Governor Nixon....an aspect of his "statement" no one mentions...

[daidalos]

Now I've heard all the condemnations of the Governor out there in Missouri, over his biased statement calling for "vigorous prosecution" of Officer Wilson.

Now before I start, let me state here and now given that we KNOW the officer was assaulted by Brown, I do not think the officer acted improperly or committed a murder.

I very much think that if you physically assault an officer and get shot because you did, that's your own damned tough luck.

Should have thought about possibly being shot, before you attacked the cop.

But that said, let us suppose for a moment that the officer, did commit a crime.

Lets suppose for a moment that he did indeed murder this Mr. Brown.

Have the libtards ever once stopped to think that because it shows definite bias, on the part of Government, for the Governor to come out saying what he said, before the autopsy's are even done.

That it is grounds for dismissal of the case?

Yes that's right ladies and gents IF the defendant can show bias on the part of the government they can have their conviction vacated, the charges dismissed, and walk out of jail scott free.

But not only that, IF they do have that happen, unless they have some different, new evidence, they can't retry him either. As it violates double jeopardy clause for the government to do so.

Thanks to this libtard governor, and statements like his made by other libs in government out there such as one state senator.

For virtually ensuring not only a change of venue, which I will be highly surprised we don't see if there are any charges filed.

But also that even IF the officer(which again I don't think to be the case on wit or iota at this point) acted improperly and was convicted of such.

Now has a pretty solid bit of evidence to give to a federal court as reason for his "conviction" by the state to be vacated and dismissed.

On the grounds that he didn't get a fair trial due to bias by certain state officials.

It's happened before folks. Yessss. that's right, criminals have had the case against them thrown out and walked out the jail scot free, because they could prove and show to the court a bias on the part of state officials.

Who were in a position, to influence and apply pressure to those involved in prosecuting the case.

(In this instance a former state AG who is now Governor)

Way to go libtards, who demand "prosecution and a guilty verdict" before any of the facts are even known.

You might have just fucked up the investigation all by your little selves.

And assured yourselves that not only does justice not happen.

But should he be convicted of any wrongdoing at all, a criminal walks free.

[Billy's bayonet]

Now I've heard all the condemnations of the Governor out there in Missouri, over his biased statement calling for "vigorous prosecution" of Officer Wilson.

Now before I start, let me state here and now given that we KNOW the officer was assaulted by Brown, I do not think the officer acted improperly or committed a murder.

I very much think that if you physically assault an officer and get shot because you did, that's your own damned tough luck.

Should have thought about possibly being shot, before you attacked the cop.

But that said, let us suppose for a moment that the officer, did commit a crime.

Lets suppose for a moment that he did indeed murder this Mr. Brown.

Have the libtards ever once stopped to think that because it shows definite bias, on the part of Government, for the Governor to come out saying what he said, before the autopsy's are even done.

That it is grounds for dismissal of the case?

Yes that's right ladies and gents IF the defendant can show bias on the part of the government they can have their conviction vacated, the charges dismissed, and walk out of jail scott free.

But not only that, IF they do have that happen, unless they have some different, new evidence, they can't retry him either. As it violates double jeopardy clause for the government to do so.

Thanks to this libtard governor, and statements like his made by other libs in government out there such as one state senator.

For virtually ensuring not only a change of venue, which I will be highly surprised we don't see if there are any charges filed.

But also that even IF the officer(which again I don't think to be the case on wit or iota at this point) acted improperly and was convicted of such.

Now has a pretty solid bit of evidence to give to a federal court as reason for his "conviction" by the state to be vacated and dismissed.

On the grounds that he didn't get a fair trial due to bias by certain state officials.

It's happened before folks. Yessss. that's right, criminals have had the case against them thrown out and walked out the jail scot free, because they could prove and show to the court a bias on the part of state officials.

Who were in a position, to influence and apply pressure to those involved in prosecuting the case.

(In this instance a former state AG who is now Governor)

Way to go libtards, who demand "prosecution and a guilty verdict" before any of the facts are even known.

You might have just fucked up the investigation all by your little selves.

And assured yourselves that not only does justice not happen.

But should he be convicted of any wrongdoing at all, a criminal walks free.

There is indeed grounds for dismissal of any charges or overturn of conviction due to the moron of a Governors statements AT A TIME WHEN THE CASE IS GOING TO THE GJ. If I was the cops lawyer I would move for change of venue to try any charges or challenge any jury impanled in the State of Mo to hear the case.

Of course in this day an age  proceedure is ignored and legal safeguards are out the window it is clear that Holder and Obamao want to whip up fevor for the coming elections, if the cop is NOT indicted you can bet Holder will try getting a civil rights violation going.

I just finished weatching MSNBC interviewing the parents and how they want the officer jailed....you know what I'd ask them?

What if your son had killed that police officer or beat him severely and was now facing charges....would you want him jailed?

[daidalos]

Their son and his friend did beat the officer severely.

And now today we found out his "friend" who started all this, has a proven track history of lying to the police, and about the police.

He's already been convicted of doing so.

Not only that, but the autopsy results, from the family's OWN AUTOPSY doesn't back up, doesn't "jive" with this "friends" testimony/claims that the officer shot Brown "execution style".

And his "friend" who was in front of the media claiming Brown was shot execution style, with the proven track record of lying to the police and authorities.

Also has an outstanding warrant.

Given those FACTS I think we can all see whats going on here.

This little thug and Brown attacked the cop, thinking he was there about the outstanding warrants, and the robbery of the seven eleven, in which Brown committed an assault.

I am sure it never occurred to these two punks, before they attacked this cop, that the officer as was the case, in fact had zero idea about the outstanding warrants or the robbery/assault they'd just committed  minutes prior.

And only stopped them to tell them to get out of the street and quit blocking traffic.

[kit saginaw]

Nixon's entire stance is based upon white racists go uncontrollably apeshit in-public when provoked.  -That their anger prevents them from surreptitiously planning/staging the murder of the provocateur. 

   

[DaisyJane]

Remember that all rules get discarded and all bets are off in situations like this.

The fact that days after the incident has it going to a Grand Jury is proof of that.  The regulation investigation hasn't even been completed and they've already got trials planned.  No one has even proven the shooting wasn't totally justified. 

The other side of the story hasn't even been heard yet.  And all this on the word of a proven liar.

Perhaps all is just being said to STOP the unrest.  They will say darn near ANYTHING to get it to stop.  Then, as the facts emerge, and time goes by, perhaps there can be a different outcome.

DaisyJane     

[Ex-Conservative]

There is still the aftermath of any trial to consider, especially if the police officer is not found guilty: white people being victimized in acts of violence by mostly young black people - clearly racist, but that fact goes unacknowledged by Liberals and the LSM. It is things like this that bring out the bluster in me and leave me wondering why we always just sit there and take it.

[daidalos]

There is still the aftermath of any trial to consider, especially if the police officer is not found guilty: white people being victimized in acts of violence by mostly young black people - clearly racist, but that fact goes unacknowledged by Liberals and the LSM. It is things like this that bring out the bluster in me and leave me wondering why we always just sit there and take it.

Some of us don't. When I first moved where I live now, I was "approached" by a neighborhood thug, who thought he would do basically what you describe above.

He thought among other things, he would get into my face, shove me around some, and intimidate me, into paying him, to park my car in a public spot, on a public street.

And which is right in front of my house.

Until I introduced him to the business end of Mr. Twelve Gauge, looked him dead square in the eye, and told him that I'll remove him from the planet, like the zit on the ass of humanity he is, without hesitation, without so much as even batting an eyelash, if he ever walked up on me again.

And no I'm not billy badass, or anything either.

I just learned how to deal with certain types, living in the ghetto is all.

To this day, that "thug" sees me, and it's "hello Mr. So and So, how are you today", polite as he can be...and not the "cracker you gotta pay me to park your car in that spot on the street" or some other bull crap he tried to pull when I first moved into the hood here.

Of course they all think I'm crazy and nuts as owl shit now too though, which I know as I've heard them telling their "homey's" when I go by things like "oh no, don't fuck with him, he's a crazy ass cracker" etc....so I guess it's a trade off.

One can see to it that one is left the hell alone by these thugs.

But, one has to be prepared to bear the stigma of being seen by them, and being libeled by them, as a "crazy ass cracker with a gun" in order to achieve the aforementioned peace. :)