/you_gov_soap-min.png?itok=0_xWmJOw)
Quote from: Solar on September 12, 2019, 04:46:28 PM
Makes ya wonder if they'll ever say. "I need to dump this loser of a Dim party?"
Perfect opportunity for one of our Memes... :biggrin:
(https://conservativehardliner.com/sites/default/files/styles/max_1300x1300/public/2019-07/you_gov_soap-min.png?itok=0_xWmJOw)
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: