I must admit I am amused at the left's outrage over the alleged hacking by Russia in an attempt to affect our election. Is anyone really surprised Putin would be up to this kind of mischief? The left, including McCain and Lindsay Graham, are besides themselves. Actually the democrats are just trying to distract from Hillary being a terrible candidate. Rush's theorem that democrats are fun when they are out of power is being proven correct again.
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 12, 2016, 04:03:23 AM
I must admit I am amused at the left's outrage over the alleged hacking by Russia in an attempt to affect our election. Is anyone really surprised Putin would be up to this kind of mischief? The left, including McCain and Lindsay Graham, are besides themselves. Actually the democrats are just trying to distract from Hillary being a terrible candidate. Rush's theorem that democrats are fun when they are out of power is being proven correct again.
So Hillary getting foreign money was not an attempt to affect our election. The thing the MSM will do to make news.
Russia wants their oil-profits to stay low, eh?
And they want their population to continue being fascinated by the wide array of candidates in American Presidential-elections.
Who'd have believed it.
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 12, 2016, 04:03:23 AM
I must admit I am amused at the left's outrage over the alleged hacking by Russia in an attempt to affect our election. Is anyone really surprised Putin would be up to this kind of mischief? The left, including McCain and Lindsay Graham, are besides themselves. Actually the democrats are just trying to distract from Hillary being a terrible candidate. Rush's theorem that democrats are fun when they are out of power is being proven correct again.
I believe you can throw in that the left is trying to make it seem as if trump got the win thru illegal means and is therefor not the real or the people's president.
Prior to Nov. 8: assumption Clinton is going to win.
Trump: "It's rigged."
Progs: "Silly Cons, can't admit they are losers.
After Nov. 8: Trump won.
Trump: "I won!"
Progs: "It was rigged!"
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 12, 2016, 04:03:23 AM
I must admit I am amused at the left's outrage over the alleged hacking by Russia in an attempt to affect our election. Is anyone really surprised Putin would be up to this kind of mischief? The left, including McCain and Lindsay Graham, are besides themselves. Actually the democrats are just trying to distract from Hillary being a terrible candidate. Rush's theorem that democrats are fun when they are out of power is being proven correct again.
Link?
I don't watch TV and I turned Rush off long ago, so is there some article out there or is this just BS FOX is spewing to get viewers?
Quote from: Solar on December 12, 2016, 06:39:39 AM
Link?
I don't watch TV and I turned Rush off long ago, so is there some article out there or is this just BS FOX is spewing to get viewers?
My post was based on a compilation of comments I heard yesterday. However, here is a link of John Bolton commenting on these allegations on FNC.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5244449986001/?#sp=show-clips
Quote
President-elect Donald Trump on Monday cast doubt on the secret CIA assessment that concluded Russia intervened in the U.S. presidential election to help him win the White House.
"Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card," Trump tweeted Monday.
"It would be called conspiracy theory!"
Read more at http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/309914-trump-it-would-be-called-conspiracy-theory-if-we-tried-to-play-the-russia
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 12, 2016, 07:21:18 AM
My post was based on a compilation of comments I heard yesterday. However, here is a link of John Bolton commenting on these allegations on FNC.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5244449986001/?#sp=show-clips
In other words, no one really knows, which was point of contention over the headline which leads to conclusion.
I don't know, I guess this falls more under MSM Distraction than anything.
Edit: DOH, it is in MSM Distraction. :lol:
Just stumbled across this, and the first thing that came to mind was the childish Oboz admin. :biggrin:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czcfr49XcAAxC49.jpg:large)
Adjusted jpg size.
walks
Quote from: Solar on December 12, 2016, 09:08:58 AM
In other words, no one really knows, which was point of contention over the headline which leads to conclusion.
I don't know, I guess this falls more under MSM Distraction than anything.
Edit: DOH, it is in MSM Distraction. :lol:
Exactly why I posted it here. The democrats are still looking for an excuse for nominating Hillary.
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 12, 2016, 10:54:33 AM
Exactly why I posted it here. The democrats are still looking for an excuse for nominating Hillary.
My bad, I misunderstood this entire thread. I'm fighting a bug at the moment, so now I'm going to bed till my brain can think straight again. :blink:
Quote from: Solar on December 12, 2016, 11:22:50 AM
My bad, I misunderstood this entire thread. I'm fighting a bug at the moment, so now I'm going to bed till my brain can think straight again. :blink:
Take care. Mrs. Sup is fighting a tough cold also.
The party that cares nothing about cybersecurity are now caring about cybersecurity?
Quote from: taxed on December 12, 2016, 12:04:05 PM
The party that cares nothing about cybersecurity are now caring about cybersecurity?
Isn't it amazing how democrats keep embarrassing themselves with their hypocrisy?
I got to ask...who didnt know russia and all other big gov. around the world interfered in other election????
we sure the hell do it to them...
and in this new tech age the best tool is a computer so we are just seeing how it looks in the first of many elections
so the real question is ...who were they in favor of???
well it sure wasn't hilary.
Quote from: taxed on December 12, 2016, 12:04:05 PM
The party that cares nothing about cybersecurity are now caring about cybersecurity?
In the Dims defense, it's not as if they knew, considering Obozo generally skipped his morning briefings, its easy to understand their claim of ignorance. :biggrin:
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 12, 2016, 11:39:11 AM
Take care. Mrs. Sup is fighting a tough cold also.
This thing sucks, I don't really mind the sneezing and coughing,. but it's how it effected my ability to think clearly.
I never even saw the word "alleged" in the title till two hours later, then read it as if it were a new thread and saw that I had posted. :huh:
Quote from: Solar on December 12, 2016, 01:05:55 PM
In the Dims defense, it's not as if they knew, considering Obozo generally skipped his morning briefings, its easy to understand their claim of ignorance. :biggrin:
He was so surprised about the rise of ISIS. Who saw that coming, aside from everyone?
Quote from: taxed on December 12, 2016, 01:10:41 PM
He was so surprised about the rise of ISIS. Who saw that coming, aside from everyone?
What, the JV team?
I know this is OT, but Iraq was under control, they were adapting to a new form of govt, and all Obozo had to do was keep the status quo.
Hmmm, maybe the Russians were tired of Dims fucking up the M/E and did help Trump? :laugh:
Quote from: Solar on December 12, 2016, 01:18:49 PM
What, the JV team?
I know this is OT, but Iraq was under control, they were adapting to a new form of govt, and all Obozo had to do was keep the status quo.
Hmmm, maybe the Russians were tired of Dims fucking up the M/E and did help Trump? :laugh:
I personally think Hussein allowed China to hack us and reap a whole bunch of intel from us. This cyber warfare is a real issue nowadays, and Hussein did stuff like allow Hillary use a private email server. I really do believe Hussein's job was to leave the door unlocked so the bad guys could come in during the middle of the night.
Quote from: taxed on December 12, 2016, 01:23:10 PM
I personally think Hussein allowed China to hack us and reap a whole bunch of intel from us. This cyber warfare is a real issue nowadays, and Hussein did stuff like allow Hillary use a private email server. I really do believe Hussein's job was to leave the door unlocked so the bad guys could come in during the middle of the night.
No doubt about it!
Even the libs are starting to figure that out, one of the reasons Trump got so many lib votes.
Lib Millennial may be stupid, but thet don't hate the US as much as the dim party thought they did.
Remember Mexico through their embassy was systematically pushing a Mexican voter registration drive? wasn't this medaling in a bigger more direct scale?
Quote from: Solar on December 12, 2016, 01:46:40 PM
No doubt about it!
Even the libs are starting to figure that out, one of the reasons Trump got so many lib votes.
Lib Millennial may be stupid, but thet don't hate the US as much as the dim party thought they did.
I also don't understand why Russia would try to hack us when Hussein was so flexible:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE
Quote from: Solar on December 12, 2016, 01:05:55 PM
In the Dims defense, it's not as if they knew, considering Obozo generally skipped his morning briefings, its easy to understand their claim of ignorance. :biggrin:
The Dem's have the CIA in it now, just like they did the DOJ and the FBI. Is there anything they don't control to get things their way?
Russian tried to influence US election in Favor of trump..... :popcorn:
Not a word about all the Money Hillary collected from various Middle east Demons from Saudi Arabia and possible a flat out enemy country like Iran. But naaaahhhhhh that wouldn;t be influencing an election, now would it?
Timeline:
Nov. 17th: James Clapper/ODNI tells Congress "no evidence of Russian hacking".
Dec. 11th: James Clapper/ODNI agrees with MSM "probable evidence of Russian hacking".
Dec. 12th: Congress recalls Clapper/ODNI to testify why he swore there was no evidence of Russian hacking.
Dec. 12th: James Clapper/ODNI tells media " no evidence of Russian hacking".
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-intelligence-idUSKBN14204E?il=0
conclusion, as viewed from Mars: Trump and Priebus would dominate Sunday news-cycle by profoundly debunking the allegations, so the MSM 'hired' Clapper to add credence to the allegations, thereby continuing to drive the news-cycle. They didn't calculate that he might be brought back to the Hill and put back Under Oath.
Quote from: kit saginaw on December 12, 2016, 10:01:30 PM
Timeline:
Nov. 17th: James Clapper/ODNI tells Congress "no evidence of Russian hacking".
Dec. 11th: James Clapper/ODNI agrees with MSM "probable evidence of Russian hacking".
Dec. 12th: Congress recalls Clapper/ODNI to testify why he swore there was no evidence of Russian hacking.
Dec. 12th: James Clapper/ODNI tells media " no evidence of Russian hacking".
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-intelligence-idUSKBN14204E?il=0
conclusion, as viewed from Mars: Trump and Priebus would dominate Sunday news-cycle by profoundly debunking the allegations, so the MSM 'hired' Clapper to add credence to the allegations, thereby continuing to drive the news-cycle. They didn't calculate that he might be brought back to the Hill and put back Under Oath.
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia-cache-ec0.pinimg.com%2F736x%2F50%2F42%2Fd2%2F5042d27025e923b1c69e0339a7094c72.jpg&hash=cd5981eb4aa3827ea725f57fbfd0ac09441cd540)
So let's see: Comey couldn't tell if Hillary's home brewed server was hacked, yet Dems know for sure hack was involved by the Russians to influence the election?
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 13, 2016, 06:17:28 AM
So let's see: Comey couldn't tell if Hillary's home brewed server was hacked, yet Dems know for sure hack was involved by the Russians to influence the election?
thats two different subjects that have nothing to do with each other...
like I said who doesnt know that russia has interfered with every election since the beginning of the cold war???
as for this latest population control through the media to keep the people stuck on one subject while ignoing realy important stuff like trump tweeting from the toilet at 3 am and attacking and destroying american companies...ie American people
I refuse to be a sucker to the media...and so should all of you...
russia wants trump not hilary, this is a well known fact, but the question is does trump feel the same about them.
well based on all the pro russia people he has around him its a safe bet to say yes he does...
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 06:56:15 AM
thats two different subjects that have nothing to do with each other...
like I said who doesnt know that russia has interfered with every election since the beginning of the cold war???
as for this latest population control through the media to keep the people stuck on one subject while ignoing realy important stuff like trump tweeting from the toilet at 3 am and attacking and destroying american companies...ie American people
I refuse to be a sucker to the media...and so should all of you...
russia wants trump not hilary, this is a well known fact, but the question is does trump feel the same about them.
well based on all the pro russia people he has around him its a safe bet to say yes he does...
That was the remark the judge made when Stein's recount BS flopped.
Quote from: Solar on December 13, 2016, 07:41:29 AM
That was the remark the judge made when Stein's recount BS flopped.
thats a whole other comedy routine that has caused laughs of despair for humanity.
sorry but trump won and unless obama tries to rule the election null and void this is all a media conspiracy to control the narrative...and the people
who cares if it was russia or a dem traitor that hacked the dems???
we all knew dems were underhanded lowlife scum just like the GOP just a little worse...
OLD NEWS
when will the current events start to be talked about with honesty...
OK I know they are ..but this crap is getting old
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 06:56:15 AM
thats two different subjects that have nothing to do with each other...
Actually they have plenty to do with each other: for one thing both involve hacking. Second of all, how can you not be able to find hacking in one, yet claim hacking in the other?
Quote
like I said who doesnt know that russia has interfered with every election since the beginning of the cold war???
How? By raising dissent? If that's your standard, Media Matters and George Soros has interfered in every election also. Any outrage for that?
Quote
as for this latest population control through the media to keep the people stuck on one subject while ignoing realy important stuff like trump tweeting from the toilet at 3 am and attacking and destroying american companies...ie American people
I refuse to be a sucker to the media...and so should all of you...
So wher did you glean this information from? The media.
Quote
russia wants trump not hilary, this is a well known fact, but the question is does trump feel the same about them.
And if they do, so what? You never heard of be careful what you wish for you may get that wish. Sometimes the best thing you can do is give people what they want, sometimes they realize its not what they really wanted. See: Obama, Barack, second term
Quote
well based on all the pro russia people he has around him its a safe bet to say yes he does...
And Hilllary haas no pro-Russian people around her, right? You forgot Obama and his promise of more flexibility after the last election?
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 08:00:26 AM
thats a whole other comedy routine that has caused laughs of despair for humanity.
sorry but trump won and unless obama tries to rule the election null and void this is all a media conspiracy to control the narrative...and the people
Again, the source of information your using? [drum roll] The media.
Quote
who cares if it was russia or a dem traitor that hacked the dems???
we all knew dems were underhanded lowlife scum just like the GOP just a little worse...
I'm sure if the shoe were on the other foot the Dems wouldn't give a puppy f@rt about how the RNC was hacked. We'd just hear a resounding chorus, echoing Obama's statement: "We won, get over it."
Quote
when will the current events start to be talked about with honesty...
OK I know they are ..but this crap is getting old
Honestly by whose definition?
I am overwhelmed by all the concern about Russia from the democrats and RINO's like McCain, Graham and Rubio. where have they been for the last eight years?
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 13, 2016, 08:34:02 AM
Again, the source of information your using? [drum roll] The media.
I'm sure if the shoe were on the other foot the Dems wouldn't give a puppy f@rt about how the RNC was hacked. We'd just hear a resounding chorus, echoing Obama's statement: "We won, get over it."
Honestly by whose definition?
sorry havent figured out how to break down quote and respond in sections..
was not aware that the wis. count was based on hacking...
but either way it goes what does it matter the election is over and I highly doubt that it will be overturned.
and if russia didnt do it it wasnt from lack of effort.
I could not care less what a dem thinks ..or for that matter a republican. as long as the abide by their oath to protect and defend the constitution..
you want honest debate how about what will we do if trump follows through with his universal healthcare plan???
what will we do if trump follows through with his plans to undermine the Bill of Rights and allow unelected gov. employees to take away peoples 2nd amendment rights without due process , along with almost the entire bill of rights as he has said???
while we are all talking about who hacked who these things are being done and no one seems to care...
I will stand for the Constitution at all cost against anyone who wants to undermine it ...and right now its trump and his humpers
The progs are desperate to paint Trump's administration as illegitimate in any way and every way they can. Plan on at least four years of whining about the popular vote, hacking, electoral college injustice, and the size of various body parts. It's been 16 years and they still haven't gotten over Gore's loss to Dubya.
Quote from: zewazir on December 13, 2016, 10:03:51 AM
The progs are desperate to paint Trump's administration as illegitimate in any way and every way they can. Plan on at least four years of whining about the popular vote, hacking, electoral college injustice, and the size of various body parts. It's been 16 years and they still haven't gotten over Gore's loss to Dubya.
let them... there are real issues that need dealt with and as long as we fall under their narrative nothing will get done...''nothing good''
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 10:01:13 AM
I was not aware that the wis. count was based on hacking...
but either way it goes what does it matter the election is over and I highly doubt that it will be overturned.
and if russia didnt do it it wasnt from lack of effort.
So how did the Russians influence the WI election if not by hacking? No matter how much the Russian supposedly influenced, it was American citizens that pulled the voting lever.
Quote
you want honest debate how about what will we do if trump follows through with his universal healthcare plan???
what will we do if trump follows through with his plans to undermine the Bill of Rights and allow unelected gov. employees to take away peoples 2nd amendment rights without due process , along with almost the entire bill of rights as he has said???
I said honest debate by whose definition? You've already told us you think whatever media your going to for information is more honest then the one we go to.
Quote
while we are all talking about who hacked who these things are being done and no one seems to care...
Translation: I couldn't get any traction on the hacking bit, so I'll change the subject.
Quote
I will stand for the Constitution at all cost against anyone who wants to undermine it ...and right now its trump and his humpers
I stand for the Constitution too. But, I can't predict the future, nor can I read minds. That's why my present attitude is wait and see.
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 13, 2016, 09:32:08 AM
I am overwhelmed by all the concern about Russia from the democrats and RINO's like McCain, Graham and Rubio. where have they been for the last eight years?
Trying to get amnesty pushed through...
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 06:56:15 AM
thats two different subjects that have nothing to do with each other...
Wrong. Caring about security when you've been in charge of the security, and cut corners and exposed communications, is a little silly.
Quote
like I said who doesnt know that russia has interfered with every election since the beginning of the cold war???
..and, how many of those hackers still beat their wives?
Quote
as for this latest population control through the media to keep the people stuck on one subject while ignoing realy important stuff like trump tweeting from the toilet at 3 am and attacking and destroying american companies...ie American people
Cyber-warefare is a serious thing. I hope President Trump gets up to speed and gets serious about it, unlike Hussein and company.
Quote
I refuse to be a sucker to the media...and so should all of you...
russia wants trump not hilary, this is a well known fact, but the question is does trump feel the same about them.
I don't understand why. Hussein was very flexible, and Hillary gave them a toy button. Why wouldn't Putin want someone to carry on the flexibility and poor cyber security policies? Hussein made fun of Romney about Russia, but now he's serious?
Quote
well based on all the pro russia people he has around him its a safe bet to say yes he does...
Pro Russia? Like when Hussein told Medvedev how flexible he is?
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 13, 2016, 11:33:57 AM
So how did the Russians influence the WI election if not by hacking? No matter how much the Russian supposedly influenced, it was American citizens that pulled the voting lever.
I said honest debate by whose definition? You've already told us you think whatever media your going to for information is more honest then the one we go to.
Translation: I couldn't get any traction on the hacking bit, so I'll change the subject.
I stand for the Constitution too. But, I can't predict the future, nor can I read minds. That's why my present attitude is wait and see.
you lost me at go ...
''I said honest debate by whose definition? You've already told us you think whatever media your going to for information is more honest then the one we go to''.
this is complete bullsht and you know it...I never said anything of the kind...
I was base it on trumps own words and no one elses..
if so show me where...or challenge me to prove it..
fact is I have proven it over and over by posting videos of trump himself.
as far as changing the subject,...well the subject has no meaning...by no matter who hacked who or why it changes nothing ...unless you are now saying we are buddy buddy with russia??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPJfKdp3bDs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sd8kFGsc-Z0&t=6s
if you have questions please feel free to ask
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 13, 2016, 09:32:08 AM
I am overwhelmed by all the concern about Russia from the democrats and RINO's like McCain, Graham and Rubio. where have they been for the last eight years?
Not all that surprising is it though?
Dims in search of a scapegoat, throwing anything at the wall that might stick, anything to draw attention away from the real issue, that the Nation Hates Marxist DimocRATS!
Trump this, Puttin that, hacked emails, contesting vote counts, and nothing outside of Stein splitting the leftist support for hillary had anything to do with it, yeah, the commie Bimbet did more damage to hillary in the end than anything else they can create out of thin air.
And even if Stein's base went to Clinton, she'd still have lost.
Yeah, at this point the Dims are only embarrassing themselves further. :biggrin:
Quote from: Solar on December 13, 2016, 01:25:46 PM
Not all that surprising is it though?
Dims in search of a scapegoat, throwing anything at the wall that might stick, anything to draw attention away from the real issue, that the Nation Hates Marxist DimocRATS!
Trump this, Puttin that, hacked emails, contesting vote counts, and nothing outside of Stein splitting the leftist support for hillary had anything to do with it, yeah, the commie Bimbet did more damage to hillary in the end than anything else they can create out of thin air.
And even if Stein's base went to Clinton, she'd still have lost.
Yeah, at this point the Dims are only embarrassing themselves further. :biggrin:
The fact that 'Pubs made a good showing in down-ballot elections across the nations supports your conclusion that people are, in general, sick and tired of the socialist encroachment on our society. I will not debate that point at all.
But, I do wonder if we would be looking at another 4-8 years of demoncrap leadership in the WH if the dims had gathered the brains to run someone who is somewhat more likeable than a dose of the clap? Where I work there are a lot of registered democrats, and I heard more than one say they didn't like Clinton in the slightest, with a couple of them saying they did not plan to vote for her.
I do strongly believe if anyone but Trump had the 'Pub nomination to run against Clinton, there would be no talk of a difference between the popular vote and the College. Had the 'Pubs fielded a more widely likeable, strong candidate, and put them up against Shrillery, the Electoral map would look more like Reagan v Mondale.
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 11:47:44 AM
you lost me at go ...
''I said honest debate by whose definition? You've already told us you think whatever media your going to for information is more honest then the one we go to''.
this is complete bullsht and you know it...I never said anything of the kind...
I was base it on trumps own words and no one elses..
if so show me where...or challenge me to prove it..
fact is I have proven it over and over by posting videos of trump himself.
as far as changing the subject,...well the subject has no meaning...by no matter who hacked who or why it changes nothing ...unless you are now saying we are buddy buddy with russia??
You aren't getting it. Wondering if Russians are trying to hack into our government and companies is like wondering if 19 year old boys are trying to get laid. Definitively saying Trump has a connection to Russia to hack into the US and throw the election is like saying there's a connection between a girl's choice in shoes and why the teenage boys are trying to bang her.
By the way, Russia, next time you throw an election by hacking, make it a little more of a blowout. If Dems voted with Hillary like they voted Dem on the down ticket in PA, and if she didn't lose a ton of Cuban votes (she could have picked off 120k Cubans if she was stronger against Castro and maybe denounced his support - Trump got ~54% or so) in Florida, then your entire hacking plan would have gone down in flames. Try a little harder next time.
The issue is the hypocricy of Libs that Russia had an effect while they have been asleep at the wheel. We have Muzzies deep in the WH, classified material floating everywhere on Gmail and elsewhere, and on and on, and NOW they wonder why it could have happened?
My question now is why did Hillary get so many votes? I'm starting to think they hacked the system to put her ahead.
Quote from: taxed on December 13, 2016, 03:22:26 PM
You aren't getting it. Wondering if Russians are trying to hack into our government and companies is like wondering if 19 year old boys are trying to get laid. Definitively saying Trump has a connection to Russia to hack into the US and throw the election is like saying there's a connection between a girl's choice in shoes and why the teenage boys are trying to bang her.
By the way, Russia, next time you throw an election by hacking, make it a little more of a blowout. If Dems voted with Hillary like they voted Dem on the down ticket in PA, and if she didn't lose a ton of Cuban votes (she could have picked off 120k Cubans if she was stronger against Castro and maybe denounced his support - Trump got ~54% or so) in Florida, then your entire hacking plan would have gone down in flames. Try a little harder next time.
The issue is the hypocricy of Libs that Russia had an effect while they have been asleep at the wheel. We have Muzzies deep in the WH, classified material floating everywhere on Gmail and elsewhere, and on and on, and NOW they wonder why it could have happened?
My question now is why did Hillary get so many votes? I'm starting to think they hacked the system to put her ahead.
Can hacking get dead people to vote?
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 06:56:15 AM
russia wants trump not hilary, this is a well known fact, but the question is does trump feel the same about them.
Uhhhhhhhh.....Hillary was eyeball deep in that fishy deal involving Uranium sales to Russia and the Russian don't want Hillary?.....HMMMMMMMMM?
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on December 13, 2016, 04:10:31 PM
Uhhhhhhhh.....Hillary was eyeball deep in that fishy deal involving Uranium sales to Russia and the Russian don't want Hillary?.....HMMMMMMMMM?
you make a good point ..but you know how political winds can change direction...that would require Putin to be consistent and trustworthy
but then we have trumps praise of Putin along with the deep connections of so many on his staff
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on December 13, 2016, 04:10:31 PM
Uhhhhhhhh.....Hillary was eyeball deep in that fishy deal involving Uranium sales to Russia and the Russian don't want Hillary?.....HMMMMMMMMM?
Bingo....
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 04:34:04 PM
you make a good point ..but you know how political winds can change direction...that would require Putin to be consistent and trustworthy
but then we have trumps praise of Putin along with the deep connections of so many on his staff
As a Businessman, Trump see's Russia as 'consumers', nothing more....and what does Russia consume the most?....Yup...OIL. Putting Tillerson in the SOS slot is a shrewd move, Tillerson as an Exxon CEO is up on the Geopolitics of oil and those countries impacted worldwide. Better we deal with the world from a standpoint of trade, which we could easily dominate, rather than be on a war footing.
Suppose the game plan is to get Russia to buy OUR oil (cheaper) than Iran's oil, such a move would hit Iran in the piggy bank...no more money for Nukes, no more money to Hamas, no more money to terrorists, etc etc.
Putin has to know that his relationship with Iran is a treacherous one, he has to know that one day those people are going to turn on him....maybe he is looking for a way 'out'
BUT, Hillary would be easier to control and manipulate than trump.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on December 13, 2016, 05:02:46 PM
As a Businessman, Trump see's Russia as 'consumers', nothing more....and what does Russia consume the most?....Yup...OIL. Putting Tillerson in the SOS slot is a shrewd move, Tillerson as an Exxon CEO is up on the Geopolitics of oil and those countries impacted worldwide. Better we deal with the world from a standpoint of trade, which we could easily dominate, rather than be on a war footing.
Suppose the game plan is to get Russia to buy OUR oil (cheaper) than Iran's oil, such a move would hit Iran in the piggy bank...no more money for Nukes, no more money to Hamas, no more money to terrorists, etc etc.
Putin has to know that his relationship with Iran is a treacherous one, he has to know that one day those people are going to turn on him....maybe he is looking for a way 'out'
BUT, Hillary would be easier to control and manipulate than trump.
I dont think thats the job of POTUS to inject himself into private business..
ie a violation of the constitution
now he is in control of regs and laws, so other than clearing a path for such a transaction its not his job.
unless of course the new conservative thought has changed
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 11:47:44 AM
you lost me at go ...
''I said honest debate by whose definition? You've already told us you think whatever media your going to for information is more honest then the one we go to''.
this is complete bullsht and you know it...I never said anything of the kind...
You did the second you started touting your media statements as honest. Otherwise you think our are just as honest as yours, but no...while parroting what your media claims, you say you won't be a sucker to the media.
Quote
as far as changing the subject,...well the subject has no meaning...by no matter who hacked who or why it changes nothing ...unless you are now saying we are buddy buddy with russia??
The subject has no meaning yet you challenge it. If it has no meaning, why bring it up?
Quote from: zewazir on December 13, 2016, 02:14:56 PM
The fact that 'Pubs made a good showing in down-ballot elections across the nations supports your conclusion that people are, in general, sick and tired of the socialist encroachment on our society. I will not debate that point at all.
But, I do wonder if we would be looking at another 4-8 years of demoncrap leadership in the WH if the dims had gathered the brains to run someone who is somewhat more likeable than a dose of the clap? Where I work there are a lot of registered democrats, and I heard more than one say they didn't like Clinton in the slightest, with a couple of them saying they did not plan to vote for her.
I do strongly believe if anyone but Trump had the 'Pub nomination to run against Clinton, there would be no talk of a difference between the popular vote and the College. Had the 'Pubs fielded a more widely likeable, strong candidate, and put them up against Shrillery, the Electoral map would look more like Reagan v Mondale.
No doubt, and the GOP/RNC knew it and still did their best to kill off Cruz, who would have repeated Reagan's 1980 sweep.
As to running an 'other than clinton', they couldn't, they didn't have anyone qualified or the least bit likeable.
It was Leon Panetta that admitted that TEA had decimated (I'm pretty sure), literally kneecapped the Dim party during two historic midterm weeps taking more than 1000 Legislative seats in 2010 alone, and severing their artery feeding the party of new blood.
They literally admitted they had no fresh faces to bring forth to the party, all they have left are aging Marxists with no appeal. :biggrin:
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 05:31:48 PM
I dont think thats the job of POTUS to inject himself into private business..
ie a violation of the constitution
Then you should support Trump and give him the benefit of the doubt, he's the president-elect according to the constitution
Quote
now he is in control of regs and laws, so other than clearing a path for such a transaction its not his job.
unless of course the new conservative thought has changed
You prefer Hillary in the big chair, controling regs and laws clearing paths for transactions--like the Russian uranium deal--not her job?
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 05:31:48 PM
I dont think thats the job of POTUS to inject himself into private business..
ie a violation of the constitution
now he is in control of regs and laws, so other than clearing a path for such a transaction its not his job.
unless of course the new conservative thought has changed
Dealing with a major foreign superpower for the
benefit of our Country is not "private business", Promoting our economy, domestic job growth, international trade and signing into law those rules regs and congressional bills impacting such matters is indeed part of the Presidents job....or should be. Likewise redacting rules, regs and prohibitive laws like those promoting the global warming agenda (Obamao and crowd) should be as well.
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 13, 2016, 05:37:15 PM
You did the second you started touting your media statements as honest. Otherwise you think our are just as honest as yours, but no...while parroting what your media claims, you say you won't be a sucker to the media.
The subject has no meaning yet you challenge it. If it has no meaning, why bring it up?
I played trumps own words ...any media post I made was just additional ..time to be honest here
I didnt bring it up, just tired of hearing about it
as for the subject matter.last week it was fake news..this week its russia hack...
whats next week??? gotta be something distracting to keep from the real issues that trump is loading his anti establishment team with establishment guys..
just be warned it aint gettin better..
you know if it wasnt for the trump worshipers paying homage to their deity on a daily basis while he is making hypocrites of them, there would be no reason to post the reality of their ignorance.
trump is a big government prick that will do anything he damn well pleases and I for one will not remain silent
just like I did with obama and bush...and clinton and bush...was to young at the time to give honest critic of reagan but have found he wasnt much better
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 05:31:48 PM
I dont think thats the job of POTUS to inject himself into private business..
Where did he do that?
Quote from: taxed on December 13, 2016, 06:56:29 PM
Where did he do that?
it was in reference to doing oil deals with russia...but he did with carrier ...not going to mention the threats he has made at least a dozen times...OOPS I just did
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 06:59:02 PM
it was in reference to doing oil deals with russia...
President Trump did oil deals in Russia? I had no idea.
Quote
but he did with carrier ...
No he didn't.
Quote
not going to mention the threats he has made at least a dozen times...OOPS I just did
I'm not under the illusion that President Trump is a free market purist. In theory, it should be moot if he can make happen what he says, but I'm not bailing simply because he's not a purist. In reality, any President who isn't against income taxes, minimum wage, and unions isn't a free-market purist. Therefore, I won't clutch my pearls when he barks at companies for moving away and trying to get them to stay.
Quote from: taxed on December 13, 2016, 07:05:50 PM
President Trump did oil deals in Russia? I had no idea.
No he didn't.
I'm not under the illusion that President Trump is a free market purist. In theory, it should be moot if he can make happen what he says, but I'm not bailing simply because he's not a purist. In reality, any President who isn't against income taxes, minimum wage, and unions isn't a free-market purist. Therefore, I won't clutch my pearls when he barks at companies for moving away and trying to get them to stay.
please read back over what I said...I was responding to a coment billy made..
and yes he did get involved with carrier..first he threatened them and any other co. that wanted to move ...and then he was in the room for the deal with indiana....and then he took credit for it..
i think that counts as injecting himself in private business
and I am not bailing on the country and constitution since that is the only thing he will swear an oath to..
this is supposed to be about making america great again...not lets make a deal
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 06:18:55 PM
I played trumps own words ...any media post I made was just additional ..time to be honest here
I agree, its time to be honest: you played two videos, one on Trump and Obamacare and one on Trump and the no fly list. Where is Trump's words on his deals with Russia which is what started this debate? Where's proof of the Russian hack, which is the subject of this thread? Can you say bait and switch?
Quote
I didnt bring it up, just tired of hearing about it
Post 29
Quote
like I said who doesnt know that russia has interfered with every election since the beginning of the cold war???
as for this latest population control through the media to keep the people stuck on one subject while ignoing realy important stuff like trump tweeting from the toilet at 3 am and attacking and destroying american companies...ie American people
I refuse to be a sucker to the media...and so should all of you...
russia wants trump not hilary, this is a well known fact, but the question is does trump feel the same about them.
"Russia wants Trump not Hillary, this is a well known fact" You got a Trump quote on that? This is something you've heard through your media an accepted as fact.
Quote
just be warned it aint gettin better..
Like it would with Hillary...
Quote
you know if it wasnt for the trump worshipers paying homage to their deity on a daily basis while he is making hypocrites of them, there would be no reason to post the reality of their ignorance.
trump is a big government prick that will do anything he damn well pleases and I for one will not remain silent
I thought you believed in the constitution. Trump won by the way the consitution was set up.
Quote
just like I did with obama and bush...and clinton and bush...was to young at the time to give honest critic of reagan but have found he wasnt much better
Sounds like all you really want to do is complain.
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 07:33:19 PM
and yes he did get involved with carrier..first he threatened them and any other co. that wanted to move ...and then he was in the room for the deal with indiana....and then he took credit for it..
i think that counts as injecting himself in private business
That "threatening," as you call it, is a common practice in government and business. Why do you think there are seat belt laws? Because the auto industry said it won't build factories in any state that didn't have seat belt laws.
Obama is known for using the tactic, do it my way or we'll cut your funds.
Quote
and I am not bailing on the country and constitution since that is the only thing he will swear an oath to..
this is supposed to be about making america great again...not lets make a deal
And how do you think the government conducts its business, through making deals
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 14, 2016, 06:03:19 AM
I agree, its time to be honest: you played two videos, one on Trump and Obamacare and one on Trump and the no fly list. Where is Trump's words on his deals with Russia which is what started this debate? Where's proof of the Russian hack, which is the subject of this thread? Can you say bait and switch?
Post 29
"Russia wants Trump not Hillary, this is a well known fact" You got a Trump quote on that? This is something you've heard through your media an accepted as fact.
Like it would with Hillary...
I thought you believed in the constitution. Trump won by the way the consitution was set up.
Sounds like all you really want to do is complain.
like I said ..I could care not care less about the hack..it has no meaning regardless of who is at fault.
but no matter how many times I say you want to stick with it instead of dealing with the elephant in the room...the constitution.
heard it from trump himself..and this is only one of several videos of trump praising Putin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7UYfnmTd5s
when did I complain that he won and should not be allowed to be potus???
I DIDN'T...and you know it. you seem to have a reading problem cause you keep mis quoting me, like a liberal would do
and what does that have to do with his intention to ignore it based on his own words
Quote from: blades on December 14, 2016, 06:28:56 AM
like I said ..I could care not care less about the hack..it has no meaning regardless of who is at fault.
but no matter how many times I say you want to stick with it instead of dealing with the elephant in the room...the constitution.
heard it from trump himself..and this is only one of several videos of trump praising Putin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7UYfnmTd5s
So? Just because you phraise someone, doesn't mean your involved with them. I phraised Obama on getting Bin Laden, does that maake me a liberal?
Quote
when did I complain that he won and should not be allowed to be potus???
I DIDN'T...and you know it. you seem to have a reading problem cause you keep mis quoting me, like a liberal would do
and what does that have to do with his intention to ignore it based on his own words
More like you have a memory problem because you keep forgetting what you write.
For example, if you followed the constitution as you claim, you would accept that the people have spoken and not be calling followers of Trump Trump humpers. (An expression liberals use, by the way.)
Another set of insults for Trump
Quote
you know if it wasnt for the trump worshipers paying homage to their deity on a daily basis while he is making hypocrites of them, there would be no reason to post the reality of their ignorance.
trump is a big government prick that will do anything he damn well pleases and I for one will not remain silent
So if you accept Thrump being president, why insult his followers and him? Don't you think you should be unifying the party in preparation for 2020? Rather than insult and divide them.
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 14, 2016, 07:29:35 AM
So? Just because you phraise someone, doesn't mean your involved with them. I phraised Obama on getting Bin Laden, does that maake me a liberal?
More like you have a memory problem because you keep forgetting what you write.
For example, if you followed the constitution as you claim, you would accept that the people have spoken and not be calling followers of Trump Trump humpers. (An expression liberals use, by the way.)
Another set of insults for Trump
So if you accept Thrump being president, why insult his followers and him? Don't you think you should be unifying the party in preparation for 2020? Rather than insult and divide them.
good lord man your losing it..
if I forgot why havent you posted it to prove your claim..
trump humpers was first coined by true constitutional conservatives to discribe the behavior of the fake con cons.and was stolen by the libs ...like they always do
and what does accepting him as potus have to do with my critique of him...NOTHING is what...and I am not a republican and dont give a sht about the party...the CONSTITUTION what he will swear an oath to...not the party
I wonder how far back in your comments I would have to go to find when you defended the constitution???
cause it seems you dont care about it much now..since you refuse to address my direct comments about it ...but instead you defend a liar
Quote from: blades on December 14, 2016, 07:42:57 AM
good lord man your losing it..
if I forgot why havent you posted it to prove your claim..
trump humpers was first coined by true constitutional conservatives to discribe the behavior of the fake con cons.and was stolen by the libs ...like they always do
and what does accepting him as potus have to do with my critique of him...NOTHING is what...and I am not a republican and dont give a sht about the party...the CONSTITUTION what he will swear an oath to...not the party
I wonder how far back in your comments I would have to go to find when you defended the constitution???
cause it seems you dont care about it much now..since you refuse to address my direct comments about it ...but instead you defend a liar
And which part of the constitution are you defending here?
Quote from: blades on December 14, 2016, 07:42:57 AM
good lord man your losing it..
Seems to me you're the one losing it, as the below proves
Quote
if I forgot why havent you posted it to prove your claim..
Which I have, but somehow you manage to miss my requoting your unpoven claims, like Russia influencing the election, or Trump being involved with Russia.
Quote
trump humpers was first coined by true constitutional conservatives to discribe the behavior of the fake con cons.and was stolen by the libs ...like they always do
and what does accepting him as potus have to do with my critique of him...NOTHING is what...and I am not a republican and dont give a sht about the party...the CONSTITUTION what he will swear an oath to...not the party
I can tell your not a Repub. I have serious doubt your a constitutional conservative. The guy hasn't even taken the oath and already your running him down. I'm not a Trump supporter, but I do believe in giving him a chance.
Quote
I wonder how far back in your comments I would have to go to find when you defended the constitution???
Not very far, ace. As a matter of fact check this thread. Your fuzzy memory is at it again. Remember, twice I said Trump won consitutionally. Odd, having to defend the consitution to someone touting they're a constitutional conservative.
Quote
cause it seems you dont care about it much now
You really should check your facks before you start projecting. See above.
Quote
.since you refuse to address my direct comments about it
You mean like you refusing to address how Russia influenced the election, or proving proof Trump is influenced by Russia
Quote
...but instead you defend a liar
I don't defend anybody, I'm just presenting you the hypocrasy of your position
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 14, 2016, 09:30:45 AM
Seems to me your the one losing it, as the below proves
Quote from: blades on December 14, 2016, 07:42:57 AM
good lord man your losing it..
Ughhhh, YOU'RE both losing it! It's "You're", Not Your!
The first letter of a sentence is capitalized!
Don't forget people, thousands read this forum daily and look to you for guidance, spelling and grammar go a long way in establishing credibility.
Quote from: Solar on December 14, 2016, 09:41:25 AM
Ughhhh, YOU'RE both losing it! It's "You're", Not Your!
The first letter of a sentence is capitalized!
Don't forget people, thousands read this forum daily and look to you for guidance, spelling and grammar go a long way in establishing credibility.
really!!!
after your dick comment do you really think outsiders care about a little grammar
Quote from: blades on December 14, 2016, 10:07:51 AM
really!!!
after your dick comment do you really think outsiders care about a little grammar
Jeez, your sensitive. You should go on a liberal forum sometime, their language will curl your hair.
Quote from: blades on December 14, 2016, 10:07:51 AM
really!!!
after your dick comment do you really think outsiders care about a little grammar
Seriously, it's your behavior that says more about you than anything I post.
I believe you took it as literal, when in fact it was part jest in an attempt to get you to look in the mirror.
Go back and reread this thread and see if you can justify your emotional outburst to the comments being made.
No one attacked you or Beck, it was you overreacting.
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/report-dnc-ignored-fbi-warnings-regarding-russian-cyber-attack/
QuoteThe Democratic National Committee brushed aside warnings from the FBI that its computer network had been breached by hackers linked to the Russian government, according to a New York Times investigative report.
The Time's examination of the election-related cyber attacks, compiled through interviews with dozens of those targeted, found that the DNC's "series of missed signals, slow responses, and a continuing underestimation of the seriousness of the cyberattack" enabled Russia to "roam freely through" the committee's network for nearly seven months without pushback.
When the FBI attempted to alert a DNC tech-support contractor that a hacker had breached the committee's protected network, the staffer conducted a brief search of the DNC computer system logs to look for signs of intrusion. Even after the FBI continued to call over several weeks, the tech worker did little to heed the bureau's warnings. According to an internal memo, the staffer said he "had no way of differentiating the call I just received from a prank call," the Times reported.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: blades on December 14, 2016, 10:07:51 AM
really!!!
after your dick comment do you really think outsiders care about a little grammar
Pay attention. He is the forum owner. Use a spellcheck program or a dictionary.
Quote from: quiller on December 14, 2016, 02:33:27 PM
Pay attention. He is the forum owner. Use a spellcheck program or a dictionary.
Well, maybe they come for his comic relief he inadvertently posts in every thread. :laugh:
Quote from: Solar on December 14, 2016, 02:50:55 PM
Well, maybe they come for his comic relief he inadvertently posts in every thread. :laugh:
Here ya go---a primer on the topic. Blame Walks for turning me on to Granny Pottymouth.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fljQSWAKqtM
Quote from: quiller on December 14, 2016, 03:02:31 PM
Here ya go---a primer on the topic. Blame Walks for turning me on to Granny Pottymouth.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fljQSWAKqtM
Never heard that tip before, and "Fuck Yeah" it's a good one! :biggrin:
Quote from: blades on December 13, 2016, 07:33:19 PM
please read back over what I said...I was responding to a coment billy made..
and yes he did get involved with carrier..first he threatened them and any other co. that wanted to move ...and then he was in the room for the deal with indiana....and then he took credit for it..
i think that counts as injecting himself in private business
and I am not bailing on the country and constitution since that is the only thing he will swear an oath to..
this is supposed to be about making america great again...not lets make a deal
Coupla points....Main one... HE"S NOT THE PRESIDENT YET.....so any "deals" don't count, not until after January 20 2017.
Second, do you think it is easy to divest ones self of a mega billion dollar plethora of businesses in such a relatively short time period? Such could take years.
Third...your inuendo that, "deals" have no place with the Executive office.....HUH?..... yet how do we get out of such past" deals" engineered by Previous Prez's And I point specifically to NAFTA and TPTA .
Last, from the tone of your posts it sounds like you want the USA to go back into cold war mode with Russia.
How should we deal with Russia....don;t say rattle the sabre coz they will rattle right back at you, and don;t say with sanctions which DON'T WORK and just piss them off more.....the only SANE answer is Diplomacy....That and TRADE
U.S. officials say Putin PERSONALLY ordered leaking hacked emails to influence election
http://therightscoop.com/u-s-officials-say-putin-personally-ordered-leaking-hacked-emails-influence-election/
Quote from: blades on December 14, 2016, 04:40:26 PM
U.S. officials say Putin PERSONALLY ordered leaking hacked emails to influence election
http://therightscoop.com/u-s-officials-say-putin-personally-ordered-leaking-hacked-emails-influence-election/
"U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News."
This, From the same administration that used the IRS as a weapon against TEA, and we're supposed to believe anything that comes out of the Lying Marxist mouths, why?
Quote from: Solar on December 14, 2016, 05:14:57 PM
"U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News."
Thisa, From the same administration that used the IRS as a weapon against TEA, and we're supposed to believe anything that comes out of the Lying Marxist mouths, why?
Now believe with a high level of confidence. Translation, we don't know but we really, really suspect.
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 14, 2016, 05:17:28 PM
Now believe with a high level of confidence. Translation, we don't know but we suspect.
:biggrin:
OR... "undisclosed sources say" Translation: We lied, there was no informant, just a Rep from the Dim party.
Quote from: blades on December 14, 2016, 04:40:26 PM
U.S. officials say Putin PERSONALLY ordered leaking hacked emails to influence election
http://therightscoop.com/u-s-officials-say-putin-personally-ordered-leaking-hacked-emails-influence-election/
Okay that's it...it's and act of war....lets Nuke 'em
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on December 14, 2016, 05:45:44 PM
Okay that's it...it's and act of war....lets Nuke 'em
Neutron bombs Billy! Think of the environment. :biggrin:
Hey, I kinda like that name, "Neutron Bomb Billy" :cool:
Quote from: Solar on December 14, 2016, 05:14:57 PM
"U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News."
This, From the same administration that used the IRS as a weapon against TEA, and we're supposed to believe anything that comes out of the Lying Marxist mouths, why?
I wonder where this outrage was when Hillary was measuring the oval office for new drapes? These people are so shallow.
Quote from: Solar on December 14, 2016, 05:51:58 PM
Neutron bombs Billy! Think of the environment. :biggrin:
Hey, I kinda like that name, "Neutron Bomb Billy" :cool:
Listen to the Lyrics..... :popcorn:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Y-9YSBB9s
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on December 15, 2016, 05:27:39 AM
Listen to the Lyrics..... :popcorn:
:thumbsup: Dy-no-
MITE choice, squire! 1985 sounds pretty darned good compared to today's trash, eh?
The opening of
this one reminds me of the 2016 election....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5EGN3O5Rs8
Reluctantly returning this thread to the topic: doesn't anybody else here find it funny that our left is now concerned over Russian influence in our government? The left is concerned about Reds under or over the bed? Really? :lol:
If nothing else 2016 has shown precisely how much a party can disintegrate and show every bad aspect as it crumbles. There is nothing adult about their many and manifest examples of bad political sportsmanship. They lost. Like children they refuse to admit it and now must be punished.
Detroit voted 95% for Hillary Clinton and yet 37% of its voting precincts had ballot boxes which had to be denied under a recount law pushed through by Democrats when they were in power.
In plain English somebody stuffed the ballot boxes---incompetently. Identifying the who of who did this may be much more difficult, but in the meantime I see early reports Detroit will get some new voting machines. That much is a plus, but they were also promising new fire trucks a long time before that....
Quote from: quiller on December 15, 2016, 07:13:26 AM
Reluctantly returning this thread to the topic: doesn't anybody else here find it funny that our left is now concerned over Russian influence in our government? The left is concerned about Reds under or over the bed? Really? :lol:
If nothing else 2016 has shown precisely how much a party can disintegrate and show every bad aspect as it crumbles. There is nothing adult about their many and manifest examples of bad political sportsmanship. They lost. Like children they refuse to admit it and now must be punished.
Detroit voted 95% for Hillary Clinton and yet 37% of its voting precincts had ballot boxes which had to be denied under a recount law pushed through by Democrats when they were in power.
In plain English somebody stuffed the ballot boxes---incompetently. Identifying the who of who did this may be much more difficult, but in the meantime I see early reports Detroit will get some new voting machines. That much is a plus, but they were also promising new fire trucks a long time before that....
Of course, if it were a 'Pub dominated area with count issues, the Dims would be screaming bloody murder about the need for a thorough investigation and calling for people's heads to roll and be incarcerated under the jail for all eternity. And, frankly, they would be right to want a full accounting for why the vote counts do not match the ballot counts.
But since it is a Dim stronghold, not only is there no call for investigation, but there is actually a (Dim written) law forbidding a recount. Now why would they write a law which forbids a recount in a situation that calls for a recount?
Sometimes I think conservatives are too complacent - perhaps because we are so used to the corruption of the progs we just chalk it off to another typical day in prog politics. This time, though, I think something should be done. Conservatives in Detroit and across the state of Michigan should be contacting the AG calling for a full investigation and looking at the potential for criminal charges. With the numbers of precincts involved in having count discrepancies, the likely hood they were ALL due to procedural "mistakes" is practically zero. There is cheating going on at a massive scale, we have evidence with
248 precincts having too many votes registered in ONE CITY, and it will just be swept under the rug as the progs distract everyone with their "It was the Russians" BS?
"All that is needed for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing."
Quote from: Solar on December 14, 2016, 05:14:57 PM
"U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News."
This, From the same administration that used the IRS as a weapon against TEA, and we're supposed to believe anything that comes out of the Lying Marxist mouths, why?
QuoteEXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers
Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com he flew to Washington, D.C. for emails
He claims he had a clandestine hand-off in a wooded area near American University with one of the email sources
The leakers' motivation was 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the 'tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders'
Murray says: 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks'
'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that,' Murray insists
Murray is a controversial figure who was relieved of his post as British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct but is close to Wikileaks
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html#ixzz4SxIiNpyO
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
http://therightscoop.com/need-take-action-will-obama-threatens-response-russian-hacking/
Quote from: blades on December 15, 2016, 07:17:37 PM
http://therightscoop.com/need-take-action-will-obama-threatens-response-russian-hacking/
Another day; another Obama red line.
Look,
Putin is like the school bully
Obama is the class nerd
Putin will always get Obama's lunch money
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 15, 2016, 07:26:11 PM
Another day; another Obama red line.
Look,
Putin is like the school bully
Obama is the class nerd
Putin will always get Obama's lunch money
nightmare scenario would be Obama declares the election null and void due to foreign ''attack'' and doesn't leave office due to the war he declares with russia
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 15, 2016, 07:26:11 PM
Another day; another Obama red line.
Look,
Putin is like the school bully
Obama is the class nerd turd
Putin will always get Obama's lunch money
FIFY
Quote from: blades on December 15, 2016, 07:36:05 PM
nightmare scenario would be Obama declares the election null and void due to foreign ''attack'' and doesn't leave office due to the war he declares with russia
War with Russia???! Get real.
Remember:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6Y9oVC-mGW8
or how about
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 15, 2016, 07:39:45 PM
War with Russia???! Get real.
Remember:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6Y9oVC-mGW8
or how about
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE
he doesnt have to go to war...just use them as an excuse.
remember we are talking about Obama and he like most progressives thinks long term
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 15, 2016, 07:26:11 PM
Another day; another Obama red line.
Look,
Putin is like the school bully
Obama is the class nerd
Putin will always get Obama's lunch money
Hussein will end up being evicted than termed. He really doesn't want to go, poor guy.
Quote from: blades on December 15, 2016, 07:49:50 PM
he doesnt have to go to war...just use them as an excuse.
remember we are talking about Obama and he like most progressives thinks long term
I don't think its Obama's call whether or not an election is null and void or not.
How does one claim a war without going to war?
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 15, 2016, 07:56:02 PM
I don't think its Obama's call whether or not an election is null and void or not.
How does one claim a war without going to war?
I think he's going to try and prevent the transition and stay. These Marxists will scratch and claw until they are physically removed.
taxed, I think you need to change the entry level question. :lol:
" Assad's days are numbered, " barry said... 1,750-days ago.
What a pathetic declaration for a sandbox-weakling, who now only has 35-days left himself.
Quote from: zewazir on December 15, 2016, 09:20:21 AM
Of course, if it were a 'Pub dominated area with count issues, the Dims would be screaming bloody murder about the need for a thorough investigation and calling for people's heads to roll and be incarcerated under the jail for all eternity. And, frankly, they would be right to want a full accounting for why the vote counts do not match the ballot counts.
But since it is a Dim stronghold, not only is there no call for investigation, but there is actually a (Dim written) law forbidding a recount. Now why would they write a law which forbids a recount in a situation that calls for a recount?
I frankly don't know. The Detroit noose-papers haven't explained that part and without specific Michigan Law citations I'm unable to track it further myself.
QuoteConservatives in Detroit and across the state of Michigan should be contacting the AG calling for a full investigation and looking at the potential for criminal charges. With the numbers of precincts involved in having count discrepancies, the likely hood they were ALL due to procedural "mistakes" is practically zero. There is cheating going on at a massive scale, we have evidence with 248 precincts having too many votes registered in ONE CITY, and it will just be swept under the rug as the progs distract everyone with their "It was the Russians" BS?
My point exactly. It's just one more reason why an inferior candidate lost.
Quote"All that is needed for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing."
I respectfully direct your attention to this long Detroit Free Press column, pointing out these leftwing MORONS are finally pointing fingers at DEMOCRATS.
Old people, to be precise. The same people who refuse to come forward to be poll workers are now criticizing the ever-aging folks who actually do.
http://www.freep.com/story/news/columnists/rochelle-riley/2016/12/16/riley-supervisor-poll-workers-not-capable-job/95495230/
Quote from: blades on December 15, 2016, 07:17:37 PM
http://therightscoop.com/need-take-action-will-obama-threatens-response-russian-hacking/
I'm sure Putin is petrified.
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 16, 2016, 04:49:40 AM
I'm sure Putin is petrified.
Just one more.... :rolleyes:
______________________________________________________
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 15, 2016, 07:56:02 PM
I don't think its Obama's call whether or not an election is null and void or not.
How does one claim a war without going to war?
since when did not have authority to do something stopped obama
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 05:40:59 AM
since when did not have authority to do something stopped obama
Since our congress has no balls!
Quote from: walkstall on December 16, 2016, 06:00:08 AM
Since our congress has no balls!
lets not give a pass to the mindless voters who keep voting for liars cheats and thieves..
for some reason no one I have ever voted for won...HMMMMM
guess I just dont like kool-aid
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 06:03:08 AM
lets not give a pass to the mindless voters who keep voting for liars cheats and thieves..
for some reason no one I have ever voted for won...HMMMMM
guess I just dont like kool-aid
Don't be shy. So tell us who did you vote for?
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 06:03:08 AM
Let's not give a pass to the mindless voters who keep voting for liars cheats and thieves..
For some reason no one I have ever voted for won...HMMMMM
Guess I just don't like kool-aid
Look, I don't want to derail this, and I definitely don't want to sound like a grammar NAZI, but for christ Sakes, all sentences start with a capital letter.
You're either, lazy or stupid, because this is something hammered all throughout elementary through to your senior year, yet you ignore the most simplest of grammatical rules, not to mention punctuation.
It's one thing to express an opinion, but if you really want to be taken seriously and not looked on as an idiot, start using spell check!
Fair warning, my patience are running out on this.
Quote from: walkstall on December 16, 2016, 06:11:10 AM
Don't be shy. So tell us who did you vote for?
in which election??which office?
I forgot I did vote R for governor and he won...but I did it for my step father cause he liked the guy, hope he doesn't frig it up ...I would fell horrible
for potus I went with the one person who has not lied cheated or stolen from the american people and is a true Con Con
Quote from: Solar on December 16, 2016, 06:37:54 AM
Look, I don't want to derail this, and I definitely don't want to sound like a grammar NAZI, but for christ Sakes, all sentences start with a capital letter.
You're either, lazy or stupid, because this is something hammered all throughout elementary through to your senior year, yet you ignore the most simplest of grammatical rules, not to mention punctuation.
It's one thing to express an opinion, but if you really want to be taken seriously and not looked on as an idiot, start using spell check!
Fair warning, my patience are running out on this.
I would put it down to both lazy and stupid...and when you start critiquing all the other grammar violations...and there is a lot of them ... I am doing my best but I feel nothing will be good enough for you
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 07:05:33 AM
I would put it down to both lazy and stupid...and when you start critiquing all the other grammar violations...and there is a lot of them ... I am doing my best but I feel nothing will be good enough for you
You'd be surprised, all I ask is that you try.
As for all the other so called violations, you're the worst by a factor of ten.
Your content is fine...
Just quit being lazy and try and impress your readers with your command of the English language.
Something we all should strive to do.
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 07:05:33 AM
I would put it down to both lazy and stupid...and when you start critiquing all the other grammar violations...and there is a lot of them ... I am doing my best but I feel nothing will be good enough for you
You have no problem with the I.
Grammar violations will happen, but not in every post. I came from a school that only had site reading and had no phonics until High school there was no Jr High. So even today I am learning.
Quote from: Solar on December 16, 2016, 07:46:28 AM
You'd be surprised, all I ask is that you try.
As for all the other so called violations, you're the worst by a factor of ten.
Your content is fine...
Just quit being lazy and try and impress your readers with your command of the English language.
Something we all should strive to do.
I thought it was punctuation and caps that was the problem? ie typing skills.
when you use just language..''speaking ''..there are no caps or puncts , just words.
truthfully there are far bigger problems in this world than my typing which is limited to two fingers.
but I will try for you..
Are you or were you a teacher?
Quote from: Solar on December 16, 2016, 07:46:28 AM
You'd be surprised, all I ask is that you try.
As for all the other so called violations, you're the worst by a factor of ten.
Your content is fine...
Just quit being lazy and try and impress your readers with your command of the English language.
Something we all should strive to do.
Just an FYI on my education...
I am a 3 time high school drop out that spent most of the last 4 yrs getting jumped and fighting the black kids since I was in a mostly black school.
who happens to be certified in several different fields and master at least a dozen areas having to do with all aspects of service for private life...ie a handyman
I have owned my own business since 1994 and have had up to 15 employees who all lost their jobs in 08 due to the failings of the dems and repubs.
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 08:06:11 AM
I thought it was punctuation and caps that was the problem? ie typing skills.
when you use just language..''speaking ''..there are no caps or puncts , just words.
truthfully there are far bigger problems in this world than my typing which is limited to two fingers.
but I will try for you..
Are you or were you a teacher?
It's an obfuscation technique. You intentionally don't write clearly to give yourself an out, or to provide a smokescreen, so you can always leave yourself an out.
This is a casual forum and we all make plenty of typos and grammar mistakes, but if it's not important enough for you to form a cogent post, then it isn't important enough for you to post.
Quote from: taxed on December 16, 2016, 09:49:34 AM
It's an obfuscation technique. You intentionally don't write clearly to give yourself an out, or to provide a smokescreen, so you can always leave yourself an out.
This is a casual forum and we all make plenty of typos and grammar mistakes, but if it's not important enough for you to form a cogent post, then it isn't important enough for you to post.
then why not say that?
so far you only said that I need to cap the start of a sentence and that I used your instead of you're
oh and price instead of Price
not one time have you said anything else.
I always try and be as coherent as possible and if you dont understand please ask. I only want to be allowed to have a voice. I have been very respectful and tried to stick to the topics at hand.
I believe we are on the same side but its hard to tell sometimes
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 10:46:16 AM
then why not say that?
so far you only said that I need to cap the start of a sentence and that I used your instead of you're
oh and price instead of Price
not one time have you said anything else.
I always try and be as coherent as possible and if you dont understand please ask. I only want to be allowed to have a voice. I have been very respectful and tried to stick to the topics at hand.
I believe we are on the same side but its hard to tell sometimes
I don't think so. It's another common technique to do just what you did -- "we're on the same side", and "we can all agree that...", but it's just 1990s trolling techniques.
If we're "on the same side", then there won't be any doubt. Until then, just like you failed to do in your previous post, write like you graduated the 3rd grade. It really isn't that hard. If I see another post where you don't punctuate, capitalize proper nouns, etc., then I'm putting you in time out. Your idiocy is one thing, but if readers and visitors can't come through and point and laugh at you because they don't want to try to figure out what you're trying to say, then you bring zero value -- intellectual or entertainment.
Quote from: taxed on December 16, 2016, 10:54:54 AM
I don't think so. It's another common technique to do just what you did -- "we're on the same side", and "we can all agree that...", but it's just 1990s trolling techniques.
If we're "on the same side", then there won't be any doubt. Until then, just like you failed to do in your previous post, write like you graduated the 3rd grade. It really isn't that hard. If I see another post where you don't punctuate, capitalize proper nouns, etc., then I'm putting you in time out. Your idiocy is one thing, but if readers and visitors can't come through and point and laugh at you because they don't want to try to figure out what you're trying to say, then you bring zero value -- intellectual or entertainment.
yOU KNOW WHAT YOU FUCKING NAZI PRICK!!!! WHY DONT YOU AND THE REST OF YOU FUCKING NAZIS GO FInd a room and fuck yoursellves....CAUse youR piss poor excuses for ameRICANs
LET ALONE CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVITIVES
go fuck yourSELF
Quote from: taxed on December 16, 2016, 10:54:54 AM
I don't think so. It's another common technique to do just what you did -- "we're on the same side", and "we can all agree that...", but it's just 1990s trolling techniques.
If we're "on the same side", then there won't be any doubt. Until then, just like you failed to do in your previous post, write like you graduated the 3rd grade. It really isn't that hard. If I see another post where you don't punctuate, capitalize proper nouns, etc., then I'm putting you in time out. Your idiocy is one thing, but if readers and visitors can't come through and point and laugh at you because they don't want to try to figure out what you're trying to say, then you bring zero value -- intellectual or entertainment.
i have been kicked off more honest sites than this one
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 11:20:01 AM
yOU KNOW WHAT YOU FUCKING NAZI PRICK!!!! WHY DONT YOU AND THE REST OF YOU FUCKING NAZIS GO FInd a room and fuck yoursellves....CAUse youR piss poor excuses for ameRICANs
LET ALONE CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVITIVES
go fuck yourSELF
Better... but you're still slow with the punctuation, and your caps are not right. Maybe your local elementary school has some night classes?
Quote from: taxed on December 16, 2016, 11:27:45 AM
Better... but you're still slow with the punctuation, and your caps are not right. Maybe your local elementary school has some night classes?
grammar police ...that is so liberal of you
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 11:28:39 AM
grammar police ...that is so liberal of you
I tried. I'm giving you a time-out, and I'm taking your Game Boy.
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/99/19/f6/9919f68762d979bb86b908147418d48f.jpg)
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 11:28:39 AM
grammar police ...that is so liberal of you
Actually, it's the liberals that are grammar deconstructionist. Their authors do things like write whole novels that are one, long sentence or write a whole novel without using "e"s
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 11:20:01 AM
yOU KNOW WHAT YOU FUCKING NAZI PRICK!!!! WHY DONT YOU AND THE REST OF YOU FUCKING NAZIS GO FInd a room and fuck yoursellves....CAUse youR piss poor excuses for ameRICANs
LET ALONE CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVITIVES
go fuck yourSELF
QuoteI have been very respectful
:rolleyes:
Quote from: blades on December 16, 2016, 11:23:11 AM
i have been kicked off more honest sites than this one
I don't know about other on this board but I can under stand why.
Quote from: walkstall on December 16, 2016, 01:10:02 PM
I don't know about other on this board but I can under stand why.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Meanwhile, back at the thread topic:
FBI agrees with CIA assessment that Russian hacks were intended to help Trump:
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fbi-agrees-cia-assessment-russia-wanted-help-trump-n697066
Are these people are setting up to overturn the election? Seems their "investigation" is leaving out any information from the outfit that actually posted the Clinton campaign emails - WikiLeaks themselves. What kind of investigation ignores that? One whose purpose is anything BUT to find facts - that's what kind.
January 20th cannot come too soon!
Quote from: zewazir on December 16, 2016, 02:59:53 PM
Meanwhile, back at the thread topic:
FBI agrees with CIA assessment that Russian hacks were intended to help Trump:
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fbi-agrees-cia-assessment-russia-wanted-help-trump-n697066
Are these people are setting up to overturn the election? Seems their "investigation" is leaving out any information from the outfit that actually posted the Clinton campaign emails - WikiLeaks themselves. What kind of investigation ignores that? One whose purpose is anything BUT to find facts - that's what kind.
January 20th cannot come too soon!
It's not the lack of evidence, but the seriousness of the charge/accusations.
Can't remember the Marxist that said something similar, but that's exactly what's happening here.
The allegations are too serious to ignore, doncha kno...
Hey Obozo, did you ever beat those pedophile charges?
Quote from: Solar on December 16, 2016, 03:39:14 PM
It's not the lack of evidence, but the seriousness of the charge/accusations.
Can't remember the Marxist that said something similar, but that's exactly what's happening here.
The allegations are too serious to ignore, doncha kno...
Hey Obozo, did you ever beat those pedophile charges?
Just what did he call it when b o did it in Israel. :popcorn:
Quote from: Solar on December 16, 2016, 03:39:14 PM
It's not the lack of evidence, but the seriousness of the charge/accusations.
Can't remember the Marxist that said something similar, but that's exactly what's happening here.
The allegations are too serious to ignore, doncha kno...
Hey Obozo, did you ever beat those pedophile charges?
I believe dan rather can claim credit for that one. I can remember it well, dan holding in his hands FORGED documents and claiming it is up to Bush to answer the " seriousness of the charge" Could have been the start of all this "fake news" we are hearing about now. :scared:
All this spin and hyper boil over the hacking of the DNC and Pedesta But there is one thing I haven't heard brought up! How stupid was it for him to click the link in the email and give the hacker his personal pass word?
My 15 year old Daughter wouldn't do that! We came very close to electing the witch with cronies so dumb about cyber security they would of had all our nations secrets secured by a password made from their dogs name!
A report today said they did try to get into the RNC network and the contaminated E-mail was found in the spam folder. It never made it past the firewall. Maybe before the Dim's think of running the country again they should be required to take some basic computer security courses! Trump may be right that it wasn't the Russians but some fat kid pimple faced in mommy's cellar!
One point that I am sure everyone here knows, If your Bank, credit company, google or any other password protected site sends you an official looking e-mail asking for info just go to the site ( with out hitting the link) If it is a legitimate message the info will be there also and you can do whatever changes you need to. Never, Never click the link! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: redbeard on December 16, 2016, 05:17:02 PM
All this spin and hyper boil over the hacking of the DNC and Pedesta But there is one thing I haven't heard brought up! How stupid was it for him to click the link in the email and give the hacker his personal pass word?
My 15 year old Daughter wouldn't do that! We came very close to electing the witch with cronies so dumb about cyber security they would of had all our nations secrets secured by a password made from their dogs name!
A report today said they did try to get into the RNC network and the contaminated E-mail was found in the spam folder. It never made it past the firewall. Maybe before the Dim's think of running the country again they should be required to take some basic computer security courses! Trump may be right that it wasn't the Russians but some fat kid pimple faced in mommy's cellar!
One point that I am sure everyone here knows, If your Bank, credit company, google or any other password protected site sends you an official looking e-mail asking for info just go to the site ( with out hitting the link) If it is a legitimate message the info will be there also and you can do whatever changes you need to. Never, Never click the link! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
This is sort of my point....even if the Russians DID hack the DNC (not the election) then whose fault is that? You people have lousy security, you have even worse security procedures. And this is the second time around for Hillary with the
insecure servers, inadequate security firewalls etc etc. ITS YOUR FAULT YOU GOT HACKED BECAUSE OF SOME $39.95 COMPUTER SECURITY PROGRAM.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on December 16, 2016, 05:37:57 PM
This is sort of my point....even if the Russians DID hack the DNC (not the election) then whose fault is that? You people have lousy security, you have even worse security procedures. And this is the second time around for Hillary with the
insecure servers, inadequate security firewalls etc etc. ITS YOUR FAULT YOU GOT HACKED BECAUSE OF SOME $39.95 COMPUTER SECURITY PROGRAM.
And They CLICKED THE LINK!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: s3779m on December 16, 2016, 04:46:33 PM
I believe dan rather can claim credit for that one. I can remember it well, dan holding in his hands FORGED documents and claiming it is up to Bush to answer the " seriousness of the charge" Could have been the start of all this "fake news" we are hearing about now. :scared:
Yep, he too, along with all the dims and trumpeted by the media, but it bugged me, so I looked it up.
It was Tom Foley (D) House Speaker who said: "The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this." "Even though there is no evidence," he said, "the seriousness of the charge is what matters."
Quote from: Solar on December 16, 2016, 06:11:59 PM
Yep, he too, along with all the dims and trumpeted by the media, but it bugged me, so I looked it up.
It was Tom Foley (D) House Speaker who said: "The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this." "Even though there is no evidence," he said, "the seriousness of the charge is what matters."
So, if someone were to randomly accuse Obama of selling 6-year-old "undocumented" girls and boys into sexual slavery to certain African nations, then "
The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this. Even though there is no evidence, the seriousness of the charge is what matters." ??
Shall we try it, just to see if they agree when it is one of theirs? :lol: :lol: :lol:
It was an IQ-test, sorta. 5 top Dem-ops and 5 top Repub-ops... and Podesta was the only test-subject to click a phishing-link in his spam-folder.
And the DNC-emails were leaked by an angry Sanders-supporter, according to Julian Assange.
Case closed.
Quote from: zewazir on December 16, 2016, 09:06:30 PM
So, if someone were to randomly accuse Obama of selling 6-year-old "undocumented" girls and boys into sexual slavery to certain African nations, then "The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this. Even though there is no evidence, the seriousness of the charge is what matters." ??
Shall we try it, just to see if they agree when it is one of theirs? :lol: :lol: :lol:
only works when accusing republicans. :lol: think of reid and Romney's taxes.
The whole Russian tampered with the election is ridiculious.
So, what the libs are trying to tell us is that the Russians tampered with the election so Hillary won the popular vote and Trump won the electoral college.
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.smosh.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fftpuploads%2Fbloguploads%2Flaughing-gifs-foolish-human.gif&hash=19aea33362dc04acf3d9749cfd202d203b65f342)
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 17, 2016, 09:23:13 AM
The whole Russian tampered with the election is ridiculious.
So, what the libs are trying to tell us is that the Russians tampered with the election so Hillary won the popular vote and Trump won the electoral college.
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.smosh.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fftpuploads%2Fbloguploads%2Flaughing-gifs-foolish-human.gif&hash=19aea33362dc04acf3d9749cfd202d203b65f342)
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
There are so many retarded angles to this whole thing that it's insane.
Quote from: taxed on December 17, 2016, 10:33:13 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
There are so many retarded angles to this whole thing that it's insane.
So is he :lol: at the fools in this government administration or the people that voted for Hillary? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on December 17, 2016, 10:33:13 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
There are so many retarded angles to this whole thing that it's insane.
Well, Taxed, it's like the Tick says:
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.weirdwildrealm.com%2Ffilmimages%2Ftick-flexing.jpg&hash=aea2bcd83be3fcd67af3cb2506d5ccce194a7a45)
"And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get
is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh,
oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit!"
Quote from: Ghoulardi on December 17, 2016, 11:43:14 AM
Well, Taxed, it's like the Tick says:
"And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get
is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh,
oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit!"
Academia personified...
(https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder210/500x/74028210.jpg)
Quote from: taxed on December 17, 2016, 10:33:13 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
There are so many retarded angles to this whole thing that it's insane.
I love it. The longer they keep their head in the sand the better for TEA. Let them keep whining as Trump hopefully continues to appoint what appears to be true conservatives. The new Office and Budget guy seems to be a real TEA type fiscal conservative. when they wake up they will go to work looking for another 70 something new face. How about Kerry for 2020? :lol: :lol:
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 17, 2016, 12:02:04 PM
I love it. The longer they keep their head in the sand the better for TEA. Let them keep whining as Trump hopefully continues to appoint what appears to be true conservatives. The new Office and Budget guy seems to be a real TEA type fiscal conservative. when they wake up they will go to work looking for another 70 something new face. How about Kerry for 2020? :lol: :lol:
That's their new blood...
Quote from: taxed on December 17, 2016, 10:33:13 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
There are so many retarded angles to this whole thing that it's insane.
THANK YOU!!!
thats been my point all along.
I mean regardless what is determined , if russia didnt do it or did do it ...nothing is going to happen unless Obama tries and start a war over it and remain in office
Quote from: blades on December 17, 2016, 12:38:54 PM
THANK YOU!!!
You're welcome!
Quote
thats been my point all along.
I mean regardless what is determined , if russia didnt do it or did do it ...nothing is going to happen unless Obama tries and start a war over it and remain in office
Welcome back! You're banned again for another 24 hours. Learn to write.
Quote from: blades on December 17, 2016, 12:38:54 PM
THANK YOU!!!
thats been my point all along.
I mean regardless what is determined , if russia didnt do it or did do it ...nothing is going to happen unless Obama tries and start a war over it and remain in office
What would make you think:
a. That Obama would start a war over hacking?
b. Obama would remain in office even if he started a war?
Quote from: taxed on December 17, 2016, 12:52:48 PM
You're welcome!
Welcome back! You're banned again for another 24 hours. Learn to write.
Damn taxed give me a heads up next time. I just cleaned up my monitor. :lol:
Quote from: blades on December 17, 2016, 12:38:54 PM
THANK YOU!!!
thats been my point all along.
I mean regardless what is determined , if russia didnt do it or did do it ...nothing is going to happen unless Obama tries and start a war over it and remain in office
Here, this will make life a whole lot better. If you use Chrome, it's free.
But check your browser to see what grammar correcting tools it has to offer for free.
https://www.grammarly.com/
Here's yet another, especially if you're writing a blog or long letter.
http://www.onlinecorrection.com/
Quote from: walkstall on December 17, 2016, 01:23:43 PM
Damn taxed give me a heads up next time. I just cleaned up my monitor. :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
It's like training a puppy.
:popcorn:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMDXl36gypw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T4MClfHOiY