Donald J. Trump
‏
Verified account

@realDonaldTrump
1h1 hour ago
More
Mexico is paying (indirectly) for the Wall through the new USMCA, the replacement for NAFTA! Far more money coming to the U.S. Because of the tremendous dangers at the Border, including large scale criminal and drug inflow,

the United States Military will build the Wall!

A WTF Moment... Roberts is being a whiny brat.


The Supreme Court on Friday dealt a setback to President Donald Trump by refusing to allow his administration to implement new rules prohibiting asylum for people who cross the U.S. border illegally, a key component of his policies aimed making it harder for immigrants to enter and stay in the United States.

The justices on a 5-4 vote denied the administration's request to put on hold a California-based federal judge's order at least temporarily preventing it from carrying out the policy intended make anyone crossing the U.S.-Mexican border outside of an official port of entry ineligible for asylum.

Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, who last month rebuked Trump over his criticism of the judiciary, joined the court's four liberals in denying the administration's request. Trump's two Supreme Court appointees, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, joined the court's two other conservatives in dissent.

Trump had criticized San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar, who on Nov. 19 blocked the policy. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals then refused the administration's request to lift Tigar's order.

Trump's comments led to an extraordinary rebuke by Roberts, who defended the independence of the federal judiciary and wrote in a public response to Trump on Nov. 21, "We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said.

The asylum restrictions were made through a presidential proclamation Trump issued on Nov. 9 alongside a new administration rule. The administration has sought ways to block thousands of Central American men, women and children traveling in caravans to escape violence and poverty in their home countries from entering the United States, with Trump calling the people in the caravans a national security threat.

Trump's proclamation stated that mass migration on the border had precipitated a crisis and he was acting to protect the U.S. national interest. Trump's policy was crafted to alter American asylum laws that have given people fleeing persecution and violence in their homelands the ability to seek sanctuary in the United States.

Quote from: Solar on December 21, 2018, 12:20:19 PM
A WTF Moment... Roberts is being a whiny brat.


The Supreme Court on Friday dealt a setback to President Donald Trump by refusing to allow his administration to implement new rules prohibiting asylum for people who cross the U.S. border illegally, a key component of his policies aimed making it harder for immigrants to enter and stay in the United States.

The justices on a 5-4 vote denied the administration's request to put on hold a California-based federal judge's order at least temporarily preventing it from carrying out the policy intended make anyone crossing the U.S.-Mexican border outside of an official port of entry ineligible for asylum.

Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, who last month rebuked Trump over his criticism of the judiciary, joined the court's four liberals in denying the administration's request. Trump's two Supreme Court appointees, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, joined the court's two other conservatives in dissent.

Trump had criticized San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar, who on Nov. 19 blocked the policy. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals then refused the administration's request to lift Tigar's order.

Trump's comments led to an extraordinary rebuke by Roberts, who defended the independence of the federal judiciary and wrote in a public response to Trump on Nov. 21, "We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said.

The asylum restrictions were made through a presidential proclamation Trump issued on Nov. 9 alongside a new administration rule. The administration has sought ways to block thousands of Central American men, women and children traveling in caravans to escape violence and poverty in their home countries from entering the United States, with Trump calling the people in the caravans a national security threat.

Trump's proclamation stated that mass migration on the border had precipitated a crisis and he was acting to protect the U.S. national interest. Trump's policy was crafted to alter American asylum laws that have given people fleeing persecution and violence in their homelands the ability to seek sanctuary in the United States.

Is it appearing we have another Bush "David Soutar" appointee in Roberts? It is going to take another Trump appointee on the Court to make it truly conservative.

Quote from: supsalemgr on December 21, 2018, 12:28:24 PM
Is it appearing we have another Bush "David Soutar" appointee in Roberts? It is going to take another Trump appointee on the Court to make it truly conservative.

I think he's even worse.

Quote from: supsalemgr on December 21, 2018, 12:28:24 PM
Is it appearing we have another Bush "David Soutar" appointee in Roberts? It is going to take another Trump appointee on the Court to make it truly conservative.

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/12/21/breaking.-ruth-bader-ginsburg-undergoes-surgery-lung-cancer

I know its Christmas and all...........but we can hope cant we???

Un-fuckin real.  Roberts needs to go.

Quote from: taxed on December 21, 2018, 01:03:44 PM
Un-fuckin real.  Roberts needs to go.

Yep, he's not even trying to cover his Progressive side any longer.

"Process" key word, means they're trying to screw Trump and us.

Let's try and contain these posts to one thread instead of starting a new one every time the story changes.

I trust Corker as far as I could throw Michael Moore.

Quote from: The Boo Man... on December 21, 2018, 05:53:04 PM
I trust Corker as far as I could throw Michael Moore.

yep, he's the epitome RINO.

Quote from: Solar on December 21, 2018, 12:20:19 PM
A WTF Moment... Roberts is being a whiny brat.


The Supreme Court on Friday dealt a setback to President Donald Trump by refusing to allow his administration to implement new rules prohibiting asylum for people who cross the U.S. border illegally, a key component of his policies aimed making it harder for immigrants to enter and stay in the United States.

The justices on a 5-4 vote denied the administration's request to put on hold a California-based federal judge's order at least temporarily preventing it from carrying out the policy intended make anyone crossing the U.S.-Mexican border outside of an official port of entry ineligible for asylum.

Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, who last month rebuked Trump over his criticism of the judiciary, joined the court's four liberals in denying the administration's request. Trump's two Supreme Court appointees, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, joined the court's two other conservatives in dissent.

Trump had criticized San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar, who on Nov. 19 blocked the policy. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals then refused the administration's request to lift Tigar's order.

Trump's comments led to an extraordinary rebuke by Roberts, who defended the independence of the federal judiciary and wrote in a public response to Trump on Nov. 21, "We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said.

The asylum restrictions were made through a presidential proclamation Trump issued on Nov. 9 alongside a new administration rule. The administration has sought ways to block thousands of Central American men, women and children traveling in caravans to escape violence and poverty in their home countries from entering the United States, with Trump calling the people in the caravans a national security threat.

Trump's proclamation stated that mass migration on the border had precipitated a crisis and he was acting to protect the U.S. national interest. Trump's policy was crafted to alter American asylum laws that have given people fleeing persecution and violence in their homelands the ability to seek sanctuary in the United States.

Isn't that special we now have an "Orange Man Bad" as the Chief Justice of the SC? What a sad, sad state of affairs...

Quote from: Solar on December 21, 2018, 01:12:17 PM
Yep, he's not even trying to cover his Progressive side any longer.

He had to come out After Kavanaugh was confirmed. Up until then he could hide behind Kennedy.

Quote from: Solar on December 21, 2018, 05:55:15 PM
yep, he's the epitome RINO.

And GONE along with Flake in 2019.

Quote from: supsalemgr on December 22, 2018, 04:41:41 AM
And GONE along with Flake in 2019.

Yep, the RINO are scattering like cock roaches as we turn on all the lights in the House.

Eight Republicans in the House joined 177 Democrats in voting against President Donald Trump's border wall funding request.

Call this The List of Political Suicides. At least, it would be, save the fact that half are leaving office, anyway.

They are: Reps. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Carlos Curbelo, both from Florida; Justin Amash and Fred Upton, both from Michigan; Ken Buck from Colorado; Will Hurd from Texas; Erik Paulsen from Minnesota; and David Valadao from California.

Meanwhile, 11 other Republicans outright skipped the vote.

What were their reasons for bucking their party's tide — for turning aside their president's wishes — for bluntly telling the conservatives of America: Sorry, we're with Democrats on this one?

Waste.

Wasteful spending, as Amash put it in a tweet.

"This massive, wasteful spending bill — stuffed with unrelated items — passed 217-185," Amash wrote. "It's amazing how some wall funding causes my fellow Republicans to embrace big government."

That's one way to look at it.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/21/eight-republicans-who-bucked-border-funding/