#neverliberal #nevermarxist
In other words, you don't even have the pretense of a logical argument, and ridicule the concept that someone would demand coherency in a debate.
You have difficulty with comprehension on the political forum..........even when facts are presented.
If anyone could explain God in scientific terms, it would probably cause your brain to melt. We wouldn't want that.
Where did you present facts, other than a pseudoscientific extrapolation from general relativity you probably did not understand?That "anyone" clearly isn't you. You're bluffing, and you know it.
I'm not bluffing. God can't be explained in scientific terms.........not by me anyway.
Not by anyone. If something cannot be explained in scientific terms, it does not exist.
Would you say only things subject to perception by our particular five senses exist?
OK, let me rephrase that:Anything that cannot be objectively verified or supported through the scientific method has no reason for us to believe that it exists.So technically, God could exist. But the probability is pretty low, because the only way he could exist would be by coincidence. Flying monkeys on Mars could exist, but for all intents of purposes we can conclusively say that they do not.
Got it. So we can conclusively say that life does not exist anywhere but on planet earth. We cannot objectively verify or support it through scientific method, so there is no reason to believe that it exists.
No, we can use basic probability analysis (read: math) to suggest that life is very much likely to exist somewhere else in the universe (something that would turn Christian theology on its head).Can you use similar arithmetic to establish that the probability of God existing is more than infinitesimal? ----You see, your entire logic here is "you can't prove that X couldn't possibly exist, so it must exist."I suppose we should start preparing for the invasion of the flying hippos from Jupiter sometime soon.
God isn't something I argue about. You may have noticed that I haven't attempted to prove that God exists.
It must be lonely being you. It explains a lot of your behavior on here. I suspect that it ties in with much of the liberal anger that we see. Hatred is all you have. Pretty sad existence.
Then exactly what are you trying to prove?
According to your convoluted logic, anything that can't be mathematically or scientifically quantified can possibly exist
Love cannot possibly exist..............and neither can hate.
Infinity cannot be quantified, therefore the universe does not exist.
Pi cannot be quantified, therefore it cannot exist, and yet it is depended on daily...............just like God.
Like I said.......you'd make a crappy scientist. Scientists go out and do the work to either prove or disprove something. The very best you can ever come up with is a demand for someone else to to prove something. We have a word for those kind of people................LOSER.
I said exactly the opposite. Please try again.Love and hate can both be scientifically verified. You need to read up on this stuff.The universe is not infinite. You need to read up on this stuff.Pi can be mathematically proven to exist. And it can be quantified - just not in decimal or fraction form. Try again.You don't understand Burden of Proof or the Rule of Parsimony, and you think that the universe is infinite. You also came up with the "pi exists, therefore God exists!" argument, which just made my day. That's the most convoluted piece of crap I've seen written all week. Thanks!
Ditto. Prove that the universe is finite.
You know as well as I that you have no idea what you're talking about.
Author
Topic: Problems with the so-called "watchmaker" argument (Read 16311 times)
