So they fired Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for rigging the Democratic primaries, and she instantly went to work for Hildabeast Clinton's dynamic band of oxygen-wasters. And then someone figured something was wrong with one of Debbie's tech people, and that led to an investigation...and now Debbie wants it stopped. Forthwith.
She's threatening the head of the Capitol Hill Police because he found an incriminating laptop and won't hand it over. Like the Demo-thug she is, Debbie says there will be consequences. Honest government? Not on her watch!
Story and brief video clip here....
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/24/wasserman-schultz-threatened-police-chief-for-gathering-evidence-on-her-it-staffers-alleged-crimes/
Quote from: quiller on May 25, 2017, 08:10:30 AM
So they fired Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for rigging the Democratic primaries, and she instantly went to work for Hildabeast Clinton's dynamic band of oxygen-wasters. And then someone figured something was wrong with one of Debbie's tech people, and that led to an investigation...and now Debbie wants it stopped. Forthwith.
She's threatening the head of the Capitol Hill Police because he found an incriminating laptop and won't hand it over. Like the Demo-thug she is, Debbie says there will be consequences. Honest government? Not on her watch!
Story and brief video clip here....
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/24/wasserman-schultz-threatened-police-chief-for-gathering-evidence-on-her-it-staffers-alleged-crimes/
Now this is an open, blatant attempt to obstruct law enforcement! Is the House ethics committee taking this up?
Quote from: redbeard on May 25, 2017, 02:59:24 PM
Now this is an open, blatant attempt to obstruct law enforcement! Is the House ethics committee taking this up?
Why would our GOP stalwarts want to embarrass someone from the other party, who
clearly has only America's best interests at heart, wanting that laptop back? National security! Classified information (that wasn't sent by mailing-list to all our pals)!
I don't believe she is in Congress anymore.
Talk about obstructing Justice. :popcorn:
Quote from: supsalemgr on May 26, 2017, 05:19:07 AM
I don't believe she is in Congress anymore.
Unfortunately she remains at the public trough.
https://www.google.com/#q=debbie+wasserman+schultz
Quote from: quiller on May 26, 2017, 11:25:34 AM
Unfortunately she remains at the public trough.
https://www.google.com/#q=debbie+wasserman+schultz
Thanks. For some reason I thought she resigned her seat to head the DNC.
Quote from: redbeard on May 25, 2017, 02:59:24 PM
Now this is an open, blatant attempt to obstruct law enforcement! Is the House ethics committee taking this up?
Naaaah! They're too busy chasing Trump shadows...
Quote from: supsalemgr on May 26, 2017, 11:41:37 AM
Thanks. For some reason I thought she resigned her seat to head the DNC.
Again, unfortunately no. She did head the DNC for a while. That's turning out to be more than just a good laugh if investigators can connect the dots on what is found on a laptop she's trying to recover.
Quote from: quiller on May 26, 2017, 05:19:28 PM
Again, unfortunately no. She did head the DNC for a while. That's turning out to be more than just a good laugh if investigators can connect the dots on what is found on a laptop she's trying to recover.
Why do I get this feeling, no matter how obvious the connection of dots will be - nothing would happen anyways...
UNLESS.... it comes down to preserving Hillary, needing a scapegoat... then the MSM would be calling for Debbie's head.
Quote from: Hoofer on May 28, 2017, 03:25:19 PM
Why do I get this feeling, no matter how obvious the connection of dots will be - nothing would happen anyways...
UNLESS.... it comes down to preserving Hillary, needing a scapegoat... then the MSM would be calling for Debbie's head.
Hillary has more to worry about from Anthony Weiner, whose impending divorce from Shrill's bunk muffin just MIGHT unearth a few of the most damaging emails, and tie the anchor to Clinton's ankles for that long vertical swim.
Jail ME? You're comin' with me!
Quote from: quiller on May 28, 2017, 05:53:13 PM
Hillary has more to worry about from Anthony Weiner, whose impending divorce from Shrill's bunk muffin just MIGHT unearth a few of the most damaging emails, and tie the anchor to Clinton's ankles for that long vertical swim.
Jail ME? You're comin' with me!
IF he lives that long.
Quote from: walkstall on May 28, 2017, 06:38:19 PM
IF he lives that long.
Everything about the Clintons has this greasy, immoral attitude. Arkansas hillbilly meets Chicago rat-bastard commie, and we're off to the races.
Wiener was and is a sideshow --- unless he
does hold incriminating evidence, and in that case bar the door and head for the bomb shelters. Shrill would nuke the planet before serving one day in the slammer.
Considering that the Dems have a higher number of seats to defend in 2020, I'm becoming more confident that the GOP will hold the fort through 2024. To me, that says we have all the time on Earth to pry out the truth about Hillary Clinton, and prevent her from ever holding office again.
Found at Publius Forum....
QuoteHours after he was sentenced, Huma reportedly said "enough", after the pounding (no pun intended) she received in the media from the scandal.
Political observers agreed with her move, noting that there's only so much one woman can swallow. (no pun intended)
Now, as a registered sex offender, and a registered Democrat, he's a shoe-in for the Democrat nomination.
http://www.publiusforum.com/category/publius-contributor/gary-krasner/
Quote from: quiller on May 29, 2017, 05:08:55 AM
Everything about the Clintons has this greasy, immoral attitude. Arkansas hillbilly meets Chicago rat-bastard commie, and we're off to the races.
Wiener was and is a sideshow --- unless he does hold incriminating evidence, and in that case bar the door and head for the bomb shelters. Shrill would nuke the planet before serving one day in the slammer.
Considering that the Dems have a higher number of seats to defend in 2020, I'm becoming more confident that the GOP will hold the fort through 2024. To me, that says we have all the time on Earth to pry out the truth about Hillary Clinton, and prevent her from ever holding office again.
I trust you are correct. I totally agree about holding the senate. However, the house is another matter with only an 18 vote majority. Ryan is perfectly capable of screwing up the house. The problem with losing the house is I believe there is a 100% chance Trump would be impeached. Being convicted is another whole matter, but the distraction would be very damaging to the country.
Quote from: supsalemgr on May 29, 2017, 06:39:39 AM
I trust you are correct. I totally agree about holding the senate. However, the house is another matter with only an 18 vote majority. Ryan is perfectly capable of screwing up the house. The problem with losing the house is I believe there is a 100% chance Trump would be impeached. Being convicted is another whole matter, but the distraction would be very damaging to the country.
If they impeach Trump they ain't gonna impeach him on what they have, CORRECTION....DON'T HAVE, so far. They will of course, back up and regroup and try another lie, which will likely fail as well.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on May 29, 2017, 06:37:32 PM
If they impeach Trump they ain't gonna impeach him on what they have, CORRECTION....DON'T HAVE, so far. They will of course, back up and regroup and try another lie, which will likely fail as well.
They won't stop trying, even with empty hands and a tsunami of public opinion against them. It's all they have in the liberal zoo, throwing crap at walls and screaming at the tops of their monkey voices.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on May 29, 2017, 06:37:32 PM
If they impeach Trump they ain't gonna impeach him on what they have, CORRECTION....DON'T HAVE, so far. They will of course, back up and regroup and try another lie, which will likely fail as well.
Impeachment by the house is a simple political process. Democrats are not concerned with the facts. Being convicted by 2/3 of the senate is a whole different matter.
Quote from: quiller on May 29, 2017, 11:49:27 PM
They won't stop trying, even with empty hands and a tsunami of public opinion against them. It's all they have in the liberal zoo, throwing crap at walls and screaming at the tops of their monkey voices.
Which is precisely why I think they will lose even more seats in 2018, people ( especially moderate Dems) are getting tired of the constant Anti Trump screech from the zoo with its daily accusations and calls for impeachment over two scoops of ice cream.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on May 30, 2017, 05:25:31 AM
Which is precisely why I think they will lose even more seats in 2018, people ( especially moderate Dems) are getting tired of the constant Anti Trump screech from the zoo with its daily accusations and calls for impeachment over two scoops of ice cream.
Outwardly, it's a party of utter failure, beginning with Obama's baldfaced lies that Obamacare would save money and allow people to keep their health plans. Democrats lied and people got smacked hard in their wallets.
Only morons don't learn from a con-job. Which explains that inwardly, Donks won't change, and they will continue bleating total nonsense which cost them so dearly in 2016.
Drive their moderates from their temple of hate. Expose their leaders for the insane, venal mob that it is. Trials are optional. Nooses are not.
http://dailysignal.com/2017/06/01/wasserman-schultz-admits-hill-it-security-violations-blames-house-administrators-for-not-stopping-her/
QuoteWasserman Schultz Admits Hill IT Security Violations, Blames House Administrators for Not Stopping Her
This thing has more twists and turns than her fake curls...
QuoteFlorida Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, whose office equipment U.S. Capitol Police seized in a criminal investigation into congressional network security violations, admitted she violated official information security policy and blamed the House's chief administrative officer for not stopping her.
In a May 17 appropriations hearing on Congress' administrative budget, Wasserman Shultz said she had violated the policies "for years and years and years." She also sought to find out how much House authorities might know about her internet usage, asking, "Are members monitored?"
When nothing else works, blame the cop for not stopping you...? Debbie and Hillary would make a nice pair- the operate pretty much the same. It's not Debbie's fault she bent the rules, it's not Hillary's fault she lost the election... there's plenty of BLAME to spread around, but it better not land on either of them!
This reminds me of an alcoholic, upon finding a bottle of hooch hidden away, keeps sneaking a drink until one day it's gone and he's discovered. How? "He man, that bottle of hooch you hid in the desk - you really ought to replace it... it's been empty for a couple of days... at least throw the bottle away, before someone discovers it and
thinks you're a drunk!"
Debbie and Hillary might make interesting & entertaining Cell mates. Just imagine the squabbles between them...
Quote from: Hoofer on June 01, 2017, 05:38:22 PM
http://dailysignal.com/2017/06/01/wasserman-schultz-admits-hill-it-security-violations-blames-house-administrators-for-not-stopping-her/
This thing has more twists and turns than her fake curls...
When nothing else works, blame the cop for not stopping you...? Debbie and Hillary would make a nice pair- the operate pretty much the same. It's not Debbie's fault she bent the rules, it's not Hillary's fault she lost the election... there's plenty of BLAME to spread around, but it better not land on either of them!
This reminds me of an alcoholic, upon finding a bottle of hooch hidden away, keeps sneaking a drink until one day it's gone and he's discovered. How? "He man, that bottle of hooch you hid in the desk - you really ought to replace it... it's been empty for a couple of days... at least throw the bottle away, before someone discovers it and thinks you're a drunk!"
Debbie and Hillary might make interesting & entertaining Cell mates. Just imagine the squabbles between them...
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcw.iabc.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F09%2Fblame-game.jpg&hash=748b8c62d2fa149f29011dd052ed522c69b5bb33)
The contents of that laptop must be stupendous just to get this bugeyed stooge to admit THIS much. I mean, this is two steps past flipping the rock over and watching them slither away. This move is, I'm one shake of my empty head away from lawyering up.