Conservative Political Forum

General Category => All Headlines => Political Discussion and Debate => MSM Distraction News => Topic started by: T Hunt on July 13, 2018, 09:23:43 AM

Title: Rod Rosenstien provides cover for the left
Post by: T Hunt on July 13, 2018, 09:23:43 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/13/rosenstein-says-12-russian-intel-officers-indicted-in-special-counsels-probe.html

QuoteDeputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announces 12 Russian intelligence officers have been indicted for hacking the Democratic National Committee during the 2016 election.

All 12 are members of GRU, a Russian Federation intelligence agency.

He is trying to offset the struck/stroke thing. In his comments he even snaps at the media and provides more cover for struck/stroke. He is totally showing his swamp credentials. This is really disgusting.  :cursing:

Here is the live video of his announcement.
https://youtu.be/UXePg606bEs

Title: Re: Rod Rosenstien provides cover for the left
Post by: Solar on July 13, 2018, 09:51:40 AM
I saw this live and came to the same conclusion as you did. The Dims know they're in trouble after Strozk exposed himself for the liar and scum he is.
They need all the distractions they can create.
Title: Re: Rod Rosenstien provides cover for the left
Post by: T Hunt on July 13, 2018, 10:14:30 AM
Quote from: Solar on July 13, 2018, 09:51:40 AM
I saw this live and came to the same conclusion as you did. The Dims know they're in trouble after Strozk exposed himself for the liar and scum he is.
They need all the distractions they can create.

Maybe we will get lucky and one of the russians will come forth and demand discovery, like one of the 13 russian troll farms did when mueller indicted them. Because while im sure the russians did whatever low level meddling they always do, i dont think it was the russians who hacked the dnc.

Rosenstien just said guccifer 2.0 was fake and made up cover for the russians. Now i cld be wrong here but i believe wikileaks was emphatic that it was not the russians but someone inside the dnc who leaked...


Also, when the dems lose the midterms be ready for russian collusion delusion 2.0
Title: Re: Rod Rosenstien provides cover for the left
Post by: Solar on July 13, 2018, 10:27:08 AM
Quote from: T Hunt on July 13, 2018, 10:14:30 AM
Maybe we will get lucky and one of the russians will come forth and demand discovery, like one of the 13 russian troll farms did when mueller indicted them. Because while im sure the russians did whatever low level meddling they always do, i dont think it was the russians who hacked the dnc.

Rosenstien just said guccifer 2.0 was fake and made up cover for the russians. Now i cld be wrong here but i believe wikileaks was emphatic that it was not the russians but someone inside the dnc who leaked...


Also, when the dems lose the midterms be ready for russian collusion delusion 2.0
Yep, Hillary made her server accessible to everyone by its very nature being unprotected. But then there's the Awan connection to the Iranians that no one has even touched on yet. :biggrin:
Title: Re: Rod Rosenstien provides cover for the left
Post by: walkstall on July 13, 2018, 10:46:52 AM
Quote from: T Hunt on July 13, 2018, 09:23:43 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/13/rosenstein-says-12-russian-intel-officers-indicted-in-special-counsels-probe.html

He is trying to offset the struck/stroke thing. In his comments he even snaps at the media and provides more cover for struck/stroke. He is totally showing his swamp credentials. This is really disgusting.  :cursing:

Here is the live video of his announcement.
https://youtu.be/UXePg606bEs


Does Rosenstein think the 12 Russian will come to the U.S. just for him.    On advice from our counsels shove it Rosenstein.    :lol:
Title: Re: Rod Rosenstien provides cover for the left
Post by: T Hunt on July 13, 2018, 11:20:47 AM
Quote from: Solar on July 13, 2018, 10:27:08 AM
Yep, Hillary made her server accessible to everyone by its very nature being unprotected. But then there's the Awan connection to the Iranians that no one has even touched on yet. :biggrin:

Another point is that russian fingerprints can be used to make it seem like it was russians when it was actually someone else. So i still dont buy that it was the russians who hack hildog and released info to hurt her. I mean they must have known she would work with them and make america weaker, so i wld think russia wld actually want the hildebeast and not trump.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-07/wikileaks-exposes-cia-exploit-capable-cyber-false-flag-attack-blame-russia

Quotethe UMBRAGE group and its related projects allow the CIA to misdirect the attribution of cyber attacks by "leaving behind the 'fingerprints' of the very groups that the attack techniques were stolen from."

In other words, the CIA's sophisticated hacking tools all have a "signature" marking them as originating from the agency. In order to avoid arousing suspicion as to the true extent of its covert cyber operations, the CIA has employed UMBRAGE's techniques in order to create signatures that allow multiple attacks to be attributed to various entities – instead of the real point of origin at the CIA – while also increasing its total number of attack types.
...
While a major motivating factor in the CIA's use of UMBRAGE is to cover it tracks, events over the past few months suggest that UMBRAGE may have been used for other, more nefarious purposes. After the outcome of the 2016 U.S. presidential election shocked many within the U.S. political establishment and corporate-owned media, the CIA emerged claiming that Russia mounted a "covert intelligence operation" to help Donald Trump edge out his rival Hillary Clinton.

Prior to the election, Clinton's campaign had also accused Russia of being behind the leak of John Podesta's emails, as well as the emails of employees of the Democratic National Committee (DNC).
...
Now that the CIA has been shown to not only have the capability but also the express intention of replacing the "fingerprint" of cyber-attacks it conducts with those of another state actor, the CIA's alleged evidence that Russia hacked the U.S. election – or anything else for that matter – is immediately suspect. There is no longer any way to determine if the CIA's proof of Russian hacks on U.S. infrastructure is legitimate, as it could very well be a "false flag" attack.

Given that accusations of Russian government cyber-attacks also coincide with a historic low in diplomatic relations between Russia and the U.S., the CIA's long history of using covert means to justify hostile actions against foreign powers – typically in the name of national security – once again seems to be in play.

Title: Re: Rod Rosenstien provides cover for the left
Post by: Solar on July 13, 2018, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: T Hunt on July 13, 2018, 11:20:47 AM
Another point is that russian fingerprints can be used to make it seem like it was russians when it was actually someone else. So i still dont buy that it was the russians who hack hildog and released info to hurt her. I mean they must have known she would work with them and make america weaker, so i wld think russia wld actually want the hildebeast and not trump.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-07/wikileaks-exposes-cia-exploit-capable-cyber-false-flag-attack-blame-russia
Which raises the question, what was the blackmail demands placed on her by the Iranians? They obviously leveraged Obozo into giving them 'Half Billion' in cash, for what, what did we get out of this, or what did their party get out of this?
Title: Re: Rod Rosenstien provides cover for the left
Post by: Cryptic Bert on July 13, 2018, 06:20:55 PM
So the only person not caught up in the Trump/Russia investigation is Trump.
Title: Re: Rod Rosenstien provides cover for the left
Post by: Billy's bayonet on July 13, 2018, 07:25:33 PM
Quote from: T Hunt on July 13, 2018, 10:14:30 AM
Maybe we will get lucky and one of the russians will come forth and demand discovery, like one of the 13 russian troll farms did when mueller indicted them. Because while im sure the russians did whatever low level meddling they always do, i dont think it was the russians who hacked the dnc.

Rosenstien just said guccifer 2.0 was fake and made up cover for the russians. Now i cld be wrong here but i believe wikileaks was emphatic that it was not the russians but someone inside the dnc who leaked...


Also, when the dems lose the midterms be ready for russian collusion delusion 2.0


I was about to say something on the same lines, Maybe this time RR and Mule Face will have their act together when the Russian Lawyers demand discovery and actually have to produce documents and sworn affidavits that Out line PROBABLE CAUSE rather than have their pants taken down AGAIN by the presiding Judge over their inept bumbling

I also think this pencil necked Geek is trying to Fk with Trump and timing this to somehow interfere with Trumps meeting with Putin coming up soon.

If so then he is beyond dispicable,
Title: Re: Rod Rosenstien provides cover for the left
Post by: Bronx on July 20, 2018, 11:30:15 AM
The cat is out of the bag. The democrats are psychologically disturbed over Trump being President. I say get them a little more disturbed....Fired this SOB..... :thumbsup: