Washington Post: Warren "a pretentious, grandstanding phony"

Started by quiller, February 14, 2017, 05:21:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Billy's bayonet

The Peoples daily worker...I Mean WAPO put this up??????? What the hell is going on? Do they seriously want to run Hillary again in 2020?
Evil operates best when under a disguise

WHEN A CRIME GOES UNPUNISHED THE WORLD IS UNBALANCED

WHEN A WRONG IS UNAVENGED THE HEAVENS LOOK DOWN ON US IN SHAME

IMPEACH BIDEN

Solar

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Deserves repeating!

"Elizabeth Warren is a grandstanding phony"
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

quiller

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on February 14, 2017, 06:09:07 AM
The Peoples daily worker...I Mean WAPO put this up??????? What the hell is going on? Do they seriously want to run Hillary again in 2020?

Billy, I swear upon all that is holy, the Washington Compost actually did put this on-line. No fingers crossed, my hand to God and the polygraph people.

And no, I absolutely didn't believe a word of it, either, until I followed the link.  :biggrin:

As for Shrill having even an iota of a chance in 2020, first she has to have the physical stamina which she definitely lacked this last time. (Someone here mentioned the Donks creating a version of Lenin's corpse to truck around on the circuit. Are we ready for that much re-invigoration?)

Also: a number of her key people will be tied up in one court case or another and the money from foreign sources are doubtlessly flowing toward younger more viable candidates --- assuming Donks come up with any. Needle meet haystack.

je_freedom

Quote from: quiller on February 14, 2017, 06:27:05 AM
As for Shrill having even an iota of a chance in 2020, first she has to have the physical stamina which she definitely lacked this last time. (Someone here mentioned the Donks creating a version of Lenin's corpse to truck around on the circuit. Are we ready for that much re-invigoration?)

The Democrats have always relied heavily on dead voters,
so it was inevitable that they would eventually run a dead candidate.
Here are the 10 RINOs who voted to impeach Trump on Jan. 13, 2021 - NEVER forget!
WY  Liz Cheney      SC 7  Tom Rice             WA 4  Dan Newhouse    IL 16  Adam Kinzinger    OH 16  Anthony Gonzalez
MI 6  Fred Upton    WA 3  Jaime Herrera Beutler    MI 3  Peter Meijer       NY 24  John Katko       CA 21  David Valadao

zewazir

Quote from: quiller on February 14, 2017, 05:21:08 AM
They're catching wise! This is their HEADLINE!  :lol: :lol: :lol:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2017/02/10/elizabeth-warren-is-a-grandstanding-phony/?utm_term=.3c688adf2150
To be fair, the article is an opinion article written by Ed Rogers, whose contributions to the opinion page of the WAPO have always been critical of the dims. (WAPO's method of being "fair and balanced".) So, nope, WAPO isn't suddenly becoming an honest news outlet - not by a long shot.

About Ed Rogers:
QuoteEd Rogers is a contributor to the PostPartisan blog, a political consultant and a veteran of the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush White Houses and several national campaigns. He is the chairman of the lobbying and communications firm BGR Group, which he founded with former Mississippi governor Haley Barbour in 1991.

Bronx

Probably kissing up to Trump so they can get called on at the press briefings. There is always a method to their madness.
People sleep peacefully at night because there are a few tough men prepared to do violence on their behalf.

A foolish man complains about his torn pockets.

A wise man uses it to scratch his balls.

quiller

Quote from: Bronx on February 15, 2017, 03:48:24 AM
Probably kissing up to Trump so they can get called on at the press briefings. There is always a method to their madness.

You give way too much credence to a pack of jackals glued to Obama's leg, his entire eight years.


quiller

Quote from: zewazir on February 14, 2017, 08:32:51 AM
To be fair,

Pfui and hogwash. I have no intention whatsoever of being fair to a media as biased as they are. Change parties if you defend the Washington Pest, or the Carlos Slim-owned New York Times.

It appeared there, and was ample amusement when it did. Why? Who knows! Rogers isn't all that conservative, but of course neither are they.

Bronx

Quote from: quiller on February 15, 2017, 03:57:13 AM
You give way too much credence to a pack of jackals glued to Obama's leg, his entire eight years.



Yeah you're probably right. Lets see how long the Washington Post can hang onto Trump's leg before they lose grip.
People sleep peacefully at night because there are a few tough men prepared to do violence on their behalf.

A foolish man complains about his torn pockets.

A wise man uses it to scratch his balls.

je_freedom

Quote from: Solar on February 14, 2017, 06:12:31 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Deserves repeating!

"Elizabeth Warren is a grandstanding phony"

There was an episode of the TV show 30 Rock
where they made fun of grandstanding phonies
by having Queen Latifah portray a Congresswoman
standing up during a committee hearing and shouting,

"It makes no difference what I say!
But if I stand up and say it dramatically enough,
people will stand up and cheer for me
as if I had said something important!"

And of course, people stood up and cheered for her
as if she had said something important!
Here are the 10 RINOs who voted to impeach Trump on Jan. 13, 2021 - NEVER forget!
WY  Liz Cheney      SC 7  Tom Rice             WA 4  Dan Newhouse    IL 16  Adam Kinzinger    OH 16  Anthony Gonzalez
MI 6  Fred Upton    WA 3  Jaime Herrera Beutler    MI 3  Peter Meijer       NY 24  John Katko       CA 21  David Valadao

zewazir

Quote from: quiller on February 15, 2017, 04:02:26 AM
Pfui and hogwash. I have no intention whatsoever of being fair to a media as biased as they are. Change parties if you defend the Washington Pest, or the Carlos Slim-owned New York Times.

It appeared there, and was ample amusement when it did. Why? Who knows! Rogers isn't all that conservative, but of course neither are they.
I meant being fair to our readers by providing complete information - and nowhere did I call Rogers "conservative". The referenced article is an OP written by their token contributing writer they keep around to show how "balanced" they are. He uses deliberately inflammatory phraseology, IMO, to ridicule real conservative writers.  My point is the article in no way indicates a change in attitude on the part of WaPo regardless of how Rogers headlines his "criticisms". They are and always will be PRAVDA wannabes for the dim party.