Quote from: Indy on July 14, 2012, 08:12:51 PM
]
"From a social standpoint, my support for Obama lies in his endorsement of gay marriage and the fact that he is not a religious nut."
That truly is sad. That's your logic for voting for him? So now he has this change of heart five months before the election, you want to keep this community organizer and committed Alinskyite in office. This man has done nothing but divided this country on every issue. That's what he's trained to do his entire adult life. He's a radical who abuses his power using his pen and executive order. You have no character.

It's very typical lib behavior to vote for someone because they have nice eyes, or they change with the polling attitude of the country like Clinton did by sticking his finger in the air to see what makes him most popular, screw doing what's right for the country.
Libs actually think this shows good character in a candidate, that they will do as the squeaky wheel demands.
Libs have no clue what it means to be a Republic, they only hear the word Democracy.

Quote from: Indy on July 14, 2012, 08:12:51 PM
]
"From a social standpoint, my support for Obama lies in his endorsement of gay marriage and the fact that he is not a religious nut."
That truly is sad. That's your logic for voting for him? So now he has this change of heart five months before the election, you want to keep this community organizer and committed Alinskyite in office. This man has done nothing but divided this country on every issue. That's what he's trained to do his entire adult life. He's a radical who abuses his power using his pen and executive order. You have no character.

Now, now. It wasn't a change of heart, exactly. Dear Leader's position "evolved," a word that intrinsically involves progress in a species. The media said so. It's pure coincidence that he just happened to "evolve" a few months before the election, and his "evolved" position, in the tradition of evolution in general, represents a better position than the one he had before -- which hasn't really been discussed much, and isn't really important anyway. The media said that too.

You're just not paying attention to what you're being told. /sarc

Quote from: Solar on July 14, 2012, 08:33:22 PM
It's very typical lib behavior to vote for someone because they have nice eyes

LOL, that's obviously not just a Lib thing.   







Question Solar, What good, IYO, will come from a Rom Presidency?

Quote from: hfishjr81 on July 14, 2012, 11:12:19 PM






LOL, that's obviously not just a Lib thing.   







Question Solar, What good, IYO, will come from a Rom Presidency?

Only time would tell but I think he would stop the class warfare nonsense, put an economic plan together that is coherent and take responsibity, which would be refreshing once again. 

Quote from: hfishjr81 on July 14, 2012, 11:12:19 PM



LOL, that's obviously not just a Lib thing.   

You really think that's why Conservatives back her?
No, her appearance is only a plus, in that libs hate the fact that most of their representatives are but ugly.

QuoteQuestion Solar, What good, IYO, will come from a Rom Presidency?

Are you seriously asking the obvious?
Mitten could be an complete incompetent, yet would still be better than a commie in the WH.

Why is it you have no problem with the Fabian socialist?
Now look up Fabian Socialist and get back to me.

Quote from: hfishjr81 on July 14, 2012, 11:12:19 PM






LOL, that's obviously not just a Lib thing.   







Question Solar, What good, IYO, will come from a Rom Presidency?

Yes she has nice eyes and the best thing she has a working brain.  It's what you libs are scared of the most.   A good looking woman with a brain. 

I wonder why so many of these Democrat women are so ugly?  Has a study ever been made as to why these women who are as ugly as five miles of bad road are Democrats?  Does it have something to do with revenge on their parents or the world or even God who made them ugly and stupid? Two of them come to mind:

Nancy Pelosi
Hillary Clinton

Nancy Pelosi: "First we have to vote for it to find out what's in it."
Hillary Clinton: (To an audience in a Muslim country) "The president respects Islam above all other religions"  Will she say anything to keep her job or is that religious philosophy acceptable to her?  Maybe she needs to read up a bit on female circumcision and then start spouting such offensive garbage.

And then there's Michelle Obama and her campaign to prevent obesity.  Has she ever even looked in a mirror at that enormous butt?  I know it's a little difficult, but if she stands  just right and the light is good, she could see that humongeous derrier.  It frightens me to say this under the circumstances, but the emperor has no clothes.  Oh, gag.

I think it's really sad that these people who call themselves "Gay," (Does that make the rest of us morose?) seem to believe that my every waking hour is devoted to contemplating what they do in bed or in public or wherever else they do it.  I have disappointing news for them.  I rarely think about them or what they do.  I don't care. Have at it. Just don't do it in the street and scare the horses.  Just leave me alone.

I have important things to think about.

Quote from: Charliemyboy on July 15, 2012, 09:05:53 AM
I think it's really sad that these people who call themselves "Gay," (Does that make the rest of us morose?) seem to believe that my every waking hour is devoted to contemplating what they do in bed or in public or wherever else they do it.  I have disappointing news for them.  I rarely think about them or what they do.  I don't care. Have at it. Just don't do it in the street and scare the horses.  Just leave me alone.

I have important things to think about.

News indeed! Like all lefties, gays think the entire world revolves (or should) around them and their views. To their minds, 2% of the population dictating behaviors and attitudes to the other 98% is okey-dokey.

Quote from: Solar on July 15, 2012, 06:46:40 AM
You really think that's why Conservatives back her?

I think that's why some did. LOL, It obviously wasn't her intellect. 

Quote from: Solar on July 15, 2012, 06:46:40 AM
Mitten could be an complete incompetent, yet would still be better than a commie in the WH.

Oh, Romney might be an idiot, but anythings better than Obama, in Your opinion. Got it.  Sounds worthy of a vote to me. 

Quote from: Solar on July 15, 2012, 06:46:40 AM
Why is it you have no problem with the Fabian socialist?
Now look up Fabian Socialist and get back to me.

I've explained My issue with both Rom and Obama, why is it You choose to look past this?  I don't like either of them.

Quote from: walkstall on July 15, 2012, 06:53:54 AM

Yes she has nice eyes and the best thing she has a working brain.

LOL!   "In  what respect, Charlie"?   


Sarah Mania! Sarah Palin's Greatest Hits

Quote from: hfishjr81 on July 15, 2012, 10:53:14 AM


LOL!   "In  what respect, Charlie"?   


Sarah Mania! Sarah Palin's Greatest Hits

She has accomplished more than Charlie Rose ever will.

Keep trying...

Quote from: taxed on July 15, 2012, 11:23:13 AM
She has accomplished more than Charlie Rose ever will.

Keep trying...

Ok. But so has Obama.  LOL, obviously an idiot can accomplish more than poor Charlie.


Keep trying...   

Quote from: hfishjr81 on July 15, 2012, 10:44:52 AM
I think that's why some did. LOL, It obviously wasn't her intellect. 

Right, and the media challenged her intellect, only to show just how ignorant the left really is.
Read and learn something.

QuotePalin prompted howls of partisan derision when she said on Boston's Freedom Trail that Revere "warned the British that they weren't going to be taking away our arms by ringing those bells and making sure as he's riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free."

Palin insisted yesterday on Fox News Sunday she was right: "Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there. That, hey, you're not going to succeed. You're not going to take American arms."

In fact, Revere's own account of the ride in a 1798 letter seems to back up Palin's claim. Revere describes how after his capture by British officers, he warned them "there would be five hundred Americans there in a short time for I had alarmed the Country all the way up."
http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view/2011_0606you_betcha_she_was_right_experts_back_palins_historical_account

QuoteOh, Romney might be an idiot, but anythings better than Obama, in Your opinion. Got it.  Sounds worthy of a vote to me. 

I've explained My issue with both Rom and Obama, why is it You choose to look past this?  I don't like either of them.

Romney is neither an idiot nor is he a Marxist, Hussein is not an idiot either, but he is anti American in that he disdains Capitalism.
So which would you rather have running the country?
Honest answer, if you're capable.

Quote from: hfishjr81 on July 15, 2012, 11:32:10 AM

Ok. But so has Obama.  LOL, obviously an idiot can accomplish more than poor Charlie.


Keep trying...

If Obama has accomplished so much, why isn't he running for reelection of the basis of those great accomplishments. He should hardly be mentioning Romney, simply floating ad after ad telling us what a great job he's done.