I have to admin, I've been asleep on this one...  It's not my fault, Hussein has too many scandals to keep track of, but this one sounds like it's gonna be big...


https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/dUVmRk82eXBzU1psWFB2aHAyNlZnUT09

QuoteABSOLUTELY HAPPENING!!!

QuoteA founding member of the Fugees is accused of conspiracy to funnel illegal campaign contributions to Barack Obama's 2012 presidential campaign and lying about it, in a spinoff of the 1MDB corruption scandal. The indictment against Prakazrel "Pras" Michel, 46, was unsealed on Friday, the government says he received over $21 million from Malaysian businessman Low Taek Jho (also known as "Jho Low") and funnelled it personally and through straw donors to President Obama's 2012 re-election campaign, then lied about it to the Federal Elections Commission in 2015.

Michel was charged with conspiracy to defraud US government, falsifying records, and making a false statement. He appeared before a federal judge in Washington, DC on Friday and pleaded not guilty."

Wooooooooooooooooooooow.

Link from that post:
https://www.rt.com/usa/459009-fugees-michel-obama-illegal-campaign/



https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/RlQ4cVRBWm8rQ01Ya2tIZ3RjK1FxZz09

QuoteI say in my book - and @AtlasHugged can testify to this - that I'm grateful that when it came to my Screenwriting career, I wasn't able to really break through despite some early critical successes, because I would have unwittingly signed away my IP to some really bad actors in the name of "getting my foot in the door."

I was reminded of that this morning, when I realized that this 1MDB thing is MUCH bigger than most people realize right now, and involves a number of Hollywood players well beyond just that Fugees guy, Pras.

One of those players, Riza Aziz, was looking at a script I wrote years ago when it went out to his production company, Red Granite. He's already been caught up in scandal with 1MDB and Jho Low, so I would not be surprised at all if his name turns up again in all this.

I mean, we're talking millions, if not billions here. What are the odds Jho Low used multiple celebs to funnel cash Obama's way?

Pretty good, I'd say.

https://gab.com/Shazlandia/posts/TTRwZDl5RVgrVVVJY0h4ZGdwMlNzUT09

QuoteAccording to the indictment, between June 2012 and November 2012, Low directed the transfer of approximately $21,600,000 from foreign entities and accounts to Michel for the purpose of funneling significant sums of money into the United States presidential election as purportedly legitimate contributions, all while concealing the true source of the money.  To facilitate the excessive contributions and conceal their true source, Michel paid approximately $865,000 of the money received from Low to about 20 straw donors, or conduits, so that the straw donors could make donations in their names to a presidential joint fundraising committee.  In addition, Michel personally directed more than $1 million of the money received from Low to an independent expenditure committee also involved in the presidential election in 2012.

The indictment also alleges that by funneling campaign contributions through straw donors, Michel caused a presidential joint fundraising committee to submit false reports to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), including a false amended report in June 2013.  The committee's reports were false because they identified the straw donors, rather than Low or Michel, as the true source of the contributions.  In addition, the indictment alleges that by contributing more than $1 million of the money he received from Low to an independent expenditure committee, Michel also caused that committee to submit false reports to the FEC, insofar as those reports identified Michel as the source of the contributions when, in fact, it was Low.  The indictment further alleges that in June 2015, Michel submitted a false declaration to the FEC in which he claimed that he had no reason to conceal the true source of his contributions to the independent expenditure committee in 2012, even though Michel knew that the true source of that money was Low and that Michel had funneled the foreign money into the election.       

Low was indicted previously, along with former banker Ng Chong Hwa, also known as "Roger Ng," in the Eastern District of New York for conspiring to launder billions of dollars and to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.  That case remains pending.

https://hotair.com/archives/2019/05/12/obama-fundraising-scheme-involves-unexpected-suspect/

QuoteBetter late than never, I suppose, when it comes to trying to clean up alleged fraudulent activity in a presidential campaign. In this case, it goes all the way back to the 2012 presidential election. The case involves a hip hop rapper and a fugitive Malaysian businessman. Hmmm. I wonder which candidate the story is about. Just kidding. The indictment was unsealed Friday and it doesn't specifically name Obama but the reference is clear, at least to the New York Times.

This story is like NXIVM, where the tentacles are going to be pretty mindblowing as it unravels.

http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/political-discussion-and-debate/another-major-scandal-heading-towards-hussein-1mdb/

RT?  You do know that is Russia media outlet.  It is hard for me to understand why baloney like this is so appealing?  It will come to nothing as all the investigations into the Clintons did.  What place in the mind does it comfort and why, are the hard questions?  America still has honest media sources and yet some gravitate to the absurd conspiracy and  biased nonsense.

As we enter another election season disinformation will cloud the mediasphere. One will read the [pick someone] are behind whatever item the 'dark money' and 501c3 entities deem divisive enough to promote as news or agitprop. The purpose of these funded sites will be to distract, distort, and confuse. And like advertising it will be tested and repeated ad infinitum. Below are examples of some of these sites and benefactors. Comments welcome from all.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-blaze/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drudge-report/

Dark money example:

"The Federalist Society is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. Top dollar funding mostly comes from right wing groups such as the Bradley Group and the Koch Foundation. In general, most donors come from the pro-business right."

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2019/04/09/daily-source-bias-check-federalist-society/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=extreme+right+sites

Source info:

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/SourceWatch
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=ALEC_Corporations


"Today we live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups... So I ask, in my writing, What is real? Because unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo-realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms. I do not distrust their motives; I distrust their power. They have a lot of it. And it is an astonishing power: that of creating whole universes, universes of the mind. I ought to know. I do the same thing."   Philip K. Dick

Sites to check if info is factual:

https://www.factcheck.org/
https://www.politifact.com/
https://www.opensecrets.org/
https://www.truthorfiction.com/
https://www.polygraph.info/
https://www.sunlightfoundation.com/
https://www.propublica.org/

Quote from: midcan5 on May 16, 2019, 04:59:50 AM
RT?  You do know that is Russia media outlet.  It is hard for me to understand why baloney like this is so appealing?  It will come to nothing as all the investigations into the Clintons did.  What place in the mind does it comfort and why, are the hard questions?  America still has honest media sources and yet some gravitate to the absurd conspiracy and  biased nonsense.

As we enter another election season disinformation will cloud the mediasphere. One will read the [pick someone] are behind whatever item the 'dark money' and 501c3 entities deem divisive enough to promote as news or agitprop. The purpose of these funded sites will be to distract, distort, and confuse. And like advertising it will be tested and repeated ad infinitum. Below are examples of some of these sites and benefactors. Comments welcome from all.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-blaze/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drudge-report/

Dark money example:

"The Federalist Society is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. Top dollar funding mostly comes from right wing groups such as the Bradley Group and the Koch Foundation. In general, most donors come from the pro-business right."

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2019/04/09/daily-source-bias-check-federalist-society/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=extreme+right+sites

Source info:

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/SourceWatch
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=ALEC_Corporations


"Today we live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups... So I ask, in my writing, What is real? Because unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo-realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms. I do not distrust their motives; I distrust their power. They have a lot of it. And it is an astonishing power: that of creating whole universes, universes of the mind. I ought to know. I do the same thing."   Philip K. Dick

Sites to check if info is factual:

https://www.factcheck.org/
https://www.politifact.com/
https://www.opensecrets.org/
https://www.truthorfiction.com/
https://www.polygraph.info/
https://www.sunlightfoundation.com/
https://www.propublica.org/

You spend a lot of time trying to diffuse this stuff. I'll admit, I don't know much about the post, however, I have learned one thing, when we post a credible story, you go to great lengths to diffuse the claim as radical.
Just wondering, do you still believe Obozo didn't spy on Trump's campaign, or that the crisis at the border isn't real, or Hillary wasn't hiding secret emails on her server?
You tried to spin all of those issues off as nothing, and yet, time proved you either a gullible fool, a leftist tool, or a paid dis-informant. I'm curious, which will you admit to? I'm guessing paid tool, because no one with a brain could be so gullible as to believe even half the shit you post without being paid to post.

Quote from: midcan5 on May 16, 2019, 04:59:50 AM
RT?  You do know that is Russia media outlet.  It is hard for me to understand why baloney like this is so appealing?  It will come to nothing as all the investigations into the Clintons did.  What place in the mind does it comfort and why, are the hard questions?  America still has honest media sources and yet some gravitate to the absurd conspiracy and  biased nonsense.

As we enter another election season disinformation will cloud the mediasphere. One will read the [pick someone] are behind whatever item the 'dark money' and 501c3 entities deem divisive enough to promote as news or agitprop. The purpose of these funded sites will be to distract, distort, and confuse. And like advertising it will be tested and repeated ad infinitum. Below are examples of some of these sites and benefactors. Comments welcome from all.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-blaze/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drudge-report/

Dark money example:

"The Federalist Society is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. Top dollar funding mostly comes from right wing groups such as the Bradley Group and the Koch Foundation. In general, most donors come from the pro-business right."

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2019/04/09/daily-source-bias-check-federalist-society/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=extreme+right+sites

Source info:

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/SourceWatch
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=ALEC_Corporations


"Today we live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups... So I ask, in my writing, What is real? Because unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo-realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms. I do not distrust their motives; I distrust their power. They have a lot of it. And it is an astonishing power: that of creating whole universes, universes of the mind. I ought to know. I do the same thing."   Philip K. Dick

Sites to check if info is factual:

https://www.factcheck.org/
https://www.politifact.com/
https://www.opensecrets.org/
https://www.truthorfiction.com/
https://www.polygraph.info/
https://www.sunlightfoundation.com/
https://www.propublica.org/

My apologies.  Is the indictment from the DoJ factual enough?
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1161696/download

Quote from: taxed on May 16, 2019, 04:42:46 PM
My apologies.  Is the indictment from the DoJ factual enough?
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1161696/download

But, but, but you didn't see his evidence. A shitload laundry list of Marxist sites...

What do you bet he didn't know all those sites were backed by communists?

https://www.factcheck.org/
https://www.politifact.com/
https://www.opensecrets.org/
https://www.truthorfiction.com/
https://www.polygraph.info/
https://www.sunlightfoundation.com/
https://www.propublica.org/

Quote from: Solar on May 16, 2019, 06:18:20 PM
But, but, but you didn't see his evidence. A shitload laundry list of Marxist sites...

What do you bet he didn't know all those sites were backed by communists?

https://www.factcheck.org/
https://www.politifact.com/
https://www.opensecrets.org/
https://www.truthorfiction.com/
https://www.polygraph.info/
https://www.sunlightfoundation.com/
https://www.propublica.org/

I picked one out of thin air for a random fact check....
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politifacts-pants-are-on-fire-on-coverage-of-obamacare-promises


Libs are so dumb...

Quote from: taxed on May 16, 2019, 06:40:50 PM


I picked on out of thin air for a random fact check....
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politifacts-pants-are-on-fire-on-coverage-of-obamacare-promises


Libs are so dumb...

The sad part is, he is clueless as to who the sites are.

Quote from: Solar on May 16, 2019, 07:14:19 PM
The sad part is, he is clueless as to who the sites are.

I would say he knows who the sites are.  He is just flinging poo just to see if anything will stick.   

Quote from: Solar on May 16, 2019, 07:14:19 PM
The sad part is, he is clueless as to who the sites are.

He doesn't hang around very long... I guess the internet is choppy in his country.

Barry gonna get fugee'd?

Finally the messiah might get exposed.

Quote from: taxed on May 12, 2019, 09:14:57 PM
I have to admin, I've been asleep on this one...  It's not my fault, Hussein has too many scandals to keep track of, but this one sounds like it's gonna be big...


https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/dUVmRk82eXBzU1psWFB2aHAyNlZnUT09

Wooooooooooooooooooooow.

Link from that post:
https://www.rt.com/usa/459009-fugees-michel-obama-illegal-campaign/



https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/RlQ4cVRBWm8rQ01Ya2tIZ3RjK1FxZz09

Barry is as guilty as sin - I have no doubt.

The only question - and it is a tough one - is how to handle it politically.

Blacks who are obviously violent criminals (Rodney King, OJ Simpson, Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown) are defended by the PC crowd using arson and riots.

Imprison Obama - YES. But be ready for the Riots. BE READY.