2020 Democrat Presidential Circus

Started by supsalemgr, January 21, 2019, 11:06:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

walkstall

Quote from: Bronx on October 18, 2019, 06:25:31 AM
Mark Stanford is going to primary President Trump with his kick off rally in Philadelphia, Pa right outside of Independence Hall.

Mark Stanford inform the media that a whopping 250,000 people are going to show up. How did he know that you ask, well because Mark Stanford said so when the media asked him where are all his supporters....."I'll talk to about 250,000 people in just a second".

Well I guess we all have a bad habit of exaggerating numbers. So you figure out of 250,000 maybe 200,000 or even 100,000 showed up, nope. How about out of the 250,000 people that was supposed to show up 249,000 didn't. That's right only one person showed up. I'll give him the benefit of doubt that, that one supporter wasn't just some person passing through.

Good luck Mark Stanford remember Argentina awaits.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/17/one-person-showed-up-mark-sanfords-campaign-launch-trump/


I would say the one person was looking for a free lunch.
A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation.- James Freeman Clarke

Always remember "Feelings Aren't Facts."

Sick Of Silence

Quote from: Bronx on October 18, 2019, 06:25:31 AM
Mark Stanford is going to primary President Trump with his kick off rally in Philadelphia, Pa right outside of Independence Hall.

Mark Stanford inform the media that a whopping 250,000 people are going to show up. How did he know that you ask, well because Mark Stanford said so when the media asked him where are all his supporters....."I'll talk to about 250,000 people in just a second".

Well I guess we all have a bad habit of exaggerating numbers. So you figure out of 250,000 maybe 200,000 or even 100,000 showed up, nope. How about out of the 250,000 people that was supposed to show up 249,000 didn't. That's right only one person showed up. I'll give him the benefit of doubt that, that one supporter wasn't just some person passing through.

Good luck Mark Stanford remember Argentina awaits.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/17/one-person-showed-up-mark-sanfords-campaign-launch-trump/

You can't subtract correctly.

250,000 minus 249,000 equals 1000

(public school education)

:ttoung:
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

Bronx

#122
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on October 18, 2019, 09:44:10 AM
You can't subtract correctly.

250,000 minus 249,000 equals 1000

(public school education)

:ttoung:

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:......... :thumbsup:

Hell give me a break I was using my fingers. I guess I better go back and have a long talk with my math teacher.

Nice catch....... :thumbsup:

Now back to our regularly scheduled programing.

CAT FIGHT

Cat fight between the Hare Krishna Tulsi Gabbard and the commie Hillary Clinton.

Tulsi Gabbard CALLS OUT 'queen of warmongers' Hillary Clinton!

Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain. From the day I announced my candidacy, there has been a ...

READ MORE HERE....
https://therightscoop.com/wow-tulsi-gabbard-calls-out-queen-of-warmongers-hillary-clinton/

People sleep peacefully at night because there are a few tough men prepared to do violence on their behalf.

A foolish man complains about his torn pockets.

A wise man uses it to scratch his balls.

ldub23

If Sanders hadnt  been afraid  of  Hillary  in 2016 and attacked  her like Gabbard he  might  be president  now.

Solar

Quote from: ldub23 on October 18, 2019, 03:12:00 PM
If Sanders hadnt  been afraid  of  Hillary  in 2016 and attacked  her like Gabbard he  might  be president  now.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Uh, No...
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

ldub23

I think he would. Trump won becuase he got  some sanders voters  in blue states.

Possum

Quote from: ldub23 on October 18, 2019, 03:36:33 PM
I think he would. Trump won becuase he got  some sanders voters  in blue states.
You could be right, but, sanders is a die hard socialist. He would run as a communist if he had the guts to do so. Just don''t see that kind of voter attending a Trump rally. Now I do think there will be ex. democrat voters who will vote for Trump this go around, but only because the dims are all socialist now. What a great time to be watching politics. :thumbup:

Solar

Quote from: ldub23 on October 18, 2019, 03:36:33 PM
I think he would. Trump won becuase he got  some sanders voters  in blue states.
Nope, the nation still despises commies, he's never had a prayer. Not to mention, he's a freakin hypocrite and a liar.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

supsalemgr

I find this Clinton/Gabbard fight bizarre. Why would Hillary open this can of worms? There is a lot of "rest of the story" to this situation.
"If you can't run with the big dawgs, stay on the porch!"

Possum

Quote from: supsalemgr on October 19, 2019, 05:14:19 AM
I find this Clinton/Gabbard fight bizarre. Why would Hillary open this can of worms? There is a lot of "rest of the story" to this situation.
Jealousy? The top three have no chance. I know it's a wild ass guess, but I still think hillary sees herself being able to win this time as being more in the middle. Gabbard might just take that away, plus Gabbard is cute. But with the investigation coming out concerning her email problems, I think she has bigger worries. This would be hillaries last shot, it's not just her age, I don't think the dim party will compete on the national scene for a long time.

Solar

Quote from: s3779m on October 19, 2019, 05:25:38 AM
Jealousy? The top three have no chance. I know it's a wild ass guess, but I still think hillary sees herself being able to win this time as being more in the middle. Gabbard might just take that away, plus Gabbard is cute. But with the investigation coming out concerning her email problems, I think she has bigger worries. This would be hillaries last shot, it's not just her age, I don't think the dim party will compete on the national scene for a long time.
Weird isn't it? Seriously, the old bat is covered in shit from all the Clinton corruption and her handlers tell her it has a nice smell to it and she believes this to be some sort of badge of honor?
Hillary's not only unelectable but she's freakin delusional for even thinking she has a snowflakes chance.
But the odd thing is, she would pull in better numbers than anyone in the field running against Trump, for the moment. I agree with Gabbard, Hillary needed to take her out because the rest of the field is way too radical left, too much for the Dim voter and it would come down to a race between Hillary and Tulsi.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Possum

Quote from: Solar on October 19, 2019, 05:57:22 AM
Weird isn't it? Seriously, the old bat is covered in shit from all the Clinton corruption and her handlers tell her it has a nice smell to it and she believes this to be some sort of badge of honor?
Hillary's not only unelectable but she's freakin delusional for even thinking she has a snowflakes chance.
But the odd thing is, she would pull in better numbers than anyone in the field running against Trump, for the moment. I agree with Gabbard, Hillary needed to take her out because the rest of the field is way too radical left, too much for the Dim voter and it would come down to a race between Hillary and Tulsi.
One question I keep turning over, will hillary, obama, or pelosi get the most blame for killing off the dims from the dims? Yeah I know that question is not worded right. I'm guessing the dims will blame pelosi because she has totally screwed them with this impeachment. Personally, I blame hillary, she is the most corrupt person I have ever known to hold any office.

Solar

Quote from: s3779m on October 19, 2019, 06:07:20 AM
One question I keep turning over, will hillary, obama, or pelosi get the most blame for killing off the dims from the dims? Yeah I know that question is not worded right. I'm guessing the dims will blame pelosi because she has totally screwed them with this impeachment. Personally, I blame hillary, she is the most corrupt person I have ever known to hold any office.
Not worded wrong at all. I too have pondered this and came to the conclusion who ever is left holding onto the old Dim banner will get the blame.
Fuglosi, for whatever reason remained even after all the others were forced out under Clinton corruption, even Harry Reid bailed, so this left one person to keep the old guard in charge.
Thing is, at the rate the party is imploding, she won't last much longer. Here's the interesting part. Will the new Marxists keep the dementia ridden old broad on as a place holder for the old Dim voters who have no idea as to what has happened to the party? You know, those idiots that always voted Dim because their daddy did.

Or will the new Marxist guard simply toss her in the trash and make a clean break of it? I think a little bit of both will occur, they'll keep her on as long as she is useful to their cause, but pressure will build to get rid of her from a vocal faction within the radical left and eventually they'll concede and throw a huge party in her honor.
What will really occurs after, is they'll begin placing all the blame on the former leadership, e.g. Clinton etal, and spin it as though they, 'the new Marxist' can save the country from its corrupted past and their media will be right there to run block and never ask questions.

I give it till after the 202 election when they lose the house and outrage among the millennial voices get media coverage. That is after all, their new base, a bunch of spoofed snowflakes. A very tiny coalition on which to build, but that's the plan for the future. They may even rename the party and include socialist.

Granted this is all speculation on my part, but it follows a pattern that's been emerging over the last 3 decades and seems Right on course to end with the new Socialist Democrat Party.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Possum

Quote from: Solar on October 19, 2019, 06:34:14 AM
Not worded wrong at all. I too have pondered this and came to the conclusion who ever is left holding onto the old Dim banner will get the blame.
Fuglosi, for whatever reason remained even after all the others were forced out under Clinton corruption, even Harry Reid bailed, so this left one person to keep the old guard in charge.
Thing is, at the rate the party is imploding, she won't last much longer. Here's the interesting part. Will the new Marxists keep the dementia ridden old broad on as a place holder for the old Dim voters who have no idea as to what has happened to the party? You know, those idiots that always voted Dim because their daddy did.

Or will the new Marxist guard simply toss her in the trash and make a clean break of it? I think a little bit of both will occur, they'll keep her on as long as she is useful to their cause, but pressure will build to get rid of her from a vocal faction within the radical left and eventually they'll concede and throw a huge party in her honor.
What will really occurs after, is they'll begin placing all the blame on the former leadership, e.g. Clinton etal, and spin it as though they, 'the new Marxist' can save the country from its corrupted past and their media will be right there to run block and never ask questions.

I give it till after the 202 election when they lose the house and outrage among the millennial voices get media coverage. That is after all, their new base, a bunch of spoofed snowflakes. A very tiny coalition on which to build, but that's the plan for the future. They may even rename the party and include socialist.

Granted this is all speculation on my part, but it follows a pattern that's been emerging over the last 3 decades and seems Right on course to end with the new Socialist Democrat Party.
If this was a business where profits were necessary for survival, I could see them hanging onto a couple of the old guard even if just to please the old clients. But this ain't, and the new guard knows it all and wants everyone to know it. The lsm will keep directing the dims on which way is the promise land,,,,,,,,,,good lord, do you think the lsm had this planned all along and are really conservative and just wanted to destroy the liberal party?????  :lol: :lol: :lol:  Sorry, sometimes I just crack myself up. 

Solar

Quote from: s3779m on October 19, 2019, 07:07:00 AM
If this was a business where profits were necessary for survival, I could see them hanging onto a couple of the old guard even if just to please the old clients. But this ain't, and the new guard knows it all and wants everyone to know it. The lsm will keep directing the dims on which way is the promise land,,,,,,,,,,good lord, do you think the lsm had this planned all along and are really conservative and just wanted to destroy the liberal party?????  :lol: :lol: :lol:  Sorry, sometimes I just crack myself up.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I think the LSM was just as blindside as was the Dim party when Trump won. I think they have been 'leftist' to wing it ever since.
But I do think that's the future of the failed party. As I've been saying for years, the Dim party we all knew is dead and will be out of power for a few decades to come.
After that is anyone's best guess as to what rises from the ashes. Thankfully I'll be dead and gone. We've been granted a reprieve from the Marxist monster, what future generations do with this moment is up to them to decide if they really want freedom.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!