After you watch this....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0JL9JfjFs8
...ask yourself how the Muslim loudmouth Keith Ellison will do running their sorry party.
Quote from: quiller on February 23, 2017, 02:20:55 AM
After you watch this....
...ask yourself how the Muslim loudmouth Keith Ellison will do running their sorry party.
The hard left thought they had things wrapped up. 8 years of the Muslim Fuhrer, followed by 8 years of Klinton, and they'd have the U.S. wrapped up and bow tied in full-on Marxism. J.Q. Public tossed them a curve and they don't know how to handle it. The leadership is unwilling to let go of their agenda and keep their heading of hard left, "Damn the icebergs, we have a schedule to keep!" And those who have benefitted the most from their divide-and-conquer methods fear for the future of their derived power, so they, too turn even harder left in desperation.
The question is, how many of their supporters will follow an even harder left turn? The race card is getting worn and tattered, the gender card never did play all that well, and their illegal votership are not going to have much left in the power circles covering their butts. Meanwhile a goodly portion of the main stream base is tired of getting caught in the ant--white, anti-working class, anti-business rhetoric.
I hope they keep up with their antics. By the time they get over their tantrums, they'll be looking at decades of rebuilding a new powerbase with any real influence.
Quote from: zewazir on February 23, 2017, 06:10:15 AM
The hard left thought they had things wrapped up. 8 years of the Muslim Fuhrer, followed by 8 years of Klinton, and they'd have the U.S. wrapped up and bow tied in full-on Marxism. J.Q. Public tossed them a curve and they don't know how to handle it. The leadership is unwilling to let go of their agenda and keep their heading of hard left, "Damn the icebergs, we have a schedule to keep!" And those who have benefitted the most from their divide-and-conquer methods fear for the future of their derived power, so they, too turn even harder left in desperation.
The question is, how many of their supporters will follow an even harder left turn? The race card is getting worn and tattered, the gender card never did play all that well, and their illegal votership are not going to have much left in the power circles covering their butts. Meanwhile a goodly portion of the main stream base is tired of getting caught in the ant--white, anti-working class, anti-business rhetoric.
I hope they keep up with their antics. By the time they get over their tantrums, they'll be looking at decades of rebuilding a new powerbase with any real influence.
Really makes me wonder, does the dim. party control the lsm, or does the lsm control the dims? I see the dims starting the blame game but not the lsm................yet. One item I do not expect to see is either of them turning on obama.
Quote from: s3779m on February 23, 2017, 04:00:41 PM
Really makes me wonder, does the dim. party control the lsm, or does the lsm control the dims? I see the dims starting the blame game but not the lsm................yet. One item I do not expect to see is either of them turning on obama.
Neither, they're inseparable, linked at the ass and face, Siamese twins, Marxists sharing one goal of taking over America.
Quote from: Solar on February 23, 2017, 04:05:38 PM
Neither, they're inseparable, linked at the ass and face, Siamese twins, Marxists sharing one goal of taking over America.
Explains why they are so proud of each other.
Quote from: s3779m on February 23, 2017, 04:00:41 PM
Really makes me wonder, does the dim. party control the lsm, or does the lsm control the dims? I see the dims starting the blame game but not the lsm................yet. One item I do not expect to see is either of them turning on obama.
They are both controlled by the same "men behind the curtain." People like Soros, to drop one name of many.
I searched the term percentage of democrats in media and found this long piece to be of interest. Back in 1964, only six percent --- SIX --- were not voting Democrat. It hasn't gotten any better since then, hovering around that same level.
Much, much more here....
http://archive.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics3.asp
Quote from: quiller on February 23, 2017, 11:37:57 PM
I searched the term percentage of democrats in media and found this long piece to be of interest. Back in 1964, only six percent --- SIX --- were not voting Democrat. It hasn't gotten any better since then, hovering around that same level.
Much, much more here....
http://archive.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics3.asp
To be fair, Democrats were an entirely different species in 1964, My Parents were Staunch Democrats, just like about everybody else in our little Pa Steel town. They were MORE CONSERVATIVE than any Republican out there too.But the MSM has always been a bunch of Liberal pukes. The yard stick has always been and will always be the New York Slimes.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on February 24, 2017, 05:01:50 AM
To be fair, Democrats were an entirely different species in 1964, My Parents were Staunch Democrats, just like about everybody else in our little Pa Steel town. They were MORE CONSERVATIVE than any Republican out there too.But the MSM has always been a bunch of Liberal pukes. The yard stick has always been and will always be the New York Slimes.
To be fair, in 1964 a black, openly radical muslim would never have gotten elected, much less considered fit to lead a political party. That's not the only decline for a party of specioal interest factions always at war with each other and themselves.
In 1964, it was still very possible to find widespread support for patriotism within the black community. If we are to believe the lamestream media these same "victims of white privilege" are hanged every day, or similar atrocities committed by racist whites.
Why can't the FBI stats back up these bullshit claims? Must libs lie about EVERYTHING?
Quote from: quiller on February 25, 2017, 04:59:04 AM
Must libs lie about EVERYTHING?
Their entire philosophy is a lie. I cannot imagine any way of supporting a lie with actual truth.
Quote from: quiller on February 23, 2017, 02:20:55 AM
After you watch this....
...ask yourself how the Muslim loudmouth Keith Ellison will do running their sorry party.
Mea dope-ah.....
Donks chose Tom Perez as next chairman of the DNC. I had guessed wrongly and had predicted Imam Ellison.
Quote from: quiller on February 25, 2017, 06:02:39 PM
Mea dope-ah.....
Donks chose Tom Perez as next chairman of the DNC. I had guessed wrongly and had predicted Imam Ellison.
Based on what I have read and heard he was the pick of the "establishment". He is a pure leftist, but without the baggage of Ellison. So he turns around and ask to have Ellison as his deputy. The democrat party is still full speed to the left.