This is what I believe and what I need to say and discuss to survive:
I think this article does need to be discussed. This article is retarded beyond belief and here's why.
1. Men, women and children need to live with love.
This love is an indispensable foundation of human society.
How is this so? Love is based in emotions of the heart which are fast and fleeting. We don't need to base the foundation or running of a society soley on emotions and love. Yes love should play a factor but so should reason and logic.
2. Three fundamental mothering capacities differentiate women from men:
A The ability to carry and nurture life in the womb.
B The capacity to give birth to that life.
C The ability to give the best possible nutrition to new human beings by breast feeding.
True
3 These three qualitative differences give mothers and potential mothers some different human rights and responsibilities to the rights and responsibilities of other people.
Specifically, what should those differing human rights be exactly and how and who enforces them?
4 The modern western demonisation of men and disempowerment of mothers are two sides of the same coin.
Let me ask you all this. Does an individual man get to define who he is as a man or does society define it for him? How can one be true to oneself if others define a role, one has no vote in the role and one is expected to play it absolutely with no questions asked?
5 The cradle of human culture is maternal love.
How is this so? Which human culture? We have 1000s of different cultures? How can can a culture be built solely on maternal love without logic and reason? Does not the heart have a person do stupid and foolish things? Shouldn't one's heart be tempered again with reason and logic. This is pure tripe and garbage.
6 True loving manliness empowers and protects mums.
And, why is this so? By whose standards? Society's? Natures? God's? Again, do I get to define for myself what is a man is or is it simply defined for me? What if this protector role is not a fundamental part of who I am? Then what? To me, a man or really a rational thinking person doesn't just accept something because society or a document says so? This person questions and he asks why? He seeks truth for it's own sake.
7 When family life ceases to be a nation’s foundation, the nation’s death is inevitable.
Why should family life be the nation's foundation instead of reason and logic. How do you figure the cessation of the family life as the nation's foundation is the cause of a nation's death? Even if this is a contributor why couldn't other factors exist as well?
